DuPont Personal Protection TECHNICAL BULLETIN NUCLEAR RISKS



Similar documents
Oil Spill Cleanup Garment Options

DuPont Personal Protection. Are you wearing the right protective garment for your needs?

DuPont Personal Protection Product Catalog

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

SUMMARY OF NFPA 1994 PROTECTIVE ENSEMBLES FOR FIRST RESPONDERS TO CBRN TERRORISM INCIDENTS, 2007 EDITION

BECAUSE SOMEONE S LIFE MAY DEPEND ON IT PRODUCT CATALOGUE

Lab PPE Guide Examples of Personal Protective Equipment

CLOTHING TO PROTECT AGAINST INFECTION

DuPont Kevlar The ScIence of cut PRoTecTIon

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)

How To Predict Personal Protective Equipment (Ppe)

If you have any questions about how to safely undertake a task or project, ask your supervisor before you begin.

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LOS ANGELES

nature invented packaging. We improved it. DuPont Tyvek PROTECTIVE PACKAGING

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT POLICY & GUIDANCE

VALCREST INTERNATIONAL

EUROPEAN STANDARDS AND MARKINGS FOR PROTECTIVE CLOTHING

EUROPEAN STANDARDS AND MARKINGS FOR HAND AND ARM PROTECTION

A short guide to the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992

DuPont Personal Protection CLOTHING TO PROTECT AGAINST INFECTION

6. ASSESSING THE NEED FOR PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) IN THE LABORATORY

Product Safety Summary Sheet

Safety Training Topic PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

APPENDIX A. Contamination (feet, leg, clothing, eyes, hands)

TEMPLE UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND RADIATION SAFETY

New Title: Standard on Protective Clothing and Ensembles for Emergency Medical Operations

DuPont Tyvek Commercial Air Barrier Assemblies Exceed Air Barrier Association of America, ASHRAE 90.1

Workshop Face Masks Standards

Job Hazard/Safety Analysis For the Lab Worker

ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY OSHA REGULATION: 29 CFR HAZARD COMMUNICATION SECTION: 1700 REVISION DATE: 2/3/2012 REVISION: 4 NUMBER:

DuPont Personal Protection

DuPont Personal Protection. Product Catalog 2013 Version 1

INFECTION CONTROL POLICY MANUAL

Best Practices for Handling Nanomaterials in Laboratories

FLAME RESISTANT (FR) NFPA 70E NESC OSHA ASTM F1506. CSA Z462 (Canada) Secondary Protection from Electric Flash fire hazards

Presented by: Rich Perry Marsh Risk Consulting

PAINT REMOVAL SYSTEM PAINT REMOVAL SPECIFICATION SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT FOR LEAD PAINT REMOVAL

Dress for Success! Some Things to Know About Personal Protective Equipment BEFORE You Handle a Pesticide

Lead Monitoring / Removal

RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM

Personal protective equipment (PPE) at work A brief guide

Additional information: -OSHA Instruction CPL 2.103, Field Inspection Reference Manual, Chapter IV, Section A -29 CFR 1910, Subpart I, Appendix B

Trade Name of this Product Isopropyl Rubbing Alcohol 91% USP. Corporate Compliance Team 1666 East Touhy Avenue

Lead Exposure Management Plan

Wenaas Offshore. A new and innovative collection redefining the standard for flame retardant workwear

Material Safety Data Sheet

Autoclave Safety. Autoclaves are sterilizers using high pressure and high temperature steam. The potential safety risks for the operators are:

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET TOILET BOWL SANITIZER

PROJECT HAZARD ASSESSMENT FORM CHEMICAL HAZARDS

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT HAZARD ASSESSMENT, EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND TRAINING DOCUMENTATION

BAX Sample Tablet, Real-Time Salmonella

UNILIC ACRYLIC EMULSION

This SDS adheres to the standards and regulatory requirements of the United States and may not meet the regulatory requirements in other countries.

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Respiratory Safety and PPE Module 7. Special Warehouse Worker Hazards in Structural Steel Fabricating and Supply Companies

Safety and Health Policy and Procedure Manual. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Section Table of Contents

Ingredient CAS Number Weight % ACGIH TLV PEL STEL Phosphoric Acid mg/m3 1 mg/m3 3 mg/m3

PI s Name Date Bldg./Rm# CDC Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3)

ATTENTION EMERGENCY RESPONDERS. Guidance on Emergency Responder Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Response to CBRN Terrorism Incidents

Company Name Chemical Spill Prevention & Clean-up Procedures Program. Last Revised On 00/00/0000

Pancreatin. Ingredient CAS No Percent Hazardous

4. Cryogenic gloves are generally designed to protect the hands from intense cold or heat.

Personal Protective Equipment Guidelines

Biosafety Level 2 Criteria

Environment. Personal Protective Equipment Requirements for Photographic Processing Facilities. Kodak s health, safety, and environmental

PPE Donning and Doffing Ebola Patients

HAZARD COMMUNICATION, SPILL RESPONSE AND WASTE HANDLING TRAINING

DuPont Kapton HN. polyimide film

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SPILL RESPONSE AND CLEAN-UP OUTSIDE BIOSAFETY CABINET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET EDTA 4Na 4H 2 O

Ambulance/HART/SORT. Emergency Services. Jacket Radio and torch fittings Adjustable cuff tabs Zipped front with catch flap over

3.8 HSP (High Solids Polyurethane)

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

Operating and Maintenance Instructions

Unit 3.4 Decontamination (Core)

Texas Department of Insurance. Provided by. Personal Protective Equipment. Division of Workers' Compensation HS96-101C (10-06)

Chemotherapy Spill Response:

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET DATE: 2009, revised July 2011 PRODUCT NAME: BOSTON BRAKE & PARTS CLEANER PRODUCT CODE: 78200

Job Hazard/Safety Analysis For the Housekeeper

MAGNESIUM METAL, TURNINGS AND RIBBON

Safe Operating Procedure

Chemical Safety in the Workplace. Guidance Notes on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Use and Handling of Chemicals

Guidance sheet 4: Chemical Spill Management

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Trade name: Master Clear Seal-5 Revised: 5/29/2015

FLAME-RESISTANT APPAREL ELECTRIC UTILITY GENERAL INDUSTRIES ARC FLASH PROTECTION OIL & GAS

Understanding The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of And Impact on the Energy Policy Act of 2005

JACKSON SAFETY* G80 Nitrile Chemical Resistant Gloves. Chemical Resistance Guide

Fume Hood Questions and Answers

AEL / SEL Number Title Description FEMA Grant Programs Grant Notes

LASER SAFETY. The use of lasers in the medical field is increasing at a tremendous rate.

Pesticide Spills. Chapter 26. In This Chapter. Keywords. Accidents. Pesticides Act and Environmental Protection Act

Environmental Education Associates

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) a short guide for wildland firefighters

Georgia Tech Laboratory Personal Protective Equipment and Appropriate Attire Policy. August 2011

The following standard practices, safety equipment, and facility requirements apply to BSL-1:

**** MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET **** STABIL Fuel Stabilizer **** SECTION 1 - CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND MANUFACTURER IDENTIFICATION ****

Clinic Infectious Disease Control

Working safely with metalworking fluids

STERILE PROCESSING MANUAL Policy & Procedure

EUROPEAN STANDARDS PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FOR FLAME RESISTANT. Alexander Gstettner, Lenzing AG Austria

Transcription:

DuPont Personal Protection TECHNICAL BULLETIN NUCLEAR RISKS

Specific questions have arisen related to the recent disaster which has occurred in Japan. A question frequently asked relates to protection from nuclear hazards. This question can be divided into two main areas: ionizing radiation hazards, and radioactive particle or liquid hazards. The guidance below is based on garments made for use in Europe. Ionizing Radiation Hazards The fabrics used in single use protective garments will not provide a barrier to ionizing radiation (e.g., gamma rays, X-rays, or radioactive particles - alpha or beta). The standard protocol used to reduce radiation exposure would include time, distance, and shielding. For garments, limited shielding may be provided by specialty garments that contain lead based materials. DuPont Personal Protection does not offer any specialty garments that provide protection from ionizing radiation hazards. Radioactive Contaminated Particle or Liquid Hazards For hazards associated with radioactive contaminated particles or liquids, rather than blocking the radiation itself, appropriate garments are designed to minimize the penetration of radioactive materials to minimize contact with the skin and clothing worn underneath. These garments are designed to be worn in a potentially affected area and then be promptly removed and disposed of, such that long-term exposure to the radioactive contaminated material is minimized after leaving the potentially affected area and to avoid contaminating other areas. Chemical protective garments are intended for single use so that a cross-contamination with radioactive particles can be minimized. In general, more body coverage is better: hooded coveralls should aid in keeping clothing and hair free of radioactive materials. DuPont Personal Protection does offer specially designed garments that provide protection from radioactive particles and liquids. Specific fabric types, seam configurations, and garment designs should be specified to match the hazard. In addition, other appropriate PPE, such as but not limited to respirators, goggles, gloves, and footwear, etc., as identified by the hazard assessment should be used in conjunction with any garment selection. Donning, doffing, and disposal of radioactive contaminated garments should only be conducted by properly trained personnel. Tyvek Classic, Tyvek Classic Plus, Tychem C (Standard and C2) as well as Tychem F (Standard and F2) are tested according EN 1073-2 as protective clothing against radioactive contamination. Protective Clothing Against Radioactive Contamination & The EN 1073-2 Standard The suit inward leakage test The EN 1073-2 standard was developed with the nuclear industry in mind, but does not apply for the protection against ionizing radiation. The 1073-2 standard itself is very similar to the Chemical Protective Clothing Type 5 standard (EN ISO 13982-1). With respect to whole suit particle protection levels, both standards reference the testing protocol Protective clothing for use against solid particulates - test method of determination of inward leakage of aerosols of fine particles into suits (EN ISO 13982-2). This test essentially determines the barrier efficiency of the suit when challenged with sodium chloride particulates of a defined size distribution. In the above whole suit inward leakage test, a person wearing the protective suit enters a testing chamber. Beneath the protective suit, the person has three measuring probes attached (one on the chest, one at the waist and one at the knee). Sodium chloride particulates (average size of 0.6 microns) are distributed throughout the cabin, the wearer performs a series of three physical activities (see figure 1): 3 minutes standing still 3 minutes on the spot walking (5km/h) 3 minutes squatting (at a rate of 5 squats per minute) Sodium chloride particulates that penetrate the protective suit are counted by the probes beneath the suit 1. The amount of sodium chloride detected by each probe (per suit per exercise type) is expressed as a percentage ratio vs. the concentration of the external challenge of particulates. The results are then used to determine both a performance classification and a nominal protection factor, analogous to respiratory standards. For EN 1073-2, when tested according to EN 13982-2, six suits are tested. The total inward leakage results (TIL) are reported, as a ratio (in %) of the test particle concentration inside the suit & the test chamber. Total Inward Leakage (TIL) = Concentration of test particles (inside suit) Concentration of test particles in the chamber 1 3 minutes per activity per probe.

Nominal Protection Factor & Performance Class (EN 1073-2 / EN 13982-2) There are three types of performance class to describe the suit particle protection level Class 1 = Lowest particle barrier Class 3 = Highest particle barrier The Nominal Protection Factor is a slightly different way of expressing the above inward leakage ratios. First of all, the Total Average Inward Leakage 2 is calculated (TIL A ). EN 1073-2 references the EN 13982-2 Protective clothing for use against solid particulates - test method of determination of inward leakage of aerosols of fine particles into suits. Fig. 1 - The suit inward leakage test NaCI (sodium chloride) Nominal Protection Factor = 100 Total Average Inward Leakage Total NaCI in cabin In other words, a suit which offers the highest protection to the fine particulates will have LOW inward leakage, and thus a HIGH nominal protection factor. A suit which offers a low nominal protection factor, e.g. 5, means it had an average of 20% inward leakage. To determine the performance classification, the total average inward leakage value per activity (standing, walking and squatting) is calculated (TIL E ). This value and also the Nominal protection factor are both considered in order to determine which performance class is attributed to the suit. See Table 1. Table 1 Mean value of inward leakage at the three sampling positions inside the suit during exercise Class One activity (TIL E ) % All activities (TIL A ) % Nominal protection factor* 3 0.3 0.2 500 2 3 2 50 1 30 20 5 * Nominal protection factor = 100 / TIL A. A performance class of 3, i.e. the highest performance class can be understood as: The highest value for the inward leakage 3 measured for each of the three activities (TIL E ) is less than 0.3% and also the overall total average inward leakage (TIL A ) is less than 0.2 %. Test particles: Sodium chloride (0.6 µm) Six suits tested Flame Photometer to measurement probes inside the suit Test conditions: - 3 min standing* - 3 min walking* - 3 min squatting* - 3 measurement probes: chest, waist and knee * Per measurement probe. Results in: % inward leakage - Highest % average leakage of the 3 activities (TIL E ) - Overall % average inward leakage (TIL A ) Nominal protection factor = 100 (TIL A ) 2 3 For all six suits, all the exercises and all 3 probes. Average of the 3 probes and all suits per activity.

Dry Environment - Contamination of Radioactive Particles For dry radioactive particle hazards, hooded DuPont TM Tyvek coveralls are suggested for your consideration. In addition, whether or not over-taped seams are required would be dictated by the expected intensity of the exposure. Garments with over-taped seams offer a higher overall protection to particles than garments with stitched seams and should ideally be preferred. Table 2 below shows the performance of different DuPont garments in terms of particle hold-out as measured by the whole suit inward leakage test (EN 13982-2 with results expressed according to 1073-2). Table 2 Results expressed according to EN 1073-2 Protective clothing against radioactive contamination (6 garments) DuPont garment name Fabric & Seam Type Highest mean value of total inward leakage for one activity (TIL E ) % Mean value of total inward leakage for all activities (TIL A ) % Nominal protection factor Performance Class ProShield 10 SMS / Stiched 17 % 9 % 10 1 ProShield 30 Microporous Film / Stiched 8 % 4 % 25 1 Tyvek Dual Tyvek (front) & SMS (rear) / Stiched 9 % 4 % 25 1 Tyvek Industry Tyvek / Stiched 5 % 2 % 38 1 Tyvek Classic Tyvek / Stiched 5 % 2 % 48 1 Tyvek Labo Tyvek / Stiched 2 % 1 % 81 2 Tyvek Classic Plus Tyvek / Stiched & over-taped 1 % 0 % 255 2 Typical values: based on mean of 22 test reports. Additional taping at cuffs, ankles & mask applied. NOTE: Products that utilize SMS or microporous film substrates (e.g.,dupont TM ProShield 10 [SMS] and DuPont TM ProShield 30 [microporous film] ) are appropriate for particle protection, however careful consideration should be given to using products that utilize SMS or microporous film substrates for disaster response activities because: 1) Microporous film fabrics may be easily abraded and the barrier layer can be readily worn away. 2) SMS fabrics tend to have quite open structures, offering low dry particle holdout performance to fine particulates.

Mixed Dry & Wet Environments, Contamination of Radioactive Particles and Liquids For liquids that have been contaminated by radiation, hooded Tychem C & F coveralls may provide protection of the wearer from the chemical hazard, but not from ionizing radiation. Based on the chemical permeation data, you are able to select the fabric that offers an adequate chemical barrier. Permeation data for the DuPont fabrics can be accessed via www.dpp-europe.com or contact our techline service via: www.dpp-europe.com/technicalsupport Table 3 below indicates the preferred and adequate solutions in case of mixed particulate and liquid contamination: Table 3 Dry contamination DuPont TM garment name Fabric description Seam type Certification types Radioactive particles Radioactive particles, liquid mist & aerosols Proshield 10 SMS Stitched 5 & 6 Proshield 30 Microporous film Stitched 5 & 6 Tyvek Dual Tyvek Front SMS rear Stitched 5 & 6 Tyvek Classic Tyvek Stitched 5 & 6 Tyvek Classic Plus Tyvek Stitched & over-taped 4b, 5 & 6 Tyvek Classic Plus (with attached socks) Tyvek Stitched & over-taped 4b, 5 & 6 Tychem C & C2 Tychem C & C2 Stitched & over-taped 3b, 4, 5 & 6 Tychem C (with attached socks) Tychem C Stitched & over-taped 3b, 4, 5 & 6 Tychem F & F2 Tychem F & F2 Stitched & over-taped 3b, 4, 5 & 6 Tychem F (with attached socks) Tychem F Stitched & over-taped 3b, 4, 5 & 6 Warning: The garments do not provide a barrier to ionizing radiation * Verify chemical permeation data. Not recommended Adequate Preferred Potentially over-specified Nuclear Hazards - Descriptions & examples Mixed dry & wet contamination Radioactive particles & heavy liquid spray with concentrated inorganic chemicals (max 2 bar pressure) Radioactive particles & heavy liquid spray with a range of organic chemicals. (max 3 bar pressure)*

Warnings: It is the user s responsibility to determine the nature and level of hazard and the proper personal protective equipment needed. The information set forth herein reflects laboratory performance of fabrics, not complete garments, under controlled conditions. It is intended for information use by persons having technical skill for evaluation under their specific end-use conditions, at their own discretion and risk. Anyone intending to use this information should first verify that the garment selected is suitable for the intended use. In many cases, seams and closures have shorter breakthrough times and higher penetration rates than the fabric. Please contact DuPont for specific data. These garments are intended for limited use and should be disposed of after single use. If fabric becomes torn, abraded or punctured, end user should discontinue use of garment to avoid potential exposure. 1) Tyvek,Tychem and Proshield garments do not provide protection from Ionizing raditiation. 2) Tyvek,Tychem and Proshield garments are not flame resistant and should not be used around heat, flame, sparks or in potentially flammable or explosive environments. 3) Tyvek, and Tychem garments with attached socks made of the garment material. For these models, these attached socks must be worn inside protective outer footwear and are not suitable as outer footwear. These attached socks do not have adequate durability or slip resistance to be worn as the outer foot covering. 4) DuPont TM Tyvek coveralls can be considered for use with the appropriate respirators and other suitable PPE. 5) Tychem aprons and smocks are available for situations where prolonged liquid exposure may be limited to the front of the torso and/or arms of the wearer. These aprons and smocks can be worn with Tyvek to provide localized protection while limiting the level of thermal discomfort. For more information on our support services, please contact: DuPont Personal Protection DuPont de Nemours Luxembourg S.àr.l. L-2984 Luxembourg Tel.: +800 3666 6666 (international toll-free) E-mail: personal.protection@lux.dupont.com Or visit our website at: www.dpp-europe.com For technical support consult our techline via: www.dpp-europe.com/technicalsupport Copyright 2011 DuPont. The DuPont Oval Logo, DuPont TM, The miracles of science TM, ProShield, Tychem and Tyvek are trademarks or registered trademarks of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company or its affiliates. 04/2011