Beef Cattle Frame Scores



Similar documents
Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

SHOW STEER SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

BREAK-EVEN COSTS FOR COW/CALF PRODUCERS

DETERMINING YOUR STOCKING RATE

Understanding and Using Cattle Basis in Managing Price Risk

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

Feeding Corn to Beef Cows

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

The Costs of Raising Replacement Heifers and the Value of a Purchased Versus Raised Replacement

Swine EPD Terminology

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Using the Futures Market to Predict Prices and Calculate Breakevens for Feeder Cattle Kenny Burdine 1 and Greg Halich 2

Creep Feeding Beef Calves Dan E. Eversole, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

SYNCHRONIZATION OF CATTLE

Beef Cattle. Production MP184 DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE R E S E A R C H & E X T E N S I O N

Feeding Value of Sprouted Grains

MCDONALD S SUSTAINABLE BEEF PILOT Information Sharing Initiative Report April 7, 2016

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

U.S. Beef and Cattle Imports and Exports: Data Issues and Impacts on Cattle Prices

COW/CALF MANAGEMENT Minimizing Calving Difficulty in Beef Cattle

Premium Interface Component

PRODUCING WHEY SILAGE FOR GROWING

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds

Livestock Risk Protection

Characterization of the Beef Cow-calf Enterprise of the Northern Great Plains

Terms: The following terms are presented in this lesson (shown in bold italics and on PowerPoint Slides 2 and 3):

Live, In-the-Beef, or Formula: Is there a Best Method for Selling Fed Cattle?

How Profitable is Backgrounding Cattle? Dr. John Lawrence and Cody Ostendorf, Iowa State University

Cattle Producer's Library - CL 1280 CONVERSIONS FOR COMMONLY USED WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Economics of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination. Dr. Les Anderson and Paul Deaton University of Kentucky

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return Calculation Decision Aids

Section 6: Cow-Calf Cash Flow Enterprise Budget Analysis 101

Definitions of Marketing Terms

Livestock Risk Protection Insurance: How Does It Work

Cattlemen s Corner Beef Newsletter

BREEDING SOUNDNESS EVALUATION OF BULLS

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Payback News. Beef Cows-The Cheapest Mineral Isn t

Grain Finishing Beef: Alternative Rations, Cattle Performance and Feeding Costs for Small Feeders

Producing Right Sized Cows Cow Size and Efficiency: Solving the Puzzle

Artificial insemination:

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

Chapter 5 DASH Your Way to Weight Loss

Net feed intake: Potential selection tool to improve feed efficiency in beef cattle

Arizona Ranchers Management Guide

GROSS MARGINS : HILL SHEEP 2004/2005

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return on Investment Calculation Decision Aids

Beef Cattle Handbook

Creep Feeding Beef Calves

Understanding and Using Basis for Livestock Producer Marketing Management 1

Managing cattle for the kind of beef you want your kids to eat.

ANIMAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE

Meat Goats. January Kent Orrell Extension Educator, Kiowa Co. Okla.

Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands

Growth & Feeding Puppies Karen Hedberg BVSc Growth

Beef Cow Share Lease Agreements

Beef - Key performance indicators. Mary Vickers

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES DAIRY BEEF. Scheme. blade-farming.com

Project Pig Production Planner

EBLEX BEEF BRP MANUAL 4. Beef production from the dairy herd

Web site:

United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef

R E S T R I C T E D B R E E D I N G A N D R O T A T I O N A L G R A Z I N G

Fact sheet: UK 2-18 years Growth Chart

Relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight in beef cattle

The impact of genomic selection on North American dairy cattle breeding organizations

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Influence of Nutrition on Reproduction in the Beef Cow Herd

Using Enterprise Budgets in Farm Financial Planning

Managing Cow-Calf Production Costs: What To Do Before The Money Runs Out By J. Walter Prevatt, Auburn University

Selecting, Feeding, Fitting, Grooming and Showing Beef Cattle

Enterprise Budget: Thomas Foulke BISON. Steven J. Torok. Cow-Calf Short Grass Prairie, Eastern Wyoming. Tex Taylor. Edward Bradley

Creep-Feeding Beef Calves

Selecting 4-H pigs. By: Ryan Harrell

VACCINATION PROGRAMS FOR DAIRY YOUNG STOCK

Livestock Judging Manual Table of Contents

Record keeping and management planning

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

Lesson Title: Beef Cattle-Animal Care is Everywhere Grade Level: K-4 Time: 1 hour Content Area: Science, Language Arts Objectives:

Measuring Soil Moisture for Irrigation Water Management

DAIRY FARMING IN SOUTH AFRICA WHERE TO NOW? William Gertenbach Institute for Animal Production Western Cape Departement of Agriculture

Livestock Rental Lease

Pasture Lease Agreements

Decision Tools to Make Management and Marketing Decisions. K State Decision Tools Cattle Price Oriented (

SAMPLE COSTS FOR FINISHING BEEF CATTLE ON GRASS

A HISTORIC EVALUATION OF RESEARCH INDICATORS IN BCRC PRIORITY AREAS

Inheritance of Color And The Polled Trait Dr. R. R. Schalles, Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University

Accelerated Replacement Heifer Feeding Programs

How To Write A Business Plan

Figure 1. Tail restraint for castrating older calves standing in a squeeze chute.

Transcription:

Beef Cattle Frame Scores AS-1091, May 1995 John Dhuyvetter, Area Livestock Specialist Frame scores are an objective, numerical description of cattle skeletal size which reflect the growth pattern and potential mature size of an animal. Frame score values typically range from 2 to 9 and are calculated from hip height and age. Frame scores are frequently reported as supplementary information to weight and other performance data. They can be used to project mature size, provide an indication of composition, and characterize performance potential and nutritional requirements of an animal. Considerable variation exists among cattle for frame size. Optimum frame score and desired body type will be different among production situations which differ in feed resources, breeding systems, and market endpoints. Low frame scores are descriptive of cattle which are short in stature for their age, tend to be early maturing, and finish for slaughter and mature at lighter body weights. High frame scores are indicative of cattle that are tall for their age, have a slower rate of maturity, and finish and mature at relatively heavy body weights. Rate of gain is usually higher for larger framed cattle; however, large differences in rate and efficiency of gain exist in cattle of similar size. For cattle developed under a consistent and adequate plane of nutrition for normal growth, a calculated frame score should be similar regardless of when the animal was measured. Theoretically an animal should have the same frame score throughout its life. Inconsistent environmental factors and management can alter skeletal growth rate, which may result in cattle developing slightly faster or slower than anticipated. As a result animals may increase or decrease a frame score over time depending on rate of growth. The Beef Improvement Federation has recommended in its "Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs" that height measurements for the calculation of frame score be taken at the hip directly over the hook bones as illustrated in Figure 1. Height measurements can be collected through the use of hip height measuring sticks marketed specifically for that purpose. Such height sticks are constructed with a sliding arm containing a bubble level on a pole scaled in height increments. To make a measurement, the pole is held vertically alongside the animal's hip with the sliding arm positioned level and directly over the hook bones and a measurement read from the pole where the arm attaches. For accurate height measurements it is necessary for the animal to have its legs set squarely and head in a normal position. An alternative to using a height stick

and where the accuracy of individual measurements is not as critical is to place a grid marked in height increments inside a scale or working chute. As cattle are being worked, a height can be read off the grid by sighting across the animal's hip. Modifications can also be made to equip cattle handling chutes with a moveable front to back pull-down measuring device calibrated to obtain height measurements. Figure 1. Proper position for correctly measuring hip height. Source: BIF Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs, 1990 Beef Improvement Federation recommended procedures are available to adjust actual height measurements to standard performance testing 205-day weaning and 365-day yearling stages. Hip heights adjusted to 205 days should be collected between 160 and 250 days of age similar to the range for calculating adjusted weaning weights. Cattle should be at least 330 days of age for predicting yearling height measurements that are adjusted to 365 days. Age of calf and age of dam adjustment factors and formulas for calculating adjusted 205-day and 365-day hip heights are presented in Table 1. As an example of adjusting an actual height, the 205-day weaning height of a bull calf born March 1 to a 4-year-old dam and weaned October 10 measuring 44 inches would be 43.4 inches. {44 + [(205-224) *.033]} * 1.01 = 43.4 Table 1. 205 day and 365 day Height Adjustment Factors and Formulas 205 day Height Adjusted Height = {actual height + [(205 - actual age)* age of calf adjustment]} * age of dam adjustment Factors for Adjusting Weaning Height bulls heifers Age of Calf.033.025 Age of Dam 2 and 13 or older 1.02 1.02 3 and 12 1.015 1.015 4 and 11 1.01 1.01 5 through 10 1.00 1.00 365 day Height Adjusted Height = {actual height + [(365 - actual age)* age of calf adjustment]}

Factors for Adjusting Yearling Height bulls heifers Age of Calf under 365 days.033.025 over 365 days.025.025 Source: BIF Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs, 1990 A hip height measurement can be converted to a frame score if the animal's age is known. Frame scores can be approximated from "height for age" frame score tables or calculated by mathematical formulas. Separate charts and formulas exist for bulls and heifers due to differing rates of skeletal growth between sexes. Beef Improvement Federation frame score charts and calculation formulas are presented in Table 2. As an example of determining a frame score, a bull measuring 48 inches at 330 days of age would be estimated to be about a frame score 5 from the chart or calculated to have a frame score of 4.98 by the formula. [-11.548 + (.4878 * 48) - (.0289 * 330) + (.0000947 * 330 * 330) + (.0000334 * 48 * 330)] = 4.98. Several beef cattle breed associations have developed their own frame score formulas and charts which are based on average growth and development within their specific breed and vary slightly from BIF calculations. Table 2. Frame score formulas and charts for bulls and heifers. Values within the tables are reported in inches. --- BULLS Frame Score = -11.548 +.04878 (Height) - 0.0289 (Days of Age) + 0.00001947 (Days of Age)2 + 0.0000334 (Height) (Days of Age) --- Age in -- Frame Score --- Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 --- 5 33.5 35.5 37.5 39.5 41.6 43.6 45.6 47.7 49.7 6 34.8 36.8 38.8 40.8 42.9 44.9 46.9 48.9 51.0 7 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.1 44.1 46.1 48.1 50.1 52.2 8 37.2 39.2 41.2 43.2 45.2 47.2 49.3 51.3 53.3 9 38.2 40.2 42.3 44.3 46.3 48.3 50.3 52.3 54.3

10 39.2 41.2 43.3 45.3 47.3 49.3 51.3 53.3 55.3 11 40.2 42.2 44.2 46.2 48.2 50.2 52.2 54.2 56.2 12 41.0 43.0 45.0 47.0 49.0 51.0 53.0 55.0 57.0 13 41.8 43.8 45.8 47.8 49.8 51.8 53.8 55.8 57.7 14 42.5 44.5 46.5 48.5 50.4 52.4 54.4 56.4 58.4 15 43.1 45.1 47.1 49.1 51.1 53.0 55.0 57.0 59.0 16 43.6 45.6 47.6 49.6 51.6 53.6 55.6 57.5 59.5 17 44.1 46.1 48.1 50.1 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 18 44.5 46.5 48.5 50.5 52.4 54.4 56.4 58.4 60.3 19 44.9 46.8 48.8 50.8 52.7 54.1 56.7 sa.7 60.6 20 45.1 47.1 49.1 51.0 53.0 55.0 56.9 58.9 60.9 21 45.3 47.3 49.2 51.2 53.2 55.1 57.1 59.1 61.0 --- HEIFERS Frame Score = -11.7086 + 0.4723 (Height) - 0.0239 (Days of Age) + 0.0000146 (Days of Age)2 + 0.0000759 (Height) (Days of Age) --- Age in -- Frame Score --- Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 --- 5 33.1 35.1 37.2 39.3 41.3 43.4 45.5 47.5 49.6 6 34.1 36.2 38.2 40.3 42.3 44.4 46.5 48.5 50.6 7 35.1 37.1 39.2 41.2 43.3 45.3 41.4 49.4 51.5 8 36.0 38.0 40.1 42.1 44.1 46.2 48.2 50.2 52.3 9 36.8 38.9 40.9 42.9 44.9 47.0 49.0 51.0 53.0 10 37.6 39.6 41.6 43.7 45.7 47.7 49.7 51.7 53.8 11 38.3 40.3 42.3 44.3 46.4 48.4 50.4 52.4 54.4 12 39.0 41.0 43.0 45.0 47.0 49.0 51.0 53.0 55.0 13 39.6 41.6 43.6 45.5 47.5 49.5 51.5 53.5 55.5

14 40.1 42.1 44.1 46.1 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 15 40.6 42.6 44.5 46.5 48.5 50.5 52.4 54.4 56.4 16 41.0 43.0 44.9 46.9 48.9 50.8 52.8 54.8 56.7 17 41.4 43.3 45.3 47.2 49.2 51.1 53.1 55.1 57.0 18 41.7 43.6 45.6 47.5 49.5 51.4 53.4 55.3 57.3 19 41.9 43.9 45.8 47.7 49.7 51.6 53.6 55.5 57.4 20 42.1 44.1 46.0 47.9 49.8 51.8 53.7 55.6 57.6 21 42.3 44.2 46.1 48.0 50.0 51.9 53.8 55.7 57.7 --- Frame score provides an indication of an animal's growth curve, which can be used to project expected finishing weight for slaughter cattle, or mature weight for breeding cattle. Table 3 provides an estimate of mature cow weight and expected slaughter weight at finish for steers and heifers by frame score. These projections are for average cattle; actual weights will also vary due to differences in muscling, body length, condition and other factors. Table 3. Relationship of frame size to projected mature cow weight and slaughter weight at Choice Quality Grade. BIF Numerical USDA Mature Steer Heifer Frame Feeder Calf Cow Slaughter Slaughter Score Frame Size Weight Weight Weight 2 Small 955 850 700 3 1030 950 800 4 Medium 1100 1050 900 5 1175 1150 1000 6 Large 1250 1250 1100 7 1320 1350 1200 8 1395 1450 1300 9 1470 1550 1400 Source: Adapted from Boggs, South Dakota State University, 1991

Greater mature cow weight is associated with increased frame scores, which results in additional feed required for maintenance because of a larger body mass. Stocking rates and quantities of feed need to be adjusted to meet the demands of larger cows. Provided necessary feed is available, larger cows generally meet their higher requirements. Under favorable management, reproductive rates tend to be similar across frame size; however, when the availability of feed becomes restricted, larger framed cattle are more susceptible to reproductive failure. Increasing mature size is a concern and may require adjusting replacement heifer development programs in order to insure they reach heavier prebreeding weights necessary to attain puberty. Large frame size is also associated with greater growth potential, longer finishing periods, and heavier slaughter weights. The generally preferred range for carcass weights of 650 to 850 pounds suggests the need to produce feeder cattle with a 5 to 7 range in frame scores. The current USDA feeder cattle grading system is based on the factors of frame size and muscle thickness. Three frame score designations are included: large, medium, and small, which relate to an evaluation by appearance of an animal's skeletal height in relation to its age and the weight at which an animal will produce a choice quality carcass with about.5 inches external fat at the 12th rib. Large frame steers and heifers would not be expected to produce choice carcasses until their live weight exceeds 1200 and 1000 pounds, respectively. Medium frame steers would be expected to produce choice carcasses at live weights of 1000 to 1200 pounds, and heifers at 850 to 1000 pounds. Small frame steers and heifers would produce choice carcasses at live weights of less than 1000 and 850 pounds, respectively. An indication of frame size is very important when estimating growing and finishing cattle nutrient requirements and projected feed intake. Although larger framed cattle will generally have increased intakes, energy concentration in the feed that is used for gain (NEg) is lower than that of medium framed cattle. Furthermore, protein requirements for large framed steers have been based on medium framed steers that weigh 15% less. This results in a greater protein requirement for large compared to medium framed cattle. Frame score is considered to be moderately to highly heritable. As such, frame score can be significantly changed through selection, primarily achieved through sire selection. With an heritability estimate of.40, about 40% of a bull's difference in frame score from herd average will be passed on to progeny. Frame score measurements are descriptive of animal type and growth patterns in beef cattle. They are useful in evaluating animal nutritional requirements, characterizing target market weights, and aid in selection decisions.

AS-1091, May 1995 County Commissions, North Dakota State University and U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Duane Hauck, Director, Fargo, North Dakota. Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. We offer our programs and facilities to all persons regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, gender, disability, age, veteran's status or sexual orientation; and are an equal opportunity institution. This publication will be made available in alternative formats for people with disabilities upon request, 701 231-7881.