QLIKVIEW SERVER LINEAR SCALING

Similar documents
QLIKVIEW SERVER MEMORY MANAGEMENT AND CPU UTILIZATION

QLIKVIEW GOVERNANCE DASHBOARD FAQ

GOVERNANCE OVERVIEW. A QlikView Technology White Paper. qlikview.com. December 2011

QLIKVIEW GOVERNANCE DASHBOARD 1.0

QLIKVIEW MOBILE SECURITY

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SAN AND NAS AND HOW CAN I USE THEM IN MY QLIKVIEW ENVIRONMENT?

QLIKVIEW DEPLOYMENT FOR BIG DATA ANALYTICS AT KING.COM

How To Test For Performance And Scalability On A Server With A Multi-Core Computer (For A Large Server)

Qlik Sense Enabling the New Enterprise

How To Use Qlikview For Utilities

QlikView for Telecommunications. Reducing Telecommunications Costs

WHY IT ORGANIZATIONS CAN T LIVE WITHOUT QLIKVIEW

QlikView 11 Source Control Walkthrough

QLIKVIEW ON MOBILE: Beyond Reporting. A QlikView White Paper. qlikview.com. December 2012

METADATA-DRIVEN QLIKVIEW APPLICATIONS AND POWERFUL DATA INTEGRATION WITH QLIKVIEW EXPRESSOR

QlikView for Telecommunications. Delivering Unprecedented Customer Intelligence

QlikView for utilities. Delivering Unprecedented Customer Intelligence

White Paper: Deploying QlikView

QlikView for utilities. Reducing Utilities Costs

QLIKVIEW ARCHITECTURAL OVERVIEW

QLIKVIEW DATA FLOWS TECHNICAL BRIEF

QLIKVIEW IN THE ENTERPRISE

QlikView for Supply Chain. High Tech

Technical White Paper: Clustering QlikView Servers

THE QLIKVIEW PRODUCT FAMILY

QlikView for Supply Chain. Chemical and Mill Products

QlikView for Supply Chain. Automotive, Industrial and Aerospace

The BARC BI Survey 10 QlikView Highlights

QlikView for media. Delivering Unprecedented Customer Intelligence

Informatica Data Director Performance

QLIKVIEW FOR LIFE SCIENCES. Partnering for Innovation and Sustainable Growth

Legal Notices Introduction... 3

WHAT S NEW IN QLIKVIEW 11

Performance brief for IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0 with VMware ESX 4.0 on HP ProLiant DL380 G6 server

SWEDBANK EMPOWERS 5,000+ USERS WITH CUSTOMER ANALYSIS TOOL USING QLIKVIEW

HP Intelligent Management Center Standard Software Platform

The QlikView deployment framework

Performance And Scalability In Oracle9i And SQL Server 2000

Protect Microsoft Exchange databases, achieve long-term data retention

NetIQ Privileged User Manager

HP Intelligent Management Center Basic WLAN Manager Software Platform

HP Intelligent Management Center Standard Software Platform

visualization pitfalls (and how to avoid them)

Identify and control performance and capacity risks. Introduction... 2

R49 Using SAP Payment Engine for payment transactions. Process Diagram

Using HP StoreOnce Backup systems for Oracle database backups

HP E-PCM Plus Network Management Software Series

Empowering Teams and Departments with Agile Visualizations

HP OpenView Service Desk Process Insight 2.10 software

Server Virtualization with Windows Server Hyper-V and System Center (20409) H8B93S

HP ProLiant BL660c Gen9 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 technical brief

THE QLIKVIEW BUSINESS DISCOVERY PLATFORM

CUSTOMER Presentation of SAP Predictive Analytics

QLIKVIEW AND THE CLOUD

Backup Strategies for Integrity Virtual Machines

HP Intelligent Management Center Enterprise Software Platform

Minimum Hardware Configurations for EMC Documentum Archive Services for SAP Practical Sizing Guide

Unleash your intuition

System requirements for Qlik Sense. Qlik Sense 3.0 Copyright QlikTech International AB. All rights reserved.

The Connected-Consumer

SuperGIS Server 3 High Availability Test Report

White Paper. SAP NetWeaver Landscape Virtualization Management on VCE Vblock System 300 Family

HP ProLiant DL380 G5 takes #1 2P performance spot on Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark Industry Applications running Windows

Managing Capacity Using VMware vcenter CapacityIQ TECHNICAL WHITE PAPER

Protecting enterprise servers with StoreOnce and CommVault Simpana

Scalability Factors of JMeter In Performance Testing Projects

VDI Without Compromise with SimpliVity OmniStack and Citrix XenDesktop

HP reference configuration for entry-level SAS Grid Manager solutions

10 Best Practices for Application Performance Testing

Cut Costs and Improve Agility by Simplifying and Automating Common System Administration Tasks

SRCH2 Solution Brief SRCH2 Solutions for Device Information Management. Powerful Mobile Collaboration and Device Management with SRCH2

Ready Time Observations

Performance characterization report for Microsoft Hyper-V R2 on HP StorageWorks P4500 SAN storage

Removing Performance Bottlenecks in Databases with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Violin Memory Flash Storage Arrays. Red Hat Performance Engineering

Cost-Effective Data Management and a Simplified Data Warehouse

QlikView Overview. Inge Nyheim Partner Sales Manager

An Oracle Benchmarking Study February Oracle Insurance Insbridge Enterprise Rating: Performance Assessment

Colgate-Palmolive selects SAP HANA to improve the speed of business analytics with IBM and SAP

Evaluation of Enterprise Data Protection using SEP Software

An Oracle White Paper July Oracle Primavera Contract Management, Business Intelligence Publisher Edition-Sizing Guide

Scalability and BMC Remedy Action Request System TECHNICAL WHITE PAPER

Agentry and SMP Metadata Performance Testing Guidelines for executing performance testing with Agentry and SAP Mobile Platform Metadata based

Case Study - I. Industry: Social Networking Website Technology : J2EE AJAX, Spring, MySQL, Weblogic, Windows Server 2008.

Qlik Sense Enterprise

Performance in the Infragistics WebDataGrid for Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX. Contents. Performance and User Experience... 2

HP PCM Plus v4 Network Management Software Series

Mission-critical HP-UX 11i v2 WebSphere Reference Architecture White Paper

QuickSpecs. What's New Dual Port SFF 10K and 15K SAS drives Dual Port 3.5" 15K SAS drives. HP SAS Drives (Servers) Overview

Landscape Design and Integration. SAP Mobile Platform 3.0 SP02

Installing and Configuring the HANA Cloud Connector for On-premise OData Access

Assessing RAID ADG vs. RAID 5 vs. RAID 1+0

ProCurve Mobility Manager 1.0

Transcription:

QLIKVIEW SERVER LINEAR SCALING QlikView Scalability Center Technical Brief Series June 212 qlikview.com

Introduction This technical brief presents an investigation about how QlikView Server scales in performance when serving multiple QlikView applications. One of the major QlikView differentiators is our customers Business Discovery adoption path. Typically, QlikView enters enterprises with a couple of QlikView applications that are created to solve a workgroup s business problems. In weeks, as the business users recognize the ease of use and the self service nature of QlikView, there is an exponential increase in the number of QlikView applications created. From an IT department s perspective, it is very important to have a predictable and performing Business Discovery infrastructure in these highly growing environments. It s important to understand that QlikView s performance scales uniformly as new QlikView applications are created. The aim of the investigation explained in this paper is to observe the behavior and effects from having multiple QlikView applications loaded and accessed at the same time on the same server and compare the result with testing the same applications loaded and accessed in sequence. As the Business Discovery environments have high adoption rates, QlikTech recognizes the importance of scalability and predictability of the QlikView architecture. The intention of this paper is to share the test results conducted by the QlikTech Scalability Center on linear scalability of the QlikView Server. These results should be taken as guidance. It is recommended to review the QlikView Architecture and System Resource Usage Technical Brief in order to get a fundamental understanding of the various QlikView components and how they utilize various hardware resources such as RAM and CPU. On the remainder of this paper, the test methodology and configurations are explained and findings are summarized with explanations of the observed performance. QlikView Server Linear Scaling 2

QlikView Resource Need Scales With the Number of Loaded QlikView Applications The aim of the investigation is to observe the behavior and effects from having multiple QlikView applications loaded and accessed on the same server and compare the result with testing the same applications in sequence in the same environment. The ideal result of the investigation would be that adding up the outcome of the individual application loads matches the outcome of the applications loaded in parallel. The investigation will show the actual results from the perspectives of CPU usage, RAM usage, throughput and average response times. The result from this investigation should serve as evidence on how QlikView Server scales for multiple applications running in parallel. Technical Information Regarding the Tests Five QlikView applications were used throughout this investigation ( App1.qvw, App2.qvw, App3.qvw, App4.qvw, and App5.qvw.) The applications are categorized as small, medium and large size applications (see Figure 1). The tests are carried out in two groups. In the first group two small-size QlikView applications are used to test the RAM and CPU utilization of the QlikView Server loading equal-size and light-weight applications. In the second group, four QlikView applications, ranging from small size to large size, are used to observe the resource utilization on the QlikView Server. Finally, the test results of the two groups are compared. QlikView Server Linear Scaling 3

Figure 1. The technical information of the test environment Environment Attribute Value QlikView Applications Small size applications App1.qvw: 79K (# of records) Middle size application App2.qvw: 6.7M App3.qvw: 56.5M App4.qvw: 63M Large size applications App5.qvw: 4M IIS Version 7 QlikView Server Version v1. Service Release 2 Small Server RAM 92 GB (SC-MEDIUM) Large Server CPU RAM 12 cores, 3.33GHz 256 GB (SC-LARGE) Load Client Machine CPU Load generator 32 cores, 2.27GHz JMeter 2.4 RAM 32 GB CPU 8 cores QlikView Server Linear Scaling 4

Test Methodology For this scalability testing, JMeter, (a load/performance testing tool), is used to simulate the user interaction scenarios with five different QlikView applications. A link to JMeter documentation is available in the references section. A specific JMeter script is created for each QlikView application simulating a predefined scenario. The scripts are then run against one application at a time (sequence test) and against all applications at once when performing parallel test executions (parallel test). In the first group of the test, App1.qvw and App2.qvw are tested against the smaller server referred to as SC-MEDIUM. In the second group of test, App1.qvw, App3.qvw, App4.qvw, and App5.qvw are tested against the bigger server referred to as SC-LARGE. The test scenarios of loading the QlikView applications are tuned to avoid saturating the CPU and RAM on the target QlikView Server. The reason for this is, as at point of saturation, it will not be visible how much RAM that is actually required per application. A sample user interaction script scenario is provided below. Figure 2. A sample user interaction script used during the testing Step Description 1 Login to the server s Access point 2 Open the QlikView application (App1.qvw) 3 Change the active sheet, static selection 4 Chart selection, zoom random area 5 Listbox selection (LB1), random selection 6 Listbox selection (LB2), random selection 7 Listbox selection (LB3), random selection 8 Clear all selections, static selection QlikView Server Linear Scaling 5

Test Results 1. GROUP 1 TESTS: LOADING TWO QLIKVIEW APPLICATIONS This test result shows the effect of loading two QlikView applications individually versus loading them in parallel on the QlikView Server. Figure 3. Group 1 test results (CPU and Private Byte) 35% CPU QVS 14 Private Byte QVS (GB) 3% 12 25% 1 2% 8 15% 6 1% 4 5% 2 % App1.qvw loaded individually App1.qvw and App2.qvw loaded parallel App2.qvw loaded individually Figure 4. Group 1 test results (Number of Actions per minute and Average response time in ms) 12 #Actions/min 18 Avg. Response Time (ms) 1 16 14 8 12 6 1 8 4 6 2 4 2 App1.qvw App2.qvw QlikView Server Linear Scaling 6

2. GROUP 2 TESTS: LOADING FOUR QLIKVIEW APPLICATIONS This test result shows the effect of loading four QlikView applications individually versus loading them in parallel on the QlikView Server. Figure 5. Group 2 test results (CPU and Private Byte) 6% CPU QVS 1 Private Byte QVS (GB) 5% 9 8 4% 7 6 3% 5 2% 4 3 1% 2 1 % App1.qvw loaded individually All four apps loaded parallel App2.qvw loaded individually App3.qvw loaded individually App4.qvw loaded individually Figure 6. Group 2 test results (Number of Actions per minute and Average response time in ms) 45 #Actions/min 35 Avg. Response Time (ms) 4 35 3 25 3 25 2 2 15 1 5 15 1 5 App1.qvw App3.qvw App2.qvw App4.qvw QlikView Server Linear Scaling 7

Summary The test result shows that by adding up the resource usage of individual QlikView applications, it is possible to get a close approximation from a resources perspective (i.e. CPU, memory) of what resources are needed when the QlikView applications run in parallel. The test results also show that the throughputs are almost at the same level when loading the QlikView applications in sequence and in parallel, due to the fact that CPU did not saturate during the test scenarois. The only thing to notice is that the average response time increases for the parallel load. This means that the system is capable of serving all incoming requests during the parallel load (i.e. not saturating in CPU), but as each request for processing is competing with requests against other applications, additional time is spent for queuing resulting longer response times. The test results show the same pattern for the smaller server (SC-MEDIUM) with fewer cores and memory as for the larger server (SC-LARGE) with more cores and memory. These observations proved that QlikView s performance scales uniformly as new QlikView applications are added to the QlikView Server. It is viable to assume that QlikView Server consumes approximately the same amount of resource when QlikView applications are loaded and accessed in parallel versus individually. This provides predictability for the QlikView administrators managing QlikView applications at a shared environment. By looking at individual QlikView application s resource usage, they can get an estimate on how much resource will be required in total. QlikView Server Linear Scaling 8

References QlikView Development and Deployment Architecture Technical Brief www.qlikview.com/.../global-us/direct/datasheets/ds-technical-brief-dev-and-deploy-en.ashx QlikView Architecture and System Resource Usage Technical Brief www.qlikview.com/.../ds-technical-brief-qlikview-architecture-and-system-resource- Usage-EN.ashx QlikView Scalability Overview Technology White Paper http://www.qlikview.com/us/explore/resources/whitepapers/qlikview-scalability-overview Tool to create load/performance tests of QlikView 1 and QlikView 11 http://community.qlikview.com/docs/doc-275 212 QlikTech International AB. All rights reserved. QlikTech, QlikView, Qlik, Q, Simplifying Analysis for Everyone, Power of Simplicity, New Rules, The Uncontrollable Smile and other QlikTech products and services as well as their respective logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of QlikTech International AB. All other company names, products and services used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The information published herein is subject to change without notice. This publication is for informational purposes only, without representation or warranty of any kind, and QlikTech shall not be liable for errors or omissions with respect to this publication. The only warranties for QlikTech products and services are those that are set forth in the express warranty statements accompanying such products and services, if any. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting any additional warranty. QlikView Server Linear Scaling 9