SECRETARY S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM



Similar documents
SECRETARY'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Rule 12(c) and 12(h)(2))

DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S EXPERT DISCLOSURE

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

EMERGENCY NOTICE OF APPEAL

The Defendants, by and through counsel, the Office of the Attorney General, submit the following Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint.

COURT USE ONLY Case Number: Names:

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO. Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202

Plaintiffs: KATHRYN H. HALL; DANNY E. STROUD; DICK R. MURPHY, Ph.D.; MARK D. HILLMAN; WAYNE W. WILLIAMS, MARK BAISLEY; and SHIRLEY J.

Defendant: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY COURT USE ONLY Counsel for Plaintiff: Marc R. Levy, #11372

COLORADO INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION S TRIAL BRIEF

SUPREME COURT, CIVIL BRANCH New York County 60 Centre Street, New York, N.Y HELP CENTER Room

Case: 1:13-cv SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31

GRANTED. Robert L. McGahey, Jr. District Court Judge

COMPLAINT PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE

HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER

CITY OF LONGMONT S MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE

COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT

DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO Court Address: 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, CO 80903

Case 3:08-cv JM-CAB Document 9 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:14-cv CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 10, 2014

Court of Appeals, State of Colorado 2 East 14th Ave, Denver, CO 80203

ANSWER SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Index. VINCENT FORRAS. on behalf of himself and all others #111970/2010

How To Answer A Complaint In A Civil Case

Claimant Colorado Ethics Watch ( Ethics Watch ), by and through undersigned

APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION (6)(A), C.R.S. 2013

STATE DEFENDANTS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff,

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF COLORADO 2 East 14 th Avenue Denver, CO (Appeal from)

The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DEFENDANT S COUNTERCLAIM

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.

ANSWER PACKET NON-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ON PREPARING AN ANSWER

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs, ) CASE NO. 08 CVH vs- ) JUDGE LYNCH

Case 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 89 Filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

RESPONSE TO SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELA WARE ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT IHOR FIGLUS

Case 5:11-cv SWW Document 4 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Attorneys for Maricopa County Community College District Board IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

MOTION OF AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICI CURIAE

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. CASE NO. 3:01-cv-1275-J-25 HTS

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Andrew C. Snyder, Esq East Prentice Avenue, #1500 Case No. 2013CV31667 Denver, Colorado Ctrm.: 269 Phone Number:

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

Case 1:13-cv RBJ Document 12 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, COLORADO. 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401

FIRST NOTICE OF ELECTION

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE HOWARD COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF HOWARD ) CAUSE NO.: APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

Case 8:13-cv EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado PLAINTIFFS: Anthony Lobato, et al. and COURT USE ONLY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING/EXPUNGING AN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT RECORD

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Case: HRT Doc#:135 Filed:07/06/15 Entered:07/06/15 13:35:01 Page1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PLAINTIFF S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 6:14-cv AA Document 14 Filed 01/19/15 Page 1 of 5

Case: EEB Doc#:9 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 15:52:25 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cv RJL Document 19 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Answer to Debt Collection Suit Instructions, Example, Sample Form

Case 3:05-cv JGC Document 170 Filed 10/26/2005 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:13-cv AC Document 16 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 11

Case LT Filed 05/14/14 Entered 05/14/14 14:14:36 Doc 6 Pg. 1 of 13

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, Comfort Dental ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED THE HONORABLE MARY YU HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

POST-DECREE OR POST-FINAL ORDERS

Case 1:03-cr LEK Document 24 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 7. Petitioner, Respondent. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER 1

Case 6:66-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NOTICE OF MOTION

the seal of the National Archives and Records Administration, that the attached reproduction(s) is TiTLE Regional Administrator, Pacific Alaska Region

COURT USE ONLY. Case Number:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dept 1A

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

HOW TO RESPOND WHEN SERVED: Surviving the Divorce Process in New York State

scc Doc 26 Filed 12/17/14 Entered 12/17/14 16:02:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

Case 5:14-cv OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Transcription:

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock St. Denver, Colorado 80202 SCOTT GESSLER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO, EFILED Document CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD Filing Date: Oct 03 2012 05:49PM MDT Filing ID: 46796149 Review Clerk: Annie Keirnes Plaintiff, v. DEBRA JOHNSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER Defendant, COLORADO COMMON CAUSE and GILBERT ORTIZ, in his official capacity as the Clerk and Recorder for the County of Pueblo Intervenors-Defendants. JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General MAURICE G. KNAIZER, Deputy Attorney General* Reg. No. 05264 LEEANN MORRILL, Assistant Attorney General* Reg. No. 38742 1525 Sherman Street, 7 th Floor Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 866-5380 FAX: (303) 866-5671 E-Mail: maurie.knaizer@state.co.us *Counsel of Record COURT USE ONLY Case No. 11CV6588 Courtroom: 203 SECRETARY S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM Scott Gessler, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State for the State of Colorado (hereinafter the Secretary ) hereby submits his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Colorado Common Cause s Second Amended Counterclaim.

ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM 1. With respect to the allegation in paragraph 1, the Secretary admits that Colorado Common Cause is a state chapter of Common Cause and that the stated purpose of Common Cause is to ensure open, honest, and accountable government at the national, state, and local levels. The Secretary is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that Colorado Common Cause s members include over 35 registered voters in Denver County who are designated as Inactive Failed to Vote, and denies the same. The Secretary denies the remaining allegations in paragraph 1. 2. The Secretary admits the allegations in paragraphs 2 through 4. 3. Paragraph 5 contains an incomplete and inaccurate statement of the law, and is denied. 4. The Secretary is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in paragraphs 6 and 7, and denies the same. 5. The first sentence of paragraph 8 contains an incomplete and inaccurate statement of the law, and is denied. The Secretary admits the allegation in the second sentence of paragraph 8. 6. The Secretary denies the allegations in paragraph 9. 7. The Secretary admits the allegation in the first sentence of paragraph 10. The second sentence of paragraph 10 contains an incomplete and inaccurate statement of the law, as well as legal argument, and is denied. 8. The Secretary admits the allegations in paragraph 11. 9. The Secretary denies the allegation in the first sentence of paragraph 12 that he brought suit to permanently enjoin the Denver County Clerk from mailing to all voters designated as Inactive Failed to Vote. The Secretary further denies the allegation in the second sentence of paragraph 12 that he has interpreted the law to prohibit election officials from mailing ballots to all voters designated as inactive failed to vote. The Secretary affirmatively states that voters designated as inactive failed to vote may vote by mail if they timely notify the proper election officials. The Secretary admits the allegation in the third sentence of paragraph 12. 10. The Secretary admits the allegations in paragraph 13. 11. The Secretary admits that paragraph 14 correctly restates 8 CCR 1505-1, Rule 12.4.1(d). 2

13.19. 12. The Secretary admits that paragraph 15 correctly restates 8 CCR 1505-1, Rule 13. The Secretary denies the allegations in paragraphs 16 and 17. 14. The Secretary is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters asserted in paragraphs 18 through 20, and denies the same. 15. In response to paragraph 21, the Secretary incorporates his answers to paragraphs 1 through 20 as though fully set forth herein. 16. The Secretary denies the allegation in paragraph 22. 17. In response to paragraph 23, the Secretary incorporates his answers to paragraphs 1 through 22 as though fully set forth herein. 18. In response to paragraph 24, the Secretary admits that the right to vote is fundamental, but denies the remaining allegations. 19. The Secretary denies the allegations in paragraphs 25 through 27. 20. In response to paragraph 28, the Secretary incorporates his answers to paragraphs 1 through 27 as though fully set forth herein. 21. In response to paragraph 29, the Secretary admits that the right to vote is fundamental, but denies the remaining allegations. 22. The Secretary denies the allegations in paragraphs 30 through 32. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM 1. Colorado Common Cause does not have standing. 2. Colorado Common Cause has failed to state a claim under the Election Code upon which relief may be granted because the Election Code does not authorize clerks to send mail ballots to voters who are designated as inactive-failed to vote. 3. Colorado Common Cause has failed to state valid constitutional claims upon which relief may be granted because inactive voters are not denied the right to vote and voters categorized as active are not similarly situated to voters categorized as inactive-failed to vote. 3

4. Common Cause fails to allege that the membership of Common Cause includes racial or ethnic minorities who are categorized as inactive failed to vote. 5. Common Cause fails to meet the pleading requirement under Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976). 6. Any alleged disparity between and among racial or ethnic groups is not purposeful or intentional. WHEREFORE, the Secretary respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment in his favor and against Colorado Common Cause. JOHN W. SUTHERS Attorney General s/ LeeAnn Morrill MAURICE G. KNAIZER, 05264* Deputy Attorney General LEEANN MORRILL, 38742* Public Officials State Services Section Attorneys for Plaintiff *Counsel of Record Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121, 1-26(9), the original of this document with original signatures is maintained in the offices of the Colorado Attorney General, 1525 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203, and will be made available for inspection by other parties or the Court upon request. 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that on October 3, 2012, she served a true and correct copy of the foregoing SECRETARY S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM upon each of the following individuals via LexisNexis File & Serve or, where indicated, via United States First Class Mail, postage prepaid: Victoria J. Ortega Steven J. Hahn Assistant City Attorneys 201 West Colfax Avenue, Dept. 1207 Denver, CO 80202-5332 Daniel C. Kogovsek Pueblo County Attorney Cynthia Mitchell Assistant County Attorney 215 West 10th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 J. Lee Gray Holland & Hart, LLP 6380 S. Fiddlers Green Cir., Suite 500 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Myrna Perez (via U.S. Mail) Mimi Marziani (via U.S. Mail) Jonathan Brater (via U.S. Mail) THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW 161 Sixth Avenue, 12th Floor New York, NY 10013 5 s/ LeeAnn Morrill LeeAnn Morrill Assistant Attorney General Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121, 1-26(9), the original of this document with original signatures is maintained in the offices of the Colorado Attorney General, 1525 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203, and will be made available for inspection by other parties or the Court upon request.