PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENTS AND DISCOVERY ISSUES



Similar documents
Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5

E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK

Friday 31st October, 2008.

Best Practices in Electronic Record Retention

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES

Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production

Article originally appeared in the Fall 2011 issue of The Professional Engineer

How To Write A Hit Report On A Lawsuit Against A Company

The Intrusive Nature of Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation

Electronic Discovery: Lessons from Zubulake

THE INCREASING RISK OF SANCTIONS FOR ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE IN E-DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE

Electronic Discovery

UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York

2004 E-Discovery Developments: Year in Review

ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL

Ethics and ediscovery

Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys

REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover. Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

Spoliation of Evidence. Prepared for:

Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

Key differences between federal practice and California practice

NEW RULES FOR ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

Record Retention Issues

DISCOVERY IN BAD FAITH CASES

In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum

Ten Tips for Responding to Litigation Hold Letters

case 2:03-cv PPS-APR document 64 filed 11/03/2004 page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. electronically stored information. 6 Differences from Paper Documents

Any and all documents Meets Electronically Stored Information: Discovery in the Electronic Age

Case3:10-cv SI Document117 Filed06/21/11 Page1 of 7

NLRB: NxGen Case Management, E-Government and E-Discovery

SAMPLING: MAKING ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY MORE COST EFFECTIVE

Corporate Governance - The Importance of a Compliant Record Retention Program. by Christopher N. Weiss 1

REINHART. Labor & Employment E-News E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS:

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES

The Rules have Changed

Predictability in E-Discovery

The Benefits of Records and Information Management (RIM) in Electronic Discovery

California Electronic Discovery Rules. William W. Belt, Jr.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

AUTION! Electronic. The courtroom falls silent. Pinning you with her gaze, the judge inquires, Do you have any questions,

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY

New Amendments to Rule 26 Dictate Use of Electronic Discovery Technology by Larry Johnson, Esq. Director, Electronic Discovery Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.

How To Handle Electronic Discovery In Aransas

Document Retention & Destruction Policies for Digital Data What You Don't Know Can Hurt You

Civil Antitrust Litigation in the United States: Implications for Ireland and the European Community

Top 10 Things We Hate to Hear During an Internal Investigation

How To Protect Your Electronic Information System From Being Destroyed

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA EVANSVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. Case No. 2:11-cv-162-FtM-36SPC ORDER

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 380

INTERNET ISSUES: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS NEW E-DISCOVERY RULES. William R. Denny Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP September 26, 2006

November/December 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN INNS OF COURT. rofessionalism. Ethics Issues. and. Today s. Technology.

Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010

2013 E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS TO THE MASSACHUSETTS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BOSTON E-DISCOVERY SUMMIT 2013 DECEMBER 3, 2013

LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE. COMMENT to the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RULES THOUGHTS ON THE NOTE TO PROPOSED RULE 37(e) April 25, 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

How To Schedule A Case In The Court Of Appeals

Social Media: Cutting Edge Evidence Questions. Presented by: Lawrence Morales II The Morales Firm, P.C. San Antonio, Texas

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

University of Louisiana System

Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery

REED COLLEGE. ediscovery GUIDELINES FOR PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

CIVIL PROCEDURE ESSAY #1.

CIVIL DISCOVERY STANDARDS* AUGUST 1999 [NOVEMBER 2003 DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY STANDARDS]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

California Enacts New E-Discovery Rules that Mirror Federal Court E-Discovery Rules - with One Exception

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

2015 ANNUAL MEETING Vancouver, BC September 11, Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Scope of Discovery?

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Legal Developments in ediscovery: Implications for Security Management

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs : CASE NO CVH 0064

Electronic Discovery: Understanding Preservation Obligations, the Potential for Cost-Shifting, and Current Developments

ESI Risk Assessment: Critical in Light of the new E-discovery and notification laws

1 of 2 DOCUMENTS. Vasquez v. California School of Culinary Arts, Inc. No. B250600

Case 2:07-cv JPM-dkv Document 85 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 8

E-Discovery: New to California 1

An Examination of Litigation Holds and the Preservation of Electronic Documents in the Context of Zubulake

PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

The Need for Discovery Professionals. by David M. Shub, Esq. VP of Discovery Strategy, DiscoverReady LLC

General Items Of Thought

LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY RECORDS RETENTION POLICY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION 1

Case 2:06-cv RSWL-JWJ Document 65 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 1 of 11

Electronic Data Retention and Preservation Policy 1

ELECTRONIC BOARD MATERIALS: BEST PRACTICES FOR DIRECTORS

United States District Court

7.010 PLEAS, NEGOTIATIONS, DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES IN CRIMINAL CASES

SSSHHHHH THERE S AN INSURANCE BROKER IN THE ROOM!

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Dawn M. Curry

The Law On Discovery and Production of Electronic Evidence: Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going? Glenn A. Smith. June 10, 2009

Transcription:

PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENTS AND DISCOVERY ISSUES August 2, 2011 Susan A. Griisser Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Educational Affairs Division 200 St. Paul Place Baltimore, Maryland 21202-2021 410 576-6482, sgriisser@oag.state.md.us

WHAT DOCUMENTS NEED TO BE KEPT/PRESERVED/PRODUCED? ALL documents relevant to the issue in the case or that may lead to discoverable evidence in any written form- emails, written notes, memo s, thumb drives, text messages. (typed, handwritten documents ) Federal Rule 34(a): Any party may serve a request to produce designated documents, electronically stored information including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, images, and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained if necessary, into reasonably useful form 2

The duty to preserve/produce documents includes ALL documents you thought were confidential ie- tenure committee documents, notes made during deliberations, your personal phone text messages, personnel records.. If it s relevant or could reasonably lead to admissible evidence then it is generally required to be produced. Also includes voice mails (if still recoverable), documents on your own personal devices- phone, home computers, thumb drives 3

WHAT IS DISCOVERABLE EVIDENCE/WHAT MUST BE PRESERVED? In a lawsuit, discovery sought must be relevant and reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. A party cannot avoid discovery when its own record keeping system makes discovery burdensome. Toledo Fair Housing Center v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 703 N.E. 2d 340 (Ohio Ct. Comm. Pleas 1996) 4

Reasonable document retention is necessary, you can t decide to throw everything away. Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Techs., 222 FRD 280,298 (2004) plaintiff, knowing that it was likely to commence patent litigation, could not employ a computer program designed to destroy relevant evidence. 5

WHY DO WE HAVE TO PRESERVE DOCUMENTS? The duty to preserve documents applies to potential/actual plaintiffs, defendants and third parties. In Court cases there are sanctions against parties for their failure to preserve and/or produce documents- Monetary sanctions including but not limited to attorneys fees. Evidence- the party cannot offer evidence on certain issues The Court can order the striking of all or part of a pleading 6

PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENTS (CONTINUED) Termination of the law suit Precludes entry of summary judgment- Lorraine v. Markel American Ins. Co., 241 F.R.D. 534 (D.Md. 2007) Adverse Inference Instruction- Cedars-Sinai,, 18 Cal. 4 th 1,11 (1998) ie- in California standard instruction 205 reads: You may consider whether one party intentionally concealed or destroyed evidence. If you decide that a party did so, you may decide that the evidence would have been unfavorable to that party. The Sanction policies of the federal court are 7

WHEN DOES THE DUTY TO PRESERVE ATTACH? Based on Common law it s the knew or should have known standard: Carlucci, 102 F.R.D. 472 (S.D.Fl. 1984)- when the product was designed Remington, 836 F.2d 1104 (8 th Cir. 1988)- when the court complaint is received Zubulake IV, When litigation is suspected, 220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). Union Pac. R.R., 2004 U.S.App.LEXIS 6 (8 th Cir. 2004) 8

INACCESSIBLE DATA Rule 26(b)(2)(B): Carves out information not readily accessible because of undue burden or cost Party propounds discovery Responding party has burden to identify inaccessible data Requesting party may file motion to compel Responding party has burden to show information is inaccessible 9

INTERNAL UNIVERSITY DOCUMENT RETENTION Internal University actions (ie- disciplinary, promotions, merit pay, tenure ) should preserve all documents in an organized manner in a place where they can be easily retrieved. Deans, departments chairs, administrators need to be able to find documents when needed including after you have left Personnel, disciplinary documents should never be thrown out no matter how old The safest preservation method is to print out all emails and put in the paper file and well as scanning paper documents into an electronic format. 10

PRESERVATION LETTERS Must be complied with, very serious sanctions to University and possibly you for failure to comply. If you are aware of others who have information ie your administrative assistants, other faculty members you need to notify the University in- house counsel (Mrs. Billie), the VP for Administration (Dr. Holden) and/or the Assistant Attorney General assigned to the case. 11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

SUMMARY Federal Rules/Md. State Rules duty of preservation of documents including electronically preserved documents Remember there are serious sanctions for your failure to not preserve and/or produce documents It is important to have an organized method of preserving documents particularly departmental personnel documents- iesigned and final copies of evaluations Everything your write should be done in a professional manner and remember it is all discoverable Do not purge any potential personnel, disciplinary, evaluation, documents Any questions on documents not relating to a specific case, contact Mrs. Billie and/or Dr. Holden. 20

QUESTIONS??? 21