Civil Antitrust Litigation in the United States: Implications for Ireland and the European Community
|
|
- Lenard Watts
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Civil Antitrust Litigation in the United States: Implications for Ireland and the European Community Joseph T. McLaughlin Heller Ehrman, LLP Prepared with the assistance of: August T. Horvath Daniel Sheridan Gregory P. Kochansky Dublin, Ireland Irish Competition Authority June 17, 2005
2 Civil Antitrust Litigation in the United States: Implications for Ireland and the European Community I. Introduction to U.S. Civil Antitrust Litigation II. III. IV. Extraterritorial Reach of U.S. Antitrust Jurisdiction Discovery Outside the U.S. in U.S. Antitrust Matters Discovery by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs in U.S. Courts V. Role of Expert Witnesses in U.S. Civil Litigation VI. Review
3 I. Introduction to U.S. Civil Antitrust Litigation
4
5 The U.S. Supreme Court on Antitrust Laws Antitrust laws are: Fundamental national economic policy. Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference (1966) A comprehensive charter of economic liberty. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States (1958) "As important to the preservation of economic freedom and our freeenterprise system as the Bill of Rights is to the protection of our fundamental personal freedoms. United States v. Topco Associates (1972)
6 The Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) Purportedly applied common law principles Led to a sea change in U.S. competition policy First employed to bring down meat, oil and tobacco "trusts"
7 The Clayton Act (1914) Allowed civil or private "enforcement" of Antitrust laws Treble damages and injunctive remedies
8 The Clayton Act: Standing Any person injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws Most commonly competitors, customers, or suppliers of the defendant firms
9 Antitrust Plaintiff Standing Protection of competition, not competitors: the goal is to increase competition. Only direct customers may sue for damages in federal court. In state court, indirect customers may sue for damages. Result: Potentially duplicative recoveries.
10 Class Actions Encourages enforcement Promotes efficiency Class must be certified Numerous plaintiffs Common issues Representatives' claims must be typical of class Representative must protect the interests of the entire class
11 Prevalence of Antitrust Lawsuits in the U.S. Between 500 and 850 cases filed each year. Less than 1% of all actions in U.S. federal courts. Increase in filings since Number of state actions is large and growing.
12 Relationship to Government Enforcement Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice prosecutes cartels, some monopolization Federal Trade Commission focuses on key industries Private Plaintiffs Broader class of violations Private lawsuits often leverage government evidence
13 Relationship to Government Enforcement: Remedies Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (injunctive relief, fines) Federal Trade Commission (injunctive relief, consumer restitution) State Attorneys General (parens patriae recovery for consumers) Private Plaintiffs (monetary damages)
14 Relevance of U.S. Framework for Practitioners in Ireland and the EU Confidence in free markets. Treble damages and multiple recovery provides strong deterrence. The consumer's interests are paramount. However, excessive litigation may impair U.S. productivity and subject companies to excessive litigation risks that chill some lawful conduct.
15 II. Discovery Outside the U.S. in U.S. Antitrust Matters
16 Basic Overview Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern. U.S. discovery requirements are intrusive. Relevance defined broadly Discovery tools Depositions Interrogatories Document Requests Requests for Admissions Initial disclosures Expert disclosures
17 Example: "Document" Defined Broadly The terms document or documents are used herein in the broadest sense permissible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a) and Local Civil Rule 26.3 (c)(2), and includes, without limitation, any writing as that term is defined in Rule 1001 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and any computer, mechanical, photographic, printed, magnetic, audio, video and other electronic recordings or records and/or other tangible records and forms of recorded information, however produced or reproduced, including but not limited to: all letters, correspondence, inter-office communications, electronic correspondence such as , and other communications recorded in any form or medium; records, memoranda, notes, telegrams, summaries, computer printouts or disks or any information retained in a computer database which can be reproduced; records of telephone calls and meetings, calendar and diary entries, notebooks, schedules, reports, studies, appraisals, analyses, lists, surveys, deeds; budgets, financial statements, ledgers, returns, financial projections, comparison between budgets, projections and actual results, working papers, financial calculations and other records of financial matters and commercial transactions; contracts, agreements, legal and accounting opinions, analyses and research; periodicals, charts, diagrams, graphs, and other drawings; interviews, speeches, transcripts, press releases, advertisements, brochures and books of account; plans and specifications; publications; photocopies, microfilm, and other copies or reproduction, and computer printouts; all drafts, outlines and proposals of any such documents (whether or not actually used), and all non-identical copies (whether different from the original by reason of notations made on such copies or otherwise) are separate documents within the meaning of the term. The term also includes information stored in, or accessible through, computer or other information retrieval systems, together with instructions and all materials necessary to retrieve, use or interpret such data.
18 Example: "Document" Defined Broadly including but not limited to: The terms document or documents are used herein in the broadest sense permissible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a) and Local Civil Rule 26.3 (c)(2), and includes, without limitation, any writing as that term is defined in Rule 1001 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and any computer, mechanical, photographic, printed, magnetic, audio, video and other electronic recordings or records and/or other tangible records and forms of recorded information, however produced or reproduced, including but not limited to: all letters, correspondence, Correspondence, inter-office communications, electronic correspondence such as , and , other communications recorded in any form or medium; records, memoranda, notes, telegrams, summaries, computer printouts or disks or any information retained in a computer database which can be reproduced; records of telephone calls and meetings, calendar and diary entries, notebooks, schedules, diary reports, studies, entries, appraisals, analyses, lists, surveys, deeds; budgets, financial statements, ledgers, returns, financial projections, comparison between budgets, projections and actual results, working papers, financial calculations and other records of financial matters and commercial comparison transactions; contracts, between agreements, budgets, legal and accounting opinions, analyses and research; periodicals, charts, diagrams, graphs, and other drawings; interviews, speeches, transcripts, press releases, advertisements, brochures and books of account; plans and specifications; publications; Drawings, photocopies, interviews, microfilm, and other speeches, copies or reproduction, and computer printouts; all drafts, outlines and proposals of any such documents (whether or not actually used), and all non-identical Microfilm, copies (whether different from the original by reason of notations made on such copies or otherwise) are separate documents within the meaning of the term. The term also includes information stored in, or accessible through, computer or other information retrieval systems, together with instructions and all materials necessary to retrieve, use or interpret such data. and all materials necessary to retrieve, use or interpret such data.
19 Common Discovery Requests in U.S. Antitrust Cases Interrogatories, document requests and depositions often seek information regarding: Corporate organizational structure Policies and procedures Evidence of collusion or conspiracy Sensitive strategic documents Pricing and profitability information All relevant internal communications Pleadings in related lawsuits
20 The Consequences of Not Complying Failure to produce or preserve documents (or destroying documents) may result in: Sanctions Unfavorable inferences at trial Default judgment
21 Videotaped Depositions Video can be used at trial Witness must be telegenic and well-prepared Witness must seem cooperative Attorneys should avoid overly aggressive tactics Cautionary Tale: Bill Gates' deposition in the Microsoft suit.
22 Discovery Outside the U.S. Under the U.S. Federal Rules U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply to foreign parties. The U.S. Federal Rules generally do not apply to foreign non-parties. Discovery outside U.S. permitted even if violation occurred in the U.S. Documents of foreign affiliates are discoverable.
23 Depositions in Foreign Countries International treaties or conventions (e.g. the Hague Convention) Letters of request ("letters rogatory") Depositions on notice Deposition before person commissioned by a foreign court
24 Discovery Under Relevant International Treaties The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters Foreign court conducts proceedings under its own rules Evidence taken before local diplomatic or consular officer Commissioner appointed in foreign jurisdiction Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory
25 The Hague Convention, Compared to the Federal Rules Under Hague Convention: Countries may refuse to submit to document discovery. Both requested and requesting parties must be parties to the convention. Permissible scope of document requests may be narrower. The Convention applies only to "civil and commercial matters" The discovery request must originate from a judicial authority.
26 IV. Discovery by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs in U.S. Courts
27 Discovery by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs in U.S. Courts: 28 U.S.C and Intel v. AMD, Inc. 28 U.S.C empowers federal courts to aid foreign litigants. Intel: irrelevant that material sought is not discoverable in the requester's jurisdiction Factors: Whether the foreign tribunal has jurisdiction to compel production Nature of the proceeding, tribunal and foreign discovery system Whether request is an attempt to circumvent restrictive foreign rules Whether the request is unduly burdensome or intrusive
28 V. Role of Expert Witnesses in U.S. Civil Litigation
29 Subjects of Expert Economic Testimony Conditions for class certification Econometric analysis of whether conduct occurred Defining product and geographic markets Feasibility of anticompetitive conduct in a particular market Computation of damages Administrability of proposed settlement Commercial quality of a party's product
30 Importance of Expert Witnesses Crucial to most complex U.S. civil litigation Especially true for antitrust law, which relies on economic theory Experts often must instruct the trial judge about basic concepts in antitrust law and economics. Sometimes judges retain neutral experts for this purpose.
31 Admissibility of Expert Testimony U.S. federal judges have considerable latitude The Federal Rules of Evidence govern: Subject matter must be helpful to the trier of fact Factual basis for testimony must be adequate Testimony must be presented in appropriate form
32 The Daubert Standard for Admissibility Four factors in admissibility: 1) Expert's technique has been tested 2) Technique subjected to peer review 3) Technique's rate of error 4) Technique generally accepted in field The factors are to be applied flexibly, non-exclusively.
33 Daubert and Antitrust Experts Courts have excluded expert testimony for: Failing to use market data Failure to account for alternative explanations Applying guidelines too mechanically Wrongly applying an accepted methodology Failing to define important factors Making unsubstantiated assumptions Potential bias of the expert
34 Example: Conspiracy "Experts" Economic expert testimony on whether a conspiracy exists: Formerly employed in many price-fixing cases under the Sherman Act "Conspiracy" is a legal concept, not economic Accordingly, some federal courts have limited economic experts to testimony about apparent "collusion" or whether an "inference" of conspiracy can be supported.
35 Thank You. Joseph T. McLaughlin Heller Ehrman, LLP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. In Re Application of ELMER EDUARDO CAMPOS-ÁLVAREZ for an Order Granting Leave to Issue Subpoenas for the Taking of Discovery
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, vs., Defendant. Case No.: CJ-2011- PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT TO: COMES NOW the Plaintiff,
More informationSupreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 99TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO: 12345
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 99TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA PRETENDER BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR STPFT 2005-XX, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO: 12345 JOHN DOE, ET AL, Defendant. / DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION PLAINTIFF S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION INJURED PERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: ) RESPONSIBLE PARTIES ) ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
More informationPART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,
More informationPrivate anti-trust remedies under US law
Competition 2006/07 Volume 1 Private anti-trust remedies under US law Kenneth Ewing, Steptoe & Johnson LLP www.practicallaw.com/0-207-5003 One of the most important features of anti-trust enforcement in
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION INJURED PERSON, Plaintiff, v. RESPONSIBLE PARTY Defendant. No. PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT RESPONSIBLE
More informationBILL ANALYSIS. C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
BILL ANALYSIS C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE C.S.S.B. 1309 gives the State of Texas civil remedies to be invoked by the attorney general
More informationCase4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
More informationCovington Webinar Series February 23, 2012 Cross-Border Discovery Issues for U.S. Litigants
Covington Webinar Series February 23, 2012 Cross-Border Discovery Issues for U.S. Litigants Marney Cheek Kristen Eichensehr Alex Hastings Ed Rippey Agenda Introduction (Rippey) Key Considerations in Cross-Border
More informationPRETRIAL LITIGATION IN A NUTSHELL. R. LAWRENCE DESSEM Professor of Law University of Tennessee ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO.
PRETRIAL LITIGATION IN A NUTSHELL By R. LAWRENCE DESSEM Professor of Law University of Tennessee ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO. 1992 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.. TABLE OF CASES TABLE OF STATUTES
More informationDISCOVERY ABROAD HOW TO OBTAIN EVIDENCE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
DISCOVERY ABROAD HOW TO OBTAIN EVIDENCE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES By KYL attorneys Elizabeth P. Beazley and Tara B. Voss California Litigation Volume 25 Number 1 2012 This article was previously
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI JANE DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Case Number 1131-********* MISSOURI COMPANY, ) ) and ) ) INDIANA COMPANY ) ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF S FIRST REQUEST
More information2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery
2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES A. [ 1] Purpose of Discovery. B. [ 2] Modern Discovery Procedures. C. [ 3] Relation to Pretrial Conference. D. Overview of California Discovery
More informationDrafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey
View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/6-569-5426 Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey EZRA ROSENBERG, MICHELLE HART YEARY AND THOMAS J. MILLER, DECHERT LLP, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION
More informationA Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F PAMELA L. HENSLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PROPOSED JOINT JOHNSTON COUNTY BOARD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION
1 1 1 1 1 BOURNE INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, CHET STOLER; SOUTH SEAS TRADING CO., Defendants. STIPULATION NO. C0-0RJB PROTECTIVE ORDER
More informationDISCOVERY: Using the Civil and Criminal Rules of Discovery in DSS Cases
DISCOVERY: Using the Civil and Criminal Rules of Discovery in DSS Cases Maitri Mike Klinkosum Assistant Capital Defender Office of the Capital Defender-Forsyth Regional Office Winston-Salem, North Carolina
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Settlement of: Sullivan, et al. v. DB Investments, Inc., et al., Civil Action Index No. 04-2819 This document relates to: Anco Industrial Diamond Corp.,
More informationFriday 31st October, 2008.
Friday 31st October, 2008. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and they hereby are amended to become effective January 1, 2009. Amend Rules
More informationLigitation process in Denmark 1. Litigation process in Denmark. A brief summary of the procedures and workings of the litigation process in Denmark.
Ligitation process in Denmark 1 Litigation process in Denmark A brief summary of the procedures and workings of the litigation process in Denmark. Litigation process in Denmark 2 Content Who will handle
More informationDiscovery Devices. Rule 26 requires the automatic disclosure of a host of basic information regarding the case
Discovery Devices Automatic (mandatory) disclosure Rule 26 requires the automatic disclosure of a host of basic information regarding the case Interrogatories Questions addressed to the other party Depositions
More informationControl Number : 44746. Item Number : 38. Addendum StartPage : 0
Control Number : 44746 Item Number : 38 Addendum StartPage : 0 2015JU[. _? PM 3: 14 APPLICATION OF WIND ENERGY BEFORE TW,,STATE OFFICE TRANSMISSION TEXAS, LLC FOR OPrLING CLERK AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
More informationLitigating the Products Liability Case: Discovery
www.goldbergsegalla.com NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT NEW JERSEY UNITED KINGDOM Litigating the Products Liability Case: Discovery New York State Bar Association Buffalo, NY October 22, 2013 Presenter
More informationBrief History of Section 4A
March 29, 2010 Hon. Christine A. Varney Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust United States Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530 Dear Assistant Attorney General Varney: We write to you on behalf
More informationTEXAS DISCOVERY RULES
A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W TEXAS DISCOVERY RULES COMPLETE TEXT TEXAS CIVIL RULES OF DISCOVERY WITH OFFICIAL SUPREME COURT COMMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 9. EVIDENCE AND DISCOVERY... 4 Explanatory
More informationInternational Investigations: Issues to Consider When Conducting or Defending Against an FCPA Investigation Outside the United States
International Investigations: Issues to Consider When Conducting or Defending Against an FCPA Investigation Outside the United States Presentation to: Ninth Annual Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Compliance
More informationCase 1:13-cv-00586-AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00-awi-sab Document Filed 0// Page of 0 DALE L. ALLEN, JR., SBN KEVIN P. ALLEN, SBN 0 ALLEN, GLAESSNER & WERTH, LLP 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () -00
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI JANE DOE INDIVIDUALLY ) and on BEHALF OF ) THE CLASS OF PERSONS ) DESIGNATED BY 537.080, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case Number *************** vs. ) ) DEFENDANT
More informationDiscovery Depositions 1 Part I: Practical Considerations in Planning and Preparing to Take a Discovery Deposition
Discovery Depositions 1 Part I: Practical Considerations in Planning and Preparing to Take a Discovery Deposition Purpose of Depositions: Perpetuate testimony Discover knowledge of facts and observations
More informationALL OF THE BELOW DUTIES ARE ASSUMED TO, AND MUST BE, UNDER THE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED ATTORNEY.
CIVIL LITIGATION PARALEGAL 2007 revision and update by Barbara Biondolillo of Berenbaum, Weinshienk & Eason, P.C., and Peggy Upton, formerly of the same firm. 2007 Revision and update reviewed by Larry,
More informationGAO CRIMINAL CARTEL ENFORCEMENT. Stakeholder Views on Impact of 2004 Antitrust Reform Are Mixed, but Support Whistleblower Protection
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2011 CRIMINAL CARTEL ENFORCEMENT Stakeholder Views on Impact of 2004 Antitrust Reform Are Mixed, but Support Whistleblower
More informationThe Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE
Responses submitted by: Name: Roddy Bourke Law Firm/Company: McCann FitzGerald Location: Dublin, Ireland 1. Would your jurisdiction be described as a common law or civil code jurisdiction? The Republic
More informationState Bar of Texas Advanced Personal Injury Law Course
State Bar of Texas Advanced Personal Injury Law Course New Rules for Expedited Jury Trials: How Each Side Can Use Them Amy Witherite Dan Worthington Eberstein & Witherite, LLP Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez,
More informationMASTER DISCOVERY TO PLAINTIFFS
Cause No. 2009-23570 IN RE IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HURRICANE IKE RESIDENTIAL HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PROPERTY CLAIM LITIGATION 11 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MASTER DISCOVERY TO PLAINTIFFS DEFINITIONS (FOR ALL
More informationBILL ANALYSIS. Senate Research Center C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Jurisprudence 4/5/2007 Committee Report (Substituted)
BILL ANALYSIS Senate Research Center C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Jurisprudence 4/5/2007 Committee Report (Substituted) AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT C.S.S.B. 1309 gives the State of Texas civil
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS ) MDL DOCKET NO.: 875 LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. VI) ) ) DEFENDANTS' MASTER REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
More informationUS DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS: IMPLICATIONS FOR FRENCH BUSINESSES
US DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS: IMPLICATIONS FOR FRENCH BUSINESSES May 11, 2012 Bijan E. Eghbal, Paris Browning E. Marean, San Diego Carol A.F. Umhoefer, Paris Agenda I. Overview of US discovery and document
More informationCase 6:13-cv-01168-EFM-TJJ Document 157 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 6:13-cv-01168-EFM-TJJ Document 157 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, PREMIUM BEEF FEEDERS,
More informationWhat to Expect In Your Lawsuit
What to Expect In Your Lawsuit A lawsuit is a marathon not a sprint. Stewart R. Albertson. There is a saying that the wheels of justice move slowly. That is as true today as when it was initially stated.
More informationGlossary of Court-related Terms
Glossary of Court-related Terms Acquittal Adjudication Appeal Arraignment Arrest Bail Bailiff Beyond a reasonable doubt Burden of proof Capital offense Certification Charge Circumstantial evidence Citation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : :
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PLAINTIFF, Successor-in-Interest to Plaintiff, vs. DEFENDANT, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S
More informationJURY INSTRUCTIONS. 2.4 Willful Maintenance of Monopoly Power
JURY INSTRUCTIONS PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS 1. ANTITRUST CLAIMS 2. Elements of Monopoly Claim 2.1 Definition of Monopoly Power 2.2 Relevant Market 2.3 Existence of Monopoly Power 2.4 Willful Maintenance
More informationThe Ins and Outs of Written Discovery and Motion Practice:
The Ins and Outs of Written Discovery and Motion Practice: An Outline to the Power Point Presentation Brynda Rodriguez Insley, Esq. Sharonda Boyce, Esq. Insley and Race, LLC 181 14 th Street NE, Suite
More informationDelaware UCCJEA 13 Del. Code 1901 et seq.
Delaware UCCJEA 13 Del. Code 1901 et seq. 1901. Short title This chapter may be cited as the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. 1902. Definitions As used in this chapter: (1) "Abandoned"
More informationEXAMINATION OUTLINE FOR PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS
EXAMINATION OUTLINE FOR PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS 2014 I. Ethics (18%) This area assesses the candidate s ability to comply with ethical standards of private investigators regarding privacy rights, confidentiality,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are a current or former user of PayPal in the United States who had an active PayPal account between April 19, 2006 and November
More informationIN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md-02308-TBR PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION : : MDL No.: 2308
Case 3:11-md-02308-TBR-LLK Document 68 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1322 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTIRCT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md-02308-TBR
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE COLLECTION PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS
UNDERSTANDING THE COLLECTION PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS 1. PRE-LITIGATION BY: MULCAHY LAW FIRM, P.C. Almost every community association has problems in collecting unpaid assessments. Most associations
More informationSOME STILL DON T GET IT: EXPERTS UNDER THE NEW RULES
SOME STILL DON T GET IT: EXPERTS UNDER THE NEW RULES Presented by Ryan J. Tucker San Antonio Mexican-American Bar Association Seminar Las Vegas, Nevada July 10-12, 2003 Authored by: Ricardo G. Cedillo
More informationThe Intrusive Nature of Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation
The Intrusive Nature of Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation October 16, 2014 Jeffrey R. Schaefer jschaefer@ulmer.com All patent infringement litigation in the U.S. takes place in federal courts. Cases
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI JANE DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Case Number 1131-********* MISSOURI COMPANY, ) ) and ) ) INDIANA COMPANY ) ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
More informationINFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT
PINAL COUNTY Apache Junction Justice Court Eloy Justice Court Superior/Kearny Justice Court Maricopa/Stanfield Justice Court JUSTICE COURTS Casa Grande Justice Court Florence/Coolidge Justice Court Mammoth/San
More informationRULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING
More informationTITLE I STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION ADVANCEMENT ACT OF 2004
118 STAT. 661 Public Law 108 237 108th Congress An Act To encourage the development and promulgation of voluntary consensus standards by providing relief under the antitrust laws to standards development
More informationElectronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys
Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys By Ronald S. Allen, Esq. As technology has evolved, the federal courts have
More informationlitigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients
litigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients litigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients executive summary Despite the great deal the United States and Canada share in common, in many
More informationIn the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division
Case 1:14-cv-02211-AT Document 61-1 Filed 12/28/15 Page 1 of 20 In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff,
More informationTo date, U.S. federal courts have imposed monitors for violations of competition laws in two matters:
Alternative Remedies Corporate Monitors and U.S. Antitrust Enforcement 2014 ICN Cartel Workshop October 3, 2014 (Taipei, Taiwan) Robert W. Tarun Robert.Tarun@bakermckenzie.com Baker & McKenzie LLP is a
More informationA Brief Overview of ediscovery in California
What is ediscovery? Electronic discovery ( ediscovery ) is discovery of electronic information in litigation. ediscovery in California is governed generally by the Civil Discovery Act. In 2009, the California
More informationData Preservation Duties and Protocols
Data Preservation Duties and Protocols November 2008 HOU:2858612.3 Discussion Outline I. The Differences Between Electronic and Paper Discovery II. The Parameters of Electronic Discovery III. Rule 37(e)
More informationMARYLAND CODE Family Law. Subtitle 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
MARYLAND CODE Family Law Title 9.5 MARYLAND UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT *** Current as of April, 2012 *** Section 9.5-101 Definitions Subtitle 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS (a) In general.-
More informationATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE The healthcare industry has exploded over the last thirty years. Combined with an increasing elderly population, thanks to the Baby Boomer generation, the general
More informationSPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT
NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Special Civil A Guide to the Court page 1 Special Civil is a court of limited jurisdiction
More informationLast amended by Order dated March 1, 2011; effective May 2, 2011.
Last amended by Order dated March 1, 2011; effective May 2, 2011. RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FOUR PRETRIAL PROCEDURES, DEPOSITIONS AND PRODUCTION AT TRIAL Rule 4:5. Depositions Upon Oral Examination.
More informationCompulsory Arbitration
Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings
More informationRULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK
RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK 10.1 General. A Judge of the District Court may order that any monies in actions pending before the Court be invested in any local financial institution for safe keeping.
More informationCOBB COUNTY STATE COURT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * * * * * * * * SUMMONS CASE NO.:
COBB COUNTY STATE COURT STATE OF GEORGIA GEORGE LOUIS BAILEY, Plaintiff, vs. MARVIN SIMPSON, Defendant. SUMMONS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CASE NO.: TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT: You are hereby summoned and required
More informationTITLE I REDUCTION OF ABUSIVE LITIGATION
109 STAT. 737 Public Law 104 67 104th Congress An Act To reform Federal securities litigation, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America
More informationAN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify
More informationExpert Witnesses in Water Court. Colorado s New Rules Governing Expert Witness in Water Court
Expert Witnesses in Water Court Colorado s New Rules Governing Expert Witness in Water Court Standards for Admissability of Expert Testimony Colo. Rules of Evidence Rule 702: Testimony by Experts If scientific,
More information(1) Claim means a written or electronically submitted request or demand that:
Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act V.T.C.A., Human Resources Code 36.001. Definitions In this chapter: (1) Claim means a written or electronically submitted request or demand that: (A) is signed by a
More informationCase 8:13-cv-01731-VMC-TBM Document 36 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 134 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:13-cv-01731-VMC-TBM Document 36 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 134 JOHN and JOANNA ROBERTS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 8:13-cv-1731-T-33TBM
More informationAmerican Polygraph Association. Antitrust Compliance Program
American Polygraph Association Antitrust Compliance Program Introduction The American Polygraph Association (APA) is a not for profit membership corporation incorporated under the laws of the District
More informationExecutive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark Section I Summary of findings There is no special legislation concerning damages for breach of EC or national competition law in Denmark,
More informationSchedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil
Queen s Bench Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3 Schedule of Forms FORMS FOR PART 1 [Foundational Rules] Form R Nil rule No. Form No. Source FORMS FOR PART 2 [Parties to Litigation] Form R rule No. Form No. Source
More informationSMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
More informationCase 2:04-cv-02247-JWS Document 45 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:04-cv-02247-JWS Document 45 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA GERALD and COREY ANDERSON, Plaintiffs, CIV 04-2247 PHX JWS vs. ORDER AND OPINION [Re: Motion
More informationLR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal
LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION KAREN M. McSHANE, et al., FEBRUARY TERM, 2003 Plaintiffs, No. 01117 v. Control No. 070576
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Case No.
More informationMASTER DISCOVERY TO INSURER AND ADJUSTER DEFENDANTS
Cause No. 2009-23570 IN RE IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HURRICANE IKE RESIDENTIAL HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PROPERTY CLAIM LITIGATION 11 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MASTER DISCOVERY TO INSURER AND ADJUSTER DEFENDANTS
More informationNOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE DOCUMENT SUBPOENA UPON GUARDIAN ANGEL TRUST, LLC
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 12-24051 (07) COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT MATTHEW CARONE, as Trustee for the Carone Marital Trust #2 UTD 1/26/00,
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. JAMES SHERMAN, et al. : : v. : C.A. No. 01-0696 : A C & S, INC., et al. :
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT In re Asbestos Litigation JAMES SHERMAN, et al. : : v. : C.A. No. 01-0696 : A C & S, INC., et al. : DECISION ON PLAINTIFF
More informationSpoliation of Evidence. Prepared for:
Spoliation of Evidence Prepared for: Spoliation Nationwide anti-spoliation trend Cases can be thrown out of court Insurers can be denied subrogation claims An insured who destroys evidence of a claim can
More informationHP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
More informationMuch Ado About Injury: Making Sense Of FTAIA Circuit Split
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Much Ado About Injury: Making Sense Of FTAIA Circuit
More informationCase: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365
Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER
More information(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
More informationThe Duke Conference: Bench-Bar-Academy Distinguished Lawyers Series Protected-Privacy Data Conference
CURRENT APPROACHES TAKEN IN U.S. LITIGATION TO COMPLY WITH POTENTIALLY CONFLICTING U.S. DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS AND EU AND OTHER FOREIGN DATA PRIVACY STATUTES David W. Ichel, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett Peter
More informationJUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961
JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION WITH TIN INC. AND UNITED STATES GYPSUM
NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION WITH TIN INC. AND UNITED STATES GYPSUM TO: Indirect Purchasers of Wallboard This notice is being provided pursuant to an Order of the United
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO RADIO SHED, INC., a Colorado Corporation, v. Plaintiff, AMERICAN ELECTRONICS, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Case No. 08-K-339 Defendant. DEFENDANT
More informationCIVIL LITIGATION PRACTICE FOR PARALEGALS. Many attorneys, paralegals and legal assistants refer to pleadings as all
CIVIL LITIGATION PRACTICE FOR PARALEGALS III. PREPARATION OF PLEADINGS Many attorneys, paralegals and legal assistants refer to pleadings as all court papers in the case. Technically speaking, the pleadings
More informationKey differences between federal practice and California practice
Discovery and deposition practice in federal court Key differences between federal practice and California practice BY BRIAN J. MALLOY Federal law governs procedural matters for cases that are in federal
More information