Comprehensive Plan Amendment



Similar documents
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners

DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT

Comprehensive Plan Policies that support Infill and Mixed Use

VANDERBILT COMPARISON

Note: The following are informal notes based on information received during this public meeting.

Attachment B Policy Audit Template

Chapter 9: Transportation

Volume II Recommendations January 2006 City of Madison Comprehensive Plan

APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE

Planning for the future. building a great city, great neighbourhoods

Housing Resource Panel SWOT Analysis Allegheny Places The Allegheny County Comprehensive Plan

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

UPPER MILFORD TOWNSHIP: ZONING HEARING BOARD A GUIDE FOR USE BY RESIDENTS

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT POLICY May 2008

MILWAUKEE. Plan. comprehensive DEPARTMENT OF CITY DEVELOPMENT MARCH, 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IMAGINE FLINT MASTER PLAN FOR A SUSTAINABLE FLINT Goals and Objectives

Community Revitalization & Economic Growth: ENTERPRISE ZONE JOB CREATION. Application for Incentives

Salt Lake City Granary District. Transit Oriented, Mixed Use Development

Building Up Business Loan Program Overview

Building Up Business Loan Program Overview

SUSTAINABLE HOUSTON: DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS, IMPACTS, AND FUTURE PLANS

Executive Summary Community Profiles

DATE STAMP RECEIVED BY OFFICE OF PLANNING

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE STANDARDS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Model Subdivision and Land Development (SALDO) Subdivision/ Land Development Presentation Overview. Why Subdivision and Land Development Regulations?

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

Infrastructure & Growth Leadership Pillar Strategy Statements from Existing Plans Developing Florida s Strategic 5-Year Direction, 29 November 2011

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

Re: Draft Environmental Impact Statement & Growth and Equity Analysis for the Seattle Comprehensive Plan Update

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF BALTIMORE And THE MID-ATLANTIC FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

City of Orlando Strategic Plan Prepared by: Analytica

Summary. Remit and points of departure

Appendix C Related Studies

Alewife Working Group June 14, 2016

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

Policy GRN The City will adopt a Go Green Initiative to implement strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the City s borders.

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Policy No.: F-7 CITY OF OLATHE COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT. Date Issued: Effective Date: Cancellation Date:

Understanding Value Capture as a Transportation Finance Strategy in Massachusetts. March 15, 2013

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

Tashman Johnson LLC Consultants in Policy, Planning & Project Management

2. Inventory available public property within the site area. Include publiclyheld property, tax-foreclosures, and donated property.

CITY OF FLORENCE NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY SECOND PUBLIC MEETING

Request for Information

Economic Development Strategy. City of Coon Rapids, June 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 SECTION I TIF GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES...2 A. TIF POLICIES AND GUIDELINES...2 B. TIF REVIEW COMMITTEE...

July 2014 CITY OF WELLAND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN AND HEALTH AND WELLNESS CLUSTER

Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

Brownfields Redevelopment Fund Asbestos and Lead Paint Abatement Application

UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PROGRAM

2. Downtown Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Summary

How To Improve Housing In Seminole County

Comparison of Goals and Policies Between Draft Plan (November 28, 2012) and Final Draft Plan (March 20, 2013)

Recommendations on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments

Multifamily Housing: Sustainable Development in Efficient, Walkable Communities

Plan and Bylaw Adoption Tools Original: May, 2005 Updated: September, 2010 Please use this update to replace earlier versions.

LONG TERM RENTAL REGISTRATION APPLICATION All sections are required to be completed. Please print, type, or apply through portal.


AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCESS

Development Variance Permit Application Package

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Center City West Greenville Business Plan Competition Guidelines

21.04 LAND USE. Managing amenity through land use strategies

ENERGY RESOURCES TOWARD BUILD-OUT

Township of Georgian Bluffs POLICY USE OF UNOPENED ROAD ALLOWANCES

The Lancaster Medical District Master Plan. The Lancaster Campus District 1

Major General Plan Amendment. Project Narrative

The Initiative represents an entirely new approach to inner-city. The recommendations that follow present a clear timetable, laying

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...1 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan...1 McKenzie County Comprehensive Plan...1 Definitions...2 Goal...2 Vision...

Cherokee County: Bells Ferry LCI Study & County Ordinance Audit. Prepared by Atlanta Regional Commission Staff Atlanta Regional Commission

DOWNTOWN BOND PROGRAM. Revolving Loan. Administered and Serviced by Eastern Savings Bank

Community Revitalization & Economic Growth: ENTERPRISE ZONE LAND IMPROVEMENT. Application for Incentives

Submittal Requirements for Development Projects

North Brevard Economic Development Zone (NBEDZ) Economic Development Plan

Successfully delivering on the goals of this plan requires that the. City not only make significant changes to its approach to housing

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #1 December 8, :00 p.m.

CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION

Revitalization Tax Exemptions. A Primer on the Provisions in the Community Charter

KEYPORT COMMUNITY PLAN

City Plan Part 1 Sustainability Appraisal Summary February 2012

References (Statutes/Resos/Policies): Title 32 C.R.S.,, Land Development Regulation, Zoning Resolution; CC92-47; CC97-544;CC03-388, CC05-398

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Page 1 Chapter Water Quality Performance Standards For Urban Development

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

COMP PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Historic Preservation in Housing and Community Development. Linking Historic Preservation to Community Development Block Grant Objectives

Economic Development Element

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. State Planning Policy state interest guideline. State transport infrastructure

A Facility Planning Guide

Tax Allocation District Redevelopment Plan for the Stadium Neighborhoods Tax Allocation District Atlanta, Georgia

New Bedford Economic Development Council

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT LOAN POOL (BDPL) GUIDELINES & APPLICATION MENOMONEE FALLS, WISCONSIN

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

City of Elkhart Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Plan

Transcription:

Staff Report CP-2-16 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Staff recommends four changes to the Economic Development element of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to reflect a new Economic Development Toolkit and new criteria for Economic Development Priority Areas. Item 1: Economic Development Element Areas of Intervention Box This request would revise the Areas of Intervention text box on page 155 of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect new criteria used in the creation and administration of Map ED-1: Target Areas for Economic Development. The new criteria focus economic development resources in industrial areas and provide greater specificity for targeting resources to high poverty areas zoned for non-residential uses. Areas of Intervention: A Geographic Focus for Economic Development An analysis of Raleigh was conducted to identify areas that demonstrate a need for economic development intervention and that also present opportunities for economic development. Areas were scored according to a number of variables. Each of these areas appears on Map ED-1: Target Priority Areas for Economic Development. Areas shaded in red orange correspond to geographies, measured in block groups, that meet one or both of the following criteria: 1. Census Block Groups in which 40% or more of the Block Group are zoned for non-residential uses; and that are considered high poverty or are adjacent to high poverty block groups. 2. Census Block Groups in which 40% or more of the Block Group are zoned for industrial use. with both an abundance of housing code violations and instances of tax arrears (need), as well as concentrations of underutilized land (opportunity). The map is an illustrative tool based upon quantitative analysis and is intended to provide the City with an identification of under-performing areas that can benefit from economic development activities. See Section 4.7 of the Community Inventory (Volume II) for more details about this analysis Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 1 CP-2-16

Item 2: Map ED-1: Target Priority Areas for Economic Development This request would revise Map ED-1: Target Priority Areas for Economic Development to reflect new economic development criteria, which focus economic development resources in industrial areas and provide greater specificity for targeting resources to high poverty areas zoned for non-residential uses. CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICER S REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 2 CP-2-16

Item 3: Policy ED 5.11 Targeting Investment This request would make the following revisions to Policy ED 5.11 Targeting Investment. These revisions reflect proposed new criteria for the Economic Development Toolkit. Target incentives and programs for public and private investments in residential, commercial and industrial areas based on criteria evaluating need and effectiveness. Need is demonstrated by socio-economic indicators and evidence of physical disinvestment. Effectiveness means that the target area is appropriate and ready for economic development. Item 4: Action Item ED 5.5 Economic Development Toolkit Review This request would add an Action Item outlining a new objective to revisit and revise the Economic Development Toolkit, including Map ED-1: Target Priority Areas for Economic Development. The following language is suggested. Complete yearly analysis of the Economic Development Toolkit and revise Toolkit criteria and Map ED-1 as needed. The following lists of considerations for the Planning and Development Officer s review and recommendations regarding a proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment are not all-inclusive. Review and recommendations of proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments may consider whether: 1. The proposed amendment corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition, trend or fact; The proposed amendment strengthens the City s commitment to economic development in two important sectors of the city s economy: 1. Areas (census block groups) zoned for non-residential uses that are located in or adjacent to areas considered to be high-poverty. 2. Areas in which a significant portion of the land (40%) is zoned for industrial use. 2. The proposed amendment is in response to changes in state law; N/A 3. The proposed amendment constitutes a substantial benefit to the City as a whole and is not solely for the good or benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time; The proposed amendment will focus economic development resources toward areas that together constitute approximately one quarter of all land in the city. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with other identified Plan policies and adopted area plans; The proposed amendment is consistent with these key Comprehensive Plan policies: Policy LU 11.2 Location of Industrial Areas Accommodate industrial uses including municipal public works facilities in areas that are well buffered from residential uses (and other sensitive uses such as schools), easily Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 3 CP-2-16

accessed from major roads and railroads, and characterized by existing concentrations of industrial uses. Such areas are generally designated as General Industrial on the Future Land Use Map. Policy ED 1.1 Corridor Revitalization Stimulate the revitalization and redevelopment of Raleigh s aging commercial corridors and centers through the use of targeted economic development programs, zoning, land use regulations, public investments in infrastructure, and incentives. Policy ED 2.1 Neighborhood Reinvestment Encourage reinvestment to improve existing neighborhoods and to attract skilled workers to Raleigh. Policy ED 2.3 Focusing Redevelopment Focus redevelopment efforts on a small number of neighborhoods each year. Continue public involvement until the economics shift and private investment can take over. Policy ED 2.4 Attracting Investment to Emerging Neighborhoods In neighborhoods with little private investment and low social and economic indicators, encourage additional development and density to enhance these neighborhoods and create a larger market base to support more and better goods and services for existing and new residents. Policy ED 2.5 Blight Abatement Reverse conditions of decline and deterioration that have affected some older areas of Raleigh. These conditions are detrimental to economic and equitable growth. Policy T 4.1 Promoting Transit Promote and support quality transit services to enhance mobility options and to meet the needs of the City s residents and visitors, with a focus on transit-dependent households. Policy ED 5.11 Targeting Investment Target incentives and programs for public and private investments in residential, commercial, and industrial areas based on criteria evaluating need and effectiveness. Need is demonstrated by socio-economic indicators and evidence of physical disinvestment. Effectiveness means that the target area is appropriate and ready for economic development. 5. The impact the proposed amendment has with regard to: A. Established property or proposed development in the vicinity of the proposed amendment; The proposed amendment is specific to two broad geographies - high-poverty areas where non-residential zones predominate, and areas where industrial zones predominate. The proposal to dedicate economic development resources to these geographies will improve their economic performance, in addition to improvements to the built environment and public realm. B. Existing or future land use patterns; The proposed text amendment is consistent with land use goals and policies contained within the Comprehensive Plan. With regard to industrial areas, the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 4 CP-2-16

proposal encourages the clustering of industrial uses, a key recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding areas zoned for non-residential uses that are also considered high poverty, the proposal will strengthen the performance of nonresidential uses. C. Existing or planned public services and facilities; The proposed amendment will focus economic development resources in the targeted areas. Increased public and private investment in businesses and communities will lead to improved public services and facilities in those areas. D. Existing or planned roadways; The proposed amendment will attract development, which typically devotes resources to improving roadways in the vicinity of the development. E. The natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation; The concentration of industrial land uses, a key component of the proposed amendment, limits potential negative impacts of such uses on the city at large. Investments in both target geographies could lead to cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval based on the above list of considerations for the Planning and Development Officer s review. STAFF COORDINATOR: Charles Dillard charles.dillard@raleighnc.gov Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 5 CP-2-16

CR# Case File: CP-2-16 Certified Recommendation of the City of Raleigh Planning Commission SUBJECT: REQUEST: CP-2-16 Comp Plan Amendment The proposed change would amend the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION: FINDINGS AND REASONS: The attached document represents the recommended revisions as a result of Planning Commission deliberations and discussion. To PC: Case History: To CC: City Council Status: Staff Coordinator: Charles Dillard: (919) 996-2651; charles.dillard@raleighnc.gov Motion: Second: In Favor: Opposed: Excused: This document is a true and accurate statement of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission. Signatures: (Planning Director) (PC Chair) Date: Date: CP-2-16 PC Certified Recommendation 1 March 21, 2016

Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition A request to amend the 2030 Comprehensive Plan text, maps or content. Planning and Development One Exchange Plaza 1 Exchange Plaza, Suite 304 Raleigh, NC 27602 Phone 919-996-2626 Fax 919-516-2684 Applicant Information Name Address City State Zip Phone Fax # Email Requested Amendment Future Land Use Map (Cite all affected parcels below.) Plan Text (Cite relevant section/page below.) Area Plan Map/Text (Cite all affected parcels and relevant section/page below.) Other Map (Specify name/map number.) Brief Description of Amendment: The undersigned applicant(s) hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, all information supplied with this application is true and accurate. Signature Date Signature Date Office Use Only File # CP- Fee Paid Check # Received By Page 1 of 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition revision 02.16.15

Directions for Filing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition 1 2 Filing a Petition: A petition must be clearly and accurately written or typed. Petitions may be filed in person at One Exchange Plaza or by mail: Planning & Development PO Box 590, Raleigh, NC 27602. Petitions to amend the Comprehensive plan must be approved by the City Council, upon a recommendation by the Planning Commission. Submittal of a Comprehensive plan amendment must be in accordance with the filing schedule (coming soon). Fee: A fee as specified on the Development Fee Schedule must be submitted with this petition. Fees are due at the time of petition submittal, and are nonrefundable. Information That Must be Submitted with Petition A Description of requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Clearly explain the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. If the request is to alter the Plan text, cite the section, page number and policy or action short title. Suggested text amendments should be submitted in blackline or strikeout format (text recommended to be removed should be strikethrough, added text should be bold). If the request is to alter the future land use map, list all affected parcels (by PIN or address), area of request, the current designation and recommended designation. Suggested amendments to any map should be described and illustrated. List any applicable area plans that provide detailed guidance for the property, with any suggested amendments. The Comprehensive Plan can be found online at www.raleighnc.gov/cp B Conditions that warrant the plan amendment Describe the conditions that warrant the plan amendment such as unforeseen circumstances or the emergence of new information, unanticipated changes in development patterns, rezoning, transportation improvements, economic opportunities, etc. C Relevance of the amendment to the Plan s six vision themes (1. Economic Prosperity and Equity 2. Expanding Housing Choices 3. Managing Our Growth 4. Coordinating Land Use and Transportation 5. Greenprint Raleigh 6. Growing Successful Neighborhoods and Communities) Explain how the amendment addresses the six guiding themes of the Comprehensive Plan. D How the amendment advances public health, safety and general welfare Explain how the amendment advances and protects the general health, safety and welfare of the citizens. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Checklist Please check off each space or N/A for not applicable. Submit all required documentation to the Planning Department. Checklist Completed N/A Had pre-application meeting with Planning staff to discuss proposal Completed and signed petition Attached map clearly showing boundaries of area and requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment Attached written statement that addresses subsections A, B, C and D Applicable fee (make check or money order payable to: City of Raleigh) Additional information as required (traffic study, etc.) Page 2 of 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition revision 02.16.15

Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition (CP-1-16) Accompanying Information A. Description of requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan includes replacing the existing Map ED- 1: Target Areas for Economic Development (Element D: Economic Development, Section D.5: Economic Development and Land Use, page 156), with a new map that utilizes revised economic development criteria. Additionally, the proposed amendment includes revisions to the text box on page 155: Areas of Intervention: a Geographic Focus for Economic Development. Both the map and the text box are located within Element D: Economic Development, Section D.5: Economic Development and Land Use. The proposed new Map ED-1 is attached. The following Text Box revisions are suggested: Areas of Intervention: A Geographic Focus for Economic Development An analysis of Raleigh was conducted to identify areas that demonstrate a need for economic development intervention and that also present opportunities for economic development. Areas were scored according to a number of variables. Each of these areas appears on Map ED-1: Target Areas for Economic Development. Areas shaded in red orange correspond to geographies, measured in block groups, that meet one or both of the following criteria: 1. Census Block Groups in which 40% or more of the Block Group are zoned for nonresidential uses; and that are considered high poverty or are adjacent to high poverty block groups. 2. Census Block Groups in which 40% or more of the Block Group are zoned for industrial use. with both an abundance of housing code violations and instances of tax arrears (need), as well as concentrations of underutilized land (opportunity). The map is an illustrative tool based upon quantitative analysis and is intended to provide the City with an identification of under-performing areas that can benefit from economic development activities. See Section 4.7 of the Community Inventory (Volume II) for more details about this analysis B. Conditions that warrant the plan amendment The proposed amendment is warranted as it reflects a revised focus on non-residential geographies, especially those areas that are zoned for industrial uses. Furthermore the revised criteria utilizes United States Census and Department of Housing and Urban Development metrics for poverty that provide greater transparency and legibility than the criteria that are used for the existing Map ED-1. In addition to revised criteria, the proposed new map utilizes Census

Block Groups with clear boundaries, providing for improved map legibility over the current map s shaded, undefined boundaries. C. Relevance of the amendment to the Plan s six vision themes. 1. Economic Prosperity and Equity The proposed amendment is relevant to this vision theme in a number of ways. First, a primary focus of this vision theme is equity. The proposed new target areas for economic development include areas in which poverty is prevalent, or where areas of poverty are located within close proximity. By targeting development activities and tools in high-poverty areas, the city would be promoting business and labor expansion in areas currently lacking adequate labor and economic resources. Siting new and expanding businesses in poor communities provides for new job opportunities for those communities populations. Second, by targeting economic development activities in industrially-zoned areas of the city, Raleigh is promoting diversity, equity and innovation, key values of this vision theme. Industrial businesses provide well-paying job opportunities for local residents who lack higher education. Additionally, industrial businesses are a primary source of innovation, and targeting economic development tools in industrial areas will increase Raleigh s profile as a city of innovation, especially in high-tech, clean-tech and green-tech, three sectors identified within this vision theme. 2. Expanding Housing Choices The proposed amendment is relevant to the vision of expanded affordable and workforce housing options in that it targets development activities in areas that suffer from high incidences of poverty, thereby focusing resources that will expand job opportunities for impoverished and underemployed communities. 3. Managing Our Growth The proposed amendment promotes quality growth in that it targets economic development resources to existing communities, thereby promoting infill development and redevelopment of underutilized areas of the city. Furthermore, by targeting existing industrial areas, the proposed map and text revisions will concentrate development resources in existing industrial areas and will discourage development of new industrial areas in inappropriate locations. 4. Coordinating Land Use and Transportation The proposed map revision identifies target areas that coincide with many areas identified on the city s growth framework and transit plan maps. Targeted economic development activities in these areas will promote intensification along existing and proposed transit lines, and will encourage infill rather than greenfield development on the city s edges. Additionally, many of the city s industrial areas are located along rail lines. Thus, targeting economic development resources in these areas will encourage the expanded use of rail and decreased use of roadways for freight and cargo transportation. 5. Greenprint Raleigh Sustainable Development By targeting economic development resources in industrial areas, particularly for businesses engaged in innovative green technologies, this amendment will promote continued sustainable development. Furthermore, by targeting resources in existing

communities, the amendment will promote sustainable infill development, thereby limiting unsustainable outward growth. 6. Growing Successful Neighborhoods and Communities Successful neighborhoods are places where people can live, work and play. By targeting economic development resources in areas with high incidences of poverty, the proposed amendment will promote infill development that includes expanded job opportunities, as well as opportunities to redevelop underutilized and blighted properties. Furthermore, by promoting expanded job opportunities within communities, the proposed amendment would create new opportunities for multi-modal and active transportation patterns, thereby reducing reliance on automobiles. D. How the amendment advances public health, safety and general welfare 1. Public Health The proposed amendment promotes public health in that in it seeks to expand access to jobs and economic resources for diverse, underemployed and impoverished population groups, thereby providing greater financial security that improves access to health care, quality food, and education. Additionally, targeting economic development resources to innovative industrial sectors could reduce reliance on businesses with large negative environmental impacts and could improve the overall environmental performance of the city s industrial economy. 2. Safety Safety is a topic that encompasses issues of crime, transportation and environmental risk, among others. The proposed amendment advances and promotes crime prevention and fighting policies and actions of the city by targeting investment in communities that currently suffer from high incidences of poverty. Encouraging redevelopment of blighted properties, more prevalent in poor communities, would both improve perceptions of safety but would also eliminate potential underobserved locations where crimes frequently occur. With regard to improved access to job opportunities in impoverished communities, the proposed amendment would give residents of poor communities viable employment options that could discourage them from engaging in illegal activities that are prevalent in such communities. Furthermore, improving the financial stability of communities generally promotes a greater sense of ownership and provides more eyes on the street, a critical element in a community s crime-fighting effort. With regard to transportation safety, the proposed amendment targets economic development resources in areas that have high incidences of poverty and a lack of job opportunities. The result is that many residents of these communities are forced to drive to other communities for work, placing strain on existing transportation networks. Increased job opportunities within communities could reduce trip times and pressure on the city s roadways, thereby reducing traffic accidents and costly delays. Finally, the proposed amendment would target resources in established industrial areas, and would discourage the development of new industrial areas in close proximity residential populations. City policies promote the isolation of high-impact industrial operations; the proposed amendment would further encourage this practice.

Additionally, targeting resources for sustainable and innovate industrial businesses would create a safer industrial economy overall. 3. General Welfare The proposed amendment would have the effect of expanding economic opportunity in both impoverished communities and industrial business areas. A diverse and geographically dispersed economy will help Raleigh to achieve the visions and themes of the Comprehensive Plan. Cities thrive when all of its communities are economically stable; the proposed amendment will help stabilize and secure the city s impoverished and industrial communities.