Planning Grant Training February 20, 2015



Similar documents
Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender

The Justice Reinvestment Initiative

Part I Improvements to Existing Programs

Data Management Plan. County of Sonoma CCP Data Management and Evaluation Sub-committee

Program Narrative. effectiveness of state and local criminal justice systems by providing a centralized and impartial

Community Supervision in Texas

External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

Associated Industries of Florida. Getting Smart on Juvenile Crime in Florida: Taking It to The Next Level

Austin Travis County Integral Care Jail Diversion Programs and Strategies

Illinois General Assembly Joint Criminal Justice Reform Committee

TRAVIS COUNTY DWI COURT JUDGE ELISABETH EARLE, PRESIDING

How To Help Mentally Ill Offenders In The Criminal Justice System

Stearns County, MN Repeat Felony Domestic Violence Court

Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Mental Health & Addiction Forensics Treatment

The Collaborative on Reentry

EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 2015

Adult Redeploy Illinois

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

County of San Diego Public Safety Realignment & Post-Release Community Supervision. Preliminary 2011 Implementation Plan

SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency.

Criminal Justice Study Consensus Questions

Statement of Policy - The Goals of Drug and Veteran Treatment Courts The Idaho Legislature established the following goals for problem solving courts:

Offender Screening. Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services

San Francisco Sex Offender Management Alliance (SFSOMA)

Michigan Drug Court Recidivism. Definitions and Methodology

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE

Adult Mental Health Court Certification Application

2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

MANDATORY SUPERVISION COURT: Blueprint for Success

O H I O DRUG COURT EVALUATION

Working Paper # March 4, Prisoner Reentry and Rochester s Neighborhoods John Klofas

Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015

National Trends: Policy Initiatives

Jail Diversion & Behavioral Health

A Preliminary Assessment of Risk and Recidivism of Illinois Prison Releasees

POTTER, RANDALL AND ARMSTRONG COUNTIES DRUG COURT: A VIABLE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCE

5-Year Strategic Plan Revised, 2010

DUTCHESS COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA

Mental Health Court 101

Statistics on Women in the Justice System. January, 2014

YORK COUNTY TREATMENT COURTS COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment

Manatee County Drug Court Overview. The Drug Court concept began in 1989 in Miami-Dade County in response to the crack

8:30 a.m. Welcome Becky Cook Kendall, Executive Director, Rockford Health Council

Criminal Justice 101 and the Affordable Care Act. Prepared by: Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition

How To Start A Community Corrections Program

RICHLAND COUNTY DRUG COURT

Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013

httpjlceo.lacounty.gov

All Interested Parties Erik Jonasson, Fiscal Analyst Drug Treatment Courts and Swift and Sure Sanctions Programs

DECRIMINALIZATION OF CANNABIS. An overview of national, state and local government policy considerations

2015 Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for State Prisoners Program Request for Proposals (RFP) CFDA Number:

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SECOND CHANCE ACT (SCA)

Pierce County. Drug Court. Established September 2004

ABA COMMISSION ON EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL SANCTIONS

The FUNDAMENTALS Of DRUG TREATMENT COURT. Hon. Patrick C. Bowler, Ret.

Alternatives to Pretrial Detention: Southern District of Iowa

COMMUNITY SAFETY VICTIM RESPECT OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY

THE SOUTH DAKOTA 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT AN OVERVIEW NEW MEXICO PRESENTATION

[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

ATLANTIC JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DRUG COURT

The Impact of Arizona s Probation Reforms in 2010

Reform of the Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Impact on Criminal Justice

VETERANS TREATMENT COURTS BEST PRACTICE ELEMENTS

OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES

Criminal/Juvenile Justice System Primer

Appendix I. Thurston County Criminal Justice Treatment Account Plan

How To Participate In A Drug Court

Governor Jennifer M. Granholm,

Building A Reformed Criminal Justice System: The Sequential Intercept Model

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION REPORT September 8, 2005

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL

Transcription:

Planning Grant Training February 20, 2015 Mary Ann Dyar, Program Director Lindsey LaPointe, Program Manager

Overview 1. Background of Adult Redeploy Illinois (ARI) 2. Basics of planning grant process 3. Uses of planning grant funds 4. Planning grant timeline and requirements 5. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Crime Reduction Act Current criminal justice system is not effective and is unsustainable more than half of people released from prison return within 3 years Being smart on crime involves understanding why people commit crimes and addressing underlying criminogenic needs Statewide information sharing across the criminal justice system is mandated, calling for the adoption of standardized validated assessment system (RANA) It is less expensive and more effective to treat low-level offenders in their communities, reserving prison space for violent criminals Adult Redeploy Illinois, based on successful juvenile model, increases alternatives to incarceration for non-violent offenders

Adult Redeploy Illinois Goals Reduce crime and recidivism at a lower cost to taxpayers Provide financial incentives to counties or judicial circuits to create effective local-level evidence-based services Encourage the successful local supervision of eligible offenders and their reintegration into the locality

ARI Program Infrastructure Adult Redeploy Illinois Oversight Board Funding (federal grant, state appropriations) Staffing (Program Director, Program Manager, 2 P-T Technical Assistance Providers - retired judges) Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority (ICJIA) support with data, research, evaluation Application process (planning, implementation grants) Performance measurement plan

22 ARI sites 24 programs 39 counties

ARI Program Models Problem-solving courts Drug Courts Mental Health Courts Veterans Courts Targeted interventions for probation violators Intensive supervision with services

ARI Key Components Validated assessment of risks, needs and assets Evidence-based practices Individualized case management Cognitive behavioral therapy Behavioral health treatment and support services Graduated sanctions and incentives Performance measurement and evaluation

ARI Planning Grant Basics Up to $30,000 available per grantee 90-120 day funded planning process to explore possible implementation of a local ARI program Counties or groups of counties are eligible to apply At close of grant, grantees submit a local implementation plan using the standard plan template available at the ARI web site: www.icjia.org/redeploy.

Uses of ARI Planning Grants Hiring strategic planning consultant or outside facilitator Performing outside or in-house data analysis Convening stakeholders Providing team training (bringing in a trainer for a group of local stakeholders, or travel to an established training or conference) Conducting site visits to observe successful diversion programs inside or outside Illinois Community resource mapping

Relevant trainings for planning teams American Association for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence 2015 Conference March 2015 Atlanta, GA National Council for Behavioral Health 2015 Conference April 2015 Orlando, FL 2015 National TASC Conference on Drugs, Crime, and Reentry May 2015 St. Petersburg, FL University of Cincinnati Corrections Institute Annual Training Institute May 2015 Cincinnati, OH Full list of trainings scheduled before June 30, 2015 available from ARI staff upon request

Data for ARI Planning Grants County-level data available at website under Site Tools County demographics and characteristics Relevant criminal justice indicators Suggested program-eligible individuals IDOC holding offense class

ARI Planning Grant Stakeholders Judges (Chief, felony, problem solving court) Probation and Court Services Stakeholders of any current diversion programs Prosecutors and public defenders Law enforcement local police or Sheriff s Office, jail representatives County board representation Treatment providers

Community Engagement Community and county mental health providers/708 Board Community substance abuse providers and TASC County public health representatives Community housing providers/homeless service providers Veteran s Administration representatives Employment/workforce development representatives Other community social service providers Faith-based communities Other community groups

ARI Funding Timeline Submit planning grant materials by March 6, 2015 Begin planning grant period no later than April 1, 2015 Complete planning grant period no later than June 30, 2015 Submit local implementation plan (standard plan template) no later than June 30, 2015 Respond to SFY16 ARI Implementation RFP for 9-12 month grants* *Contingent upon SFY16 state appropriation level

Importance of Planning Grant Process Planning processes lead to stronger implementation plans Planning process can lead to new and unexpected directions for ARI implementation grants ARI and ICJIA staff can provide technical assistance and guidance during planning process Planning processes can help ensure a future ARI program addresses local needs and fits with local criminal justice infrastructure Planning processes help build local commitment and collaboration Planning grantees often spend less funds than budgeted

Testimonials Seven members of the planning committee team went to do a site visit at the Center for Court Innovation (NYC) with very different ideas about a successful court model and came back from the visit with a sense of urgency, enthusiasm and an agreed upon structure and direction for the new court. Large county planning group stakeholder A true collaborative and community approach was employed to prepare the Adult Redeploy FY 14 grant application. Over the past 90 days of the planning grant, key stakeholders really came together and worked collectively to develop a comprehensive plan and budget for implementation of the proposed specialty court. Circuit wide planning group stakeholder The Illinois Center of Excellence for Behavioral Health and Justice was contracted and delivered a comprehensive, two-day training. The presenters provided information and technical assistance aimed at helping the stakeholders design a specialty court that is responsive to the needs of non-violent felons with a mental health disorder. Group work was completed by each County such as resource mapping exercises, and identifying sanctions, resources and gaps. Training participants worked collectively to create process flow charts and logic models that identified inputs, activities, participants, target population and short, intermediate and long term outcomes and impacts for the proposed problem solving Court. Planning for implementation was addressed by identifying the key stakeholders responsible for implementation of the plan for each County. Circuit wide planning group stakeholder

ARI Reporting Requirements Planning grantees submit monthly fiscal report, quarterly data reports, and a closeout report Monthly fiscal reports (due 5 th of month) Quarterly data reports (due 15 th of month) Completed local plan (due last day of grant period) Close out report (due within 30 days of the grant end)

ARI Local Plan Mini-strategic plan Executive Summary Description of and Justification for the Target Population Description of the Planning Partners Description of Gaps in Sanctions and Services Description of the Proposed Adult Redeploy Illinois Program Model (including incorporation of existing ATIs and human services, and use of EBPs) Timeline Budget

ARI Target Populations Overall ARI-eligible population based on the average number of commitments to the Illinois Department of Correction (IDOC) during the last three calendar years for non-violent, probationable offenses Jurisdictions can carve out a specific target population out of larger, ARI-eligible population. Required 25% reduction goal calculated based on the locally defined target population. Strong planning process can lead to a specific ARI-eligible target population that matches with target evidence-based interventions outlined in local plan

Example target populations Macon County based on total ARI-eligible population ARI-eligible individuals admitted to IDOC Total suggested program-eligible individuals SFY11 297 SFY12 202 SFY13 245 AVG 248 25% reduction goal 62 2 nd Circuit Judicial Circuit based on smaller target population ARI-eligible individuals admitted to IDOC Total suggested program-eligible individuals Class 3s and 4s only SFY11 262 138 69 SFY12 255 140 70 SFY13 268 155 78 AVG 262 145 73 25% reduction goal 19 *Drug court eligible *The Second Judicial Circuit has defined Drug court eligible as an estimated 50% of ARI-eligible Class 3 and 4 IDOC commitments

Application documents Letter on official letterhead Amount requested Basic proposed planning grant activities Key stakeholders involved Project timeline and time period covered Cover Page (template available at website)* Budget (template available at website)* Applications submitted electronically to ARI staff at maryann.dyar@illinois.gov or lindsey.lapointe@illinois.gov *Accessed through ARI website: http://www.icjia.org/public/redeploy/planning_grant_notice.cfm

FAQs Q: On the cover page, what is the program title and agreement number? A: The program title is Adult Redeploy Illinois Planning Grant and ARI staff will assign a number when processing materials. Provide a previous agreement number if ARI funds have been previously received in this jurisdiction. Q: On the cover page, what are implementing agencies, program agencies, authorized officials and fiscal contacts? A: The county is the implementing agency and the County Board President is the authorized official. The program agency is the lead agency on the grant (most often Court Services or Probation) and the Chief Judge is the program agency s authorized official. The fiscal contact person can be the Director of Court Services, a Grants Manager or an Administrative Assistant. Q: What are CAGE codes and DUNS numbers? A: A CAGE Code and DUNS number is automatically produced when an entity signs up on www.sam.gov for a CCR (registration), required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, which guides funding decisions through the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority (ICJIA) where Adult Redeploy Illinois is housed. All grantees and sub grantees of ICJIA must be registered at www.sam.gov.

FAQs Q: If we do planning a grant, do we have to apply to be a site? A: No, there is no obligation to respond to an implementation RFP. Q: When will we know about a SFY16 state appropriation? A: The state budget and state appropriation is expected to be known in June after Memorial Day. Q: Can ARI funds be used to keep a problem solving court running if other funds are expiring, such as federal funds? A: Yes, other counties have used ARI funds for this purpose as long as funds go to programming for prison bound offenders so not misdemeanants.

Q: Is this webinar available online? FAQs A: Yes, the webinar slides will be posted on the Adult Redeploy Illinois website as of the close of business on Monday, February 23 rd at the Resources and Publications tab. http://www.icjia.org/public/redeploy/ Q: Who do I contact for more information or future questions? A: Please feel free to contact program staff: Mary Ann Dyar, Program Director, Adult Redeploy Illinois 312-793-8949 Maryann.dyar@illinois.gov Lindsey LaPointe, Program Manager, Adult Redeploy Illinois 312-793-0895 Lindsey.lapointe@illinois.gov

Questions? Thank you for your interest in Adult Redeploy Illinois!