E-Ethics Approval application process



Similar documents
CHILDREN AND ADULTS SERVICE RESEARCH APPROVAL GROUP

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) INVESTIGATOR GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS

SUPPORT STAFF DISCIPLINARY AND DISMISSAL PROCEDURE

Address Co-Principal Investigator Information Co- Principal Investigator Faculty Staff Grad. Student Undergrad. Student

DISPUTE RESOLUTION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR TEACHING & SUPPORT STAFF IN SCHOOLS

Sample Peer Mentoring Handbook

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

one Managing your PBX Administrator ACCESSING YOUR PBX ACCOUNT CHECKING ACCOUNT ACTIVITY

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Grievance Policy. 1. Policy Statement

APAC Accreditation Assessment Summary Report. Psychological Sciences and Statistics (PSS) Date of determination 11 April2 014

NATIONAL JOINT COUNCIL FOR STAFF IN SIXTH FORM COLLEGES

PROCEDURE Police Staff Discipline. Number: C 0901 Date Published: 9 May 2013

How to Raise a Complaint Introduction

Automated Funding Proposal

Dublin City University Business School Ph.D Scholarship Scheme Guidelines for Applicants

TribeHR: Employee Training Last updated: 1 October 2013

Work with your prospective supervisors to complete your application.

Building Event Registration Forms in DonorSnap

Professional Development Office. Navigating the Symplicity System

How To Become A Doctor Of Philosophy (Clinical Psychology)

Postgraduate degrees. In 2010, a fifth of geography graduates returned to university to undertake postgraduate study.

Birkbeck, University of London. Student Complaints Policy and Procedure

Proportionate Review (PR) IRAS Application & Documents. Authorisations & Signatures. Contact CBS Team

Frequently Asked Questions

DISCIPLINE & GRIEVANCE WORKSHOP DECEMBER 2011

APAC Accreditation Assessment Summary Report

COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES STUDENT ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT POLICY Effective April 29, 2009

ATTENDANCE AGREEMENT NATIONAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN ROYAL MAIL AND THE CWU

MONMOUTHSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DATA PROTECTION POLICY

DISCIPLINARY POLICY. APPROVED BY South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Quality and Governance Committee

Accreditation at Highly Accomplished and Lead Teacher. Information for Referees

Redundancy & Redeployment Policy. Transformation & Human Resources

Grass University Degree Application Process

Recognition of Prior Learning

Programme Specification ( )

Accredited Body Report CPA Australia. For the period ended 30 June 2013

1. INTRODUCTION SCOPE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES REPRESENTATION INVESTIGATIONS SUSPENSION...

UAF-UAA Joint PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology with Rural, Indigenous Emphasis Outcomes Assessment Goals, Objectives, and Benchmarks

Code of practice for mediators

Prepared by the Policy, Performance and Quality Assurance Unit (Adults) Tamsin White

CSci application information for self-guided route

City of De Pere. Halogen How To Guide

Document 12. Open Awards Malpractice and Maladministration Policy and Procedures

Procedure for applying to BUE- LSBU PhD Programme

Stonefish Online Recruitment System

APAC Accreditation Assessment Summary Report

Incident Investigation Guidelines

GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN THE FACULTY OF PHARMACY INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTARY POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

Securing safe, clean drinking water for all

PhD Rules and Procedures

Human Subjects Research at OSU

PLAGIARISM POLICY. Regulations on Unfair Practices and Disciplinary Action & Procedure

Research Ethics Guidelines. Contact:

VII. Masters Degree Progress Regulations, Taught and Research (excluding MPhil programmes)

Invoice Cloud Frequently Asked Questions

Questions and Answers for using MyCareCouncil

Application for Employment

MASTER'S DEGREE EXIT PROJECT GUIDELINES

Faculty of Science and Engineering Ethics Committee Expedited Form for research involving human participants

I. Definitions of Membership Categories... p.2. II. Society Dues Structure p.4. III. Chapter Rosters p.5. IV. Membership Reports p.

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT Bachelor of Computer Science (Honours) Information for Students

Guidelines for Mentors and Students. The Ongoing Achievement Record (OAR)

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Mass Announcement Service Operation

Clinical Psychology Graduate Program The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada

My Aged Care Assessor Portal User Guide. Part Two: Team Leader, Assessor, Delegate and Delegate Support Functions

Turquoise Equities. Rule Book. Issued 3 July 2016

Contents. Introduction. Creating a list. Growing your list. Managing unsubscribes. Handling spam complaints. Managing bounces

CAPABILITY AND POOR PERFORMANCE PROCEDURE

BUSINESS CHICKS, INC. Privacy Policy

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Skype for Business User Guide

National Standards for Disability Services. DSS Version 0.1. December 2013

EMMA Application v. 4.9 User Manual

Emircom Knowledge Base Management system (EKBMS)

Creating a Transfer of Human Ethics Clearance Application

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Fitness to Practise Panel. Date: 12 January Medical Practitioner

IV. Masters Degree Progress Regulations, Taught and Research (excluding MPhil programmes)

Self Service User Guide

RESEARCH GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

ONLINE APPLICATION GUIDELINES Last Updated: December 9, 2015

Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs Registration guide for New Entrepreneurs

Registration Guide- New entrepreneurs

A step-by-step guide to making a complaint about health and social care

Care service inspection report

Procedure 1B.1.1 Report/Complaint of Discrimination/Harassment Investigation and Resolution

Helpful Links 8 Helpful Documents 8 Writing History 9 Pending Peer Reviews 9 Navigation Tabs 10 Changing Courses 10

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Trainer's guide to the PTS e-learning system

Appendix 1. This appendix is a proposed new module of the DFSA Rulebook. Therefore, the text is not underlined as it is all new text.

Wentworth Institute of Technology Cooperative Education Student Handbook 1

Transcription:

E-Ethics Approval application process 1. Who should complete an E-Ethics form? An E-Ethics Approval application must be submitted by researchers (undergraduate, masters students, PhD students and staff) prior to commencing any research involving human participants, personal data and animals. The E-Ethics form is the formal university record that confirms researchers have considered and developed plans to address the ethical issues associated with their research. You should complete the E-Ethics form after you have discussed ethical issues with your research advisor/supervisor or research team. You are encouraged to consult the Geography Ethics Committee for advice at any stage prior to completing /should the forms, especially for Track B applications. 2. What are the responsibilities and penalties regarding E-Ethics approval? It is the responsibility of the researcher to commence and complete the processes for ethical approval. It is the responsibility of research supervisors to ensure the researchers they are supervising have completed the appropriate ethical approval process prior to commencing research. Ethical approval cannot be given once the study has started. Failure to engage meaningfully with the University of Exeter ethics procedures, including completing an E-Ethics form, is considered a matter of academic misconduct and may result in penalties. These range from the reduction of marks for the implementation of methodology in submitted work to the prospect of legal action for breaches to data and child protection laws. 3. Where can I find the E-Ethics form? The online form can be accessed via the Geography Ethics Committee pages: For students http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/currentstudents/ethics/ For staff at http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/staffarea/ethics/ Or, you can go directly to the form via http://www.exeter.ac.uk/staff/ethicalapproval/ You will need to log in (sometimes twice) using your Exeter id and password. 4. What happens to the E-Ethics form after I have submitted it? Once you have completed the forms (see below) it is sent to your research advisor/supervisor for review and approval. It will then be sent to the Geography Ethics Committee. If the information supplied is to the satisfaction of the supervisor and Ethics committee, your form will be approved and you should receive an email notification, after which you can start your empirical research. The E-Ethics form will be returned to you for further information if the details you have provided about your planned research methods and the means by which you will address ethical issues in your research are not clear and complete. It is quite common for forms to be returned. 1

5. Flow Chart of Process The E-Ethics system allows for applications to follow either Track A or Track B. Dependent upon the question answers, Track A or B will be automatically selected. It is expected that the majority of undergraduate and taught masters dissertations should follow Track A. Track A is intended for studies which: a) Involve low ethical risk procedures, subjects and/or individuals (i.e. 18 years or above). b) Do not involve children or vulnerable adults. c) Are not intrusive when involving animals. d) Do not involve direct individualised DNA analysis e) Do not involve novel exercise protocols or substantially modified protocols. f) Include only non-invasive procedures for human test subjects. Track B is intended for all studies excluded by Path A. 2

6. Step by step guide to making an E-Ethics Approval application a. Accessing the E-Ethics form Go to http://www.exeter.ac.uk/staff/ethicalapproval/ and log in using your Exeter id and password. You will be asked to select your discipline select Geography. You will then be able to create new application. Applications can be saved at any point and returned to at a later date. N.B. For the form to work correctly you will then need to navigate using the previous and next bottom of the form. Do not use the tabs at the top of the form to create a new application. b. Details This section asks for details of the project, researcher and supervisor. For type of project, please select from staff, masters, PhD or undergraduate project as appropriate. The researcher completing the form should enter their email as the correspondent s email. For researchers based in Exeter research group is likely to be Human (Streatham). You should select this as a default. The project supervisor is your dissertation advisor, the principal investigator of funded research, or the research group lead. 3

c. Summary You will be asked to provide a 400 word summary of your research and the methods that you will use to investigate them. This summary should be brief and needs to be understood by someone who is not an expert in this research field. You must specify your research methods. Focus groups, interviews, participant observation, textual analysis, online methods and so forth all raise different ethical issues. The form will be return to you if you do not explain the methods you intend to use in your research. At the end of this section is a drop down box in which you should select Track A for research that has no significant ethical considerations or Track B for research which raises more complex ethical issues (See Section 5). N.B. The answers to later questions may override your selection. d. Consent You will be asked a number of questions: select yes, no, n/a (not applicable) as appropriate. The form assumes you are a psychology researcher, not a geographer. Please answer the first question as being about general research aims and methods, not limited to experimental procedures. You must answer all the questions. Your form will not be approved unless you have answered all of these questions, even if the answer is not applicable. If you have answered no to any of these questions you must explain why in the box at the end of the page. An example: If will be undertaking research that includes observation of a shopping centre you may select Track A and answer the question If the research is observational, will you ask participants for their consent to be observed? with no. Your explanation would likely turn on the research topic, practicalities and/or data being anonymised. 4

e. Participants You will be asked if your project involves deliberately misleading participants or whether there is a risk of participants experiencing either physical or psychological distress or discomfort in the process of research. This section is targeted at experimental psychological research and is less likely to be relevant to geography research. However, if you are working with vulnerable people and/or on researching on sensitive issues you should use the drop down boxes to explain how you intend to provide help and support to people who may experience problems (e.g. details of local support groups provided on information sheet). f. Groups You will be asked if any of the participants in your research are in, what are judged to be, vulnerable groups. Again, your form will not be approved unless you have answered all of these questions, even of the answer is no or not applicable. Your answers to these questions may result in further drop boxes. If you are working with local schools you will be directed to University of Exeter Partnerships Director. Contact with local schools is centrally managed to prevent overburdening local communities with research requests. If you answer yes to either questions about working with under 18s or vulnerable groups, you will be automatically directed to Track B, even if you previously selected Track A. 5

g. Animals If your research involves working with animals, other social studies looking at human/animal interactions with no potential animal harm, you should seek the advice of the Geography Ethics Committee. h. Track A or Track B This is the section where you summarise the ethical issues in your research and what you will do to address these. Both Track A or Track B applicants should complete all the boxes in this section. So long as you have navigated the page using the previous and next tabs the form will automatically stream your application to the appropriate track. Track A You will be asked to confirm there your project has no significant ethical implications that need to be bought before the ethics Geography Ethics Committee. Tick yes if you agree there are no significant ethical issues that require further committee discussion. Even if you tick yes, you must still complete the text box beneath. All research involving human subjects involves some ethical issues. You should explain what you consider to be the ethical issues arising in your research and how you will mitigate these. You should not try to hide or ignore ethical considerations. At the very least this should include your protocols for gaining informed consent, assuring confidentiality and issues of data management (e.g. https://www.exeter.ac.uk/media/level1/academicserviceswebsite/it/recordsmanagementse rvice/research_dp_guidance_200912.pdf) Please ensure you complete this box or your form will be return to you. 6

Track B You will be asked a number of further questions which elicit more detailed responses on what the significant ethical issues are and how you are mitigating and proposing to handle these. Please discuss these with your supervisor prior to filling in this form. Your responses should be clear, concise, and informative. If your research involves mixed methods please ensure the links between different methods, ethical issues and ethical working practices are clear. If your research involves working with children and young adults; adults who may lack the capacity to consent (due to cognitive disability or temporary incapacitation, e.g. through drugs/alcohol); research in health or social care settings or the management of offenders you are strongly advised to consult the committee at an early stage. Students must do this. You should also notify the Geography Ethics Committee that you will be submitting a Track B proposal. These are discussed at one of the Committee meetings. You must book a slot with the committee to ensure your proposal can be discussed in a timely way. 7

i. Attachments You should use this section to upload the documents relevant to your ethical working practices. This will include information sheets and consent forms used to recruit participants. If your research is being conducted within an organisation, workplace or school, you should also upload confirmation of their consent. The ethics committee will check these are supplied, but you should consult your research supervisor for their assistance in developing simple, clear and appropriate information and consent forms for your research. Please only upload word documents with short file names. j. Save or Submit You have the option of saving your work in order to return to it at a later date. Before you submit your form please ask yourself the following questions: Have I talked through these ethical issues and working practices with my research supervisor? Have I included the planned research methods and location in my research summary? Have I completed the boxes on ethical issues and ethical working practices for both Track A and Track B applications explaining consent procedures and data protection issues? Have I uploaded permissions, information sheet and consent form? These are the most common reasons why forms are returned to researchers for further information. 7. How long will it take to process my E-Ethics form? Track A applications are sent to supervisors to approve, before being forwarded for review to the chair of the Geography Ethics Committee. This process will depend on staff time and availability and can take up to two weeks in normal circumstances, though you may hear earlier. You should check staff availability prior to submitting E-Ethics forms during vacations if you require approvals within two weeks, as annual leave may result in the process taking longer than two weeks. If your research is likely to require Track B approval you should contact the Chair at an early stage for advice and to book a slot at the relevant ethics committee meeting. The committee meets in October, December, February, May and June (please contact the chair for dates). The E-Ethics form should be completed and signed by the supervisor at least a week before the Committee meeting. You are reminded that ethical approval cannot be given once the study has started. 8. What are the possible outcomes from my E-Ethics application? The E-Ethics system allows for the following outcomes: Approval of a submission as it stands; Return of a form for revision due to missing or unclear information; Accept the project subject to specified alterations; Reject the project proposal. You can log on to the system to follow the progress of your application. 8

9. Can I appeal against the decision made by the Geography Ethics Committee The Geography Ethics Committee will try and work with all researchers to devise appropriate ethical working practices. A researcher has the right to appeal in writing against a decision made by the Geography Ethics Committee within ten working days of the notification of that decision. There are two grounds for such appeal: a) Where the researcher feels that the Committee has been unfair in its consideration of a proposal and/or has not properly understood it; b) Where there have been any irregularities in the procedures adopted by the Committee. The Chair will convene a meeting of the Committee with the researcher to review the proposal and the grounds for the decision. This meeting should normally be held within ten working days of notification of the appeal. There will be at least two Committee members in addition to the Chair in attendance. At this stage the Discipline Ethics Committee may: Up-hold its original decision to reject the proposal; Up-hold the appeal of the researcher and approve the original proposal; Up-hold the appeal of the researcher but refer the decision until appropriate revisions have been made to the proposal. Following an unsuccessful appeal, and where the researcher is dissatisfied with the decision of the Committee, researchers have the right to submit a final appeal to the University Ethics Committee. 10. Who do I contact for further information? If your questions concerns readings and resources for developing ethical research practices in geography, please consult your research supervisor in the first instant. If you have questions about the formal process of applying for E-Ethical approval please contact the Chair of the Geography Ethics Committee (Gail Davies, g.f.davies@exeter.ac.uk) or other relevant members of the Geography Ethics Committee (see http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/staffarea/ethics/). 9