Key Information. QP or Partial QP Determination



Similar documents
MIPS. ACR Issues Analysis of Proposed MACRA MIPS Rule

5/19/2016 MIPS AND MACRA: MAKING SENSE OF THE NEW REGULATIONS AND PAYMENT SYSTEMS. No Disclosures AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program

Overview of Physician Payment System Reforms in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (H.R. 2)

CMS is requesting information to aid in the planning and implementation of the MIPS in the following areas:

CMS Listening Session: Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)

MIPS Performance Scoring: Understanding How CMS Proposes to Calculate Performance Is Key to Preparing for MIPS Participation

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) Summary of SGR Repeal and Replacement Provisions

MACRA & APMs: More than Acronyms June 2, 2016

Transforming Healthcare through Data-Driven Solutions. Pay for Performance Solutions

A MACRA Overview. A web discussion with guests Ivy Baer, Gayle Lee, and Tanvi Mehta of AAMC

Compliance Audit Tool

March 28, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

Understanding Meaningful Use. Review of Part 1 and Part 2

Repeal the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), avoiding annual double digit payment cuts;

Basis and Purpose Definitions Application Eligibility... 11

Medicaid EHR Incentive Frequently Asked Questions

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 H.R. 2

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rule

HIMSS Public Policy Initiatives in 2015: Using Health IT to Enable Healthcare Transformation Jeff Coughlin Senior Director Federal & State Affairs

Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Repeal and Replace: Comparison of 2014 and 2015 Legislation

Medicaid Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use Audits. Lisa Reuland, Program Manager October 22, 2015

CMS QCDR (Qualified Clinical Data Registry) and Other Ways PPRNet Can Help with Value-Based Payment

Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) Proposed Rule Summary March 31, 2011

STATEMENT OF ACHIEVING THE PROMISE OF HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR & PENSIONS

February 26, Dear Mr. Slavitt:

Meaningful Use Updated Sajid Ahmed MPD/ PDM 1

Andy Slavitt Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Issue Brief. CMS Finalizes Rules for Medicare Shared Savings Program (ACOs) KEY POINTS COMMENT

Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015

Reinsurance, Risk Corridors, and Risk Adjustment Final Rule

CMS FINALIZES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM

THE EVOLUTION OF CMS PAYMENT MODELS

The Rise of the Machine: The Role of Data & Analytics in New Healthcare Delivery Models

Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) and the NC Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Summary of Final Rule Provisions for Accountable Care Organizations under the Medicare Shared Savings Program

February 24, 2012 (202) CMS PROPOSES DEFINITION OF STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) TECHNOLOGY

Mount Sinai Care: A Medicare Shared Savings Program Primer. Brett Bernstein, MD, AGAF, FASGE Medical Director, Provider Partners of Mount Sinai IPA

Re: CMS 3323 NC, Request for Information (RFI): Certification Frequency and Requirements for the Reporting of Quality Measures Under CMS Programs

THE LANDSCAPE OF MEDICAID ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODELS

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions July 1, 2009

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Supporting Meaningful Use. July 22, 2010

EHR Meaningful Use Incentives for School-Based Health Clinics

Request for Information on Assessing Interoperability for MACRA (HHS-ONC )

To: From: Date: Subject: Proposed Rule on Meaningful Use Requirements Stage 2 Measures, Payment Penalties, Hardship Exceptions and Appeals

Frequently Asked Questions: Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Payment Program

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Public Health Clients

Testimony of Charles Jarvis, Vice Chair of the HIMSS EHR Association. House Ways and Means Committee, Health Subcommittee

Eligible Professionals User Guide for the Georgia Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

WHEN COVERAGE ENDS AND CONTINUATION OF COVERAGE

Transcription:

HIMSS MACRA NPRM Fact Sheet Alternative Payment Models: Qualifying Alternative Payment Model Participant & Partial Qualifying Alternative Payment Model Participant Determination Key Information During a QP performance period, a group of eligible clinicians participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APM) may be determined to be a Qualifying Alternative Payment Model Participant (QP) or Partial QP. The group of eligible clinicians does not need to have relationships with each other. Instead, the group of eligible clinicians needs only to have relationships with the Advanced APM Entity. The QP Performance Period is the full calendar year that aligns with the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) performance period. The QP Performance Period concludes one year and one day before the payment year. This timeframe gives Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) the opportunity for meaningful QP assessment and ensures operational alignment with MIPS. QP or Partial QP Determination The QP determination occurs at the group level of individual eligible clinicians who are identified as part of an Advanced APM Entity. If the collective Threshold Score of the eligible clinician s group meets the relevant QP threshold, all eligible clinicians in that group would receive the same QP determination for the corresponding Performance Period. Thus, the eligible clinicians in that group would either be QPs or partial QPs. The Medicare Option is the only option available during the first two years of the program (payment years 2019-2020). Beginning in 2021, CMS will apply the All-Payer Combination Option only to the following: o An Advanced APM Entity group of eligible clinicians or o Eligible clinicians who do not meet either the QP Payment Amount or Patient Count Threshold under the Medicare Option, but meet the lower Medicare threshold for the All-Payer Combination option. CMS determines the eligible clinician group s QP status (i.e., QP or partial QP) by calculating the Threshold Score and comparing the Threshold Score to the relevant QP Threshold or Partial QP Threshold. The QP (but not the Partial QP) will be excluded from the MIPS payment adjustments. Eligible clinicians who do not meet the QP threshold but reach the Partial QP threshold for a year will be considered to be Partial QPs. Partial QPs have the opportunity to decide whether they wish to be subject to a MIPS payment adjustment. Please refer to Figures E, F, and G in the Appendix, which illustrate whether an eligible clinician will be determined to be a QP or a Partial QP by CMS.

Payment Rates for QPs (after the group of eligible clinicians is determined to be QPs) For payment years 2019-2024, the QP will receive a lump sum payment equal to 5 percent of the estimated aggregate payment amounts for Medicare Part B covered professional services for the prior year. For payment years 2026 and later, payment rates under the Medicare physician fee schedule for services furnished by the eligible clinician will be updated by the 0.75 percent qualifying APM conversion factor. Partial QPs and Election to Report to MIPS If the group of eligible clinicians participating in the Advanced APM Entity is determined as a group to be Partial QPs, then the Advanced APM Entity must make an election each year on behalf of all of its identified participating eligible clinicians on whether to report under MIPS. Accordingly, the decision of whether to report and subsequently be subject to MISP adjustments should be made at the group level. The Advanced APM Entity may change its election for a year at any time during the QP Performance Period. However, the election becomes permanent at the close of the QP Performance Period. Additional Information CMS will notify both Advanced APM Entities and their participating eligible clinicians of their QP and Partial QP status as soon as the determination has been made and validated. CMS will also issue a public notice on the CMS website that such determinations have been completed for the applicable QP Performance Period. Resources Executive Overview HIMSS Fact Sheets Contact Lee Kim, Director of Privacy and Security at lkim@himss.org

APPENDIX FIGURE E from the MACRA NPRM (Section II.F.5).

FIGURE F from the MACRA NPRM (Section II.F.5).

FIGURE G from the MACRA NPRM ( Section II.F.5).