LECET MARKET SUMMARY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DEPLOYMENT



Similar documents
New Map Book

Operating Pipeline Companies Ohio Valley & Southern States Region by State & Pipeline Company

FYI: Natural Gas Issues in California. April 2001

Canadian Natural Gas Exports and Promotion of Cleaner Energy in the US Market

A Look at Western Natural Gas Infrastructure During the Recent El Paso Pipeline Disruption

Lyons Canyon Ranch Draft Environmental Impact Report

Conventional Pipeline Station Work PIPELINE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

Spectra Energy Builds a Business

Houston Contracting Company, Inc.

PIPELINE EMERGENCY CONTACT DIRECTORY

North American Natural Gas Midstream Infrastructure Through 2035: A Secure Energy Future

Tres Palacios Natural Gas Storage Acquisition Overview. September 7, 2010

PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )

Major Projects Pipelines (U.S. & Canada)

PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )

PROJECT EXPERIENCE Development/Transaction Support United States MANAGING DIRECTOR

ALASKA NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PROJECT

Natural Gas Pipeline Regulation: Costs and Benefits of the Canadian Approach Glenn Booth Chief Economist National Energy Board Gold Coast, July 2004

Led by growth in Texas, the Southeast, and Northeast, power burn is headed for a January record

METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE

About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines Transporting Natural Gas

Outlook for the North American and Ontario Gas Markets

Displacement of Coal with Natural Gas to Generate Electricity

Modeling the US Natural Gas Network

Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC Response to New York State Energy Highway RFI

QUARTERLY FOCUS: NATURAL GAS EXPORTS TO MEXICO

Utilities - Electric

TO ALL HOLDERS OF NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY S FERC GAS TARIFF, SIXTH REVISED VOLUME NO. 1

Natural Gas Monthly. October Office of Oil, Gas, and Coal Supply Statistics U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585

Supply Options for the U.S. Northeast

5. Natural Gas Pipeline Network: Changing and Growing

Additions to Capacity on the U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Network: ,462 21,270 5,000 4,000 3,000. Miles 2,000 1,000

LNG Poised to Significantly Increase its Share of Global Gas Market David Wood February 2004 Petroleum Review p.38-39

DANIEL J. LAWTON LAWTON CONSULTING B.A. ECONOMICS, MERRIMACK COLLEGE M.A. ECONOMICS, TUFTS UNIVERSITY

Expanding Natural Gas Service: Opportunities for American Homes and Business

S Y S T E M M O D E R N I Z A T I O N

Legend. Cochin. Pacific 3 CALNEV NGPL KMCO 2. Pacific. KM Te KMTP. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America-NGPL (KMI) NGPL Natural Gas Storage (KMI)

Natural Gas Futures Trading Markets

Platts 3 rd Annual Midstream Development & Management Conference - Houston, Texas

Suzanne Minter. Manager, Oil and Gas Consulting BENTEK Energy. Natural Gas Outlook

Gulf Natural Gas Region

Complete Project Inspection. Construction Management and Inspection Services Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Controls

Natural Gas: Winter Abundance! and Some Confusion

University of Denver, MBA, Business Administration, 1973 Regis University, BS, Business Administration, 1972

J.P. Morgan Energy Conference

Offshore Alabama Prepared by the University of South Alabama MBA Consulting Group in December 2010

BDCOWAIV UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT

National Regulatory Conference May 20, The Role of Natural Gas in Electric Generation

CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS:

Brubaker & Associates, Inc. Testimony Filed Since 1999 by Michael Gorman on Cost of Capital Issues

Natural Gas Monthly. May Office of Oil, Gas, and Coal Supply Statistics U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585

Smart Modernization Pipeline Safety & Natural Gas Infrastructure Expansion

SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING, PARTS (d) and (d)

Office of Energy Projects Energy Infrastructure Update For February 2014

Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC

Final Abandonment Costs For PNGTS Transmission Plant

Renewable Energy Mandates Cost Texas Consumers. Bill Peacock Texas Public Policy Foundation

Form 10-K. El Paso Corporation

CHAPTER 3: NATURAL GAS IN MONTANA: CURRENT TRENDS, FORECASTS AND THE CONNECTION WITH ELECTRIC GENERATION

LONG-TERM ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE TO SERVE ELECTRIC GENERATION NEEDS WITHIN ERCOT

COMMERCIAL FINANCE ASSOCIATION. Annual Asset-Based Lending and Factoring Surveys, 2008

HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDS SIGNATORY TO THE NATIONAL RECIPROCAL AGREEMENT

141 FERC 61,117 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

STATE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION RATES IN 2009 FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE

NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

Railroad Job Vacancies Reported to the RRB June 21, 2016

APPENDIX A RETENTION OF BLACK HILLS CORPORATION S NONUTILITY BUSINESSES

Regional Gas Market Update

Global Shale Energy Development: Expanding Economics, Trends, and Implications

Comanche Trail Pipeline Project. September 2015

8. Network Usage and Growth

Pipeline Safety Information Critical Information for Public Officials

Copano Energy Reports Fourth Quarter and Year End 2010 Results

2014 APICS SUPPLY CHAIN COUNCIL OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT EMPLOYMENT OUTLOOK

(713) (713) (24-hour media line) (713) Date: May 3, 2013

Keeping Our Options Open: Markets for Canadian Crude and the Pipeline Dilemma

Spectra Energy Reports Second Quarter 2007 Results

Remarks of Terrance J. Fitzpatrick President and CEO Energy Association of Pennsylvania March 10, 2011

Spectra Energy Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2007 Results

Comments and Responses of North Baja Pipeline

Natural Gas Summit 11/14/12

Spectra Energy Reports Third Quarter 2007 Results

Spectra Energy Reports Second Quarter 2014 Results Quarter in Line with Company Plans; On Track to Exceed Full-Year EBITDA Targets

FACTS THE Methane Emissions Update

First Quarter EnergyIQ. Summary of Energy Industry M&A and Capital Markets Activity. AmherstPartners.com

DIRECT TESTIMONY GEORGE L. DONKIN BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CASE NO G-42T AND CASE NO G-PC ON BEHALF OF

APICS OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT EMPLOYMENT OUTLOOK REPORT SUMMER 2013

PIPELINE ROUTING PERMIT. For A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DAKOTA AND RAMSEY COUNTIES ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY D/B/A XCEL ENERGY

Presentation to the State of Alaska Legislature. Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) NPV Analysis and Results

A Preliminary Investigation Into the Cost of Reducing Fuel Risk in the MISO Midwest Footprint

A Case for Midstream Energy

Natural Gas Market Centers: A 2008 Update

Natural Gas Diversification Strategy for PREPA GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR PUERTO RICO

Natural Gas Market Centers and Hubs: A 2003 Update

The Gathering Exemption Under the Natural Gas Act

On-Site vs. Off-Site Electric Power Supply in Refineries in the USA: The Use of Cogeneration in Texas and Louisiana

Natural Gas Pipelines

Natural Gas Year-In-Review 2006

June2015. Publishedby: PennsylvaniaPublicUtilityCommision P.O.Box3265 Harisburg,PA

Issue. September 2012

Transcription:

LECET MARKET SUMMARY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DEPLOYMENT MARKET FUNDAMENTALS The market for the construction of natural gas pipelines continues to be strong and promises significant growth in the United States and Canada. The apparently insatiable thirst for a relatively clean energy source, particularly for electric power production, insures an expanding demand for new and upgraded pipelines. These pipelines will include new large bore transportation lines which move the gas from the well head sources to the regional users such as utilities where the gas reaches customers via smaller distribution lines. Natural gas frequently provides several advantages over other fuels Environmentally acceptable Clean burning and less polluting Efficient burning-lower fuel costs Proven safe and sensible fuel Available in required quantities Low transportation costs Efficient distribution system Potential price stability (given adequate expansion) Laborers are traditionally involved in the deployment of gas pipelines of varying sizes Owners are typically publicly regulated (i.e., FERC) firms engaged in the transportation and/or distribution of natural gas. A sampling of firms engaged in interstate transportation include: El Paso (53,700 miles) Colorado Interstate Gas - Cypress Natural Gas Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Mojave Pipeline Southern Natural Gas - Gulf States Pipeline Co. ANR - Florida Gas Transmission 50%

Duke (11,931 miles) Texas Eastern (9,088 miles) - Alabama-Georgia Energy System Algonquin (1,064 miles) - Florida Gas Transmission-50% East Tennessee (1,129 miles) - Gulf Stream Natural Gas System-50% Maritimes & Northeast (650 miles) - West Coast Energy Williams (27,300 miles) Northwest Pipeline - Buccaneer Gas Pipeline-50% Transcontinental Gas Pipeline - Gulf Stream Nat. Gas-50% Texas Gas Transmission - MAPCO Pipeco (formerly Enron) (30,000 miles) Northern Natural Gas - Mid-western Gas Northern Border Pipeline - Calypso Pipeline Florida Gas Transmission Co. - Transwestern Pipeline PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric) - Florida Gas Transmission-50% Buccaneer Gas Pipeline-50% Kinder Morgan (30,000 miles) Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Horizon Pipeline Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Trans. - Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline - Northern Gas Company Trailblazer Pipeline Co. - KN Watternburg Red Cedar Gathering Company (owns 49% with S. Ute Indian Tribe) Transcolorado Gas Transmission Reliant Energy (56,020 miles) Reliant Energy ARKLA Reliant Energy Minnegasco Entex Ni Source, Inc. (12,750 miles) Bay State Gas Columbia Gas of KY Columbia Gas of MD Columbia Gas of OH Columbia Gas of PA Columbia Gas of VA Columbia Gas Trans. Co. Cross Roads Pipeline Co. Columbia Gulf Trans. Co. Note: The total for these top seven owners is 221,701 miles of pipelines or approximately 74% of the total existing interstate pipeline capacity in the U.S.A. Contractors: Murphy Bros., Sheehan Pipeline Co., HC Price Construction, Henkles & McCoy, ARB, Delta Gulf, Miller Pipeline, Michaels Pipeline Co., Welded Construction Skill/Training Requirements for Pipeline Deployment: Compaction Rigging Cutting & Burning Trenching & Shoring Safety Pressure Piping Techniques Hydrostatic Testing Gravity Flow Piping System Utility Line & Grade 2 Stringing & Tallying Pipe Road Boring Pipe Coating Pipe Repair

National Fuel Gas Company - Seneca Resources Corporation - Horizon Energy Development, Inc. - Empire State Pipeline (purchased from Duke Energy, October 3, 2003) (157 miles) - National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation Enterprise Products Partners - Acadia Gas (purchased from Coral Energy April, 2001) (1042 miles) - Mapletree, LLC (purchased from Williams, August 1, 2002) - Oaktree, LLC (purchased from Williams August 1, 2002) - MidAmerica Pipeline (purchased from Williams July 31, 2002) (7,226 miles) - Seminole Pipeline (purchased from Williams July 31, 2002) (1,281 miles) Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. - Enbridge Pipelines, (Lakehead) L.L.C. (3,300 miles) - Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama) L.L.C. (111 miles) - Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.L.C. (2,251 miles) - Enbridge Pipelines (Texas) - Enbridge Pipelines (Louisiana) - Enbridge Pipelines (North Dakota) L.L.C. (950 miles) - Enbridge Pipelines (MidLA) - Enbridge Pipelines (AL/TN) L.L.C. (281 miles) - Enbridge Pipelines (KPC) L.L.C. (1,120 miles) - Pan Grande Pipeline, L.L.C - Mid LA Gas Transmission, L.L.C. - H&W Pipeline, L.L.C. - Texana Pipeline Company - Vector Pipeline (through Energy Transportation North) - Alliance Pipeline ( purchased from Williams, October 30, 2002) AIG Highstar Capital, L.P. - Southern Star Central Corporation - Southern Union Panhandle - Central National Gas Pipeline (purchased from Williams November 15, 2002) - CMS Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Corporation (purchased from CMS Energy 1 st quarter 2003) TransCanada Pipe Lines, Ltd (24,00 miles) - Northern Border Pipeline Co. - Tuscarora Gas Transmission Co. MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company - Northern Electric & Yorkshire Electricity (UK) - CalEnergy - Northern Natural Gas - Kern River Gas Transmission Company (purchased from Williams, March 27, 2002) (927 miles) (Updated 5/22/03) 3

SHORT TERM MARKET OUTLOOK Demand for natural gas in North America is accelerating rapidly. This will tax all resources and services related to bringing the product to users. In the years 2000 2002 the average growth rate for demand is anticipated to be 3.4% per year, vs. 0.9% per year between 1994-1999. (Source: Energy Information Administration, May 2001.) % Growth Rate for the years of 1994-1999 and 2000-2002 4 4 3.5 3.5 3 3 2.5 2.5 2 2 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 1994 1999 0 2000 2002 What s Driving the Market? 90% of new power plants being built today burn natural gas, because design, permitting and construction costs are extremely competitive relative to the alternatives. Proposed natural gas pipeline expansion projects for 2001 and 2002: Western - 15 projects Midwest - 15 projects Southwest - 9 projects Northeast - 21 projects Central - 11 projects Southeast - 16 projects Consumption of natural gas in the United States in 2001 will approximate 22.6 trillion cubic feet (tcf) with North American reserves currently recognized and estimated at 300 tcf. This represents a very tight Reserve Life Index (RLI) of less than 9.0 years supply. Recoverable resources are estimated to grow another 300 tcf over the next ten years. Prices are expected to remain high in the near term, averaging close to $4.00 to $5.00 / MMbtu in 2001. Concerns exist, however, that if prices remain at these levels, a form of re-regulation might be imposed upon the market price. While production and consumption growth is expected, current construction of transmission pipelines and storage facilities appears to be lagging. 4

LONG TERM MARKET OUTLOOK Over the next 15 to 20 years, new natural gas pipelines are estimated to involve about 301,000 additional miles representing approximately $150 billion in construction costs. This includes 38, 000 miles of new gas transportation lines and 263, 000 miles of new distribution lines. Growth in natural gas consumption is expected to continue, reaching a 62% increase by 2020 over the year 2001. Much of this growth is expected on the industrial side, particularly in power generation. Each $1 million of new natural gas pipeline construction represents approximately 2 person years of employment for laborers (4000 hours). Over the next 20 years, $150 billion of pipeline construction will generate approximately 600,000,000 person hours of employment in the laborer category or about 12% of the total expenditure. This works out to 15,000 laborers employed per year. Present employment hours for LIUNA members in all types of pipeline construction is approximately 6 million hours annually (2000). Market share is difficult to measure precisely in this industry, but assuming a market share of 50%, 7,500 LIUNA members per year would be required, in contrast to the approximately 3,000 currently employed. A relatively slow start in the initial years is anticipated as energy needs are further defined. Even an extremely cautious estimate of labor demand will more than double the need for LIUNA members in the future. Market share increases would obviously increase the employment opportunities significantly. Additionally, considerable maintenance and upgrading of existing natural gas pipelines will take place supplementing the above estimates. About 200,000 miles of interstate gas pipeline is currently operational. Maintenance is covered by operator Qualification Regulations. Similar growth is anticipated in Canada in new pipeline construction which has an existing base of over 347,000 miles of gas and oil pipelines. Significant new construction will be required to move supplies through and to the United States. Also, it should be noted that some of the figures mentioned here may include Canadian construction costs for pipelines originating in Canada. 5

MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS All decisions relative to the construction and maintenance of pipelines are made by the owners who are making their decisions based on price and scheduling. Currently, we rely on union contractors to market their companies to owners who make presentations on the advantages of their individual companies and not necessarily on the advantages of using union labor. Whatever reputation unions have with the owners, can be largely attributed to signatory contractors and their experience with them. Since there are seven major owners who control approximately 74% of the U.S. pipeline capacity, it is recommended that LIUNA, in conjunction with other interested unions if necessary, develop a marketing campaign aimed directly at these firms. As part of this effort, we need to take the necessary steps to deliver a skilled productive workforce. This includes the ability to recruit and train the necessary workforce and to document the experience and qualifications of workers who are already involved in pipeline construction. 6