I N F 0 R M A T I 0 N



Similar documents
v. : Criminal Number: IRINA ZELIKSON : Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1349 and 982(a)(7) I N F O R M A T I O N

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) No. 14 CR vs. ) Violation: Title 18, United States Code, ) Section 1347 CHARLES DEHAAN ) COUNT ONE.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CR-LENARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by Indictment, the.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury, in and for the District of New Jersey,

2004R01432/JWD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:07-cr RWS-CCH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR.THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT INDICTMENT GENERAL ALLEGATIONS. The Medicare Program

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Jose L. Linares INFORMATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT y. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. INFORMATION. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DATE FILED: I N F O R M A T I O N COUNT ONE

. 4 " ~ f.".2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. December 19,2003. Our Reference: Report Number A-O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

BORIS SOKHA : Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 and Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201 I N F O R M A T I O N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO:

) (28 u.s.c. $ 2a6l(c))

* Criminal No

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City, Kansas, Docket)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Minnesota

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless. 1. Donald & Co. Securities Inc. ("Donald & Co.") was

Case 2:14-cr AJS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Charging, Coding and Billing Compliance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:05-cr BBM-ECS Document 9 Filed 07/05/2005 Page 1 of 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

. I. EA~f~~~. g y li!j LJO SKO :=o:- ..,'Ii9. b~., _ !11M+I!it~~ i 1 5 CR 0 0

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. : Criminal No. 08- I N F O R M A T I O N

VIDANT HEALTH POLICY & PROCEDURE. PREPARED BY: Office of Audit & Compliance REVISED: 11/09, 2/12 REVIEWED: 2/07, 2/08, 2/09, 3/10, 2/11

CASE 0:14-cr JRT-JSM Document 1 Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT DISTRJCT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Filed: Violations: 15 U.S.C U.S.C.

FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS. 1) Federal False Claims Act (31 USC )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR MAIL FRAUD AND WIRE FRAUD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COUNT ONE. THE SPECIAL AUGUST GRAND JURY charges:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION INDICTMENT COUNTS ONE THROUGH SIX. The Scheme to Defraud

Medicare Since early in this century, health care issues have continued to escalate in importance for our Nation. Beginning in 1915, various efforts

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

FEB To facilitate identification, please refer to report number A in all correspondence relating to this report.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : DATE FILED:

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Touchstone Health Training Guide: Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DMSION ) ) Filed: ) ) CRIMINAL INFORMATION

False Claims / Federal Deficit Reduction Act Notice Help Stop Healthcare Fraud, Waste and Abuse: Report to the Firelands Corporate Compliance Officer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

To file a claim: If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact our Claim office at

How To Get A Medical Bill Of Health From A Member Of A Health Care Provider

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

Case 3:14-cr AWT Document 39 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT.

v. 18 u.s.c and 2

VNSNY CORPORATE. DRA Policy

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 09- v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 11-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:05-cv CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18

Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act

COUNT ONE. Conspiracy to Commit Bank Robbery. 1. On or about March 29, 2013, in the Southern

Coffee Regional Medical Center FALSE CLAIMS EDUCATION

CENTERLIGHT HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY. SUBJECT: Detection & Prevention of Fraud, Waste & Abuse POLICY NO.:

FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS

Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

II. After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

COUNT 1. The SPECIAL AUGUST 2012 GRAND JURY charges: a. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. was a Chicago-based

Summary Plan Description FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Appendix L: Nebraska s False Medicaid Claims Act Nebraska Statues Chapter 68 November 2013 Section Terms, defined.

How To Get A Medical License In Michigan

Comment [1]: BDERIV. Comment [2]: EDERIV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Stanley R. Chesler. 18 u.s.c u.s.c u.s.c. 2

BCBSM MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE MANAGED CARE PROGRAM

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. : v. : Crim. No. : JOHN F. BALLIRO : 18 U.S.C. 201(c), 371, 1001, : & 2 INDICTMENT

VILLAGECARE CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2007

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Transcription:

2008R00902/SBM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. 13- JOSE KATZ v. 18 u.s.c. 1349 18 u.s.c. 287 18 u.s.c. 2 I N F 0 R M A T I 0 N The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by indictment, the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey charges: The Defendant COUNT ONE (Health Care Fraud Conspiracy) 1. At various times relevant to this Information: a. Defendant JOSE KATZ, M.D. {"defendant KATZ"), resided in Closter, New Jersey and was a board-certified cardiologist licensed to practice medicine in the States of New Jersey and New York. b. Defendant KATZ was the founder, Chief Executive Officer, and sole equity-holder of Cardio-Med Services, LLC ("Cardio-Med"), and Comprehensive Healthcare & Medical Services, LLC {"Comprehensive Healthcare") {collectively, the "Katz Companies"), described in more detail below.

Co-Conspirator c. Mario Ronca!, a co-conspirator who is not charged as a defendant herein, resided in Woodland Park, New Jersey. Ronca! had a medical degree from San Juan Bautista School of Medicine in San Juan, Puerto Rico, but was not licensed to practice medicine in New Jersey or New York. d. In fact, Mario Ronca! applied for but was denied a medical license in New Jersey. Ronca! was advised that he was ineligible under New Jersey law to obtain a medical license in New Jersey, both because San Juan Bautista School of Medicine was not properly accredited, and because Ronca! lacked certain requirements for international medical students to be licensed in the United States. e. Mario Ronca! worked at the Katz Companies purportedly as a medical assistant. f. In fact, Mario Ronca! held himself out to patients of the Katz Companies as a licensed physician and performed functions that were permissible to be performed only by a licensed physician. - 2 -

The Katz Companies g. Cardio-Med provided cardiology, internal medicine, and other medical services to individual patients. Cardio-Med had offices in Union City, New Jersey; Paterson, New Jersey; and West New York, New Jersey. h. Comprehensive Healthcare provided cardiology, internal medicine, and other medical services to individual patients. Comprehensive Healthcare had offices in Manhattan, New York; and Elmhurst, Queens, New York. Medicare, Medicaid, and Private Insurers 2. At all times relevant to this Information: Medicare a. Medicare was a federal program established by the Social Security Act of 1965 to assist qualified aged, blind, and disabled individuals in paying for the cost of health care. The Medicare program worked by reimbursing health care providers for the costs of health care services and items at fixed rates. b. Medicare Part B provided supplemental medical insurance benefits to eligible beneficiaries for a variety of outpatient services, such as physicians' services and diagnostic testing. Medicare Part B was a "health care benefit program" as defined by federal law. c. Medicare Part B only paid for physicians' services, such as diagnosis, therapy, surgery, and consultations, if they were furnished by a doctor of medicine who was legally - 3 -

authorized to practice by the state in which he or she provided the services and who was acting within the scope of his or her license. d. Medicare "carriers" were regional companies that contracted with the government to oversee the administration and processing of Medicare policies and to serve as the primary point of contact for health care providers enrolled in the Medicare program. e. Medicare carriers assigned Medicare billing numbers called Provider Identification Numbers ("PINs") to health care providers who enrolled in Medicare. f. Defendant KATZ had PINs assigned by Medicare carriers for Cardio-Med's offices in New Jersey and Comprehensive Healthcare's offices in New York. Medicaid g. Medicaid was a jointly funded, federal-state health insurance program established by the Social Security Act of 1965 that provided certain health benefits to the disabled and individuals and families with low incomes and resources. Medicaid was a "health care benefit program" as defined by federal law. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield h. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield ("Empire BCBS") was a health insurance company offering coverage in New York State. Empire BCBS was the largest private health insurer in New - 4 -

York. Empire BCBS was also a "health care benefit program" as defined by federal law. Aetna Life Insurance Company i. Aetna Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates ("Aetna") offered health insurance coverage in New York State. Aetna was also a "health care benefit program" as defined by federal law. Relevant Medical Terms 3. At all times relevant to this Information: a. Coronary Artery Disease ("CAD") (i) CAD was the most common type of heart disease and occurred when the arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle became hardened and narrowed. {ii) CAD was caused by the buildup of cholesterol and other matter, called plaque, within the arteries' inner walls. As the buildup increased, less blood flowed through the arteries, and this could lead to chest pain, blood clots, or heart attack. {iii) Over time, CAD could weaken the heart muscle and cause heart failure or changes in the normal beating rhythm of the heart. b. Angina Pectoris ("Angina") (i) Angina was a symptom of CAD and was characterized by chest pain or discomfort that occurred when the heart muscle did not receive enough oxygen-rich blood. - 5 -

{ii) The most common form of angina was "stable angina," which had a regular pattern and occurred when the heart was working harder than usual. {iii) "Disabling angina" was a classification of angina where a patient experienced angina symptoms while performing everyday living activities. c. Enhanced External Counterpulsation ("EECP") {i) EECP was a non-invasive outpatient treatment for angina. {ii) EECP involved placing the patient on a treatment table and wrapping the patient's lower trunk and legs in three air cuffs, similar to blood-pressure cuffs, which inflated and deflated in synchronization with the patient's cardiac cycle. (iii) A full course of EECP usually consisted of 35 one-hour treatments. {iv) Medicare Part B would pay for EECP only for those patients who were diagnosed with disabling stable angina that was inoperable or for which surgery would be highly risky. - 6 -

The Conspiracy 4. From at least as early as in or about January, 2004, through in or about 2012, in the District of New Jersey, and elsewhere, the defendant, JOSE KATZ, did knowingly and willfully conspire and agree with Mario Roncal and others to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud health care benefit programs, namely, Medicare Part B, Medicaid, Empire BCBS, Aetna, and others, and to obtain, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, money and property owned by, and under the custody and control of, those health care benefit programs, in connection with the delivery of and payment for health care benefits, items, and services, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1347. Object 5. The object of the conspiracy was for defendant KATZ, Mario Roncal, and others to enrich themselves by billing Medicare Part B, Medicaid, Empire BCBS, Aetna, and others for unnecessary tests and unnecessary procedures based on bogus diagnoses, and for medical services rendered by unlicensed practitioners. - 7 -

Manner and Means 6. It was part of the conspiracy that defendant KATZ, from in or about July, 2006, through in or about February, 2009, spent more than $6 million for advertising on Spanish-language television and radio stations, which attracted hundreds of patients to the Katz Companies every day. From in or about 2005 through in or about 2012, Medicare and Medicaid paid the Katz Companies more than $70 million for their services, which included unnecessary diagnostic testing and unnecessary prescribed treatments, as described below. 7. It was further a part of the conspiracy that defendant KATZ ordered substantially the same battery of diagnostic tests for patients he treated, no matter the reason the patients were seeking treatment. These diagnostic tests were performed at the Katz Companies, which enabled defendant KATZ to bill Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers, including Empire BCBS and Aetna, for these services. 8. It was further a part of the conspiracy that defendant KATZ instructed employees at the Katz Companies who were not physicians to order and perform diagnostic tests for patients of other physicians at the Katz Companies, which patients defendant KATZ had not examined, even when those other physicians had not ordered the tests and therefore deemed the tests unnecessary. - 8 -

9. It was further a part of the conspiracy that defendant KATZ instructed his blood lab technician and others to order a "basic profile blood panel," which defendant KATZ personally created and which included approximately 30 tests, for every Medicare and Medicaid patient, irrespective of the reason the patient had sought medical care, whether the examining physician had ordered the panel, or whether the tests on the panel were reasonable and necessary for the treatment or diagnosis of the patient. These blood tests were performed at the Katz Companies, which enabled defendant KATZ to bill Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers, including Empire BCBS and Aetna, for these services. 10. It was further a part of the conspiracy that defendant KATZ falsified patient charts with fictitious and boilerplate symptoms and would falsely diagnose a majority of his Medicare and Medicaid patients with angina to justify prescribing unnecessary EECP treatments for those patients. In fact, defendant KATZ prescribed EECP treatments for patients even though some of those patients had contraindications for the treatment. These EECP treatments were performed at the Katz Companies, which enabled defendant KATZ to bill Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers, including Empire BCBS and Aetna, for these services. From in or about 2005, through in or about 2012, Medicare and Medicaid paid the Katz Companies more than approximately $15.6 million for EECP treatments. - 9 -

11. It was further a part of the conspiracy that defendant KATZ, because the Katz Companies had more patients than defendant KATZ could personally treat, ordered Mario Ronca! to treat patients, knowing that Ronca! was not licensed to practice medicine in New Jersey or New York. 12. It was further a part of the conspiracy that Mario Ronca!, at the direction of defendant KATZ, did: a. hold himself out to fellow employees and to patients as "Dr. Roncal;" b. examine new patients as well as defendant KATZ's follow-up patients; c. order diagnostic tests for patients; d. diagnose patients with medical conditions, diseases, and the like; and e. recommend and prescribe courses of treatment, including surgery, for patients. 13. It was further a part of the conspiracy that Mario Ronca!, at the direction of defendant KATZ, falsely diagnosed Medicare and Medicaid patients with angina and prescribed EECP treatments for those patients. 14. It was further a part of the conspiracy that Mario Ronca!, with the knowledge and consent of defendant KATZ, forged defendant KATZ's signature on paperwork associated with Roncal's unlawful services, including on patient charts. - 10 -

15. It was further a part of the conspiracy that defendant KATZ billed Medicare Part B and Medicaid for the services provided by Mario Roncal by submitting claims for payment to Medicare carriers using defendant KATZ's PINs as if defendant KATZ had provided the services, when in fact defendant KATZ had not provided the services and knew that Roncal had provided the services. All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349. - 11 -

COUNT TWO (False, Fictitious, and Fraudulent Claims to the Social Security Administration) 1. The allegations set forth in paragraph 1 of Count One of this Information are re-alleged and incorporated herein. The Social Security Administration 2. At all times relevant to this Information: a. The Social Security Administration ("SSA") was an independent agency of the United States that was, among other things, responsible for administering retirement, disability, and survivors benefit programs to eligible persons as defined by federal law and regulations, including the Social Security Act of 1935 and the Federal Insurance Contributions Act of 1939 ("FICA" }. b. Under FICA, earnings from work and the corresponding payment of federal withholding taxes for the requisite period of time entitled an employee to Social Security disability and retirement benefits. c. Employees reported their earnings and any payments of withholding taxes by attaching W-2 Wage and Tax Statement forms ("Forms W-2") to their annual federal income tax returns ("Forms 1040") filed with the Internal Revenue Service. These Forms W-2 were filed with the SSA through W-3 Transmittal of Wage and Tax Statements ("Forms W-3"}, which were transmittals to the SSA for purposes of recording earnings and accruing future benefits. - 12 -

d. FICA wages, also known as "Social Security wages," were those wages subject to FICA taxes, also known as "Social Security taxes." Employees paid Social Security taxes on their Social Security wages up to a maximum amount, which ranged between $87,900 and $106,800. The "No-Show" Employee 3. At all times relevant to this Information, A.K. was defendant KATZ's spouse and performed little or no work for the Katz Companies. The Scheme 4. At various times relevant to this Information: a. Defendant KATZ caused A.K. to be added to Cardio-Med's payroll, notwithstanding that A.K. did little or no work for Cardio-Med. b. Defendant KATZ caused to be transmitted to the SSA false Forms W-2 for calendar years 2005 through 2011 purportedly reflecting earnings from A.K.'s supposed work at Cardio-Med in an aggregate amount of approximately $1,251,604 and payment of FICA withholding taxes in connection with those earnings. c. The false and fraudulent Forms W-2 were transmitted by Forms W-3 to the SSA to satisfy eligibility requirements for disability and retirement benefits. - 13 -

5. From in or about 2006, until on or about March 14, 2012, in the District of New Jersey, and elsewhere, the defendant, JOSE KATZ, did make and present false claims, namely, Forms W-2 and W-3 for A.K. issued by Cardio-Med falsely representing that A.K. earned maximum Social Security wages from 2005 through 2011, for purposes of establishing eligibility for federal retirement and disability benefits, to a department and agency of the United States, namely, the Social Security Administration, knowing such claims to be false, fictitious, and fraudulent. All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 287 and Section 2. - 14 -

FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 1. The allegations contained in Count One this Information are hereby realleged and incorporated by reference for the purpose of noticing forfeiture pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a) (7). 2. Upon conviction of the offense contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1347, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349, charged in Count One of this Information, the defendant, JOSE KATZ, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a) (7), all right, title, and interest in any property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the offense of conviction. 3. If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant: a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty, the United States shall be - 15 -

entitled, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a) (7), to forfeiture of any other property of the defendant, JOSE KATZ, up to the value of the property described in the preceding paragraph. PAUL J. F~~~~~ ~~ United s - 16 -

Criminal No. 2013- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JOSE KATZ INFORMATION 18 u.s.c. 1349 18 u.s.c. 287 18 u.s.c. 2 PAUL J. FISHMAN UNITED STATES ATTORNEY NEWARK, NEW JERSEY By: Scott B. McBride Assistant U.S. Attorney 973-645-2708