Truven Health Analytics: Market Expert Inpatient Volume Projection Methodology



Similar documents
Massachusetts Acute Care Hospital Readmissions Profile: July, 2012 to June, 2013 Boston Medical Center September 2015

HAI LEADERSHIP PARTNERING FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE

Linking Quality to Payment

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Center for Health Information & Analysis (CHIA) Non-Governmental Application for Case Mix Data

Using Cost Accounting Data to Develop Capitation Rates

Using Medicare Hospitalization Information and the MedPAR. Beth Virnig, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Research and Professor University of Minnesota

Measure Information Form (MIF) #275, adapted for quality measurement in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations

New Health Analytics MS-DRG Grouper-Calculator-Analyzer

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION AND UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER REGARDING

Improving Hospital Performance

The Big Data Dividend

Florida Medicaid Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Hospital Performance Differences by Ownership

Abstraction 101 An Introduction for New Abstractors

Statewide Hospital Quality Care Assessment Frequently Asked Questions

THE LANDSCAPE OF MEDICAID ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODELS

MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS CENTRAL MA. Acute Care Hospital Utilization Trends in Massachusetts FY

FY2015 Final Hospital Inpatient Rule Summary

Total Cost of Care and Resource Use Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

your EHR s 3M Core Grouping Software

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing Programs

Hospital Financing Overview

CMS Readmission Penalties: Estimating the Impact of Socioeconomics and Race

Home Health Initiatives Reduce Avoidable Readmissions by Leveraging Innovation

Potentially Preventable Readmissions (PPRs) Policy and Calculations Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services July 31, 2012 (Revised)

Selection of a DRG Grouper for a Medicaid Population

A STRATIFIED APPROACH TO PATIENT SAFETY THROUGH HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

MedInsight Healthcare Analytics Brief: Population Health Management Concepts

Summary of Major Provisions in Final House Reform Package

ACA Premium Impact Variability of Individual Market Premium Rate Changes Robert M. Damler, FSA, MAAA Paul R. Houchens, FSA, MAAA

CMS Data Resources. Informing the Affordable Care Act. Jason Petroski, PhD, MPA Director, Division of Survey Management and Data Analysis

A predictive analytics platform powered by non-medical staff reduces cost of care among high-utilizing Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries

HCUP Methods Series Overview of Key Readmission Measures and Methods Report #

Proprietary information of MedCost, LLC. Do not distribute or reproduce without express permission of MedCost.

ZEPHYRLIFE REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING REIMBURSEMENT REFERENCE GUIDE

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

CMS Office of Public Affairs MEDICARE PROPOSES NEW HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM

MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS WESTERN MA. Acute Care Hospital Utilization Trends in Massachusetts FY

ICD-10 Compliance Date

MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS NORTHEAST MA. Acute Care Hospital Utilization Trends in Massachusetts FY

Florida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis

Results from the Commonwealth Fund s State Scorecard on Health System Performance Kansas in comparison to Iowa

Presented by Kathleen S. Wyka, AAS, CRT, THE AFFORDABLE CA ACT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RESPIRATORY C PROFESSION

The Role of Insurance in Providing Access to Cardiac Care in Maryland. Samuel L. Brown, Ph.D. University of Baltimore College of Public Affairs

What do ACO s and Hospitals want from SNF s and CCRC s

TECHNICAL HANDBOOK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND ENGINEERING VOLUME II - HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLANNING PART 11 - FACILITIES PLANNING GUIDELINES

Achieving Quality and Value in Chronic Care Management

Data Analysis Project Summary

HEALTH PRICE TRANSPARENCY IMPROVEMENTS FOR TEXAS CONSUMERS APRIL 15, 2014 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE STAKEHOLDER MEETING

IBA Business Analytics Data Challenge

Application of Information Systems and Secondary Data. Lynda Burton, ScD Johns Hopkins University

How Will Hospital Readmission Penalties Impact Skilled Nursing Facilities?

STATISTICAL BRIEF #151

Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database (APCD) May 18, 2011

Appendix A WORK PROCESS SCHEDULE HIM (HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT) HOSPITAL CODER O*NET-SOC CODE: RAPIDS CODE: TBD

PCMH and Care Management: Where do we start?

NAPH Summary of Proposed Medicare DSH Regulations

Specialty Excellence Award and America s 100 Best Hospitals for Specialty Care Methodology Contents

THE EVOLUTION OF CMS PAYMENT MODELS

Rotator Cuff Repair Surgical Procedures

Care Coordination at Frederick Regional Health System. Heather Kirby, MBA, LBSW, ACM Assistant Vice President of Integrated Care

See page 331 of HEDIS 2013 Tech Specs Vol 2. HEDIS specs apply to plans. RARE applies to hospitals. Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) *++

Estimating the Impact of the Transition to ICD-10 on Medicare Inpatient Hospital Payments

Westchester Medical Center Operating Budget

Value Based Care and Healthcare Reform

Medicare Physician Reporting: Beyond PQRS. Mary Patton Wheatley Senior Specialist, AAMC August 17, 2011

5/3/2016. Value-Based Purchasing in Minnesota Medicaid AGENDA

CHIA OVERVIEW OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ALL-PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE APRIL 2015 CENTER FOR HEALTH INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS

US Hospital Information Systems Overview and Outlook, Managing Information in an Era of Reform

The Promise of Regional Data Aggregation

Value-Based Purchasing Program Overview. Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012

The meeting was called to order at 5:27 by the Chairman of the Executive Committee, Joseph Szot, M.D.

MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING AND MUST BE RECEIVED OR POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER

Response to Serving the Medi Cal SPD Population in Alameda County

MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING AND MUST BE RECEIVED OR POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER

Leveraging Predictive Analytic and Artificial Intelligence Technology for Financial and Clinical Performance

CARE GUIDELINES FROM MCG

The Changing Landscape of Healthcare and What it means to you!

Washington Health Benefit Exchange. Leading Age 2014 Annual Conference. Phil Dyer Board Member

GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION EXECUTIVE RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES (ERRDS) ERRDS, HEALTH POLICY COMMISSION

Transcription:

Truven Health Analytics: Market Expert Inpatient Volume Projection Methodology Truven s inpatient volume forecaster produces five and ten year volume projections by DRG and zip code. Truven uses two primary data sets to produce these forecasts: current and projected demographic data from Nielsen Demographics, and inpatient claims data from private and public sources. Inpatient estimates project the total volume of annual acute care admissions and patient days by zip code, age group, sex, payer, and DRG for every market in the United States. To construct population-based use rates, Truven uses all-payer state discharge data for 24 states and Medicare (MEDPAR) data. Then, these rates are applied to demographic projections by zip code to estimate inpatient utilization for current and projected years. Truven uses hospital discharge data from 2010 and 2011 to create inpatient utilization rates by county, age group, gender, payer, and DRG. Then, to estimate the baseline volume of admissions and patient days that the population will demand, these use rates are multiplied by current (and projected) insurance coverage projections at the zip code level. This results in Truven s baseline estimate. In addition, Truven creates a second set of adjusted and trended estimates which take into account the effect of healthcare reform adjustments and DRG forecast trends. The primary impact of healthcare reform that Truven considers is the change in insurance coverage, particularly the increase in the number of adults covered by Medicaid. Truven conducted extensive research to determine the impact of health care reform at a local level. This research incorporates data on the impact of similar legislation that was implemented in Massachusetts, and the differences in current Medicaid coverage by state. Additionally, the projections include an adjustment for CMS readmission penalties starting in fiscal year 2013 and increasing in 2015. Truven projected a decrease (although not a complete elimination) in the number of readmissions after an initial admission of Heart Failure, Heart Attack (AMI), or Pneumonia (in 2013), and PTCA, CABG, COPD, or Other Vascular Surgery (added in 2015). Because the readmission may be for any condition, the projected admissions/readmissions rates for a wide range of conditions (not just the seven targeted conditions) decrease in 2013 and again in 2015. Different adjustments are calculated for the most common reasons for readmission, and planned readmissions were taken into account. The adjustments were spread over two years, 2012-2013 and 2014-2015, to take into account early adapter policies to reduce readmissions before the penalties apply. Beyond the health care reform adjustments, DRG specific forecast trends are overlaid on the estimates. The trends are calculated by examining historical trends in diagnostic categories from 2003 to 2011, continuing the trend into the future, and then applying a transforming

relationship between diagnostic categories and DRGs. Only trends with sufficient volume and clear direction were overlaid on the adjusted projections. All projections are made by gender and by various age groupings, including the four main age groups, and the more-detailed pediatric age group within the 0-17 age group. The age groups include: The main age groups are 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, and 65+ The pediatric age groups are <1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-17

This is a sample output from the inpatient forecast tool: Baseline includes minimum impact of healthcare reform I IQRG Product Line L cludes all product lin es~ Proj 5 Yr Baseline is the 5 year projected discharges by DRG Product Line. Proj 5 Yr Adjusted & Trended is the 5 year projections of discharges by DRG Product Line. Variance Difference is the difference between thesyear discharges ands year discharges. variance% is the percent change between the 5 year discharges ands year discharges. Proj 5 Y r Baseline is the 5 year projected days by DRG Product Line. Proj 5 Yr Adjusted & Trended is the 5 year days of discharges by DRG Product Line. Variance Difference is the difference between the 5 year days and 5 year projected days. Variance % is the percent change between the 5 year days and 5 year projected days. DRG Product Line Obstetrics De l General Medicine Psychiatry General Surgery Obstetrics NO Proj 5 Yr Proj 5 Yr Baseline Ad 'usted & Trended 8,579 10,888 17,160 18,052 3,778 4,364 6,685 7,053 1,106 1,422 Variance Difference % 2,309 26.9% 891 5.2% 586 15.5% 368 5.5% 315 28.5% k@ Proj 5 Yr Proj 5 Yr Baseline Ad usted & Trended 23,850 30,201 75,344 80,1 66 26,242 30,418 54,734 59,257 3,414 4,400 Variance Difference % 6,351 26.6% 4,822 6.4% 4,176 15.9% 4,523 8.3% 986 28.9% Total 94,220 99,959 5,739 6.1% 440,233 467,206 26,973 6.1%

Appendix: Detailed Methodology Data Preparation, Filters, and Quality Checks To improve the accuracy of the estimates, Truven implemented multiple filters, groupers, and quality checks to the all-payer state data and the MEDPAR data prior to creation of the use rates. We included only inpatient acute care facilities that are shortterm, non-federal hospitals. To determine which hospitals met these criteria, we used a combination of public reference databases, as well as an empirical analysis of each facility s average length of stay. In order to keep all estimates consistent, Truven re-grouped all of the state data using the Federal Fiscal Year 2011 MS-DRG grouper, or DRG version 28. Because the data used in these estimates are not all from Federal Fiscal Year 2011 (October, 2010 to September, 2011), the DRG assigned to each record and the estimates that result from them may differ from that provided by the state. Truven Health Analytics filtered out all records with missing or erroneous values for county, age, sex, payer, and principal diagnosis. In addition, Truven Health Analytics removed invalid combinations of age, sex, DRG, and ICD-9 diagnosis code. Also removed were records with a length of stay value that was missing, negative, or greater than 365 days. Use Rate Construction If all-payer state data were available for 2010 Q1 or later, Truven divided the most current and complete four quarters of inpatient volume for each county within the state by the corresponding county population. This yielded use rates by age group, sex, DRG, and county. Use rates were built for both admissions and patient days, and represent the average amount of annual inpatient care consumed by the population. Out-of-State Migration Adjustment Truven corrects use rates for out-migration from all counties in order to properly estimate inpatient demand for a population. If a patient from a county in an all-payer state receives care in a state without all-payer data, Truven corrects for this outmigration in one of two ways. Using the Hospital Market Area file, Truven can identify what percentage of Medicare patients left the county for care in a state without allpayer data. If that percentage was greater than 10 percent, Truven did not use local allpayer data, and instead substituted regional rates for the affected counties. If the percentage was less than 10 percent, Truven adjusted all of the county s use rates to account for the observed out-migration.

Identification of Underreported Counties Most inpatient data sets collected by state agencies or associations are reliable and complete. However, in some situations, facilities are either not required or unable to report all information. To identify the specific counties that appear to be affected by these situations, Truven used the Hospital Market Area file. In such cases, Truven did not use local all-payer data, but instead substituted regional rates for the affected counties. Payor Categories The estimates are reported for the following payor categories: Medicare Medicaid Dual Eligible Private Exchanges Private Direct Private Employee Sponsored Uninsured Discharges for Medicaid, Private Exchanges, Private Direct, Private Employee Sponsored, and the Uninsured are all derived from all-payer data available in the Projected Inpatient Database (PIDB). The PIDB is a proprietary database that contains information from various inpatient claims data sources, and is appropriately weighted to reflect the national total number of discharges. The Dual Eligible population is a special population that receives benefits from both Medicare and Medicaid. The healthcare utilization on this population is not available in the PIDB, but is available from CMS. Therefore, a combination of the MEDPAR data, the CMS Standard Analytical File 100 percent Inpatient File, and the Standard Analytical File 100 percent Denominator File was used to determine the expected number of discharges for the Dual Eligible population per DRG and geographic location. Types of Estimates (Healthcare Reform Estimates) Inpatient Demand Estimates includes two sets of projections for current through projected years. Baseline Estimates The Baseline projections reflect the changes in inpatient demand due to demographic shifts, as well as the minimum impact of reform on payer mix. The utilization rates are assumed constant over the 10 years of projections. Adjusted and Trended Estimates The adjusted projections include the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the inpatient utilization. The projections include both the shifts in healthcare coverage due to ACA and the expected impact of the ACA on the discharge rate due to specifics in the legislation. Beyond the healthcare reform adjustments, DRG forecast trends are overlaid on

the estimates. Adjusted and Trended projections assume all projected enrollment goals are met for the impact of reform starting in 2014 and in all future year forecasts. Pediatric Estimates The Pediatric Estimates are derived using a two-step process. First, estimates are created for the age cohort 0 to 17 years. Then, a national distribution that is DRG- and age-specific method is applied to the localized estimates resulting in reliable estimates of discharges for the refined age cohorts. The national distributions for each DRG are derived from the weighted PIDB, and represent a reliable probability of a specific DRG occurring in the specific age cohort. Regional and National Models A regional rate model is created by assigning each state available in the PIDB to a Census region. Then, the discharges are counted for each DRG, region, age, payer, and gender cohort. The count of discharges is then divided by the region-specific population, resulting in a regional utilization rate. The regional estimates are calculated by applying the regional rate to the locally-defined population. The national rate model is calculated by summing up the weighted discharges from the PIDB for each DRG, age, payer, and sex cohort. We then divide by the total national population for each corresponding cohort. The result is a national rate model that is applied to the locally-defined populations. The regional- and national-based local estimates are intended as benchmarks for the local utilization. Population Data The use rates previously described are applied to demographic data at the zip code level to yield estimates of inpatient discharges by a given population from 2014 through 2024. Truven factors in age, sex, and insurance mix of each population to ensure that the estimates reflect local variation. Age and sex statistics at the Zip code level are obtained from Nielsen Demographic data. Insurance mix for the population is derived from the Truven 2014 Insurance Coverage Estimates database, which estimates the number of people covered by various health insurance arrangements at the Zip code level. Truven has done extensive research to forecast the year-by-year impact of Healthcare Reform on insurance enrollment. The forecasted impact of the extended coverage at the Zip code level incorporates local employer-based coverage, household income statistics, Medicaid eligibility rules, and other local factors.