Pacific Northwest Society of Pathologists Activity Title: 2009 Spring Meeting Location: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA Objectives for this Session Understand the history of medical error disclosure and recent legal developments Identify the error disclosure issues unique to pathology Recognize the relevance of sub-histology of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in selection of optimal chemotherapy choice for advance NSCLC Understand the potential utility of molecular markers such as ERCC-1, RRM-1, and others in selecting chemotherapy choices for patients with advanced NSCLC Assess the potential value of molecular markers of the epidermal growth factor receptor axis in individualizing treatment recommendations for patients with NSCLC. Identify the pathological features of mesothelioma Identify the use of specialized testing in diagnosing mesothelioma Identify the new approach to neuroendocrine epithelial lung tumors Describe the features of lung allograft rejection Analyze their own lab to identify places where errors occur Define how barcoding technologies can eliminate labeling errors Demonstrate recently described patterns of lung cancer pathology Provide a conceptual framework for understanding bronchiolar pathology and show the correlation between bronchiolar pathology and CT scanning Provide basic knowledge of lung CT for Pathologists and show how CT findings can help in pathologic interpretation Recognize certain lesions of bone that may mimic a sarcoma and recognize histopathological and radiological features that are necessary in distinguishing a pseudosarcomatous tumor from sarcoma Speakers: Thomas Colby, MD, Jack West, MD, Ben Hoch, MD, Mark Wick, MD, Samuel Hammar, MD, Susanne Dintzis, MD, PhD, Rodney Schmidt, MD. Disclosure statements: Yes Overall Program Evaluation: Objectives Objectives Objectives Not Met Met Overall course content Excellent Unsatisfactory Overall program organization Organized Unorganized Your perception of enhanced professional effectiveness Will Enhance Effectiveness Will Not Enhance Effectiveness Materials Organized Unorganized Materials Relevant Not Relevant
Mark Wick Benign/Borderline Lung Tumors Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Thomas Colby Lung Cancer Update Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Suzanne Dintzis Disclosing Harmful Pathology Errors to Patients Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Samuel Hammar The Macroscopic, Histologic, Histochemical, Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural feature of Mesothelioma Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Mark Wick Neuroendocrine Lung Tumors Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent
Thomas Colby Bronchiolitis Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Rodney Schmidt Error Reduction Opportunities in the AP Lab Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Thomas Colby Pathologic-Radiologic correlation in Diffuse Lung Disease Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Jack West Individualized Treatment Decisions Based on Pathology Variables in Lung Cancer Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent Ben Hoch Diagnostic Challenges in Bone Pathology: Reactive Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent
Mark Wick Lung Transplant Reject Content Informative Uninformative Presentation Interesting Boring Speaker knowledge of content Competent Incompetent 1.Please tell us about yourself: A. [ ] MD/DO Specialty: [ ] Administrator/Manager [ ] Other B. Type of organization: [ ] Private practice [ ] Group Practice (# in group ) [ ] IPA/PHO [ ] Hospital Medical Staff [ ] County Medical Society [ ] State Specialty Society [ ] Other 2. To what extent did this course meet your expectation? (Circle one) Exceeded On Target Okay So/So Low 3. Do you feel that the presentation was fair, balanced, and free of commercial bias? If no, please explain. 4. As a result of attending this activity, how will you change your practice? 5. Comments and suggestions: 6. Future topic and speaker suggestions:
For CME Credit: Please complete the following only if you are claiming hours less than the maximum. I attended this course: Date: for hours of CME credit. Name (please print) Signature: