Kraig E. Humbaugh, M.D., M.P.H. Kentucky Department for Public Health



Similar documents
The KHIE ConnectionPartnering to Improve Patient Health Outcomes

The PCA Peanut Butter Outbreak - Minnesota s Involvement and Perspective

Planning for Health Information Technology and Exchange in Public Health

Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use

Ohio Department of Health Seasonal Influenza Activity Summary MMWR Week 10 March 6 th, March 12 th, 2016

The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)

Electronic Public Health Case Reporting: Current & Future Possibilities. Joint Public Health Forum & CDC Nationwide Call October 16, 2014

How Electronic Health Records Might Change Birth Defects Surveillance (and what to do about it!)

What is your vision of population/public health practice in an era when the health care of all Americans is supported by EHRs?

Public Health Case Reporting Using Consolidated Clinical Data Architecture (C-CDA) Pilot

Meaningful Use Stage 1 and Public Health: Lesson Learned

Gastrointestinal Outbreak at a Kentucky Youth Basketball Tournament February 2012

AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria

Custom Report Data Elements: IT Database Fields. Source: American Hospital Association IT Survey

Heather Hanson, MPH Bureau of Communicable Disease NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

Thank you everybody for attending this session. What I want to

Damon A. Ferlazzo, MPA Clinical Use and Benefits of State Immunization Information Systems August 21, 2014

Department of Health Budget Hearing. November 24, 2014

Comments from ISDS on proposed rule for meaningful use March 15, 2010 Introduction Structure of comments

ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab

Electronic Medical Records and Public Health

Stage 2 Meaningful Use - Public Health

QUICK QUIZ ANSWERS. 3. Some foodborne pathogens can also be spread by water, from person-to-person, and from animal-to-person. A. True B.

Registering as an Individual Provider for Illinois Department of Public Health Meaningful Use Please read before proceed with the survey

Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS) Office of Health Policy (OHP)

Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health Identified Knowledge Domains of Public Health

Personal Injury TYPES OF HOLIDAY ILLNESSES. Telephone

Meaningful Use. Michael L. Brody, DPM FACFAOM CCHIT Ambulatory Workgroup HITSP Physician Perspective Technical Committee NYeHC

NY Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Eligible Professionals Meaningful Use Stage 2 (MU2) Webinar

Frequently asked questions about whooping cough (pertussis)

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System - Enteric Bacteria. A program to monitor antimicrobial resistance in humans and animals

Meeting/Workshop: Delivery and Cost Studies Methods Workshop

The State of Health Data Exchange: The Impact on Healthcare Operations

Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Defendant

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use. Goals and Principles

HITECH Act Update: An Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Regulations

State of Michigan Department of Community Health

Duties and responsibilities of Kentucky e-health Network Board -- Permitted functions of the board -- Elements of fully implemented Kentucky

Introduction to Public Health: Explaining Its Role in Disasters

Newborn Screening and Health Information Technology

Childhood Diseases and potential risks during pregnancy: (All information available on the March of Dimes Web Site.)

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use Stage 2: Summary of Proposed Rule for Eligible Professionals (EPs) Wyatt Packer HIT Regional Extension Center (REC) HealthInsight

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

to the Medicare and Medicaid

Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Agenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program

Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Ten Points of Interest

9/9/2015. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits

Gail Bennett, RN, MSN, CIC

Modified Stage 2 Final Rule

2013 Indiana Healthcare Provider and Hospital Administrator Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Survey

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012

Mississippi Public Health Timeline

4Medapproved Learning Lunch Webinar Series How to Keep up with Stage 2 MU (Meaningful Use) Questions and Answers

Health Information Exchange in NYS

The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health

OPTIMIZING THE USE OF YOUR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD. A collaborative training offered by Highmark and the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative

Introduction to Public Health Informatics and their Applications

Online Communicable Disease Reporting Handbook For Schools, Child-care Centers & Camps

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Administrator Training

TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET

North Texas School Health Surveillance: First-Year Progress and Next Steps

THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NH DHHS HEALTH ALERT

Achieving Meaningful Use

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT PERTUSSIS (WHOOPING COUGH)

Using Health Information Technology to Improve Quality of Care: Clinical Decision Support

Contact: Barbara J Stout RN, BSC Implementation Specialist University of Kentucky Regional Extension Center

Meaningful Use Objectives

How To Qualify For EHR Stimulus Funds Under

It s where we drive Quality Improvement and Get Money to aid in our ability to provide quality patient care

Meaningful Use Stage 1:

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Dentists as Eligible Professionals. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

Dr. Peters has declared no conflicts of interest related to the content of his presentation.

Custom Report Data Elements: 2012 IT Database Fields. Source: American Hospital Association IT Survey

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

Achieving Meaningful Use in Presented by the SFREC

A review of the public health response to two pertussis outbreaks in Maryland: Lessons Learned

Healthcare Information Technology (HIT) Reform: The Challenge for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Meaningful Use Stage 2:

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

Objective 1A: Increase the adoption and effective use of health IT products, systems, and services

Electronic Health Record Systems Public Health Functionality


4/30/2013 HPV VACCINE AND NORTH DAKOTA HPV IMMUNIZATION RATES HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS HPV CONTINUED

Health Information Exchange: Where Are We Now & Where Do We Go From Here? HEALTHeLINK Western New York s Clinical Information Exchange

HIE Strategy in California and Stage 2 Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Definition of Foundational Public Health Services

Electronic Case Reporting to Public Health An EHR Vendor s Perspective Public Health - EHR Vendors Collaboration Initiative

Transcription:

Electronic Health Information Exchange of Laboratory Data: An Epidemiologist s Perspective Kraig E. Humbaugh, M.D., M.P.H. Kentucky Department for Public Health

Disclaimers No conflicts of interest to report Not a laboratorian Not an informatics expert Practical, applied epidemiologist Pediatrician Cabinet for Health and Family Services 2

Objectives Using examples, discuss 1) Pros and cons of the electronic exchange of lab data in public health 2) How electronic lab data exchange systems are used in Kentucky to benefit public health--- and the successes and challenges associated with some of those systems Cabinet for Health and Family Services 3

Advantages of Electronic Health Data Exchange in Public Health Speed Efficiency Accuracy Better access to more and bigger data sets Easier linkages between data sets Cabinet for Health and Family Services 4

Disadvantages of Electronic Health Data Exchange in Public Health Impersonal Often expensive, especially up-front system development costs Requires new skill set for public health professionals, e.g., IT vendor management Data thinking sometimes gets lost in data mining Questions of data sharing and ownership can become more complex Cabinet for Health and Family Services 5

Cultural Adaptation in PH & IT Change in attitudes and processes Human connectors between PH & IT; between laboratory, epidemiology, and environmental health--- can be helpful Speaking in a common language Understanding what each can bring to the table Cabinet for Health and Family Services 6

How epidemiologists use lab data from electronic exchanges In investigations To identify cause of illnesses or threats, mitigate exposure, and prevent spread of illnesses In decision and policy making To determine trends and help answer bigpicture population health questions Cabinet for Health and Family Services 7

Investigation example: Multi-State Salmonellosis Outbreak Salmonella is a genus of bacterium that causes disease in humans Gastrointestinal illness Typhoid fever Illness typically associated with eating raw or undercooked food Symptoms appear 12-72 hours after ingestion of a large dose (inoculum) Diarrhea, fever, abdominal cramps lasting 4-7 days Cabinet for Health and Family Services 8

60 Reported Salmonellosis Cases* in Kentucky 2008-2012 50 Number of Cases 40 30 20 Average 2008-2011 2012 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 MMWR Week * Includes 2012 confirmed and non-confirmed cases

Initial Investigation Regional increase in cases Anecdotally Common grocery store chains More cantaloupe consumption than expected Actions Spread awareness of possible salmonellosis outbreak Division of Laboratory Services prioritized Salmonella testing

Laboratory Bacterial Testing Increasing Detail Species Group Serotype Hospital/ Contract Lab Hospital/ Contract Lab OR State Lab State Lab Salmonella enterica Group B Typhimurium PFGE Pattern State Lab JPXX01.0324

National Case Count http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium-cantaloupe-08-12/map.html

Summary of Kentucky Outbreak 70 Cases of Salmonellosis Matching the Outbreak Strain Three died Average Age: 48 years 73% Female 75% Hospitalized

Cantaloupe Traceback Investigation Reported Grocery Stores Background Pattern 0324 Grocery Chains 1 and 2 Reported by 9 of 10 patients with the outbreak pattern 90% Grocery Chain 1 7 5 Grocery Chain 2 6 4 Reported by 11 of 30 patients with background patterns 37% Other 21 1 Total 34 10 χ 2 p < 0.01 for outbreak cases to shop at Chains 1/2 vs Other

Cantaloupe Traceback Identified single supplier for stores- Farm A Grocery Store of Case Patient Grocery Store of Case Patient Farm A Distribut or A Grocery Store of Case Patient Grocery Store of Case Patient Grocery Store of Case Patient

Electronic Data Exchange: NEDSS National Electronic Disease Surveillance System System provides info for developing line lists and epi curves Large reference lab and some hospitals have automatic feeds into the system for electronic reporting of positive results Smaller hospital labs and providers--- except for health departments--- do not System is not designed to link cases or serve as outbreak management system Cabinet for Health and Family Services 16

PulseNet Electronic Data Exchange: PulseNet Outbreak of Salmonella: 3 or more isolates with matching PFGE patterns or 2x baseline for common PFGE patterns Images sent to CDC electronically CDC assigns ID to isolate pattern Plusses: Helps epidemiologists recognize connections between cases before shoe leather epidemiology might; more outbreaks recognized Challenges: more outbreaks recognized, even some with no obvious link except a genetic Cabinet for Health and Family Services 17

Population Health Examples Using electronic data exchange to improve traditionally poor health outcomes, by establishing baselines and trends Health and wellness prioritized by the governor Under ACA, Medicaid was expanded and the state s own health benefit exchange, called kynect, created 640,000 estimated uninsured Kentuckians. By April, 413,410 (over 10% of the pop n) enrolled through Cabinet for kynect; Health and Family Services 75% reported not 18

kyhealthnow 2019 Goals Reduce Kentucky s rate of uninsured individuals to less than 5%. Reduce Kentucky s smoking rate by 10%. Reduce the rate of obesity among Kentuckians by 10%. Reduce Kentucky cancer deaths by 10%. Reduce cardiovascular deaths by 10%. Reduce the percentage of children with untreated dental decay by 25% and increase adult dental visits by 10%. Reduce deaths from drug overdose by 25% and reduce by 25% the average number of poor mental health days of Kentuckians. http://governor.ky.gov/healthierky/kyhealthnow

Kentucky Health Information Exchange Statewide Health Information Exchange Core components of the KHIE include: a master patient/person index; record locator service; security; provider/user authentication; logging and audits; clinical messages and alerts. The system includes patient demographics, lab results, radiology and transcription reports, historical patient diagnoses, medications, procedures, dates of services, hospital stays, reporting to the state immunization and cancer registries, reporting of syndromic surveillance data and reportable labs/diseases. KHIE also offers a community record (virtual health record) for care coordination. First pilot hospital was connected in April 2010 Statewide implementation began in January 2011 kyhealthnow 20

Kentucky Health Information Exchange kyhealthnow 21

KHIE Successes & Challenges Successes Meaningful use incentives have encouraged widespread participation Interoperability with immunization registry and state lab s information management system Challenges Patient-centric approach: great for clinical data access, but more difficult for population health data access Trending; data are not static Cabinet for Health and Family Services 22

KY-CHILD Kentucky Certificate of Birth, Hearing, Immunization and Lab Data a Web-based application that allows patient demographics to be stored in a central database and shared among Kentucky s health and human services programs: electronic collection and submission of data related to certificates of live and still births, newborn vaccinations, and newborn metabolic and hearing screenings and coming soon neonatal abstinence reporting Cabinet for Health and Family Services 23

KY-CHILD Successes & Challenges Successes Linkage of lab reports (newborn screening and microbiology) and IR records in the KY-CHILD system/master database and then fed to KHIE Challenges Reconciliation of many un-named baby records, including newborn screening and immunization data, after transfer from KY- CHILD to KHIE Complexities related to ownership and data sharing rules and policies Cabinet for Health and Family Services 24

Summary Electronic data exchanges are valuable tool for public health professionals. To use the new tools, Public Health must adapt and communicate more effectively with Information Technology. New solutions for sharing health information electronically bring some new challenges. Cabinet for Health and Family Services 25