IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE



Similar documents
Case 2:14-cv AJS Document 18 Filed 06/03/14 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cv GMN-GWF Document 18 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 139

Case 3:08-cv JSW Document 5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cr AJS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:06-cv TFM Document 19 Filed 12/11/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

8:13-cv GRA Date Filed 02/07/13 Entry Number 12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Case: EEB Doc#:9 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 15:52:25 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Storage Computer v. Worldwide CV JM 07/17/02 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

Michie's Legal Resources. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence Act of [Acts 1999, ch. 201, 2.

SENATE... No The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In the Year Two Thousand Fourteen

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ACCEPTABLE USE AND TAKEDOWN POLICY

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

New York Consolidated Law Service General Business Law Article 25 - Fair Credit Reporting Act

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No

smb Doc 13 Filed 07/21/15 Entered 07/21/15 15:12:40 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 ORDER GRANTING PROVISIONAL RELIEF

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 11

INEX No /06 SHORT FORM ORDER HON. STEPHEN A. BUCARI

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Sample Antitrust Risk-Shifting Provisions in M&A Transactions

2:13-cv GAD-LJM Doc # 6 Filed 04/03/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 174 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 134 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 6

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

Case 1:14-cv RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LOCAL RULES of THE CIVIL COURTS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS -- including revisions approved by the Texas Supreme Court 12/7/05

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 55 Filed: 08/16/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:<pageid>

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT ( BAA )

Prepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA,

Chapter No. 367] PUBLIC ACTS, CHAPTER NO. 367 HOUSE BILL NO By Representatives Briley, Hargett, Pleasant

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"), for its Complaint alleges:

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

DISTRICT CT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Case No.. 96-CV-4693

FILE NO. 11 CV ) ) ) THIS CAUSE came on before the undersigned judge for entry ofa Consent Judgment. It

NOTICE TO GRANDPARENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 43 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE HOWARD COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF HOWARD ) CAUSE NO.: APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Flat Fee From Being Charged In Florida

Case 1:14-cv WYD-MJW Document 28 Filed 09/25/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:15-cv MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT JUVENILE COURT RULES

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure VIII. PROVISIONAL AND FINAL REMEDIES AND SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS. Rule 65. Injunctions.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. NOTICE TO CONSUMER DEBTOR(S) UNDER 342(b) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93 1

Case 6:66-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

Case 2:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. GREEN, S.J. September, 1999

Huron County Juvenile Court

Case 2:06-cv JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

<;:aser = 13- ev- 1234

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

Office of Personnel Management. Policy Policy Number: Definitions. Communicate: To give a verbal or written report to an appropriate authority.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Appellate Docket No.: Appellate Case Style:

NC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ PHONE (928) FAX (928)

Real Estate Agent Website Linking Agreement

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 320 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2754 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ARTICLE 705 Curfew. "Minor" shall mean and include any unmarried person under the age of eighteen (18) years.

CHAPTER 172. C.56:11-28 Short title. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "New Jersey Fair Credit Reporting Act."

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plkintiff, Civil No. 4 0 6 v. MIKHAILOVICH BOGACHEV, FILED EX PARTE AND UNDER SEAL RECEIVED MAY 2 7 CLERK, DISTRICT COURT WEST. OF PENNSYLVANIA TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plkintiff, the United States of America has filed a complaint for injunctive relief pursuant to 2511. to show C. 1345 and 2521, based on Defendants' violation of 18 1343, 1344, and Government has also moved ex parte for a temporary restraining order and an order why a preliminary injunction should not be granted pursuant to Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and U.S.C. 1345(a)(1) and 2521. FINDINGS FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Hiving reviewed the papers, declaration, exhibits, and memorandum filed support of the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause and Other Ancillary Relief, the Memorandum of Law in support thereof ("Memorandum of Law"), as well as the declaration, the Court hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case and there is good cause to b elieve that it will have jurisdiction over all parties hereto; the Complaint states a claim upon relief may be granted against Defendants under 18 U.S.C. 1345 and c

2. There is good cause to believe that Defendants have engaged in and are likely to engage in.cts or practices that violate U.S.C. 1343, 1344, and and that the Government is, therefore, likely to prevail on the merits of this action. 3. There is good cause to believe that, unless Defendants are restrained and enjoined by Order of this Court, immediate and irreparable harm will result from Defendants' ongoing violations of 18 U.S.C. 1343, 1344, and The evidence set forth in the Government's of Law, and the accompanying declaration, demonstrate that the Government is likely to on its claim that Defendants have engaged in violations of 18 U.S.C. 1343, 1344, and by: a. intentionally infecting hundreds of thousands of computers with malicious software to steal banking and other online credentials from infected computers and enlist those computers into the Gameover Zeus "botnet" (a network of other infected computers controlled by the defendants); b. using the Gameover Zeus malware to intercept victims' communications without authorization; using credentials stolen by the Gameover Zeus malware to access victim bank accounts and fraudulently transfer funds; and d. intentionally infecting more than computers in the United States with "Cryptolocker," a form of malware known as which encrypts users' critical files and then demands a ransom in order to return the files to a readable state. 2

4. There is good cause to believe that if such conduct continues, it will cause irreparable harm to both individuals and businesses in the United States. There is also good cause to believe that Defendants will continue to engage in such unlawful actions if not restrained from doing so by Order of this Court. 5. Based on the evidence cited in the Government's Memorandum of Law and accompanying declaration and exhibits, the Government is likely to be able to prove that the are engaged in activities that violate United States law and harm members of the public, and that the Defendants have continued their unlawful conduct despite the clear injury to members of the public. 6. There is good cause to believe that providing the Defendants with advance notice of this would cause immediate and irreparable damage to this Court's ability to grant effective final relief. Based on the evidence cited in the Government's Memorandum of Law and accompanying declaration, there is good cause to believe that - if the Defendants were to be notified advance of this action ~ the Defendants would relocate their servers and/or command and control infrastructure, change the coding of their malware, or otherwise implement measures to blunt defeat the Government's planned disruption effort if informed in advance of the Government's actions. 7. The Government's request for this ex parte relief is not the result of any lack of diligence an the Government's part, but instead is based upon the nature of Defendants' illegal conduct. Therefore, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b), good cause and the interests of justice require that this Order be granted without prior notice to Defendants, and accordingly, the Government is relieved of the duty to provide Defendants with prior notice of the Government's Application. 3

8. The has demonstrated good cause to believe that Defendants have directed their illegal activity at individuals and businesses located in the Western District of Pennsylvania by, among other things, infecting numerous computers in this District with Zeus and Cryptolocker and by using credentials stolen by the Gameover Zeus malware gain unauthorized access to the bank accounts of victims in this District. 9. The Government has demonstrated good cause to believe that to immediately halt the injury caused by Defendants, Defendants must be prohibited from infecting computers with Zeus and Cryptolocker and from communicating with existing computers infected with Gameover Zeus and Cryptolocker. The Government has demonstrated good cause to believe that Defendants have used, and will use in the future, the domain names identified in Appendix A to commit violations of 18 U.S C. and in connection with the Gameover Zeus malware. There is good cause to believe that to immediately halt the Defendants' illegal activity and to prevent further ham to individuals and businesses in the United States, each of the Defendants' current and domains set forth in Appendix A must be immediately: 1) made inaccessible to the and 2) redirected to the following name-servers: and ns2.kratosdns.net. There is good cause to believe that Defendants have used, and will use in the future, the domain names identified in Appendix B to commit violations of 18 U.S.C. in connection with the Cryptolocker malware. There is good cause to believe that to immediately halt the illegal activity and to prevent further harm to individuals and businesses in the United States, each of the Defendants' current and prospective domains set forth in Appendix B must immediately made inaccessible. 4

12, There is good cause to believe that Defendants have used, and will use in the future, the domain names identified in Appendix C to commit violations of U.S.C. 1343, l 344 and 2521 in connection with the Gameover Zeus malware and violations 1 in connection with the Cryptolocker malware. There is good cause to believe that immediately halt the Defendants' illegal activity and to prevent further harm to individuals and. businesses in the United States, each of the Defendants' current and prospective domains set forth in Appendix C must be immediately made inaccessible. 13. There is good cause to permit service of documents filed in this case that have been unsealed by this Court, and any unsealed Orders entered by the Court in response thereto, as provide<jl below, given the exigency of the circumstances, and the need for prompt relief. The following of service, which provide due process, satisfy Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3), and are calculated to provide notice to Defendants; a. Via overnight delivery upon defendant Bogachev's home address in Anapa, Russian Federation; and b. Via email to the email addresses used by defendant Bogachev and the defendant using the alias Chingiz as identified in the Declaration of Special Agent Peterson; c. Via email to the email addresses provided by the registrants of all active Internet domain names currently used by the Defendants to control the malicious software programs known as Gameover Zeus and Cryptolocker; and d. Via publication on the Internet web sites of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. fii+t^tpj*

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants, their representatives, and persons who are in active concert or participation with them are temporarily restrained and from using malic ious software or code in furtherance of any scheme to commit wire fraud, bank fraud, or to engage in unauthorized interception of electronic communications, and in particular, are prohibited from running, controlling, or communicating with software known as Cryptolocker and Gameover Zeus (also known as Peer to Peer Zeus), on any computers not owned by the Defendants' IT S FURTHER ORDERED that the Government shall establish substitute server(s) and other computer infrastructure as specified in the Government's Memorandum of Law that, in with the relief ordered below, will replace the Defendants' command and control the Gameover Zeus botnet and sever the Defendants' connection to the infected computers the Gameover Zeus botnet. Pursuant to the Pen Register Trap and Trace Order signed by this Court, the Government is authorized to collect dialing, routing, addressing and signaling ("DRAS") information from the infected computers that connect to the infrastructure created pursuant to this Order. The Government shall ensure that no electronic content or other non-dras information is when victim computers connect to the infrastructure established to this Order. 6

IT S FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to any currently registered domains set forth in Appendix A, the Domain Registries identified in Appendix E shall take the following actions: Take all reasonable measures to redirect the domains to the substitute servers by this Order, including changing the authoritative name servers for the domains to.kratosqns.net and ns2.kratosdns.net Take all reasonable measures to propagate the foregoing changes through the Domain 3. previous System as quickly as practicable; Prevent any further modification to, or transfer of, the domains without the of this Court; Refrain from providing any notice or warning to, or communicating any way with Defendants or Defendants' representatives and refrain from disclosing this Order until such time as this Order is no longer under seal, except as necessary to execute this Order; 5. Provide reasonable assistance in implementing the terms of this Order and take no action to IT set forth in the implementation of this Order, FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to any currently unregistered domains A, the Domain Registries identified in Appendix E shall take the following actions: 1. Take all reasonable measures to redirect the domains to the substitute server(s) established by this Order, including changing the authoritative name servers for the domains to and ns2.kratosdns.net; Take all reasonable measures to propagate the foregoing changes through the Domain System as quickly as practicable; 7

Prevent any further modification to, or transfer of, the domains without the previous authorization of this Court; 4. Refrain from providing any notice or warning to, or communicating in any way with Defendants or Defendants' representatives and refrain from disclosing this Order until such time as this Order is no longer under seal, except as necessary to execute this Order; 5. Provide reasonable assistance in implementing the terms of this Order and take no action to frustrate the implementation of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to any currently registered domains set forth in Appendix B, the Domain Registries identified in Appendix E shall take the following actions: Take all reasonable measures to render the domains unresolvable through the Domain 2. System; Take all reasonable measures to propagate the foregoing changes through the Domain Name System as quickly as practicable; 3. Prevent any further modification to, or transfer of, the domains without the previous authorization of this Court; Refrain from providing any notice or warning to, or communicating in any way with Defendants or Defendants' representatives and refrain from disclosing this Order until such time as this Order is no longer under seal, except as necessary to execute this Order. 5. Provide reasonable assistance in implementing the terms of this Order and take no action to frustrate the implementation of this Order. 8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to any currently unregistered domains set forth i actions: 1. Appendix B, the Domain Registries identified in Appendix E shall take the following Take all reasonable measures to reserve, lock, or otherwise prevent the domains from being resolved; If applicable, take all reasonable measures to propagate the foregoing changes through 3. Domain Name System as quickly as practicable; Prevent any further modification to, or transfer of, the domains without the previous authorization of this Court; 4. Refrain from providing any notice or warning to, or communicating in any way with or Defendants' representatives and refrain from disclosing this Order until such time as this Order is no longer under seal, except as necessary to execute this Order; Provide reasonable assistance in implementing the terms of this Order and take no to frustrate the implementation of this Order. IT Appendix efforts to 1. S FURTHER ORDERED that with respect to the domain names set forth in the Internet Service Providers identified in Appendix D shall take reasonable best the following actions; Render the domains unresolvable by blocking domain name resolution for the domains; Refrain from providing any notice or warning to, or communicating in any way with Defendants or Defendants' representatives and refrain from disclosing this Order until such time as this Order is no longer under seal, except as necessary to execute this Order.

Not enable, and take all reasonable steps to prevent, any circumvention of this Order by Defendants, Defendants' representatives, or any other person; and 4, Provide reasonable assistance in implementing the terms of this Order and take no action to frustrate the implementation of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of the Court Filings shall be served as follows: via overnight delivery to the home address of Evgeniy Bogachev in Anapa, Russia; via email to the known email addresses for defendants Evgeniy Bogachev and via email and postal mail to each postal and email address provided by the registrants of all active Gameover Zeus and Cryptolocker domain names; and via publication on the websites of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. IT FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) that the shall appear before this Court on to show cause, if there is any, why this Court should not enter a Preliminary Injunction, pending final ruling on Complaint against the Defendants, enjoining them from the conduct temporarily restrained by the preceding provisions of this Order. IT FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants shall with the Court and serve on the any answering affidavits, pleadings, motions, expert reports or declarations and/or legal no later than two (2) to the on tin The Government may file responsive or supplemental for a 10

materials, affidavits, or memoranda with the Court and serve the same on counsel for the Deferidants no later than (1) injnnrtinn in thir * shall overnight thnt rthrr rinti in IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall expire on the? day of June at [nut exceed to the further Order of this Court, Entered day of May, at a.m., DISTRICT JUDGE 11