UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Mozelle W. Thompson Orson Swindle Thomas B. Leary Pamela Jones Harbour



Similar documents
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Mozelle W. Thompson Orson Swindle Thomas B. Leary Pamela Jones Harbour

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz J. Thomas Rosch DECISION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Sheila F. Anthony Mozelle W. Thompson Orson Swindle Thomas B. Leary

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz J. Thomas Rosch

individually and as an officer of Safety Cell, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade

Case 2:13-cv ES-JAD Document Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

This is a special proceeding commenced by the Attorney General of the State of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv Document 2-1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU CONSENT ORDER

2016-CFPB-0006 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) Magistrate Judge Sidney I.

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Case 1:15-cv WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDERS

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE COLORADO JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NUMBER

CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C et. seq.

COST SHARING AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENERAL AGENT AGREEMENT

HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN OF GREATER NEW YORK SELLING AGENT AGREEMENT

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

Case5:09-cv JF Document30 Filed03/04/10 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

ICC EVALUATION SERVICE, LLC, RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION REPORTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

RULE. Office of the Governor Real Estate Appraisers Board. Appraisal Management Companies (LAC 46:LXVII.Chapters )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Case No.

SMALL PRESS UNITED DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2009 between. with its principal office at

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY RETIREE HEALTH CARE TRUST (the TRUST) AND [INVESTMENT MANAGER]

DELAWARE CODE ANNOTATED *** CURRENT THROUGH 2009 REGULAR SESSION OF THE 145th GENERAL ASSEMBLY *** TITLE 6. COMMERCE AND TRADE SUBTITLE II.

Below is an overview of the Molex lease process as it applies to Molex Application Tooling equipment.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:

Operating Agreement. WXYZ Company, LLC, a [State] Limited Liability Company

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Jon Leibowitz, Chairman William E. Kovacic J. Thomas Rosch Edith Ramirez Julie Brill

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( Bureau ), through its examiners and other

PARTIAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SB 588. Employment: nonpayment of wages: Labor Commissioner: judgment enforcement.

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

Bond Form Commentary and Comparison

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

SPECIAL - PURPOSE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF. LLC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOTICE OF RULEMAKING

ARIZONA. Title 10 - Corporations and Associations

Master Software Purchase Agreement

Case 1 :09-cv S-DLM Document 2 Filed 09/18/09 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Personal Property Title Insurance Owner s Policy (PPT-1)

General Workings Inc. (also doing business as Vulcun); Analysis of Proposed Consent

THE BROADBAND FORUM, INC. TRADEMARK USAGE GUIDELINES (AS OF JANUARY 2012)

BILL ANALYSIS. C.S.S.B By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Case 5:07-cv JKG Document Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S

EEOC and CRT share authority for the enforcement of Title VII with respect to state and local governmental employers.

BROKER AGREEMENT. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of promises, covenants and agreements hereinafter contain, the parties agree as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE BOARD OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY. LCB File No. R Effective October 24, 2014

LLC Operating Agreement With Corporate Structure (Delaware)

Construction Defect Action Reform Act

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 2 Filed 12/23/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-md RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )

ANNOTATED PROPOSED ORDER

Transcription:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 022 3122 COMMISSIONERS: Timothy J. Muris, Chairman Mozelle W. Thompson Orson Swindle Thomas B. Leary Pamela Jones Harbour ) In the Matter of ) ) DOCKET NO. C-4092 GLOBAL INSTRUMENTS LTD., ) a corporation, and ) ) DECISION AND ORDER CHARLES PATTERSON, ) individually and as an officer ) of the corporation. ) ) The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the Respondents named in the caption hereof, and the Respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Consumer Protection proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge the Respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and Respondents, their attorneys, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an Agreement Containing Consent Order, an admission by Respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the complaint, a statement that the signing of said Agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such Complaint, other than jurisdictional facts, are true, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the Respondents had violated the Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed Consent Page 1 of 6

Agreement and placed such Agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in 2.34(f) of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following Order: 1. Respondent Global Instruments Ltd. is an Iowa corporation with its principal office or place of business at 819 Industrial Drive, Trenton, Missouri 64683. 2. Respondent Charles Patterson is President of the corporate respondent. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, or controls the policies, acts, or practices of the corporation. His principal office or place of business is the same as that of Global Instruments Ltd. 3. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the Respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest. ORDER DEFINITIONS For purposes of this order, the following definitions shall apply: 1. Competent and reliable scientific evidence shall mean tests, analyses, research, studies, or other evidence based on the expertise of professionals in the relevant area, that have been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results. 2. Pest-control product shall mean any Pest-A-Cator, Pest-A-Cator Too!, Pest-A-Cator Plus, Pest-A-Cator Too! Plus, Riddex, Riddex Jr., PestVacator 800, or PestVacator 1500, or any other product designed, advertised, or intended to repel, control, drive away, or eliminate any insect or animal pest, including but not limited to, mice, rats, and cockroaches. 3. Unless otherwise specified, respondents shall mean Global Instruments Ltd., a corporation, its successors and assigns and its officers; Charles Patterson, individually and as an officer of the corporation; and each of the above s agents, representatives, and employees. 4. Commerce shall mean as defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 44. I. IT IS ORDERED that respondents, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, Page 2 of 6

offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any pest-control product, in or affecting commerce, shall not make any representation, in any manner, expressly or by implication, that such pest-control product: A. repels, controls, drives away, or eliminates, temporarily or indefinitely, mice, rats, cockroaches, or any other insects or animal pests, B. repels, controls, drives away, or eliminates any mice, rats, cockroaches, or any other insects or animal pests in a desired area or an area of a certain size, C. is an effective alternative to or eliminates the need for chemicals, pesticides, insecticides, exterminators, or any other pest control product or service, or D. will alter the electromagnetic field, send a pulsating signal, or otherwise work inside the walls or through the wiring of homes, offices, schools, restaurants, hospitals, or other buildings in a manner that effectively repels, controls, or eliminates mice, rats, cockroaches or any other insects or animal pests, unless, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation. II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any product, in or affecting commerce, shall not make any representation, in any manner, expressly or by implication, about the benefits, performance, or efficacy of such product, unless, at the time the representation is made, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable evidence, which when appropriate must be competent and reliable scientific evidence, that substantiates the representation. III. and assigns, and respondent Charles Patterson shall, for five (5) years after the last date of dissemination of any representation covered by this order, maintain and upon request make available to the Federal Trade Commission for inspection and copying: Page 3 of 6

A. All advertisements and promotional materials containing the representation; B. All materials that were relied upon in disseminating the representation; and C. All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations, or other evidence in their possession or control that contradict, qualify, or call into question the representation, or the basis relied upon for the representation, including complaints and other communications with consumers or with governmental or consumer protection organizations. IV. and assigns, and respondent Charles Patterson shall deliver a copy of this order to all current and future principals, officers, directors, and managers, and to all current and future employees, agents, and representatives having responsibilities with respect to the subject matter of this order, and shall secure from each such person a signed and dated statement acknowledging receipt of the order. Respondents shall deliver this order to current personnel within thirty (30) days after the date of service of this order, and to future personnel within thirty (30) days after the person assumes such position or responsibilities. Respondents shall retain the signed, dated statements acknowledging receipt of the order for a period of five (5) years and upon request make them available to the Federal Trade Commission for inspection and copying. V. and assigns, shall notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any change in the corporation that may affect compliance obligations arising under this order, including but not limited to a dissolution, assignment, sale, merger, or other action that would result in the emergence of a successor corporation; the creation or dissolution of a subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or practices subject to this order; the proposed filing of a bankruptcy petition; or a change in the corporate name or address. Provided, however, that, with respect to any proposed change in the corporation about which respondent learns less than thirty (30) days prior to the date such action is to take place, respondent shall notify the Commission as soon as is practicable after obtaining such knowledge. All notices required by this Part shall be sent by certified mail to the Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. 20580. Page 4 of 6

VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Charles Patterson, for a period of three (3) years after the date of issuance of this order, shall notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his current business or employment with Global Instruments Ltd., or of his affiliation with any new business or employment involving the marketing of any consumer product. The notice shall include the respondent s new business address and telephone number and a description of the nature of the business or employment and his duties and responsibilities. All notices required by this Part shall be sent by certified mail to the Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. 20580. VII. and assigns, and respondent Charles Patterson shall, within sixty (60) days after the date of service of this order, and at such other times as the Federal Trade Commission may require, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order. VIII. This order will terminate on August 22, 2023, or twenty (20) years from the most recent date that the United States or the Federal Trade Commission files a complaint (with or without an accompanying consent decree) in federal court alleging any violation of the order, whichever comes later; provided, however, that the filing of such a complaint will not affect the duration of: A. Any Part in this order that terminates in less than twenty (20) years; B. This order's application to any respondent that is not named as a defendant in such complaint; and C. This order if such complaint is filed after the order has terminated pursuant to this Part. Page 5 of 6

Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the respondent did not violate any provision of the order, and the dismissal or ruling is either not appealed or upheld on appeal, then the order will terminate according to this Part as though the complaint had never been filed, except that the order will not terminate between the date such complaint is filed and the later of the deadline for appealing such dismissal or ruling and the date such dismissal or ruling is upheld on appeal. By the Commission, Commissioner Harbour not participating. SEAL: ISSUED: August 22, 2003 Donald S. Clark Secretary Page 6 of 6