Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines For Master s in Health Informatics Degree



Similar documents
Guidelines for Master's in Health Informatics Oral Comprehensive Examination

GUIDELINES FOR MASTER'S ORAL EXAMINATION

How To Pass The Nursing Dna

III. THE CLINICAL DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY PH.D. PROGRAM

COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS AND DESIGN Department of Art Education and Art History DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN ART EDUCATION PROCEDURES MANUAL

Graduate Thesis Proposal Guidelines CSUB Department of Biology

Division of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Comprehensive Examination Policy and Procedure Statement Ed.D. Program

TOWSON UNIVERSITY EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM STUDENT GUIDE FOR COMPLETING A THESIS Last updated: October 22, 2012

Guidelines for Confirmation of Candidature for Doctoral and Masters By Research Degrees

Ph.D. Handbook

ADVANCED NURSING PROJECT & COMPREHENSIVE EXAM PROCEDURES

Senior Thesis for Distinction in Psychology Richard Stockton College of New Jersey

Graduate Student Handbook

PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR DOCTORAL STUDENTS. Ed.D. Human Resource & Workforce Development Education

SCHOOL OF NURSING GRADUATE PROGRAM STUDENT HANDBOOK

The current ( ) Marketing Ph.D. Committee consists of Greg M. Allenby (Committee Chair), Xiaoyan Deng, Nino Hardt, and Rebecca Walker Reczek.

PH.D. RECORD OF PROGRESS Curry School of Education University of Virginia (For Students Entering Fall 09 or later)

SECTION III: INFORMATION SPECIFICALLY FOR DNP STUDENTS

Family and Consumer Sciences Education (FCSE) Doctor of Philosophy

Special Education Doctoral Student Handbook

Research Guidelines for the Master of Science in Nursing. Northern Michigan University College of Professional Studies Department of Nursing

Doctoral Handbook. Educational Administration, K-12 Educational Leadership. August 26, University of Wyoming

To demonstrate satisfactory performance, graduate students pursuing the M.A. degree will be expected to:

Outline of Policies: Kinesiology and Nutrition Doctoral Program (October 2014)

Program Guidebook. Ph.D. Applied Behavior Analysis (Post-Master s)

Doctoral Comprehensive Examination

MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICUM MANUAL

GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN THE FACULTY OF PHARMACY INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTARY POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

TOWSON UNIVERSITY College of Business and Economics Department of Accounting. ACCT 497 Internship

ME Ph.D. Program: Revised Rules and Requirements

Procedures, Guidelines, and Timelines Updated Nov. 2014

DOCTORAL DEGREE PROGRAM

Ph.D. Program FINANCE

Electrical Engineering Ph.D. Program. Information Booklet

GUIDELINES FOR ADVISING MPH STUDENTS Master of Public Health, MPH One University Place, Rensselaer, NY

Interdisciplinary Information Science PhD Program QUALIFYING EXAM PROCEDURES STUDENT ROLES HIGHLIGHTED

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

Section Three. Nursing: MSN Research Procedures. Page 25

Master of Science in Technical Communication Policies & Procedures

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY GRADUATE STUDENT / ADVISOR HANDBOOK DOCTORAL DEGREE PROGRAM. College of Education. University of Arizona

Master s Degree THESIS RESEARCH PROJECT CLINICAL PROJECT INFORMATION

GUIDELINE: FORMAT AND PRESENTATION OF A RESEARCH PROPOSAL FOR HIGHER DEGREES BY RESEARCH

Department of Nursing and Health DNP PORTFOLIO GUIDELINES. DeSales University DNP Program Outcomes

COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION MASTER S PROGRAM

PROGRAM OF STUDIES. For the degree of. in Educational Studies, Instructional Technology. Major code: PH6225. Submitted by.

Cognitive Area Program Requirements 10/4/12 1

GRADUATE STUDENTS' MANUAL. Department of History California State University, Chico Chico, California

Texas Woman s University Special Education Doctoral Student Handbook

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION. Adopted May 31, 2005/Voted revisions in January, 2007, August, 2008, and November 2008 and adapted October, 2010

HANDBOOK FOR GRADUATE NURSING STUDENTS Supplement to the Ferris State University Code of Student Community Standards

Guidelines for Master s Thesis. Occupational Therapy

Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Higher Education Administration Concentration

Ph.D. Applied Behavior Analysis Program Guidebook

HANDBOOK FOR DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

ELA Master s Programs

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE MANUAL

DEGREE REQUIREMENTS & ACADEMIC GUIDELINES

The Communications Handbook

Department of Psychology

Interdisciplinary Studies Doctorate. Graduate Student Handbook

Teacher Education Division Ed.D. Handbook

BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION DEGREE TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT. Culinary Management and Tourism & Resort Marketing INTERNSHIP MANUAL

Chapter 6. The Graduate Program of Study

Page 1 of 11. Description of the Program

Doctor of Nursing Practice Capstone Handbook

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN NURSING PROGRAM STUDENT MANUAL THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF NURSING

LOURDES UNIVERSITY Graduate School Master of Science in Nursing NUR 698 NURSING CAPSTONE

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Effective January 2014

Graduate Student Handbook. College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences

University of Delaware. Program Policy Document

The BA/MA Program Proposal Rutgers-Newark, Psychology

INDIANA UNIVERSITY EAST-EARLHAM COLLEGE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE BACHELORS DEGREE IN ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY EDUCATION (Under Review)

Graduate Studies Policies Manual

ASSESSMENT 5: Masters Degree ECE Summative Assessment Project, Thesis or Paper

HANDBOOK. Educational Specialist Students. fv{ééä Éy Xwâvtà ÉÇ. for. TÇwÜxãá hç äxüá àç UxÜÜ xç fñü Çzá? ` v{ ztç

Procedures of Policy No. (4) - Professional Doctorate Programs

The Doctoral Program in Curriculum and Instruction. Program Guide For Students and Faculty. College of Education Northern Arizona University

Program of Study Ph.D. in Community Health Promotion University of Arkansas. Introduction

THESIS GUIDELINES for MA in Theology and Ministry, MA in Pastoral Ministry, and MEd in Religious Education

Texas State University. Sociology Department. Handbook. MA with a Major in Sociology. MS with a Major in Applied Sociology. 7 th Edition (2015)

Master s Project Manual

The Student Nurses Association Charter

Scholarly Project and Thesis Guidelines. for the. MSON Graduate Nursing Programs

Master of Arts in Criminal Justice

Department of Biomedical Engineering. Graduate Handbook

Annual Review of Doctoral Students Guidelines Department of Computer Science College of William & Mary July 2014

August 15, December 15, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Counselor Education and Counseling Program Applicant:

Course Facilitator. Course Description

DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY STUDENT HANDBOOK

DrPH Student Handbook

FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING POLICY SERVICE LEARNING REQUIREMENT UNDERGRADUATE (BSN) PROGRAMS

LLED Doctoral Program Requirements

ONE-YEAR MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH DEGREE PROGRAM IN EPIDEMIOLOGY

Graduate Student Handbook

Master of Criminal Justice Internship/Field Study Information Package and Forms

Student Handbook. Georgia State University

Online Master's Degree in LITERACY STUDIES

Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Program

Doctoral Program Requirements

Transcription:

Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines For Master s in Health Informatics Degree Purpose The purpose of the oral comprehensive examination is for the faculty to: Assess the student s synthesis of knowledge in the areas of the informatics, leadership, and discipline specific cores. Evaluate the student s ability to demonstrate synthesis and application of their knowledge in the context of the Master s Program Objectives. Verification of Eligibility for the Oral Comprehensive Exam Students should check with Center for Health Informatics one semester prior to the anticipated semester for oral comprehensive examination to make certain his/her academic record indicates all courses required for graduation. The student is responsible, after clearance with the chair of the committee, for arranging for the oral examination with the committee. Prior to final approval for the oral comprehensive exam, provide the following to the Center for Health Informatics: o A paper copy your completed research project with the appropriate signatures on the title page (see next item below) o A copy of the Research Project Title Page (Appendix A of the Guidelines for Research Project) o A 1-page summary of your research project content and research activities Selection of the Oral Examination Committee and Chair The oral examination committee is composed of three faculty members who participate in the graduate health informatics program and who hold current graduate faculty status at the University of Kansas. o The oral examination committee chair must be a doctorally-prepared faculty member from the Center for Health Informatics. o The research project advisor serves as a member of the committee o One of the faculty members must be from the student s discipline-specific area (Clinical, HP&M, or Public Health). The Director of the Health Informatics Graduate Programs reviews your choice of committee membership for appropriateness. Once approved, the student may contact the committee members to request their participation. If students change oral examination committee membership, time, or place of exam, they must complete a new Progress to Degree Form (Appendix A of this document) for the Center for Health Informatics. Prior to the examination, the role of oral examination committee chair and members is to act as resource persons to assist the student with preparation in the area of expertise that the student identified in selecting the faculty member as a committee member.

Scheduling the Examination It is important to schedule the examination 2-3 months in advance so as to coordinate the busy schedules of all involved. Note: If you have not completed your Progress to Degree form and your IPHI 860 research project, you must note in the meeting invitation that the exam is tentative based on the completion of your research paper and Progress to Degree Form. 1. Identify a time when all oral examination committee members can attend. Allow 2 hours for the exam. Note: In order to manage scheduling conflicts, use the KUMC Outlook Calendar to verify the times that your committee members are available. 2. Reserve a conference room for the meeting through the Center for Health Informatics by sending an email request to HealthInformatics@kumc.edu. 3. Send a meeting invite in your KUMC Outlook account for yourself and the committee members to attend your oral comprehensive exam. Be sure to include the room location. 4. Complete the Progress to Degree form (Appendix A of this document) and submit to HealthInformatics@kumc.edu at least three weeks prior to the desired date for the examination. The oral examination must be conducted during the student's last semester. The student must be currently enrolled. Preparation for Examination In preparation for the oral comprehensive examination, the student should: Meet with your committee chair 1-2 months in advance of the examination to discuss how to prepare for the oral examination. Each committee chair will have a preferred examination format and structure, so this step is very important to complete. Create a presentation for the committee members. Identify the approach that will be used in the formal presentation. The purpose of the presentation is for you to demonstrate that you ve met the objectives of the HI Program through your coursework and assignments. Review coursework, knowledge gained, and how these have helped in meeting the Master s Program Objectives (Appendix B of this document). Review course assignments (products) and practice experiences against the Program Objectives to help organize examination preparation. Conduct a personal reflection and identify insights about the educational process and outcomes. Review information about theories, techniques, application and experiences garnered that have raised you to a master level of practice. KUMC Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines for Master of Science in Health Informatics 2

Examination Process The oral comprehensive examination is approximately 2 hours in length. The student must be currently enrolled in the last semester of program study. The suggested procedure for the oral examination is as follows: 1. The committee chair introduces the student. 2. The student summarizes his/her experiences as a master's student. 3. Presentation of the research project is optional. During examination questioning, the research project carries comparable weight as other courses. 4. An approximate time frame for oral examination follows. Please note that committee chairperson and circumstances may vary one or more elements within the time frame. Chair introduction - 5 minutes Student presentation 10 to 30 minutes Questions - 45 to 60 minutes Evaluation 5 to 10 minutes 5. The committee will direct questions to the student in order to assess the student's competency in the selected field of study and the student's ability to synthesize knowledge gained while in the program. 6. Throughout the exam, the committee will assess student performance. 7. After the examination has been completed, the student will be asked to leave the room. At this time the committee members evaluate the student's understanding of the selected field of study using the Master s Program Objectives as an evaluation guide. 8. The student is brought back into the room to receive the committee s pass/not pass decision. Outcomes The criteria for determining a satisfactory and unsatisfactory oral examination are reflected on the evaluation form (Appendix C of this document): Satisfactory For each program objective, the student must obtain a rating of advanced, good, or threshold to receive a determination of Pass for the examination. The ways in which the student synthesizes knowledge from the core courses, the specialty courses, and the research courses are clearly articulated. The student identifies a variety of strategies whereby this knowledge can be applied for the future. Unsatisfactory If the student receives a lacks understanding in one or more of the program objectives, the student receives a determination of Not Pass for the examination. The ways in which the student synthesizes knowledge from the core courses, the specialty courses, and the research courses are not clearly articulated. The student cannot identify a variety of strategies whereby this knowledge can be applied in the future. KUMC Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines for Master of Science in Health Informatics 3

Concluding Process: An outcome is determined by the committee at the time of the examination. When the committee has reached a consensus of Pass/Not Pass for the examination, the chair will verbally convey the committee s decision to the student. After the oral examination, the Evaluation Grid form (Appendix C) is completed and is signed by all committee members. If a committee member is present virtually and therefore cannot sign the form, the committee chair will get a verbal permission from that faculty member to sign on his/her behalf. o If the results of the oral comprehensive examination are satisfactory, the chair of the committee returns the completed Evaluation Grid to the Center for Health Informatics where the information on the form will be submitted electronically to the Office of Graduate Studies. o If the results of the oral examination are unsatisfactory, the chair of the committee returns the completed Evaluation Grid form to the Center for Health Informatics marked unsatisfactory. The student is responsible for scheduling a subsequent oral comprehensive examination meeting, allowing adequate time to generate a new Progress to Degree form. Students are allowed a total of 3 attempts to successfully pass the oral comprehensive examination. The examination committee Chair is responsible for providing written feedback to students not passing the oral comprehensive examination and for sending a copy of the feedback to other committee members. The written feedback will give students information about areas of weakness and strength. KUMC Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines for Master of Science in Health Informatics 4

APPENDIX A Progress to Degree Form Form Instructions: Deadline for submitting this form is a minimum of 3 weeks prior to oral comprehensive evaluation. Send the completed form to HealthInformatics@kumc.edu. If you make any changes to your committee members or date/time/location of your exam, a new form is required. Prior to approval for the oral comprehensive exam, provide the following to the Center for Health Informatics: o A paper copy of your completed research project with a signed title page (Research Project Title Page, Appendix A of the Guidelines for Research Project) o A 1-page summary of your research project content and research activities The director of the Center for Health Informatics will notify you when your committee has been approved. TO: Director of the Health Informatics Program FROM: (Student's name) RE: PROGRESS TO DEGREE FORM Research Project Title: Committee Members: The following have agreed to serve on my oral examination committee. (Please include the email address where these persons may be reached if participants are not KUMC faculty.) Chairman Member Member Reader (Optional) Scheduled Date/Time for Exam: Building & Room Reserved for Exam: KUMC Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines for Master of Science in Health Informatics 5

APPENDIX B Health Informatics Program Objectives Instructions: Speak with your committee chair about using the objectives below for preparing for the oral comprehensive exam and for creating your presentation. Program objectives: Upon completion of this program, graduates will be able to: 1. Synthesize advanced knowledge of concepts, theories, principles, and research from health and health-related disciplines, the liberal arts, and the natural and behavioral sciences as it relates to a specialized area of health informatics. 2. Apply standards of informatics practice to meet the health needs of individuals and systems in relation to improving the quality, safety, efficiency and effectiveness of health care delivery. 3. Integrate ethical, legal, economic and cultural considerations as well as personal, professional, and client values in the application and promotion of health informatics. 4. Collaborate with professional colleagues to demonstrate professional identity, values, and beliefs that guide effective leadership, communication, innovation and change management to effectively facilitate the achievement of health system, population, organization, and professional goals. 5. Generate research questions from theory and practice and evaluate research findings that promote best practices in health informatics. 6. Develop health policy and procedures that are responsive to societal trends and are influential in implementing, evaluating, and revising information technology. KUMC Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines for Master of Science in Health Informatics 6

Appendix C KU Master s in Health Informatics Final Oral Comprehensive Examination - Evaluation Grid Program Objectives Advanced Understanding Good Understanding Threshold Understanding Lacks Understanding Synthesize advanced knowledge of concepts, theories, principles, and research from health and health-related disciplines, the liberal arts, and the natural and behavioral sciences as it relates to a specialized area of health informatics. Apply standards of informatics practice to meet the health needs of individuals and systems in relation to improving the quality, safety, efficiency and effectiveness of health care delivery. Integrate ethical, legal, economic and cultural considerations as well as personal, professional, and client values in the application and promotion of health informatics. Collaborate with professional colleagues to demonstrate professional identity, values, and beliefs that guide effective leadership, communication, innovation and change management to effectively facilitate the achievement of health system, population, organization, and professional goals. Generate research questions from theory and practice and evaluate research findings that promote best practices in health informatics. Develop health policy and procedures that are responsive to societal trends and are influential in implementing, evaluating, and revising information technology. KUMC Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines for Master of Science in Health Informatics 7

Grade Advanced Good Threshold Lacks Understanding Criteria Comments insightful; program objectives addressed in a way that indicates comprehension of objective and underlying issues; communicate message clearly, concisely, directly, and with confidence Comments meet, or at times, exceed, basic requirements of specific objective; presentation indicates beginning insight into major ideas related to objective; communicates message with clarity, directness, and conciseness, although some unevenness may be apparent Comments offer little insight into greater issues related to objective, but meet basic requirements; message reasonably clear, concise, and direct, but may be uneven in presentation Lacks understanding or insight related to objectives and unable to demonstrate how knowledge can be applied. Comments: Student Name: Date of Examination: Pass Not Pass Oral Examination Committee: Chairperson Signature: Print Name: Member Signature: Print Name: Member Signature: Print Name: KUMC Oral Comprehensive Examination Guidelines for Master of Science in Health Informatics 8