B.Arc ie. Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555. Dear Sir / Madam:



Similar documents
TALEN ~ SEP ENERGY. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC CFR 50.

Ifred M. P~aglia Manager, Nuclear Licensing. March 14, 2013 NND

This occurrence is considered to be of no significance with respect to the health and safety of the public.

Apr; 1 5, CFR U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C

In Reference 3, the RAI includes two questions for which responses are provided in Attachment 1.

A-Ow INDIA NA MICHIGAN POW!ER. September 18, 2015 AEP-NRC CFR Docket No.:

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No ; NRC ] PPL Bell Bend, LLC; Combined License Application for Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. In the Matter of )

How To Determine An Operating Safety Certificate

Should you have any questions in regard to this submittal, please contact Ms. Margaret Earle at

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

91/09/20 Energy Center, AFFILIATION MINECK,D.L. Iowa Electric Light RECIP.NAME. DPR-49,moving list from Section 3.

REGULATORY GUIDE 5.29 (Draft was issued as DG 5028, dated May 2012) SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1. Renewed License No. NPF-63

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket Nos ; NRC ] Entergy Operations, Inc.; Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C November 13, 2012

Nuclear Safety Council Instruction number IS- 23 on in-service inspection at nuclear power plants

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS WASHINGTON, DC July 17, 2012

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C June 1, 2005

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C March 3, 2011

Proposal to Consolidate Post-Fukushima Rulemaking Activities

March 31, Dear Mr. Marion:

Reconsideration of Application of GDC-4 Exclusion of Local Dynamic Effects to Local Debris Generation

TRAINING COURSE LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 (FSME )

OFFICIAL USE ONLY SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION January 25, 2008 ENERCON SERVICES, INC. - NRC EVENT FOLLOWUP INSPECTION REPORT /

HANFORD TANK WASTE REMEDIATION SYSTEM PRIVATIZATION CO-LOCATED WORKER STANDARDS

REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH. REGULATORY GUIDE 8.4 (Draft was issued as DG-8036, dated April 2010)

Environmental laws have been enacted to protect natural resources and the public health. A number

Crystal River Unit 3 License Transfer Notification of Transfer Date

MATERIALS LICENSE. 1. Honeywell International, Inc. 3. License Number: SUB-526, Amendment 6-1

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C June 26, 2014

REGULATORY GUIDE (Draft was issued as DG-1207, dated August 2012)

CODE/NAME ENCL CODE/NAME ENCL

ATTACHMENT I TO IPN RELATED TO LOAD TESTING AND,24 MONTH OPERATING CYCLES

US-APWR Human Performance Monitoring Implementation Plan

October 22, 2015 EA

Summary of NRC s Review of the Recent Security Issues at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [EA ; NRC ] In the Matter of Northern States Power Company, Minnesota

Westinghouse. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C February 16, 2010

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE

Subject: 30-day Report of Event Criticality Accident Alarm System Degradation

HIPAA Security Checklist

Operational Reactor Safety /22.903

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS WASHINGTON, DC

2. ASTM Standard E , "Standard Practice for Conducting Surveillance Tests for Light-Water Cooled Nuclear Power Reactor Vessels".

This document is the property of and contains Proprietary Information owned by Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and/or its subcontractors and

Regulatory Guide Configuration Management Plans for Digital Computer Software Used in Safety Systems of Nuclear Power Plants

AP1000 European 18. Human Factors Engineering Design Control Document

Government Degree on the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants 717/2013

SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

RC-17. Alejandro V. Nader National Regulatory Authority Montevideo - Uruguay

MDEP Generic Common Position No DICWG 02

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE DG-1154 (Proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.128, dated October 1978)

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, 0.C July 7, 2015

Published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) number 166 of July 10th 2009 [1]

Wilfred C. LaRochelle Principal Nuclear Consultant HSB Global Standards, USA

September 11, 2013 ACCEPTANCE TO THE NRC MATERIALS CONTROL AND SECURITY SYSTEMS AND PRINCIPLES TRAINING COURSE (S-201) (FSME )

Element D Services Plumbing

HIPAA Audit Processes HIPAA Audit Processes. Erik Hafkey Rainer Waedlich

HIPAA/HITECH PRIVACY & SECURITY CHECKLIST SELF ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS

April 15, Dear Dr. Williams:

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C February 1, 2006

MATERIALS LICENSE. Docket or Reference Number Maximum Amount that Licensee May Possess at Any One Time Under This License: Source

June 8, SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC Inspection Report No )

The Mammography Quality Standards Act Final Regulations Document #1

Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants

Healthcare Management Service Organization Accreditation Program (MSOAP)

152 FERC 61,200 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Part 40. [Docket No. RM ]

Ventilation Standard For Health Care Facilities

MATERIALS LICENSE. 1. American Centrifuge Operating, LLC 3. License Number: SNM-2011, Amendment 4

Nuclear Safety Council Instruction number IS-19, of October 22 nd 2008, on the requirements of the nuclear facilities management system

How to Become a Radiation Safety Officer

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION. December 10, 2008

OVERVIEW OF THE OPERATING REACTORS BUSINESS LINE. July 7, 2016 Michael Johnson Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs

How To Write A Contract For Software Quality Assurance

Iowa Code Section states:

NEI 06-13A [Revision 0] Template for an Industry Training Program Description

Current as of 11/10/08 1 of 1

Response to NRC Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Fermi 2 License Renewal Application - Set 37

Orders of Interest to the Board Current as of October 20, 2010

REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH. REGULATORY GUIDE (Draft was issued as DG-1226, dated August 2009)

Es/_. Gentlemen: If you have any questions regarding this matter. please contact this office. Sinc. ly. James P. O'Rilly Regional Administrator

ARMED FORCES RADIOBIOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 6901 WISCONSIN AVENUE BETHESDA, MARYLAND

The Piping System Model a New Life Cycle Document. Elements of the Piping System Model

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

Hazardous Materials Management Considerations in Healthcare

Loan Originator Compensation Requirements under the Truth In Lending Act

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK

M0okc. OPower. -Nuclear. February 6,

TO TEST OR. NOT TO TEST Redefining the Role of Third-party Consultants CLEANING & RESTORATION A PUBLICATION OF THE RESTORATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

OWestinghouse. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C February 1, 2010

Status on Spanish Regulations and Industry. actions related to Filtered Containment. Venting Systems (FCVS)

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURE 88045

License Application Package Overview MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility 27 September 2006

Dose Standards and Methods for Protection. Radiation and Contamination

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY ASBESTOS AWARENESS PROGRAM

This notice sets forth a process under which an eligible contractor who constructs

INTRODUCTION. Three Mile Island Unit 2

Transcription:

Jeffrey B. Archie Vice President, Nuclear Operations 803.345.4214 A SCANA COMPANY May 12, 2008 Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Dear Sir / Madam: Subject: VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) DOCKET NO. 50-395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER 2008-002-00) CONTROL ROOM NORMAL AND EMERGENCY AIR HANDLING SYSTEMS INOPERABLE DUE TO PRESSURE BOUNDARY BREACH Attached is Licensee Event Report (LER) No. 2008-002-00, for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS). The report describes the sequence of actions that led to South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) determining that the allowed outage time for Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation 3.7.6.a.2 had been exceeded. This report is submitted in accordance with 1OCFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B). Should you have any questions, please call Mr. Bruce Thompson at (803) 931-5042. Very truly yours, J B.Arc ie GRAJBAcdr Attachment.c: K.B. Marsh S. A. Byrne N. S. Carns J. H. Hamilton R. J. White L. A. Reyes R. E. Martin NRC Resident Inspector M. N. Browne K. M. Sutton D. L. Abstance P. Ledbetter EPIX Coordinator INPO Records Center J&H Marsh & McLennan NSRC RTS (C-08-00944) File (818.07) DMS (RC-08-0072) SCE&G I Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station - P. 0. Box 88 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065, T (803) 345.5209 * www.sceg.com

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 08/31/2010 (9-2007) Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours. Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Records and FOIA/Privacy Service Branch (T-5 F52), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by internet LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) e-mail to infocollects@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may (See reverse for required number of not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the diqits/characters for-each block) information collection. 1. FACILITY NAME 2. DOCKET NUMBER 3. PAGE Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station 05000 395 1 OF 4 4. TITLE Control Room Normal and Emergency Air Handling Systems Inoperable Due to Pressure Boundary Breach 5. EVENT DATE 6. LER NUMBER 7. REPORT DATE 8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED MOTHFACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REV MONTH DAY YEAR I NUMBER NO. 05000 0 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 03 11 2008 2008-2 - 0 05 12 20081 05000 9. OPERATING MODE 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR : (Check a// that apply) Mode 1 fl 20.2201(b) E 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C) 0 50.73(a)(2)(vii) El 20.2201(d) [] 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) C] 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) fl 20.2203(a)(1) [ 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B) E] 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) [] 20.2203(a)(2)() El 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) [] 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A) 10. POWER LEVEL El 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) I] 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) E[ 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10%20.2203(a)(2)(iii) El 50.36(c)(2) C] 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A) Ej 73.71 (a)(4) 1060% []20.2203(a)(2)(iv) []50.46(a)(3)(ii) ]50.73(a)(2)(v)(a) []73.71 (a)(5) E] 20.2203(a)(2)(v) E] 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) [] 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) j 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D) Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER FACILITY NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code) Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (803) 931-5042 13. COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT MANU- REPORTABLE C MANU- REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT FACTURER TO E CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT FACTURER TO EPIX D VI Y 14. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 15. EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR YES (If yes, complete 15. EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE) 0 NO SUBMISSION DATE 09 01 2008 ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) On March 11, 2008 following maintenance on an outside air intake valve, Surveillance Test Procedure STP-454.002 was performed to restore the "A" train of the Control Room Normal and Emergency Air Handling (CR Ventilation) System to service. The test results were unsatisfactory. Investigation into the test failure determined that a control room pressure boundary (CRPB) breach occurred during normal preventive maintenance performed February 26, 2008 on Instrument and Control (I&C) Area Air Handling Unit XAH0048. The identified breach was sufficient to allow a quantity of air out-leakage that reduced CRPB pressure below Technical Specifications (TS) minimum and resulted in increased outside air flow that exceeded the maximum allowed by TS. Repairs were made to the air handling unit and the surveillance test was successfully completed on March 14, 2008. The effect of the leakage at XAH0048 on the "B" Train of CR Ventilation could not be readily determined. Therefore, both trains of CR Ventilation were assumed to be inoperable from February 26 to March 14, 2008. Since this condition affected both trains of CR Ventilation and existed for greater than 24 hours, TS Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.7.6.a.2 was violated. expected that station procedures will be revised to specify performance of the surveillance test procedure that verifies operability of the CRPB when maintenance is performed on XAH0048. A Supplemental Report will be submitted by September 1, 2008, describing the results of the root cause analysis and any additional corrective actions taken. NRC FORM 366 (9-2007)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERU.s. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-2007) LC S EVPI INRC FORM 366A SEQUENTIAL YEAR NUMBER NO. Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station 05000 395 2 OF 4 2008-002 - 00 PLANT IDENTIFICATION Westinghouse - Pressurized Water Reactor EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION XAH0048 - Instrument and Control Area Air Handling Unit IDENTIFICATION OF EVENT On March 11, 2008, following maintenance on an outside air intake valve, Surveillance Test Procedure STP-454.002 was performed to restore the "A" train of the Control Room Normal and Emergency Air Handling (CR Ventilation) System to service. This test required demonstrating that the CR Ventilation System maintained a positive pressure in the Control Room Pressure Boundary (CRPB) while limiting the outside air (OA) intake flow. This test is required to meet Technical Specifications (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) 4.7.6.e.3. The test.results were unsatisfactory. Investigation into this event determined that a boundary breach occurred on February 26, 2008, during normal preventive maintenance performed on Instrument and Control (I&C) Area Air Handling Unit XAH0048. The identified breach was sufficient to reduce CRPB pressure below TS minimum and resulted in increased OA flow that exceeded the maximum allowed by TS. This breach condition was considered to have existed from February 26, 2008 until the breach was identified and repaired with return to service on March 14, 2008. On March 19,,2008 a past operability review concluded that the effect of the leakage at XAH0048 on the "B" train of CR Ventilation could not be readily determined.' Therefore, both trains of CR Ventilation were assumed to be inoperable from February 26 to March 14, 2008. Since this condition affected both trains of CR Ventilation and existed for greater than 24 hours, TS Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.7.6.a.2 was violated. EVENT DATE March 11, 2008 Condition Reports CR-08-00944 and CR-08-00972 were initiated to address this event. REPORT DATE May 12, 2008 CONDITIONS PRIOR TO EVENT Mode 1, 100% Power DESCRIPTION OF EVENT Following unsatisfactory test results during performance of STP-454.002, the "A" train of the CR Ventilation System was declared inoperable and an investigation was initiated to determine the reason for the test failure. This investigation of the CRPB identified a breach in the suction plenum of Air Handling Unit XAH0048. XAH0048 is physically located within the CRPB and comprises a physical portion of the CRPB, but has no functional interface with the CRPB. This air handling unit cools and recirculates air to the I&C maintenance shop located outside of the CRPB. Repairs were made to XAH0048 and the surveillance test was successfully completed on March 14, 2008. On March 19, 2008 a past operability review concluded that the effect of the leakage at XAH0048 on the "B" train of CR Ventilation could not be readily determined. In addition, the review conservatively determined that the "B" train CR Ventilation would probably have exceeded the TS maximum limit of 1,000 SCFM outside air flow. The "B" train CR ventilation may very well have maintained the control room differential pressure above 0.125 inch w.g., but it would have been reduced from its normally expected value and could have challenged the TS requirement of greater than.0.125 inch w.g. Therefore, both trains of CR Ventilation were assumed to be inoperable from February 26 to March 14, 2008. The root cause team determined that on February 26, 2008 maintenance had been performed on XAH0048. During this maintenance, duct tape had been removed to allow removal of screws which held a panel cover in place. Following maintenance REV NRC FORM 366A (9-2007)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-2007) L E-ET PR LI INRC FORM 366A SEQUENTIAL REV YEAR NUMBER NO. Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station 05000 395 3 OF 4 DESCRIPTION OF EVENT (Continued) 2008 002-00 the duct tape was not restored. Although the post-maintenance test verified that the CRPB had been restored, it only required that the differential pressure be determined with the CR Ventilation System operating in the normal mode. The CRPB differential pressure is normally higher with the CR Ventilation System in the normal mode than in the emergency mode. The breach condition was considered to have existed from February 26, 2008 until the breach was identified and repaired with return to service on March 14, 2008. Since this condition affected both trains of CR Ventilation and existed for greater than 24 hours, TS Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.7.6.a.2 was violated. CAUSE OF EVENT Investigation into the test failure determined that a control room pressure boundary (CRPB) breach occurred during normal preventive maintenance performed February 26, 2008 on Instrument and Control (I&C) Area Air Handling Unit XAH0048. The identified breach was sufficient to allow a quantity of air out-leakage that reduced CRPB pressure below TS minimum and resulted in increased outside air flow that exceeded the maximum allowed. Since this condition affected both trains of CR Ventilation and existed for greater than 24 hours, TS Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.7.6.a.2 was violated. expected that station procedures will be revised to specify performance of the surveillance test procedure that verifies the operability of the CRPB when maintenance is performed on XAH0048. A Supplemental Report will be submitted by September 1, 2008, describing the results of the root cause analysis and any additional corrective actions taken. ANALYSIS OF EVENT The CRPB is designed and maintained to provide a habitable environment such that occupants within the CRPB can control the reactor safely under normal conditions and maintain it in a safe condition following a radiological event, hazardous chemical release, or a smoke challenge. The VCSNS Control Room Normal and Emergency Air Handling System consists of two independent, redundant trains that recirculate air in the normal and emergency mode and additionally provide filtration of the air in the emergency mode. It also serves to maintain a positive pressure within the CRPB of greater than 0.125 inch w.g. with a maximum of 1000 SCFM per train of outside air during system operation. Pressurization of the CRPB minimizes infiltration of unfiltered air through the CRPB from all the surrounding areas adjacent to the CRPB. The subject breach in the suction plenum of Air Handling Unit XAH0048, resulted in the following conditions when the Control Room Normal and Emergency Air Handling System is operating in the emergency mode: - The Control Room differential pressure (dp) decreased below the TS limit of 0.125 in w.g., with a measured dp of -0.1 inch w.g. for Train "A" and a projected dp of greater than 0.1 inch w.g. for Train'"B". This dp loss was attributed to the out-leakage of air due to the breach of XAH0048. - To compensate for the out-leakage, OA intake flow increased above the TS limit of 1000 SCFM, with a measured value of -1054 SCFM for Train "A" and a projected value of < 1100 SCFM for Train "B". Both conditions are adverse as control room personnel could possibly be exposed to a larger dose during a radiological event or to more hazardous conditions during a chemical release. Outside Air Intake Flow - An increase in outside air intake flow of -100 SCFM (i.e., to 1100 SCFM) is judged to have a small adverse impact on both radiological and chemical event consequences. The impact on control room doses is small because the outside air is filtered before entering the control room in the emergency mode. Significance can be quantified by examining the limiting event for control room doses which, for VCSNS, is the postulated Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA). Current design basis analyses for this accident are performed in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.4. Thyroid, as opposed to whole body, doses are limiting. Existing studies indicate that an increase in the outside air flow of -100 SCFM would increase the 30-day thyroid dose by -0.85 Rem. This is equivalent to -4.7 SCFM of unfiltered inleakage into the CRPB. Dose impacts on other non-loca events NRC NRC FORM 366A (9-2007)

NRC FORM 366A EVENT REPORT ý1 (L )u.s. U.LICENSEE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-2007) L E-'NR T 1 YEAR SEQUENTIAL REV NUMBER NO. Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station 05000 395 4 OF 4 ANALYSIS OF EVENT (Continued) 2008-002 - 00 would be significantly less because of the smaller source terms. Hazardous chemical assessments consider a chlorine cylinder release and failure of the Ammonium Hydroxide Tank in accordance with the guidance of Revision 0 and Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.78, respectively. Current analyses are based on the TS limit for outside air flow (1000 SCFM), but have inherent margins to accommodate potential increases in CRPB inleakage in excess of 700 SCFM before the applicable toxicity limit is approached. Control Room Differential Pressure - A baseline ASTM E741 integrated test was performed in March 2005 to measure leakage into the CRPB. Filtered outside air was found to be within the current TS limits of 1000 SCFM per train and the maximum unfiltered CRPB inleakage recorded was 41 SCFM. This as-found condition was less that the current analysis limit of 55 SCFM, which is based on thyroid doses being less than or equal to 30 Rem during a postulated LOCA. A decrease in the Control Room differential pressure to - 0.1 inch w.g. is adverse since it creates the potential for unfiltered inleakage to increase above the previously measured maximum of 41 SCFM. This is of concern primarily from a LOCA dose standpoint since, based on current methods, margins are small (- 15 SCFM). Increases in unfiltered inleakage (if any) are expected to be small since a positive pressure would have been maintained in the Control Room. Inleakage margins are small because of the conservatisms inherent to the current licensing basis methods. Substantial increases in the margin (i.e., hundreds of SCFM's) could be made available by crediting the higher thyroid dose limits within Regulatory Guide 1.195 or Alternate Source Term methods. Even though the exact impact on unfiltered inleakage cannot be quantified, these inherent conservatisms provide reasonable assurance that the CR Normal and Emergency Air Handling System would have been able to accomplish its safety function. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Repairs were made to the air handling unit, XAH0048, and the surveillance test was successfully completed on March 14, 2008. expected that station procedures will be revised to specify performance of the surveillance test procedure that verifies the operability of the CRPB when maintenance is performed on XAH0048. A Supplemental Report will be submitted by September 1, 2008 describing the results of the root cause analysis and any additional corrective actions taken. PRIOR OCCURRENCES There is no historical evidence of a prior occurrence. NRC NRC FORM 366A (9.2007) (9-2007)