Austin ISD Frequently Asked Questions FY2013 Preliminary Budget



Similar documents
PRELIMINARY BUDGET HANDBOOK

SCHOOL FINANCE 101. Presented by Brenda Burkett, CPA, SFO Chief Financial Officer Norman Public Schools. February 2015

Generation Next Leadership Council SPECIAL SESSION

Facility Master Plan Guiding Principles

2014/15 Strategic Update for the Community

AD VALOREM TAX ADOPTED BUDGET

BUDGET. Our mission is to know every student by name and need Ohio Drive Frisco, Texas

Texas Two-year Colleges Briefing for State Policymakers

MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT December 12, 2014

TEMPORARY TAXES TO FUND EDUCATION. GUARANTEED LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY FUNDING. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

State Cashflow Management

To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

Bond Refusal in Broward County - Frequently Asked Questions

City of San Diego General Fund Reserve Benchmark and Review

A Guide to. NYC Public Schools Budget

TASA Summary of House Interim Charges Related to Public Education 84th Legislative Session November 2015

Vital Questions and Answers on Preserving the Quality of Our Schools and Protecting Our Quality of Life. Visit our

Dallas ISD School Performance Review: A Six-Month Report Card December 2001

A Blueprint for Transforming Philadelphia s Public Schools. Safe, high-quality schools. Fiscal sustainability.

GUIDE TO THE TEXAS SCHOOL EMPLOYEES UNIFORM GROUP HEALTH COVERAGE ACT (HOUSE BILL 3343)

Strategic Plan Every Student: College and Career Ready. Strong Students Strong Schools Strong Staff Strong System

Debt Comparison by Unit Type

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

How To Plan For A Community College

School Finance Made Easy Part 1: Educational Instruction and Operation

Overview of the School Finance System

School District Snapshot

Business Office Department Improvement Plan

R00A99. Early Childhood Development. Maryland State Department of Education. Response to the Analyst s Review and Recommendations

TASA Summary of Education Related Senate Interim Charges. 80 th Legislature

(1) Bases the computations for steps 1, 2 and 5 on net enrollment only, eliminating the adjusted enrollment limits;

Property Tax Relief: The $7 Billion Reality

Keeping Tuition Affordable for Ohio Families

Operations Update (Referendum, Count Day, CSR & Budget)

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

MISSOURI. Gerri Ogle Coordinator, School Administrative Services Department of Elementary and Secondary Education I. GENERAL BACKGROUND.

School District - Understanding the Capital Project and General Fund Types

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas Revised January 2012

2009 SCHOOL FINANCE LEGISLATION Funding and Distribution

The Budget: The Governor s Proposition 2 Debt Proposal

Budget Model Redesign Initiative Stakeholder Discussions

The districts are divided into the following four groups, based on student net enrollment per square mile:

Executive Summary. Oregon City Service Learning Academy

Transportation Funds Forecast

Introduction WI F D F. in the analysis are weighted to compare district and charter

Wythe County Public Schools Comprehensive Plan

City of Surprise, Arizona Comprehensive Financial Management Policies FY 2013

Department of Finance. Strategic Plan California s Fiscal Policy Experts

2005 SCHOOL FINANCE LEGISLATION Funding and Distribution

GENERA L OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE SUMMARY

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Additional CCSD Dual Credit Class List. CEM 100 Construction Management (Credits); 3 AIT 200 Applied Industrial Technology Projects (Credits); 1-6

Understanding School Choice in Alachua County: Funding School Choice in Florida

School Finance 101. MASA / MASE Spring Conference Joel Sutter Ehlers Greg Crowe - Ehlers

PROPOSED FY MINIMUM FOUNDATION PROGRAM FORMULA

Governor s Proposals for the State Budget and Education

IBO. Albany Budget Relief: How Much in City Gap-Closing Help? More Details on PIT Increase. Also available from IBO at

DIVISION OF ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision Date 04/03/00 Filing Number 4,271 Date Issued 04/76 Page 1 of 5 Revisions #

The Responsibility of the Board of Education in Managing School District Fiscal Fitness New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY

August 2014 Report No

How Utah Public Schools are Funded. Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel February 5, 2013

Profile of the Baltimore County Public Schools

Loudoun County Public Schools Proposed Reorganization Plan May 8, 2015

York Catholic District School Board

ERIC GORDON 1830 West 28 th Street, Apartment 9 Cleveland, Ohio Eric_S_Gordon@yahoo.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Are California Teacher Pensions Distributed Fairly?

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Federal Context & Funding Opportunities for PreK-3rd

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAM BASED ON THE FINAL COMPUTATIONS FOR THE YEAR

The NEVADA PLAN For School Finance An Overview

2015 Legislative Positions Adopted by the Delegate Assembly In Savannah, Georgia, on June 13, 2014

TAX TO FUND EDUCATION AND EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

City of Surprise, Arizona Comprehensive Financial Management Policies Effective July 1, 2015

July 12, Guiding Principles: Digital Learning Environment, Learning Standards, Assessments for Learning

Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District Financial Management Policy Statements

Annual Report July 28, 2012

Our 3 Priorities. Raise student achievement, particularly in reading & math. Close achievement gaps for students of color and special education

Performance Dashboards in Local Government: What, Why, and How?

Arizona s Pension Challenges: The Need for an Affordable, Secure, and Sustainable Retirement Plan

Puerto Rico s Economic and Fiscal Crisis

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs): MINNESOTA S STAFF DEVELOPMENT STATUTES Minnesota Statutes, sections 122A.60 and 122A.61

CALIFORNIA S NEW EDUCATION FUNDING FORMULA:

Childhood Learning in Charter Schools

Biennial Budget Office of Higher Education

RE: STAFF BRIEF: INSURANCE APPROPRIATION REQUESTS FOR FY 16

School of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan

Albuquerque Public Schools 2015 Questionnaire for Board of Education Candidates

Proposition 38. Tax for Education and Early Childhood Programs. Initiative Statute.

The Economic and Fiscal Impacts Of Texas School District Capital Spending: Opportunities and Challenges under Current 50-Cent Tax Rate Cap

Spring Child Development and Education Department. Dept. Chair: Mayra E. Cruz

Administrative Procedure Manual

ATTACHMENT D CHARTER SCHOOLS IN MICHIGAN

Los Angeles Unified School District - Job Opportunity

FINANCE FY 2015 PROPOSED BUDGET WORK SESSION DEBT MANAGEMENT PLAN. Presented by Ben Gorzell, Jr. Chief Financial Officer

Township High School District # Levy for Fiscal Year

Evaluating theEducational Service Authority (EESA), 2014

FY 2016 Budget Request

SAN FRANCISCO RETIREMENT FAQS

PALADIN CAREER & TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL CHARTER SCHOOL NO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Transcription:

This document represents the district s commitment to increase the level of transparency that surrounds a complex budget process. The budget supports the district s Strategic Plan, which is the product of a genuine consensusbuilding process, and embodies the vision of the community for our work. The Austin Independent School District (AISD) has proposed an annual operating budget for FY2013 of $838.9 million that includes funding and supports to attain AISD s mission of being nationally recognized as an outstanding school district, instilling a passion for lifelong learning in all students. Specifically, the proposed budget is closely aligned to the Board s FY2013 Strategic Plan Priorities which include: Supporting Whole Child, Every Child by expanding academic (intellectual), physical (health, wellness, and safety), social, and emotional initiatives and programs to enhance the education of the whole child, Developing a College-ready Culture by expanding and enhancing advanced academic programs to prepare all students for college, career, and life, Establishing a Rich Portfolio of Options by exploring and establishing new delivery models to provide an enhanced portfolio of academic options to promote graduation rates and higher achievement for students, Strengthening our Human Capital by refine our human capital strategy to recruit, retain, promote, reward, evaluate, and develop the highest quality educators; and, Improving systems through accessible performance management, shared data, technology integration, facility master planning, and aligned operations. AISD continues to ensure that resources are strategically aligned and that budgeted funds are primarily spent on supports for schools and students. Although the district has faced severe budgetary constraints, it has found the resource capacity to support critical investments directly related to specific Key Action Steps of the Strategic Plan which are included in the proposed budget. However, as we entered the second year of the Strategic Plan, it has become more challenging to fully fund the plan as the district s struggled to maintain funding for important programming like full day pre-k and maintaining the second planning period. Our Strategic Priorities have not changed, but our means to devote resources to those priorities have changed considerably. 1. What is the latest information on AISD s FY2013 (School Year 2012-2013) budget? The FY2013 preliminary all Funds budget totals $982 million which includes the general, food and debt service funds. It represents an increase of about $7.7 million or 0.8 percent increase primarily attributable to an increase of $6.4 million in the debt service fund. The net change in the general fund is $355,700. We expect to use reserves in all funds to make up revenue shortfalls of approximately $32.5 million in the general fund, $748,635 in food and $1,234,458 in debt service funds. You may review the FY2013 Preliminary Budget at www.austinisd.org/budget.

2. What are Annual Academic and Facilities Recommendations (AAFRs) and how do they impact the budget? The AAFRs serve as a blueprint for how the district establishes both its short- and longrange facilities plan. They have both a capital and operational impact and must be included in the district s overall budget planning. In December 2011, the Board of Trustees approved all six AAFRs presented by the Superintendent. Dual Language Immersion Programs to Four Additional Schools North Central Overcrowding Learning Support Centers/Disciplinary Placement 2008 Bond: Designate North Central Area of District for Elementary School In District Charter: Graduation Pathways Education Program In District Charter: College Preparation (IDEA Public Schools) 3. What is Fund Balance? Why is maintaining a large Fund Balance so important? Fund Balance is a measure of net financial assets which is similar, but not identical to, equity or accumulated savings. In other words, it is like the balance in your checking account. Deposits are like assets, and the bills you need to pay are like your liabilities. What remains is generally considered your available balance. Maintaining a healthy fund balance allows the district to ensure enough cash reserves for important needs like payroll, cover unanticipated revenue fluctuations, and allows us to get a high bond rating which affects our credit-worthiness and cost of borrowing. In addition, the state requires that we have a minimum of two month s worth of operating expenses in our Fund Balance. The state considers two and a half month s worth of operating expenses as an optimal level which would be approximately $159.9 million in FY2013. 4. What is Chapter 41 also known as Recapture? Recapture, which represents 12 percent of Austin ISD s governmental funds, is a function of Chapter 41 of the Texas Education Code which equalizes educational spending across school districts, with varying amounts of property wealth. The Chapter 41 provision recaptures local tax dollars from property-rich districts and redistributes the funds to property-poor districts. Under this law, golden pennies represent the 6 cents that property-rich school districts like AISD are allowed to retain in revenue above the one-dollar tax that is assessed on all taxable property values. Any revenue collected on property taxes above these 6 cents is subject to recapture by the state. In other words, nearly 45 percent of the revenue generated beyond the 6 cents is sent to the state for redistribution to property-poor school districts. It is projected that AISD will submit $135.2 million to the state in recapture funds in FY2012 and $114.8 million in FY2013.

5. Will AISD employees receive a pay raise in FY2013? The proposed FY2013 Preliminary Budget includes costs to support a one-time payment for employees to provide the equivalent of a 3 percent raise for all employees, which would cost an estimated $14,160,000. The one-time payment would be funded out of district reserves. However, if Austin voters chose to approve a tax rate increase through a Tax Ratification Election (TRE) in November 2012, the district could effectuate the salary increase and make it permanent for all employees. 6. What are AISD s major funding needs? AISD is facing steep cost increases for fuel, utilities, food, and other fixed expenses while revenue is declining. Additionally, AISD must be able to generate the resources it needs to attract and retain high quality staff. This is especially critical now because AISD salaries are losing ground in comparison to surrounding districts. Our analysis indicates that AISD teaching salaries today, are 3.6% behind our regional competitors like Round Rock, Eanes and Pflugerville and 11.3% behind our urban counterparts in Houston, Dallas and others. This is without taking into account the fact that the AISD is the only district in the area that contributes to the Social Security system for its employees. The district is spending more, but salaries are less. The AISD must do as much as possible to avoid losing its best employees to surrounding districts or other large urban districts in the state. Recent changes in the state school finance system have made it more difficult for the district to meet its financial obligations without a tax increase. 7. How did changes to the state school finance system impact AISD s finances? In 2011, for the first time in 60 years, the Texas Legislature failed to fully fund the Foundation School Program. Faced with a substantial budget shortfall, the 82nd Legislature reduced state formula funding to public school districts and eliminated funding for a host of grant programs in its biennial FY2012 and FY2013 state budget. In total, these reductions total $5.4 billion compared to what school districts would have earned during the same twoyear period under the prior funding levels. Austin ISD has also struggled as a result of these cuts. The district lost about $35.6 million in funding in FY2012 and had to implement a reduction in force that resulted in the elimination of 1,153 positions. AISD will lose an additional $25 million in FY2013, which has been factored into the preliminary budget, for a total of $60.7 million in losses this fiscal biennium. Finally, state budget language that eliminates the district s hold harmless funding translates to a total loss of $150 million for Austin between FY2012 and FY2018. 8. What has the district done to scrub the budget before seeking a tax increase? In response to these fiscal challenges, AISD has been austerity planning for the past three years.

In FY2010, 18 central office positions were eliminated, which saved more than $700,000. A central office hiring freeze saved the district more than $1.5 million. In FY2011, the district cut $27 million from the Central Office budget by: eliminating more than 100 positions and enacting a hiring freeze; restricting travel and curtailing operating expenses; eliminating paper pay checks; moving towards self-insurance; and undertaking other cost-savings measures, including implementing a one-week shut down and a 10-hour/four-day work week in July to save on energy costs and other operational expenses. In FY2012, the AISD Board of Trustees adopted a Declaration of Financial Exigency as precursor to a reduction in force. As a result, the district was able to implement an aggressive Deficit Management Plan, which included the elimination of 1,153 positions, allowing the district to offset a reduction of $35.6 million in state funds, a loss of nearly $64 million in federal stimulus funds and a reduction of $20 million in state grants. Savings from the personnel cuts, however, were not sufficient to cover the projected FY2012 deficit, which required the district to implement other cost-savings measures, including, but not limited to: imposing hiring freezes and 30 day wait periods to fill non-essential positions in central departments; increasing employee contributions for the same level of health coverage; reducing departmental budgets; support for professional development travel and food; implementing a one-week shut down and a 10-hour/four-day work week in July; and reducing programmatic funding for programs such as athletics, summer school and school turnaround initiatives. 9. What other initiatives could be supported through a TRE besides compensation? There are a number of important strategic plan priorities that could be supported through a TRE. They include: Pre-k/Early Childhood- In FY2012, AISD lost nearly $5 million in State grant funds to support full day pre-k. One-time Federal funds made up for these losses but they are due to expire in FY2013 so funds are needed to fully restore the program going forward. Additionally, resource support for early literacy before 3 rd grade is critically important to strengthen student success. Fine Arts-AISD is in partnership with the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to establish a long range plan to deliver fine art to AISD students. The first phase of the program begins with a comprehensive audit of existing arts education

resources and needs assessment by Kennedy Center staff to determine gaps. Based on this information, a plan is created that focuses on increasing arts education opportunities for K-8 students. Funding from the TRE could be used to address any gaps that are found. Athletics-Along with fine arts, critical investments are needed for athletics to support district needs in areas such as: ensuring equity in athletics programming across the district, replenishing team uniforms, providing access to field trips, obtaining quality protective gear and improving facilities and equipment. Unlike fine arts, a comprehensive assessment has not yet been initiated. However, the district s Capital Improvement and Bond Planning Advisory Committee (CIBPAC) has indicated that investments are needed in both infrastructure and programming. Social Emotional Learning-AISD has partnered with the Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) to strengthen Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) districtwide. SEL is the process whereby children develop essential social and emotional skills, knowledge, and attitudes to ensure academic success and preparation for college, career and life. Funds could be used to accelerate the implementation of SEL in all schools to improve student emotional intelligence and behavior leading to important outcomes such as: reduced bullying, classroom disruption, aggression and interpersonal violence to create a safe and welcoming school environment and become a national model in the practice of SEL. 10. I have read and seen news stories about neighboring districts having to make additional cuts in the upcoming school year. What is going on with AISD? Multi-year financial planning has been crucial in managing district finances in the face of a challenging budget climate, which has included a decline in the district s tax base, operational deficits, state funding cuts, and expiring federal funding while navigating through a sluggish economy. In response to these fiscal challenges, AISD has been austerity planning for the past three years. As a result, we are currently in a position where we do not anticipate having to reduce staff or make other significant budget reductions for FY2013. 11. What can the community do to help our schools? Stay Informed Visit the AISD web site http://www.austinisd.org and watch meetings of the Board of Trustees on AISD-TV, Channel 22, or streaming on the web site. Stay in Touch Contact your local legislator to express your views about education funding. To find your state representative and senator, visit www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us. Think Outside the Box Partner with AISD s Office of Innovation and Development to financially support school programming. For more information, visit www.austinisd.org/iad.

Remember Every Day Counts Each day a child misses school, the district loses funding. It is estimated that the district receives $5.9 million in revenue for every 1 percent increase in attendance. 12. Can the community submit budget input and feedback? Yes, AISD welcomes community feedback. You may visit www.austinisd.org/budget and click the Submit Your Feedback link, email budget@austinisd.org, or attend the events listed in item number eight below (key dates in the budget process). 13. Since AISD s preliminary budget is still a work-in-process, could things change? Yes, the FY2013 preliminary budget provides a first glance of the investment plan for the FY2013 school year. It will evolve as the budget process advances and presents opportunities for input from key stakeholders including parents, students, citizens, and staff. The district will hold meetings with the community to unpack the preliminary budget so additional input can be incorporated before the final recommended budget is presented by the Superintendent and ultimately adopted by the Board in June 2012. 14. What are the key dates in the budget process? Feb 27: Superintendent presents the Preliminary FY2013 Budget Mar 5: Board discussion on Preliminary FY2013 Budget and tax rate. Apr 2: Board discussion on Preliminary FY2013 Budget and tax rate. Apr 3: Community Conversation on the Preliminary Budget. Apr 16: Superintendent presents the Revised FY2013 Budget to the Board Apr 17: Community Conversation on the Preliminary Budget. Apr 18: Staff Conversation on the Preliminary Budget (Tentative) Apr 23: Public hearing on FY2013 Revised Budget. Jun 4: Superintendent presents the FY2013 Recommended Budget Jun 18: Board conducts legally required public hearing on proposed budget and tax rate. Jun 18: Board adopts budget. Jul 25: Travis Central Appraisal District certifies appraisal values. Aug 27: Board adopts tax rate. Aug 31: State Budget Adoption (Legally Required)