Quality Guideline : 360 Degree Feedback Assessment. Process Lead Assistant Manager, HCBD Version No 1.0



Similar documents
Quality Guideline : TMR&D/QMS/GL/018. Handling Customer Satisfaction Survey For Project, Product and Services

Quality Procedure : IT Helpdesk Services. Process Lead Head of IT Unit Version No /06/2006 All Original Document DCA. The current process

Performance Review Documentation for Duke University Employees

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES

Civil Service Performance Management System

JOB DESCRIPTION. Name SUMMARY

Staff Performance Appraisal Report GP 247 B (Revised 2008)

ITD BACKUP MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

The Performance & Learning Plan and Year End Performance Evaluation Process Overview: Employee Guide

APPENDIX B-2 FOCUS GROUP PROTOCOLS

DATA QUALITY STRATEGY

Onboarding Plan Day Onboarding Plan

Staff Performance Appraisal Report GP 247 A (Revised 2008)

Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF):

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT COACHING AND PERFORMANCE GEORGIA PERIMETER COLLEGE

University of California, Berkeley

Position Description

Investors in People Communications Plan. Introduction What is IiP?

ONLINE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM (OPAS AT Staff) USER MANUAL (APPRAISER/HOD)

This Service Level Agreement (SLA) is between Alchemex (Pty) Ltd, Alchemex VAR s and Alchemex Customers.

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

University Performance Management Tool (for Managers)

Performance Management Overview

Procedure for Document Control and Management

Annual Performance Evaluation Form

REMEDY 7.5 INCIDENT MANAGEMENT AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT USER MANUAL

HANDBOOK PUBLIC SERVICE STAFF PERFORMANCE PLANNING PERFORMANCE REVIEW PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DECISION-MAKING

Tesco & MFPE Suppliers: Commitments to Ethical Trading

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

Training trainee solicitors Guidelines on performance review and appraisals

ANNUAL FACULTY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY

Research Data Management Policy

Introduction. Background Knowledge. The Task. The Support the Work Setting Should Provide

Information Commissioner's Office

Using Technologies to Onboard New Hires

Annual Employee Performance Review

PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT OF INBOUND TRANSACTIONAL CONTENT

MSD Onboarding Program for New Employees For MSD Human Resource Liaisons

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM Civil Service of Jamaica

Mississippi Statewide Implementation of a Family Centered Practice Model: Increasing Readiness and Managing Change

Wait List is a feature which allows students to add themselves to a waitlist on a class that has met its maximum enrollment limit.

HOW TO ACCESS AND USE GET HELP

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Course Title: Postgraduate Diploma/Master of Science in Human Resource Management (PgD/MSc in HRM)

How To Add Security Roles On Banner Har Account On A Pc Orca (For A Free Download) On A Microsoft Powerbook (For Free) On An Ipa 2.5 (For An Ipad) On Pc Ora (For

Performance Competencies 1 = Does Not Meet Job Requirements

ZyXEL Issue Tracking System Public GUI. User s Guide

Job Description (For Positions in CAW Local 555, Unit 1)

Royal Insurance Corporation of Bhutan Performance Management System (PMS) User Manual

Business Intelligence (BI) Data Store Project Discussion / Draft Outline for Requirements Document

Interim Performance Management System. Performance Appraisal Form. User Manual

Supporting Attendance at Work Program. Guidelines for Employees

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)

RSA Identity Management & Governance (Aveksa)

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

Employee Position Description & Performance Evaluation Manual

Why do you want to launch a business analyst career? Some possibilities include:

Jericho Forum Report Back

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE REVIEW FORM

DHHS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) Testing

Best Practices For Assigning First Call Responsibilities For Healthcare Networking Issues

Completing the Streamlined DCIPS Performance Apprasial in the PAA

HL7 Onboarding Guide for. May 2015 v3

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS:

Human Resources Reform for the IHS

The Appraisal Interview

CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES

Instruction Guide. People First Dependent Certification Process

Creighton University Annual Staff Performance Review Frequently Asked Questions

One Page Talent Management

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS AND FORM

Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.

Donna Ecclestone, Associate Director Physician Integration and Onboarding, Private Diagnostic Clinic, Duke University Medical Center

Professional Registration System Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) Certification Application HR User Manual Version 1.0

Evaluating Performance. A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation

Table of Contents. Transmittal Letter Executive Summary Background Objectives and Approach Issues Matrix...

Transcription:

PROCESS PROFILE Process Name 360 Degree Feedback Process Lead, Version No 1.0 Process Author, Date Created 01/12/2014 Process Owner Head, Date Approved 31/12/2014 VERSION HISTORY Version Number Effective Date Page No Description of Changes Authorized By Initial Issue 1.0 1/12/14 All Prepared by: Mazlinda Abdul Manap Reviewed by: Approved by: Khairul Haniza Yeop Hashim Description of Change: Original document DCA Controlled Page 1 of 5

PROCESS PROFILE... 1 VERSION HISTORY... 1 1.0 PURPOSE... 3 2.0 SCOPE... 3 3.0 ABBREVIATION... 3 4.0 DEFINITIONS... 3 5.0 BUSINESS RULES... 3 6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES... 3 7.0 PROCESS FLOW... 4 8.0 PROCEDURES... 4 9.0 PROCESS MEASUREMENT... 5 10.0 QUALITY RECORDS... 5 11.0 REFERENCES... 6 Controlled Page 2 of 5

1.0 PURPOSE This procedure shall ensure all process 360 Feedback is being monitored and managed in a systematic manner to meet the objective of best practice. A 360 Feedback is a survey that measures Behavioral Competency level of an Executive. It is an internal online system; accessible via Intranet & Secure VPN. 2.0 SCOPE This guideline covers all process of managing 360 Feedback systems starting from sending reminder email until moderation process. 3.0 ABBREVIATION 3.1 Human Capital Business Driver 3.2 Appraiser HOD/HOL/ 3.3 HOD Head of Department 3.4 HOL Head of Labs 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Process Owner The designated function which holds accountability to drive the operational process ownership, manage performance and process change control 4.2 Process Lead The designated function which is responsible to support process owners and ensure effective processes execution. He/she shall be responsible to review on process change control 4.3 Process Author The designated function which holds the responsibility to create new process and/or update existing process documentation 4.4 Employee An individual who works under a permanent contract of employment with TM R&D. 5.0 BUSINESS RULES Non-applicable. 6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 6.1 TM GHR is the system owner of 360 feedback assessment system 6.2 shall be overall responsible for the implementation of this process in TM R&D 6.3 All Employees required to fill up the 360 feedback assessment system 6.4 Immediate Supervisor is the responsible to give approval for selection of provided by employees Controlled Page 3 of 5

The other responsibilities person for each step in the procedures is listed in the responsibility column. 7.0 PROCESS FLOW 360 Feedback Version 1.0 TM GHR Start 1. Inform LOB for system open for 7. Receive information and open the system for evaluation 16. Resolve the problem and inform status 12. Extract result, clean up data, distribute result to relevant HR, summarize for presentation to management and pull data to MAPS 13. Resolve system error 2. Receive and send email to fill up 5. Verify and track record All Completed? No 18. Send reminder to complete 360 Yes 6. Inform TM GHR for 100% feedback giver list completion 8. Receive info and send email to fill up evaluation form and follow the dateline 17. Receive and inform staff 11. Inform GHC TM for 100% assessment completion 10. Receive completed form and track record 14. Inform staff regarding problem solved 15. Inform employee time to time to complete 360 assessment on time End All Staff 3. Fill up feedback giver list online 9. Fill up evaluation and submit form Immediate Supervisor 4. Make approval selected Yes 8.0 PROCEDURES Step Detail Description 1 TM GHR shall inform LOB for system open for feedback giver list 2 to send email to all employees to fill up feedback giver list Person In- Charge TM GHR Documents/ Records Emails 360 system 3 All employees start fill up feedback giver form online All employees 360 system 4 Appraiser to make approval for selected Appraiser 360 system 5 to verify and track record If all completed, proceed to step 6 If not completed, proceed to step 18 6 to ensure and inform TM GHR for 100% feedback giver list completed 360 system 360 system Controlled Page 4 of 5

Step Detail Description 7 TM GHR receive information and open the system for evaluation 8 receive info and email to all employees to start fill up 360 via online Person In- Documents/ Charge Records TM GHR 360 system - 360 system - 9 All employees start fill up 360 All Employee 360 system - 10 receive completed form and track record 360 system - 11 to inform TM GHR for 100% assessment completion 12 TM GHR extract result, clean data, distribute result to TM GHR relevant HR, summarize for presentation to management and pull data to Maps 13 If employee facing problem pertaining to the system, TM GHR to inform TM GHR to resolve the system error 14 TM GHR to inform, then to inform staff regarding the problem solved 15 to inform employees from time to time to complete the 360 assessment on time 360 system - 360 system final report Email Email Email 9.0 PROCESS MEASUREMENT Process Activity Customer CTQ Operations Definition Measurement Defect To complete the task as per SLA Service Level Agreement (SLA) To ensure all is completed within the timeline (subject to system readiness) % of complete task according to verify and validate the process completion % of complete task is more than SLA 10.0 QUALITY RECORDS No Record Name Retention Period Maintained by 10.1 10.2 10.3 Controlled Page 5 of 5

10.4 11.0 REFERENCES No References Document No 11.1 Quality Manual 11.2 360 feedback assessment guideline 11.3 Moderation process guideline Controlled Page 6 of 5