= r t dt + σ S,t db S t (19.1) with interest rates given by a mean reverting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck or Vasicek process,



Similar documents
The option pricing framework

PRICING and STATIC REPLICATION of FX QUANTO OPTIONS

Stochastic Optimal Control Problem for Life Insurance

MTH6121 Introduction to Mathematical Finance Lesson 5

Term Structure of Prices of Asian Options

LECTURE 7 Interest Rate Models I: Short Rate Models


Optimal Investment and Consumption Decision of Family with Life Insurance

Chapter 7. Response of First-Order RL and RC Circuits

Technical Appendix to Risk, Return, and Dividends

11/6/2013. Chapter 14: Dynamic AD-AS. Introduction. Introduction. Keeping track of time. The model s elements

DYNAMIC MODELS FOR VALUATION OF WRONGFUL DEATH PAYMENTS

A Probability Density Function for Google s stocks

Option Pricing Under Stochastic Interest Rates

A Generalized Bivariate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Model for Financial Assets

INTEREST RATE FUTURES AND THEIR OPTIONS: SOME PRICING APPROACHES

Journal Of Business & Economics Research September 2005 Volume 3, Number 9

Stochastic Calculus and Option Pricing

Mathematics in Pharmacokinetics What and Why (A second attempt to make it clearer)

Credit Index Options: the no-armageddon pricing measure and the role of correlation after the subprime crisis

Random Walk in 1-D. 3 possible paths x vs n. -5 For our random walk, we assume the probabilities p,q do not depend on time (n) - stationary

The Transport Equation

New Pricing Framework: Options and Bonds

Modelling of Forward Libor and Swap Rates

Duration and Convexity ( ) 20 = Bond B has a maturity of 5 years and also has a required rate of return of 10%. Its price is $613.

17 Laplace transform. Solving linear ODE with piecewise continuous right hand sides

Analogue and Digital Signal Processing. First Term Third Year CS Engineering By Dr Mukhtiar Ali Unar

Foreign Exchange and Quantos

Dependent Interest and Transition Rates in Life Insurance

2.5 Life tables, force of mortality and standard life insurance products

EURODOLLAR FUTURES AND OPTIONS: CONVEXITY ADJUSTMENT IN HJM ONE-FACTOR MODEL

Answer, Key Homework 2 David McIntyre Mar 25,

Optimal Stock Selling/Buying Strategy with reference to the Ultimate Average

LIFE INSURANCE WITH STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATE. L. Noviyanti a, M. Syamsuddin b

Economics Honors Exam 2008 Solutions Question 5

AP Calculus BC 2010 Scoring Guidelines

Modeling VIX Futures and Pricing VIX Options in the Jump Diusion Modeling

Chapter 2: Binomial Methods and the Black-Scholes Formula

Time Consisency in Porfolio Managemen

Differential Equations and Linear Superposition

AP Calculus AB 2013 Scoring Guidelines

Measuring macroeconomic volatility Applications to export revenue data,

Carol Alexander ICMA Centre, University of Reading. Aanand Venkatramanan ICMA Centre, University of Reading

ON THE PRICING OF EQUITY-LINKED LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS IN GAUSSIAN FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT

Life insurance cash flows with policyholder behaviour

Pricing exotic options. with an implied integrated variance

Present Value Methodology

Pricing Futures and Futures Options with Basis Risk

ARCH Proceedings

Pricing of an Exotic Forward Contract

A Note on Using the Svensson procedure to estimate the risk free rate in corporate valuation

Differential Equations. Solving for Impulse Response. Linear systems are often described using differential equations.

Task is a schedulable entity, i.e., a thread

Lecture 6 Black-Scholes PDE

On the degrees of irreducible factors of higher order Bernoulli polynomials

FX OPTION PRICING: RESULTS FROM BLACK SCHOLES, LOCAL VOL, QUASI Q-PHI AND STOCHASTIC Q-PHI MODELS

How To Price An Opion

HOW CLOSE ARE THE OPTION PRICING FORMULAS OF BACHELIER AND BLACK-MERTON-SCHOLES?

Longevity 11 Lyon 7-9 September 2015

Option Put-Call Parity Relations When the Underlying Security Pays Dividends

Equities: Positions and Portfolio Returns

Appendix A: Area. 1 Find the radius of a circle that has circumference 12 inches.

1. y 5y + 6y = 2e t Solution: Characteristic equation is r 2 5r +6 = 0, therefore r 1 = 2, r 2 = 3, and y 1 (t) = e 2t,

Carbon Trading. Diederik Dian Schalk Nel. Christ Church University of Oxford

Optimal Time to Sell in Real Estate Portfolio Management

The Black-Scholes pricing formulas

Developing Equity Release Markets: Risk Analysis for Reverse Mortgage and Home Reversion

Second Order Linear Differential Equations

I. Basic Concepts (Ch. 1-4)

Vector Autoregressions (VARs): Operational Perspectives

The Path Integral Approach to Financial Modeling and Options Pricing?

Cointegration: The Engle and Granger approach

The Valuation of Petroleum Lease Contracts as Real Options

Term Structure of Commodities Futures. Forecasting and Pricing.

Credit Risk Modeling with Random Fields

AP Calculus AB 2010 Scoring Guidelines

4. International Parity Conditions

Chapter 4: Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

Return Calculation of U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Indices

Transcription:

Chaper 19 The Black-Scholes-Vasicek Model The Black-Scholes-Vasicek model is given by a sandard ime-dependen Black-Scholes model for he sock price process S, wih ime-dependen bu deerminisic volailiy σ S,, and wih ineres raes r = r which are assumed o be no consan, bu sochasic. Tha is, under he risk neural measure, we ignore dividends ds S = r d + σ S, db S 19.1 wih ineres raes given by a mean revering Ornsein-Uhlenbeck or Vasicek process, dr = r r d + σ r db r 19. wih a consan ineres rae volailiy σ r. This model is in paricular relevan for pricing longer daed opions wih mauriies of 5, 10 or 0 years. The Brownian moions db S and db r may have a non vanishing correlaion, The soluions o 19.1 and 19. are given by > s and db S db r = ρ d 19.3 S = S s e s ru σ S,u /du+ s σ S,udB S u 19.4 r = e s r s + r1 e s + σ r e s eu db r u 19.5 For he model 19.1,19., here is a closed form soluion for plain vanilla calls and pus. For a consan ime independen sock volailiy σ S, = σ S, a derivaion can be found in [1]. For ime dependen volailiy he derivaion is similar. There is he following 153

154 Chaper 19 Theorem 19.1: Le, under he risk neural measure, he sock and ineres rae processes S, r be given by 19.1,19. and le g be given by Then he following saemens hold: g := 1 e 19.6 a Le H = HS T, r T be some non exoic payoff wih mauriy T. Then: V S, r,, T := E [e ] T r sds HS T, r T S, r = P, T + v,t φ, r,t φ, ξ e φ +ξ where R H v,t S e P,T r,t φ, ξ := r + e T r r σ r g T dφ dξ π 19.7 + σ r g T [ ρ,t φ + 1 ρ,t 1/ ξ ] 19.8 ρ,t := ρ σ S,u e T u du + σr g T v,t g T 19.9 v,t is given in b below and P, T is he price of a zero bond in he Vasicek model, P, T := E [ e ] r sds r = A, T e gt r 19.10 r A, T = e σ r g T [T ]} σ r 4 gt 19.11 b The price of a plain vanilla european call/pu is given by ɛ = +1 for call, ɛ = 1 for pu V S,, T = ɛ S Nɛd + P, T KNɛd } 19.1 where d ± = v,t = [ ] log S/K ± v P,T,T / 19.13 v,t σ S,u + ρ σ r σ S,u g T u + σ r g T u } du 19.14 Remarks: i Since ineres raes have dimension 1/ime, he IR volailiy σ r has dimension 1/ime 3. The sock volailiy has dimension 1/ ime and has dimension 1/ime. Thus v,t in 19.14 above is indeed a dimensionless quaniy as i should be.

Chaper 19 155 ii For consan sock volailiy σ S,u = σ S =: σ, v,t = σ T + ρ σ r σ = σ 1 T + ρ σ σ r T 1 e or, wih τ := T, 1 e T u du + σ r T 1 e T + T + σr T 1 e T + 1 e T 1 e T v = vτ = σ τ + ρ σ σ r τ gτ + σ r τ gτ+g τ 19.15 and ρ,t = ρτ = ρ σ g τ + σr g τ vτ g τ 19.16 Proof of Theorem: We have o compue he expecaion V S, r,, T = E [e = E [e r sds H ] r sds HS T, r T S, r S e ru σ S,u /du e ] T σ S,u dbu S, rt S, r 19.17 wih saisfy he SDE s S T = S e ru σ S,u /du+ σ S,u dbu S 19.18 r T = e T r + r1 e T + σ r e T T e u db r u 19.19 wih correlaed Brownian moions We have ds S = r d + σ S, db S 19.0 dr = r r d + σ r db r 19.1 db S db r = ρ d 19. r u du = 1 e T r + r T 1 e T + σr 1 e T v db r v =: µ,t + σ r g T v db r v 19.3

156 Chaper 19 where we inroduced he noaion µ,t = 1 e T r + r T 1 e T 19.4 g = 1 e 19.5 Inroducing furher η,t = 1 σ S,u du 19.6 and db r db 19.7 db S = ρ db + 1 ρ dz 19.8 wih wo independen Brownian moions db and dz, he expecaion 19.17 reads V S, r,, T = e µ,t e σr g T u db u 19.9 H S e µ,t η,t +σ r g T udb u + T σ S,u ρdb u+ 1 ρ dz u, r T dw BdW Z where dw B = dw B u } <u T denoes he Wiener measure wih respec o B. To eliminae he facor e σr g T u db u in he firs line of 19.9, we make he subsiuion of variables d B u = db u + σ r g T udu or, for s, T ], and leave Z unchanged. Then, by Girsanov s Theorem such ha e σr B s = B s + σ r s g T u du 19.30 g T u db u 1 σ r g T u du dw B = dw B 19.31 V S, r,, T = e µ,t e 1 σ r g T u du 19.3 H S e µ,t η,t +σ T r g T u[d B u σ rg T u du] σ e S,u ρ[d B u σ rg T u du]+ 1 ρ dz u }, r T dw BdW Z = e µ,t + 1 σ r H g T u du S e µ,t η,t σ r g T u du ρσ r σ S,u g T u du e ρσ S,u +σ rg T u}d B u+ 1 ρ σ S,u dz u, r T dw BdW Z

Chaper 19 157 wih r T given by r T = e T r + r1 e T T + σ r e T u db r u = e T r + r1 e T T + σ r e T u d B u σ r g T udu = e T r + r1 e T σ r g T T + σ r e T u d B u =: q,t + Y,T 19.33 where we abbreviaed and we used he relaion q,t = e T r + r1 e T σ r g T 19.34 Y,T = σ r e T u d B u 19.35 e T u g T udu = e T u e T u du = 1 1 e T = 1 1 e T T 1 e T + e = 1 g T 19.36 The random variables X,T := ρσ S,u + σ r g T u} d B u + 1 ρ T σ S,u dz u 19.37 Y,T = σ r e T u d B u 19.38 are Gaussian wih mean 0 and variances v,t := V[X,T ] = [ρσs,u + σ r g T u ] } + 1 ρ σs,u du 19.39 w,t := V[Y,T ] = σr e T u du = σr g T 19.40 CovX,T, Y,T = ρσr σ S,u e T u + σrg T ue T u} du = ρσ r where we used 19.36 again in he las line. Thus, inroducing F,T := µ,t η,t σ r σ S,u e T u du + σ r g T 19.41 g T u du ρσ r σ S,u g T u du 19.4

158 Chaper 19 and recalling r T = q,t + Y,T, we obain V S, r,, T = e µ,t + 1 σ r g T u du R H S e F,T +X,T, q,t + Y,T e 1 X,T,Y,T C 1 X,T,T Y,T dx de C,T dy,t,t = e µ,t + 1 σ r g T u du 19.43 H S e F,T + v,t x, q,t + w,t y e 1 x,yr 1,T x y de dx dy R,T π R π 19.44 where C,T = V[X,T ] CovX,T, Y,T CovX,T, Y,T V[Y,T ] 19.45 denoes he covariance marix of X,T and Y,T and R,T he corresponding correlaion marix, wih R,T = 1 ρ,t ρ,t = CovX,T, Y,T V[X,T ]V[Y,T ] = ρσ r ρ,t 1 σ S,u e T u du + σ r g T v,t σ r g T 19.46 = ρ σ S,u e T u du + σr g T v,t g T 19.47 Transforming o independen Gaussians, V = e µ,t + 1 σ r g T u du 19.48 S e F,T + v,t x, q,t + w,t ρ,t x + 1 ρ,t 1/ y e x +y R H dx dy π For he special case H 1, 19.17 and he las equaion reduce o V = P, T = E [ e r udu r ] = e µ,t + 1 σ r g T u du 19.49

Chaper 19 159 Wih ha, we obain where we inroduced e F,T = e µ,t σr g T u du ρσ T r σ S,u g T u du η,t = e 1 σ r m,t := 1 σ r g T u du ρσ r σ S,u g T u du η,t / P, T =: e m,t /P, T 19.50 From he definiion of v,t in 19.39 v,t = = such ha, recalling 19.6, g T u du ρσ r σ S,u g T u du η,t 19.51 [ρσs,u + σ r g T u ] } + 1 ρ σs,u du σ S,u + ρσ r σ S,u g T u + σrg T u } du 19.5 m,t = v,t 19.53 Thus, now for a general H again, coninuing wih 19.48, S V S,, T = P, T H P,T em,t + v,t x, x,t x, y e x +y R = P, T + v,t x, x,t x, y e x +y R H v,t S e P,T dx dy π dx dy π 19.54 where x,t x, y = q,t + w,t ρ,t x + 1 ρ,t 1/ y = r + e T r r σ r g T +σ r g T [ ρ,t x + 1 ρ,t 1/ y ] 19.55 In paricular, for a plain vanilla call HS T = S T K +, he same compuaion as in he Black-Scholes case see chaper 6 gives } S V Call S, r,, T = P, T Nd P,T + KNd = S Nd + P, T KNd 19.56 where [ d ± = log S /K P,T ] ± v,t v,t 19.57

160 Chaper 19 and his proves he heorem. Calibraion of he Model o European Call Opions We assume ha he ineres rae process has already been calibraed o he iniial yield curve by using a suiable shif funcion r 0 d r 0 + ϕ}d wih a piecewise consan ϕ as well as o swapions and caples. Now we wan o fi he model o ATM call opions on S wih he mauriies T 1, T,..., T n. Le σ imp T i be he implied volailiies of hose call opions. We assume ha he insananeous sock volailiy σ S, =: σ is piecewise consan on he inervalls [0, T 1, [T 1, T,...,[T n 1, T n ]. From he Theorem 19.1 above we find ha he implied volailiy σ BSVas,imp squared, imes mauriy of a plain vanilla call in he BS-Vasicek model wih mauriy T is given by v 0,T v T = σbsvas,impt T 19.58 = 0 σu + ρσ r σug T u + σrg T u } du For piecewise consan σu u [Ti 1,T i =: σ i he above equaion becomes we wrie emporarily σ r insead of σ r for he ineres rae vol, o avoid confusion wih he equiy σ i s v Ti = = i j=1 i j=1 j T j 1 σu + ρσ r σug T i u + σ r g T i u } du 19.59 σj T j T j 1 + ρσ r Tj σ j T j 1 g T i udu + σ r } T j T j 1 g T i u du wih T 0 := 0. Now he calibraion is done by requiring σ BSVas,imp T i = σ model imp T i! = σ marke imp T i σ imp T i 19.60 for all i = 1,,..., n. The righ hand side of 19.60 is aken from marke daa, and he lef hand side is given by he expression 19.59. Thus we are led o he following sysem of quadraic equaions for σ i : For all i = 1,,..., n σ impt i = i j=1 σj ρσ + σ r Tj j T j T j 1 g T i udu + σr } Tj T j T j 1 g T i u Tj du T i 19.61

Chaper 19 161 where we pu T j = T j T j 1. From his se, σ 1, σ,..., σ n can be deermined inducively saring wih σ 1 : For i = 1, he above equaion simplifies o σimpt 1 = σ1 ρσ + σ r T1 1 T 1 T 0 g T 1 udu + σr } T1 T 1 T 0 g T 1 u du 19.6 which gives σ 1 = ρ σr 1 T 1 T 0 ± g T 1 udu σimp T 1 + ρ σ r T1 T 1 T 0 g T 1 udu σ r T 1 1 T 0 g T 1 u du 19.63 We have 1 s 1 s 1 1 e s g s udu = 1 s g s u du = 1 1 1 e s s + 1 e s s 19.64 19.65 For small x := s < 1 we may Taylor expand o obain 1 e x = 1 1 x+x / x 3 /6+Ox 4 x x = 1 x + x + 6 Ox3 19.66 Thus, 1 s g s udu = 1 1 1 x + x + 6 Ox3 x + x + 6 Ox3 = 1 = s 1 g s s u du = 1 + O s 19.67 1 [ 1 x + ] x 6 + 1 x + x + 3 Ox3 = 1 x 3 + Ox3 = s 3 + O s 3 19.68 Realisic daa from IR calibraion are around 10 percen and σ r around 0.5 o 1 percen, a leas in pre-financial-crisis imes 10%, σ r 1% 19.69 Then, since σ imp T is around 0 o 40 percen, for mauriies less han, say, 5 years such ha T i 0.5 o jusify a Taylor expansion, σ impt 1 σr T 1 1 T 0 g T 1 u du σ impt 1 σ r T 1 /3 σ impt 1 T 1/100 3 19.70

16 Chaper 19 should be posiive. If his is no he case σ 1 = 0 may be a reasonable choice. Now suppose ha σ 1,..., σ i 1 have already been deermined. Then σ i is obained from σimpt i = σi ρσ + σ r Ti i T i T i 1 g T i udu + σr } Ti T i T i 1 g T i u T du i T i + s i 1 σ 1,..., σ i 1 19.71 where we pu s i 1 = i 1 σj ρσ + σ r Tj j T j T j 1 g T i udu + σr } Tj T j T j 1 g T i u Tj du T i 19.7 j=1 If one would subsiue in he above expression T i by T i 1, one would obain he expression for σ impt i 1. Therefore we abreviae Then, σ i = ρ σr + T i i T i σ imp,i T i σ imp,i := σ impt i s i 1 σ 1,..., σ i 1 19.73 T i 1 g T i udu 19.74 + ρ σ r Ti T i T i 1 g T i udu σ r Ti T i T i 1 g T i u du if he above expression is a posiive real number and σ i = 0 oherwise. Finally, 1 s 1 s s g T udu = 1 1 e T e s s g T u du = 1 1 e T e T s T s + e T e T s s s