FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: September 28, 2005 CONTACT: Dan Romer, 215-898-6776; 610-202-7315 (cell)



Similar documents
Executive summary. Participation in gambling activities (Chapter 2)

Gambling participation: activities and mode of access

Gambling and College Students: Literature Review

Gambling participation: activities and mode of access

A Survey of Gambling in Delaware. Walter Mateja, Robert Wilson, and Betty Ableman

Gambling and Problem Gambling Prevalence Among College Students in Florida July 2008

IS LEGALISED ONLINE GAMING IN NORTH AMERICA INEVITABLE AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE

NCAA Student-Athlete Gambling Behaviors and Attitudes: Supplementary Tables May 2013

THE ADDICTIVE POTENTIAL OF SPORTS BETTING

Gambling participation: activities and mode of access

University of Saskatchewan Survey

From slot machines to gaming terminals experiences with regulatory changes in Norway Vienna September 2010

Online Gambling. The main forms of online gambling are online wagering and online gaming.

REPORT OF SURVEY ON PARTICIPATION IN GAMBLING ACTIVITIES AMONG SINGAPORE RESIDENTS, 2014

Internet gambling : An online empirical study among student gamblers. Professor Mark Griffiths Andrew Barnes

Standard 12: The student will explain and evaluate the financial impact and consequences of gambling.

Gaming Trends: Internet and Cell Phones

Norway: The slot machine and problem gambling

Problem Gambling in Germany Evidence and Preventive Measures

TEENS. talking to. about GAMBLING. Our YOUTH ENGAGEMENT. Strategy

Gambling Commission. Trends in Gambling Behaviour

REPORT OF SURVEY ON PARTICIPATION IN GAMBLING ACTIVITIES AMONG SINGAPORE RESIDENTS, 2011

NATION OK WITH SPORTS BETTING; ONLINE GAMBLING A DIFFERENT STORY

ADOLESCENT GAMBLING ON THE INTERNET: A REVIEW

Social media gambling amongst youth: Parental, operator or regulatory responsibility. McGill University

If You Think Investing is Gambling, You re Doing it Wrong!

2007 ADULT GAMBLING PREVALENCE STUDY

GAMBLING ADDICTIONS ON THE INTERNET

The impact of social media gambling sites on youth: Should we be concerned?

Problem Gambling Assessment Instruments & Screens

Is online gambling on state regulated websites safer? An analysis of the first national survey on online gambling

Gambling Behavior among High School Students in the State of Connecticut

Socialization processes of online gambling: experiences of Finnish online Gamblers

Understanding gamblingrelated

Finnish survey: Attitudes on gambling

INTERNET GAMING MRS. AMINA MAKNOON DIRECTOR OF LEGAL SERVICES BETTING GAMING AND LOTTERIES COMMISSION

Study on Hong Kong People s Participation in Gambling Activities (2005) Key Statistics

Introduction to the Danish Gambling market. Experiences from Denmark

Standard 12: The student will explain and evaluate the financial impact and consequences of gambling.

Gambling Attitudes and Behaviors: A 2011 Survey of Adult Iowans

August 31, 2005 Phone: (303) / (303) DENVER Colorado Attorney General John Suthers and Colorado Limited Gaming Control

Youth Gambling via Social Media and other Digital Technologies

Social Impact of Gambling. Andy Todd Counselling Manager RCA Trust Paisley

Gambling among sports people. Heather Wardle & Andrew Gibbons

OUR POLICY IS 19+ Enter a casino gaming floor. Purchase, play or redeem lottery products. Wager on simulcast or live racing

Internet Gambling in Canada: Prevalence, Patterns and Land-Based Comparisons

The ability to play National Lottery games

The Prevalence of Underage Gambling

(SEE IF YOU KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT GAMBLING)

Gambling participation: activities and mode of access

Problem Gambling: The Hidden Addiction

IVTs and tools for responsible gambling

Betting on Excel to enliven the teaching of probability

Gambling revenue Gambling revenue and taxation


2014 BRITISH COLUMBIA PROBLEM GAMBLING PREVALENCE STUDY. Gaming Policy and Enforcement Branch. B.C. Ministry of Finance FINAL REPORT.

Enrollment Data Undergraduate Programs by Race/ethnicity and Gender (Fall 2008) Summary Data Undergraduate Programs by Race/ethnicity

Gambling and Problem Gambling in Mississippi

What risks do simulated gambling activities pose to young people?

HIGH-RISK STOCK TRADING: INVESTMENT OR GAMBLING?

Underage gambling in England and Wales

Parents As Partners: Talking to Your Child About Responsible & Problem Gambling. BC Problem Gambling Help Line

Executive Summary. 1. What is the temporal relationship between problem gambling and other co-occurring disorders?

Fixed Odds Betting Terminals and the Code of Practice. A report for the Association of British Bookmakers Limited SUMMARY ONLY

Daymark Community Monitor. Community Attitudes to Sports Betting

General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination June 2015

Nature and scope of illegal games of chance in the Netherlands G.H.J. Homburg MSc and E. Oranje MSc July 2009

Code of Practice. Queensland responsible gambling Code of Practice. Section I V

How To Stop Gambling In France

NAPCS Product List for NAICS 7132: Gambling Industries

Problem and Responsible Gambling Strategy

The Regulation of Online Gaming Across Jurisdictions: Success, Standards and Stability

Online Gambling in Italy S&D seminar ONLINE GAMBLING European Parliament 14 November 2012

NEW JERSEY VOTERS DIVIDED OVER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE. A Rutgers-Eagleton Poll on same-sex marriage, conducted in June 2006, found the state s

Problem Gambling. Over the last decade, legalized gambling in Canada has grown - rapidly! So has problem gambling!

Toronto Resident Casino Survey Prepared for The City of Toronto

(septembre 2009) 30 %

Transcription:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: September 28, 2005 CONTACT: Dan Romer, 215-898-6776; 610-202-7315 (cell) Card Playing Trend in Young People Continues About 2.9 Million Young People Gamble on Cards in Average Week Increased Use of Internet Gambling Sites Also Observed The results of the Annenberg Public Policy Center s 2005 National Annenberg Risk Survey of Youth (NARSY) indicate that the likelihood that young men will gamble on card games continues to increase. The national survey of 900 young people, ages 14 to 22, found a 20% increase in monthly rates of card gambling compared with our previous study conducted in the summer of 2004. This large increase indicates that more young people are being drawn to this form of gambling. Based on our latest estimates, there are approximately 2.9 million young people between the ages of 14 and 22 who are gambling on cards on a weekly basis. Over 80% of these youth are male. Card playing may also be spilling over to increased use of Internet gambling sites. Those who play cards are also more likely than other gamblers to gamble on the Internet. The rate of gambling on cards at least once a week among 14 to 22 year old males went from 10.1% in 2004 to 12.5% in 2005, a statistically nonsignificant increase (see Table 1). However, the comparable rates for monthly card gambling jumped from 34.7% to 41.6%, a highly significant 20% increase over that time period (see Table 2). The rates for young women were considerably lower, indicating again that this phenomenon is primarily attracting young men. Only about 2.8% of young women reported gambling on cards on a weekly basis in 2005. Nevertheless, about 17.9% of young women report gambling on cards at least once a month. As noted in last year s survey, the rate of card playing was even higher among youth who attend schools. About 14% of male high school youth reported gambling on cards at least once a week, and 15.4% of college youth reported the same activity. Monthly gambling among high school and college males was 37.0% and 50.4% respectively.

The rate for male youth not attending schools (about 25% of 14 to 22 year olds) was lower at 8.2% weekly and 41.3% monthly in 2005. The higher rate among schoolattending youth suggests that this practice is especially powerful in settings where young people spend time with each other and can arrange games with their friends. The rising rate of card playing and overall gambling is worrisome, said Dan Romer, Director of the NARSY. Young people are more prone to addiction and increased exposure to gambling during the adolescent years increases the chances of developing gambling-related problems. Internet Gambling Card players are also more likely to report gambling on Internet sites. This is not surprising since most of those sites offer opportunities to wager on poker. Young men reported a statistically significant increase in weekly gambling on the Internet going from 1.1% in 2004 to 2.4% in 2005. The comparable rates for young women did not change (.7% both years). Monthly rates of Internet gambling remained stable with 19.6% of young men reporting monthly use of Internet gambling sites compared to 19.2% in 2004. If such gambling were legally restricted, young people under the age of 21 would be prohibited from accessing these sites. Our survey indicates that about 2.5% of males between the ages of 14 and 20 use these sites on a weekly basis. This rate is no different from the overall rate for all youth in the survey. This finding supports concerns that Internet gambling sites do not adequately screen out underage players. Based on these latest estimates, approximately 580,000 young people ages 14 to 22 gamble on the Internet on a weekly basis. Most of these young people are under age 21. Overall Rates of Gambling Also Up Gambling on cards also seems to be attracting more young people to gambling. Monthly rates of total gambling in young men went from 48.2% in 2004 to 57.1% in 2005. This increase appears attributable to the increased interest in card playing which accounts for about 70% of monthly gambling activity. Weekly rates of gambling also have increased in young men going from 17.8% in 2004 to 23.9% in 2005. This increase is attributable to increased card playing with both friends and on Internet sites as well as other forms of gambling such as playing of the lottery.

Gambling Problems NARSY asks self-identified gamblers four questions about symptoms of problem gambling: preoccupation, over-spending, tolerance and withdrawal. In 2004, 44.9% of young people who gambled weekly reported at least one of the problem symptoms. In 2005, the percentage increased to 54.5%. Card players tend to report more problem gambling symptoms than other types of weekly gamblers. If the trend toward card playing among young people continues, the overall severity of symptoms may also continue to increase. We also asked persons who gamble at least once a month if their gambling ever led to their owing people money and if so, the highest amount they had ever owed. About 10% answered that it had. We estimated conservatively the average debt to be close to $74. (We excluded one respondent who claimed he owed as much as $10,000). This level of indebtedness would amount to over $115,000,000 for the population of approximately 16 million monthly gamblers ages 14 to 22. Table 1. Percentages of Youth (Ages 14-22) Reporting Gambling in Average Week: Years 2002-2005. School Status by Year Type of Gambling By Gender High School Post High School Not in School 2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2004 2005 Card Playing 6.2 3.9 7.2 8.2 1.4 4.3 7.0 8.4 3.1 11.5 4.4 7.7 4.4 6.0 6.3 7.9 Male 9.2 5.7 10.8 14.0 2.0 7.3 12.5 15.4 6.0 20.0 6.6 8.2 7.1 10.1 10.1 12.5 Female 3.6 1.5 3.3 1.6 0.0 1.1 2.2 1.6 0.9 2.5 2.0 8.1 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.8 Internet 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 2.4 0.9 1.3 0.3 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.6 Male 1.5 1.0 1.9 2.4 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.7 2.6 0.0 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.1 2.4 Female 2.1 2.0 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 2.0 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 Other Gambling 10.1 9.7 7.9 9.5 7.3 8.5 9.8 9.6 18.3 17.9 12.3 14.9 12.2 11.5 9.5 10.7 Male 6.7 11.0 6.1 10.1 8.9 9.4 8.5 9.8 21.2 15.5 10.8 11.0 12.1 11.5 7.7 10.6 Female 5.7 2.9 5.1 4.9 4.3 2.2 7.0 3.9 9.9 8.5 9.4 3.1 6.7 4.5 6.8 4.4 All Gambling 13.2 11.4 12.9 16.7 8.3 10.6 14.7 15.5 19.7 23.5 14.6 15.9 14.6 14.4 13.7 16.0 Male 16.5 17.1 16.9 25.5 11.9 17.7 21.0 26.0 28.8 36.2 17.9 20.0 20.0 22.0 17.8 23.9 Female 9.8 5.9 8.7 6.6 5.2 3.3 9.2 5.5 10.7 11.0 10.8 12.1 9.2 6.7 9.3 7.3. Note: Other gambling includes playing the lottery, betting on sports or horse races, and use of slot machines. Shaded values indicate statistically significant change from 2004 to 2005.

Table 2. Percentages of Youth (Ages 14 22) Reporting Gambling in an Average Month: Years 2004, 2005 School Status and Year Type of Gambling by Gender High School Post High School Not in School 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 Card Playing 21.3 24.4 34.0 38.2 29.1 34.3 26.3 30.1 Male 29.7 37.0 45.3 50.4 34.7 41.3 34.7 41.6 Female 12.0 9.9 24.0 26.6 22.8 26.5 17.6 17.9 Internet Gambling 10.5 8.5 20.5 20.7 17.7 19.7 14.6 14.2 Male 15.2 13.9 29.5 26.6 19.2 25.7 19.2 19.6 Female 5.7 2.2 13.1 15.0 16.1 13.3 9.9 8.5 Other Gambling 22.6 26.4 36.0 39.8 44.9 37.5 31.3 32.9 Male 27.9 34.6 40.3 44.7 44.9 45.0 34.9 40.0 Female 16.8 17.0 32.3 35.4 45.0 29.3 27.6 25.5 All Gambling 31.5 39.2 48.7 52.6 53.5 45.7 40.9 44.2 Male 40.3 53.4 59.0 65.3 55.4 56.0 48.2 57.1 Female 21.9 23.0 39.7 40.2 51.0 34.7 33.4 30.3 Note: Other gambling includes playing the lottery, betting on sports or horse races, and use of slot machines. Shaded values indicate statistically significant change from 2004 to 2005.

Methodology The surveys were conducted by telephone between May 8 and June 21 in 2002; between March 3 and June 30 in 2003; between April 27 and September 16 in 2004; and between April 28 and August 25 in 2005 by Shulman, Ronca, and Bucuvalas, Inc., using random digit dialing procedures. The survey is designed by the Adolescent Risk Communication Institute of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. The samples contain 900 (2003 and 2005) and 1501 (2004) completed interviews with young people ages 14 to 22 across the 48 contiguous states. The response rates were approximately 50% across the four years, which is comparable to the rate obtained by CDC (48.9%) in its national telephone surveys of behavioral risk factors. Results are weighted to represent national proportions for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and region of the country. Error ranges for the survey vary with the question, subgroup examined, and the year of the survey. The maximum error is +/- 3.3% for the entire samples in 2002, 2003 and 2005 and +/- 2.6% for the entire sample in 2004. When data are examined by subgroup, the maximum error is larger. All respondents were asked questions about a range of risky activities, including the frequency of engaging in specific gambling activities in an average month. Weekly gamblers are those who said they gambled at least once a week in an average month. Data for monthly gambling in years 2002 and 2003 are not shown since the questioning used to obtain these rates was not comparable to years 2004 and 2005. If respondents had engaged in one or more specific gambling activities in an average month, they were asked four questions about difficulties related to their gambling. These items asked whether in the past year the respondent had (a) often found yourself thinking about gambling, (b) ever needed to gamble with more and more money to get the amount of excitement you want, (c) ever spent more than you had planned on gambling, and (d) ever felt bad or fed up when trying to cut down or stop gambling? ###