36 Ivan Road Application to Remove Three Private Trees



Similar documents
Chapter 813 TREES. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Council of the City of Toronto as indicated in article histories. Amendments noted where applicable.

Summary of the Heritage Tree Ordinance Updated July 2013

CITY OF DUNWOODY. 41 Perimeter Center East Dunwoody, GA Phone: Fax: MEMORANDUM

ARBORIST REPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 813, TREES. Chapter 813 TREES. ARTICLE I Inspection; Removal of Infested Trees

APPEAL APPLICATION FORM: TREE REMOVAL BY CITY IN PUBLIC AREAS

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

Tree Talk. Customer Care.

L A N D S C A P E P A T T E R N S

URBAN FORESTRY BRIEF Questions & Answers Recommended Changes to the Urban Forest Preservation Act of 2002

Tree Management Guidelines

Fort Wayne Emerald Ash Borer

City of Cambridge Climate Protection Action Committee. Recommendation to the City Manager on Urban Heat Island Mitigation

Tree Assessment Report Prepared for: Dr. Peter Giarrizzo 18 Franklin Place Pelham NY 10803

agrees to replace at no charge any tree that dies and subsequent inspection shows that the wire basket was not properly removed.

Croft House Lodge Tree Removal and Building Relocation Mitigation Report. November 2010

Tree Planting Process

Green Roofs are the Way to Grow By Mark Gaulin

TREE PERMIT APPLICATION Private Property- Section MBMC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

TREE PROTECTION POLICY AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION NEAR TREES

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards

Begin forwarded message:

Toronto's New Soil and Tree-based Standards for Boulevards

Why hire an arborist?

What you need to know about the management of. the Emerald Ash. Borer (EAB) Guidelines for hiring tree care services to manage urban trees

Urban Ecosystem Services Seattle s Urban Forest

City of Casey Tree Guide

A DISCOVERY REGARDING THE DEATH OF ASH TREES IN THE PLYMOUTH AREA

Street and Reserve Trees Policy

One Major Six Concentrations. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst

SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PRINCIPLES HISTORICAL ON THE GROUND

Construction Guidelines for Tree Protection. d. DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN FORESTRY ADMINISTRATION

CONSENT, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 34A, 88, 104, 104C, and 108 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT, IS GRANTED. THE FULL DECISION IS SET OUT BELOW

Tree Management Policy

Touch briefly on developing a private. Identify key elements that make a private property tree ordinance effective

Guidelines for. Urban Tree Canopy

Parks, Forestry & Recreation

Chapter TREE PROTECTION REGULATIONS

Borough of Doylestown Shade Tree Commission Meeting Minutes

Chapter 1b - Priority Map Development

COLLEGE TOWNSHIP CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE O HERITAGE TREE ORDINANCE

Cool Spaces. earth-wise guide to. green strategies: light strategies: Keep Austin Cool

Avoiding Tree & Utility Conflicts

The Basics of Tree Pruning

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

City of Markham - Contractors to Perform Tree Azin Injections

Open Forum: Tree Preservation Town of Morrisville

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

: WOODLAND AND TREE PRESERVATION:

TEXT OF BILL Incorporated Village of Sea Cliff BILL NO

Chapter 24 TREES AND SHRUBS

Hard Decisions Ahead With Ash Trees

APPLICATION PROCESS FOR LAND DISTURBING PERMIT

Portland State University. Campus Tree Care Plan

LOWER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP Montgomery County, Pennsylvania ORDINANCE NO.

i-tree-eco International Versions

isbn / Recommended citation for the full chapter:

Optimum Solar Orientation: Miami, Florida

(c) Western Sycamore (Platanus racemosa)

Virginia State University Tree Care Plan

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

How To Preserve Trees

Tree Trimming Tips and Tricks

Objectives. EAB Symptoms 8/18/14. Emerald Ash Borer: A Threat to Colorado s Community Forests. 1- to 2-Year Life Cycle.

CONNECT PLAN PROTECT ENGAGE MANAGE

2O11-1O AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF ISLAND HEIGHTS, OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ESTABLISHING A TREE STEWARDSHIP ORDINANCE

Council Policy. This Policy assists in the implementation of the Council Plan Revised 2010, in particular Strategy 3.1.

Liveability Planning Checklist Give it to the Council!

Oak Trees BASIC GROWING REQUIREMENTS FOR YOUR

Parks and Open Space Department Forestry Section Agreement for Contractors to Perform Arboricultural Services on Town Property

CWSRF Project Descriptions and Examples for Green Project Reserve

Toronto: Ahead of the storm development of the climate change adaptation action plan

Planning the Urban Forest

Planting and Tree Care for Roxborough Park. Keith Worley, Forester ISA Certified Arborist

Nevada Shade Tree Council 2011 STRATEGIC PLAN Adopted February 4, 2011 THREATS/ISSUES AFFECTING NEVADA S URBAN FORESTS

POLICY P350.5 Trees on Development Sites and Street Verges. Relevant Management Practice Nil Relevant Delegation Delegations DC 342 and DM 342

Urban and Community Forestry Agriculture & Natural Resources TIMELY INFORMATION Post Storm Tree Assessment; Guide to evaluating trees

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES OAK TREE ORDINANCE

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-

Guide To Trees And Power Lines

SPECIAL REPORT. TD Economics THE VALUE OF URBAN FORESTS IN CITIES ACROSS CANADA

Public Utility District #1 of Jefferson County Vegetation Clearance Policy And Specifications

Effective immediately, I am directing the staff to observe the following rules regarding tree removal in the public rights-of-way in Beaufort County:

Fireline Rehabilitation on Donnelly Flats fire (B222) Summary: 7/1/99 R.R. Jandt

Corralling the evidence about the value of Green Infrastructure. Martin Moss. Senior Advisor Green Infrastructure Operations England.

Richmond City s Green Infrastructure Assessment

Portland Trees - permits, tree removal, report a downed tree.

Solar Heating Basics Page 1. a lot on the shape, colour, and texture of the surrounding

River Friendly Landscape Program Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) February 2016

1 ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE OUTBREAK

Urban greening for a healthier west

The built environment : a policy framework for climate adaptation

Community Greenscapes & Trails

CHAPTER 13 NATURAL RESOURCES ARTICLE III. TREES

Total Criteria Score Out of a possible 6

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

SMUD SHADE TREE AND COOL ROOF PROGRAMS: CASE STUDY IN MITIGATING THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS

APPENDIX "F' TREE REMOVAL F-1

Urban Ecosystem Analysis For the Houston Gulf Coast Region Calculating the Value of Nature

November General Notes. Tree Protection. Tree Protection and New Development Guidance Note

Transcription:

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 36 Ivan Road Application to Remove Three Private Trees Date: April 18, 2016 To: From: Ward: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Jason Doyle, Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Ward 44 Scarborough East P:\2016\Cluster A\PFR\SC14-051016-AFS#22793 SUMMARY This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove three (3) privately-owned trees located at 36 Ivan Road. The application indicates the main reason for tree removal is due to the location of a proposed new house and subsequent purported damage to or significant loss of roots involved in the excavation for the foundation. The presence of cytospora cankers on the trees, leading to slow decline, is also stated as a reason. The subject trees are all Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees measuring 38 cm, 40 cm and 47 cm in diameter. Urban Forestry does not support the removal of these trees as they are healthy and maintainable. RECOMMENDATIONS The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that: 1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove three (3) privately-owned trees located at 36 Ivan Road. Financial Impact There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. Staff Report for Action on 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees 1

COMMENTS Urban Forestry received an application for a permit to remove three (3) privately-owned trees situated at the front of the property at 36 Ivan Road. The subject trees are Norway spruce trees measuring 38 cm, 40 cm and 47 cm in diameter. The request to remove these trees has been made due to the location of a proposed new house outside the tree protection zone (TPZ) and subsequent purported significant loss of or damage to roots involved in excavation for the foundation. The presence of cytospora cankers on some of the trees, which can lead to decline of the trees' health, was also stated as a reason for removal. An initial arborist report which accompanied the application describes the trees to be in good condition; however a revised version of the arborist report was later provided and stated that the trees were in fair condition. Two of the three trees (38 cm and 47 cm in diameter) are identified as having cankers and one tree (40 cm in diameter) is identified as having possible cankers. The arborist notes that some of the cankers are large branchgirdling cankers; however does not specify if these are on the trees for which removal is requested. The arborist report also states that the construction of the (new) house may interfere with the trees, even if outside the tree protection zone (TPZ) area and that the roots could possibly be damaged from compaction or cutting. Urban Forestry staff have inspected the trees and reviewed the construction plans for the site. Few signs of cytospora canker on the trees were found. Review of the plans indicates that there is no conflict between the trees and the proposed new house. No excavation is shown to occur inside any of the trees' minimum tree protection zone (TPZ) as required by the City's Tree Protection Policy and Specifications for construction Near Trees. The trees can be fully protected during construction of the proposed new house. As required under Section 813-19, of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 813, Trees, Article III, a Notice of application sign was posted on the subject property for the minimum 14-day period, in order to provide an opportunity for comment by the community. One (1) letter of objection regarding the trees' removal was received. A permit to remove these trees was denied by Urban Forestry. The owner is appealing this decision. Should City Council approve this request for tree removal, in accordance with Section 813-20 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 813, Trees, Article III, permit issuance must be conditional upon the provision of satisfactory replacement planting. As a condition of permit issuance, the property owner has proposed to plant fifteen (15) large growing shade trees in the backyard. This proposal is considered to be an adequate condition and supported by Urban Forestry. Trees improve the quality of urban life and contribute greatly to our sense of community. They are aesthetically pleasing and soften the hard lines of built form and surfaces in an urban setting. Trees contribute to the overall character and quality of neighbourhoods. Staff Report for Action on 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees 2

Studies suggest that social benefits such as crime reduction and neighbourhood cohesion can be directly attributed to the presence of trees. The environmental benefits of trees include cleansing of air, noise and wind reduction, and protection from ultraviolet radiation. Trees reduce rainwater runoff thereby reducing soil erosion and lowering storm water management costs. They also contribute to moderation of temperature extremes and reduction of the urban heat island effect by providing shade during the summer. Trees provide many economic benefits, including the enhancement of property values. Homes with mature trees have higher value when compared to similar types of homes in similar locations without trees. Mature trees are associated with reduced home energy consumption. Air conditioning costs are lower in a home shaded by trees and heating costs are reduced when trees mitigate the cooling effects of wind in winter. Trees are a community resource, which can make the city more attractive to investors, tourists and prospective residents, thus contributing to growth and prosperity. It is the goal of the City of Toronto to increase the city's existing tree canopy to 40 percent. The loss of the tree canopy in the city due to the ice storm experienced in December 2013, as well as the presence of the Asian long-horned beetle and the emerald ash borer make the preservation of all healthy trees more necessary now than ever. Urban Forestry, therefore, does not support removal of these three (3) trees. CONTACT Mark Ventresca, Supervisor Tree Protection and Plan Review, Urban Forestry Tel: 416-396-5131, Fax: 416-396-4170, Email: mventre@toronto.ca SIGNATURE Jason Doyle Director of Urban Forestry Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division Staff Report for Action on 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees 3

ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 - Photograph of the three (3) Norway spruce trees. Attachment 2 - Photograph of the three (3) Norway spruce trees. Attachment 3 Photograph of the three (3) Norway spruce trees. Staff Report for Action on 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees 4

Attachment 1 Subject Trees Staff Report for Action on 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees 5

Attachment 2 Staff Report for Action on 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees 6

Attachment 3 Staff Report for Action on 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees 7