Carbon Footprint of a Dell Latitude E6540

Similar documents
Comparing the Carbon Footprints of 11G and 12G Rack Servers from Dell

White Paper Life Cycle Assessment and Product Carbon Footprint

Environmental Performance Data Calculation Standards

A clean energy solution from cradle to grave

Environmental Benefits of Thin Computing A comparison of the environmental impacts of conventional desktop and thin computing

How To Calculate The Greenhouse Effect (Carbon Footprint) On A Desktop Pc (Fujitsu)

Environmental Impacts of E-Books

CARBON ASSESSMENT TICKETING DELIVERY SYSTEMS

HUGO BOSS ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT. Our claim. Our approach

3. Operational Highlights

Climate Change and Waste The Missing Link December 2010 Written by Jacob Gregory

GREEN ICT DELL, OUR SUPPLIERS AND CUSTOMERS

ECO-EFFICIENT RECYCLING THE RECYCLING INDUSTRY: A PERSPECTIVE FOR THE GREEN ECONOMY FACING THE ECONOMIC CRISIS. Duccio Bianchi - Ambiente Italia

IT for Green: Impacting the Triple Bottom Line - People, Planet, and Profits. Webcast May 21, 2008

Sample Scope 3 GHG Inventory Reporting Template

Sustainability: 5 Simple Ways Businesses Can Save at Work Tips from the Logistics Experts at UPS

Life Cycle Assessment of a Solid Ink MFP Compared with a Color Laser MFP Total Lifetime Energy Investment and Global Warming Impact

INDUSTRY INTRODUCTION: PLASTICS

Case Study of an IBM Rack- mount Server. Christopher Weber. Asst. Research Professor. Carnegie Mellon University.

How To Do A Complete Life Cycle Analysis Of Packaging

Life-cycle Cost Analysis: Aluminum versus Steel in Passenger Cars

Environmental Product Declaration

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM POLICY ON SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES

Greening Supply Chain for a Better Environmental Management

LIFE-CYCLE IMPACTS AND COSTS OF MANGANESE LOSSES AND RECOVERY DURING FERROMANGANESE PRODUCTION

Energy consumption. Environmental indicators

ICT Remanufacturing in the European B2B market. Questions + Answers.

ECO-FRIENDLY COMPUTING: GREEN COMPUTING

Woodfibre Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project. Review of Related Upstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Estimates

GHG Protocol Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard ICT Sector Guidance. Chapter 7:

THE ACS BACKGROUND GENERAL COMMENTS

BES 6001 Issue 3 Guidance Document

What are the environmental burdens of invoicing systems? A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Emissions Inventory, Fiscal Year Siemens Building Technologies Division, U.S. usa.siemens.com/buildingtechnologies

Your Partner in Sustainability

COMPARATIVE PRODUCT LIFECYCLE ASSESSMENT NIKE, Inc. Product Comparisons

Konica Minolta s green contribution

How To Know If Cfc 12 Is Still Needed

THE BIG GREEN PICTURE HOW KONICA MINOLTA INNOVATIONS, PROGRAMS & ENERGY-SAVING INITIATIVES PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS

The BOMBARDIER* REGINA*

E-waste Challenges & Solutions

Category 3: Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2

KWE Basic Philosophy. As of March 2010, KWE is ISO14001 certified at 6 locations in Japan and 8 locations overseas

Greening the Supply Chain: A Way towards a New Way

Shades of Green. Shades of Green: Electric Cars Carbon Emissions Around the Globe. Shrink That Footprint. Lindsay Wilson.

Environmental Policy March 2012

6.3 Structured identification of business improvement opportunities using Life Cycle Assessment: A case study in the gas turbine industry

SUSTAINABILITY & THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE IMPACT: HOW TO BEGIN

SERVICEWEAR APPAREL CORPORATE SUPPORT CENTER INITIATIVES:

DHL GREEN SERVICES DECREaSE EmISSIoNS. INCREaSE EffICIENCy.

Product Environmental Assessment Activities in Taiwan

An Introduction to Product Takeback

State of the art sustainability marketing tools

Carbon Sequestration Tool Background and User Guide

siemens.com/mobility Metro Oslo Environmental Product Declaration according to ISO 14021

White Paper Product Quality Fujitsu ESPRIMO PCs, Fujitsu CELSIUS workstations, Fujitsu FUTRO thin clients

About this document. UPS Attention: Sustainability Report Editor 55 Glenlake Parkway N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30328

Category 5: Waste Generated in Operations

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of solar cooling systems

Materials Footprint Reduction of Televisions and Computer Monitors:

Quantitative Inventory Uncertainty

How To Understand The Purpose Of Life Cycle Assessment

NetSuite Offers Green Alternative to Traditional On-Premise ERP and CRM Solutions

A Green Idea. Reclaiming Urban Wood Waste And Urban Forest Debris. For Fuel/Combustion & Renewable Energy

A New Model for Estimating Carbon Emissions from LTL Shipments

Greening Fleets. A roadmap to lower costs and cleaner corporate fleets

BT s Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain Scope 3 accounting and reporting

Fraunhofer System Research for E-Mobility (FSEM) Current LCA results and need for further research

TOSCA. How companies work to realize sustainability goals

Empowering Sustainability in Logistics

Environmental sustainability BBC Environment Targets: Performance 2014/15

Baxter driver David Kirkpatrick delivers dialysis products to home patient Liam McMahon in Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Greening The Data Center

Transcription:

Carbon Footprint of a Dell Latitude E6540 Puneet Shrivastava, Regulatory Senior Engineer, Environmental Affairs Markus Stutz, Regulatory Principal Engineer, Environmental Affairs October 2013 Total greenhouse gas emissions for the Latitude E6540 (408 kgco 2 eq) are comparable to those for filling up a VW Golf fuel tank nearly 3.5 times. Figure 1: Breakdown of Contributions to Carbon Footprint From product design to end-of-life recycling and everything in between, we consider the environment at every stage of a product s lifecycle. Our environmental programs and initiatives help Dell and our customers reduce consumption and minimize environmental impact. Dell recognizes that climate change is real and must be mitigated, and we support efforts to reduce global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to levels guided by evolving science. We are also committed to reducing GHG emissions beyond our own operations. To do this, we have adopted a strategy that takes into account the GHG impacts of our products and our suppliers. We look at each stage of the product life cycle from

developing, designing and sourcing through manufacturing and operations, order fulfilment, customer use and product recovery. By assessing the carbon footprint of a laptop, we are able to identify areas for improvement to reduce overall GHG emissions and also help customers do the same. Calculating the carbon footprint of a laptop The carbon footprint includes GHG emissions contribute to global warming in kg of CO 2 equivalent (kgco 2 eq). Dell uses PAIA (Product Attribute to Impact Algorithm) to perform product carbon footprints (PCFs) on current models of desktops and laptops. PAIA is a streamlined LCA tool developed by MIT s Materials System Laboratory that estimates carbon and energy impact. It takes into consideration important attributes of the product which can be correlated to activities such as manufacturing processes or transportation to calculate the product carbon footprint 1. The life-cycles phases taken into account are Manufacturing, Transportation, Use, and Recycling. Assumptions made and information required for each phase are as follows: Build: Manufacturing traditionally includes the extraction, production, and transport of raw materials, the manufacturing of components, and subassemblies (including the product packaging), the manufacturing of the product, and the final assembly of the laptop. These values can be derived from attribute information that is gathered from general dimensions, chassis and mechanics, hard drive, optical drive, power supply unit, motherboard and other boards, and packaging. Ship: Transportation contributions include air, ocean, and land transportation of the laptop and its packaging from the product manufacturing location to the final assembly sites, and from there to the distribution centers. Transport of the laptop from distribution centers to the end customer was also included. Transport can be quite varied, depending on region, laptop customization level, and lead time. Use: Lifetime of the laptop was estimated at 4 years. This is consistent with general business customer use models. It was assumed that the external power supply is connected to the electricity 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. To determine the energy consumption in use, the US Environmental Protection Agency s Energy Star Typical Energy Consumption (TEC) method was used. This method focuses on the typical energy consumed while in normal operation during a representative period of time and can be used to compare the energy performance of computers. The use phase was considered in the US only. Recycle: It is common for laptops to be refurbished and/or reused at the end of the first customer use. For this study, however, it was assumed that the laptop was sent for recycling 1 MIT Materials System Laboratory: http://msl.mit.edu/projects/paia/main.html

at the end of the first customer use. Following US electronics recycling requirements, we assumed 75% of the laptop is recycled, while the rest is incinerated to recover the energy contained. Transport to recycling as well as energy used in mechanical separation and shredding were taken into account. Carbon footprint of the Dell Latitude E6540 The total carbon footprint of a Dell Latitude E6540 is approximately 408 kgco 2 eq when used in the US. Figure 2: Total Product Carbon Footprint [kgco 2 eq] of the Latitude E6540 Laptop in the US. The GHG emissions from manufacturing is roughly 2/3 of the total, with use and transportation making up the majority of the remaining 1/3. This distribution is consistent with other PAIA-modeled Latitudes. In this case, the relative complexity of the laptop, its low power consumption, and its relatively short lifetime are key factors. A lot of effort has gone into enhancing the energy efficiency of laptops. For most other computer equipment (e.g., desktop PCs and servers), the use phase is typically a much larger component. Manufacturing contributes 259 kgco 2 eq to the overall carbon footprint (64%) The GHG emissions from manufacturing makes up almost 2/3 of the total emissions. This can be attributed to the steps taken to decrease the carbon input in the other phases. The majority of the emissions contributed to the manufacturing phase come from the materials and production of, in order of importance, the mainboard and other boards and the display.

Packaging 1% Display 30% Chassis 6% Assembly 3% Hard Drive 4% Optical Drive 1% Power Supply 5% Battery 4% Mainboard and other boards 46% Figure 3: Breakdown of manufacturing phase in the carbon footprint. Total manufacturing contribution is 259 kgco 2 eq, or 64% of the total carbon footprint. Transportation contributes 38 kgco 2 eq (9%). Currently, transporting products from the assembly location to the country of use relies on a large part on air transport, with a smaller portion being shipped via ocean. Within the country of use, Dell transports primarily by truck. Air transportation has a very high impact due to the fact that is very energy intensive. In contrast, truck and ship transport have much lower impact. Use contributes 110 kgco 2 eq (27%). This product is Energy Star version 5.2 certified, which requires it to have several regulated power modes, including multiple idle stages, sleep, and off. Considering these modes and the average use of a laptop, a yearly TEC, or typical energy consumption, can be calculated. For the Latitude E6540 this is 36.87 kwh. Recycling contributes 1 kgco 2 eq, which is not significant when compared to the other phases, and makes up 0% of the total emissions. PAIA uses the cut-off method for end-of-life. The impact of end of life is calculated, but recycling is not credited to offset the carbon footprint. However, a market mix of recycled metals is assumed on the front end (raw materials phase), so recycled content is taken into account upstream. The total product carbon footprint is comparable to consuming 188 liters (50 gallons) of gas, enough to fill a VW Golf fuel tank nearly 3.5 times. This comparison demonstrates that the greenhouse gas emissions over a four-year lifespan of the laptop are relatively modest. What is Dell doing to lower the carbon footprint? By optimizing consumption of energy, we can reduce costs, shrink our carbon footprint and develop expertise that allows us to help our customers do the same.

Build: We committed in early 2009 to further reduce our worldwide facilities GHG emissions by 40% by 2015. We require our primary suppliers to measure and publicly report their GHG emissions, and we ask them to set improvement goals of their own and set expectations for their suppliers. We also continue to making smarter choices about the materials that go into our products by using environmentally preferable materials and avoiding those that are not. Ship: With the introduction of Smart Selection systems, the vast majority of purchases will be premade models. These will ship via ocean and will change the transportation from the manufacturer to the customer from a 70% air 30% ship ratio to 20% air 80% ship or better. Use: All Latitude laptops, OptiPlex desktops, and Precision workstation systems can be configured for Energy Star compliance and are among the most energy-efficient in the industry. As of fiscal year 2013, we also offer approximately 200 products registered for Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT). The use of power management features, which put the laptop into sleep mode when not used, needs to be applied by the users more uniformly. This is best achieved by leaving the power management in the factory-default setting. Recycle: Dell s goal was to offer safe, responsible recycling solutions to all of our customers globally. We were the first in the industry to ban the export of non-working electronics and e-waste to developing countries and we work hard to develop convenient technology recycling programs available to communities worldwide. We have partnered with shipping companies to provide free mail-back recycling of Dell-branded electronics equipment. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the MIT Materials System Laboratory for their development of and support with PAIA. They also thank Dell s Global Environmental Affairs, Logistics, Supply Chain, and Mechanical Engineers teams, as well as the Compal team for their support on this project.