Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) in Montenegro



Similar documents
Regulatory Reform in EU accession countries: Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment system Croatian case

/ Insurance. Regional Highlights * Bosnia and Herzegovina. karanovic/nikolic. /March 2015/

Presented at the Public-Private Dialogue 2015 Workshop (Copenhagen, March 10-13, 2015)

Public Administration Reform Process In Macedonia: Between Politics And Good Governance

REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

LAW ON THE CENTRE FOR TRAINING IN JUDICIARY AND STATE PROSECUTION SERVICE

Dialogue between the Government and stakeholders a crucial factor for improving Business Environment

Policy Brief. Public e-procurement at the local level in Albania. Challenges in the fight against corruption. Mona Xhexhaj

THE WESTERN BALKANS LEGAL BASIS OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND INSTRUMENTS

LAW ON THE BASES REGULATING SECURITY SERVICES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. ( Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 116/2007, 72/2012) I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Tentative Action Plan

EXTERNAL AUDIT AND RELATION BETWEEN INTERNAL AUDITORS, SUPERVISORY BODY AND EXTERNAL AUDITORS OF THE BANKING SECTOR IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Proposal for an Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Regulation

The Double Democratic Deficit Parliamentary Accountability and the Use of Force under International Auspices

Project Fiche No. 8 Implementation and follow-up of the Small Business Act (SBA)

Government Decree No. 29/2008. (II. 19.) on the Powers and Competences of the Minister Heading the Prime Minister s Office

Pursuant to Article 95, item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro I hereby pass the ENACTMENT PROCLAIMING THE LAW ON BANKS

PRIORITIES TURKEY MAY 2013

Response from the Department of Treasury, Western Australia, to the Productivity Commission s Draft Report Regulatory Impact Analysis: Benchmarking

CEAS ANALYSIS. of the Law on Amendments of the Law on the Security Intelligence Agency

Assisting Economic Transition: An RIA Strategy for Developing Countries

CONSULTATION PAPER CP 41 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CREDIT INSTITUTIONS AND INSURANCE UNDERTAKINGS

USAID Business Enabling Project in Serbia Scope of Work for Consultant Technical Assistance to the Ministry of Finance and Economy

PRINCIPLES AND GOOD PRACTICES

Handling impact assessments in Council

PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AS THE FOUNDATION OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION

Initial appraisal of a European Commission Impact Assessment

INDICATIVE GUIDELINES ON EVALUATION METHODS: EVALUATION DURING THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD

CROSSCUTTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM STRATEGY

CEEweb s position for limiting non-renewable energy use in Europe

Office of the Executive Council. activity plan

High Representative of the Union for Foreign Policy and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission

Accountability of central banks and supervisory bodies what should be the remit of auditors at EU and national level

LATVIA. The national Youth Guarantee Implementation Plan (YGIP)

Structure of the Administration (political and administrative system)

THE BANJA LUKA PLEDGE A DECADE OF ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE

Screening report Turkey

Training Professionals in Trade Policy Development Advocacy and Negotiation - The Training Challenge in Commercial Diplomacy

Seminar on egovernment / mgovernment and Strategic Planning in PA January 2014 Danilovgrad, Montenegro PROVISIONAL PROGRAMME

EU decision making and negotiation techniques

Impact of Public Internal Financial Control on Public Administration in Croatia

Official Journal of the European Union

Učešće mladih. Institutional framework. National Strategy Priorities / Objectives Legal framework. Funding

Numbered 2010/11 Prime Ministry Circular about Istanbul International Finance Center Administrative Structure was published in the Official Gazette

THE LAW ON PRESCHOOL EDUCATION I. BASIC PROVISIONS

QUICK REFERENCE BEst PRaCtICE REgUlatIoN HaNdBooK

BSA SERBIAN REGULATORY BODY

First of all, taking opportunity of the conference, I feel pleased to come together with you in distinguished and historical city, Belgrade.

Description of the program

Joint Declaration. On the Establishment of the Regional Co-operation Council (RCC)

CITIZENS' LABOR RIGHTS PROTECTION LEAGUE N.Narimanov street, 11 \ 16, Baku AZ1006, Azerbaijan

BARRIERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDEPENDENT FOREIGN POLICY THINK-TANKS IN RUSSIA

URBACT III OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ( ) CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE CREATION OF 20 ACTION-PLANNING NETWORKS

Diversity of Cultural Expressions INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS

Reforming criminal laws in any state is a time-consuming, intensive, and laborious

Ireland s Corporation Tax Strategy and FDI

Preparation of the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Cohesion Policy, Milan 10 October 2014

Job Profile. Component Manager, Deepening Democracy Democratic Governance Facility (Senior Adviser (N1)) Uganda

ATLANTA DECLARATION AND PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Project: Assessing the feasibility of establishing a Central Securities Depository

Risk Management Strategy EEA & Norway Grants Adopted by the Financial Mechanism Committee on 27 February 2013.

Inter-Institutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment (IA) General principles

Management Seminar on Global Assessments, Yalta, September Macedonian experience with the use of Global Assessment

Tempus & Bilateral Cooperation with Industrialised Countries

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Georgia. Progress Report

Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership

MANUAL FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL

Election Monitoring and Democracy Studies Center (EMDS)

GREEK ACTION PLAN ON ASYLUM AND MIGRATION MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Consultation Paper. ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures. 13 February 2014 ESMA/2014/175

Vienna 2 Initiative. Working Group on the European Banking Union and Emerging Europe 12

Evidence-informed regulation The ACMA approach

PRESENTATION OF THE SPI ALBANIA MODERNIZATION PLATFORM. SPI Albania Secretariat European University of Tirana January 15, 2009

LAW ON VOLUNTEERING Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia no. 85 from

Logan City Council. Strategic Planning and Performance Management Framework

Private Television in Poland & Slovakia

Professionsbachelor i Innovation og Entrepreneurship Bachelor of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

CONTENT OF THE AUDIT LAW

Central bank corporate governance, financial management, and transparency

Feasibility study for the Design and Implementation of Demandside Innovation Policy Instruments in Estonia

Vacancy for a post of Information Officer - COI (Temporary Agent, AD 5) in the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) REF.

FBF position paper on the European Commission's proposal for a Directive on bank accounts ****

LAW ON THE PROTECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMISSION FROM THE PRESIDENT, MS WALLSTRÖM, MR KALLAS, MS HÜBNER AND MS FISCHER BOEL

LAW ON FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS. ( Official Herald of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 62/2006 and 31/2011) I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Team Development and Team Management

Draft Concept Note Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea. The 2014 Busan Global Partnership Workshop 6-7 November, Seoul. 1.

APRA S FIT AND PROPER REQUIREMENTS

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STRATEGY

FINANCIAL ADVISERS REGULATION: VOLUNTARY AUTHORISATION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No /..

Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 July 2015 (OR. en)

Job Profile. Head of Programme (N1) Governance Facility. Nepal

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Job Profile. Component Manager, Voice and Accountability Democratic Governance Facility (DGF) (Senior Adviser (N1)) Uganda

BAR ASSOCIATION OF SERBIA LAWYERS LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

LAW ON RESTRUCTURING AND REHABILITATION OF A PORTION OF THE BANKS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA

CONTEMPORARY HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DEFENSE SYSTEM. Gajić Željko. Strategic Planning Department, Ministry of Defense, Serbia

7. LAW ON LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT FINANCING. Pursuant to Article 88 item 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Montenegro, I hereby issue the

Transcription:

- Towards Better Regulation Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) in Montenegro SUMMARY: As a candidate country for joining the European Union, Montenegro has the obligation to harmonize its overall legislation with the EU Acquis. Having in mind that there is a significant number of existing laws that have to be amended, as well as those that are yet to be adopted, the state administration has to undergo a comprehensive reform in order to meet the challenge. Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) is one of the mechanisms that will be of great significance for the process of diminishing administrative ballast. RIA is a method which is used in harmonizing laws and bylaws, indicating financial and material impact that the new legislation will have. It is applied before the law is adopted. This concept has been introduced in the USA, while its use on the European soil has been increasing ever since 2003, when it was implemented on the EU level. Unlike the countries of the region (Serbia and Macedonia) where RIA is applied only to draft laws, in Montenegro RIA will be applied to bylaws as well. The purpose of this policy brief is to explain the concept of RIA, its significance and the practice of the countries of the region in its implementation. It will explain the challenges that our Government may face while implementing RIA. This brief also tries to open up a public debate about the benefits and effects that the implementation of this mechanism will have. Opinions and attitudes in this text are those of authors and do not necessarily comply with those of the Think Tank Fund What is Regulatory Impact Assessment? Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) 1 is a method used during adoption of the new legislation and during amendment of the already existing legislation 2, through a specific consultative process with all stakeholders. This consultative process is conducted before the adoption and amendment of a law and it must be based on documents that indicate the costs and benefits of the implementation of the law. 3 The role of RIA is to help decision-makers to formulate, implement and monitor changes in the legislative system by helping them to assess the need for regulating a certain issue. The analysis includes a clear list of costs of law implementation and the context of the impact that the new regulation is going to have on all stakeholders. The implementation of RIA aims to provide effective and efficient laws. Effectiveness implies reaching goals that were planed when the law was drafted and efficiency implies that these goals are accomplished with the minimum of costs. The laws that follow these two criteria are often referred to as good laws. RIA promotes public debate and consultations with all relevant actors, beneficiaries, business alliances, citizen groups, NGOs, etc. This results with transparency in government decision-making 1 Expressions like Regulatory Impact Analysis, Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) and Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement can also be found in literature. The first two refer to the process, and the other two refer to the document which is a product of the process. 2 Regulation in this sense includes all general legal acts, that is laws and bylaws, as well as the acts that adopted by regulatory bodies in conducting their obligations (regulations, directions, etc.) 3 Definition from the Strategy of Public Administration Reform in Montenegro for the period 2011-2016, Aurum, Podgorica, March 2011. Available at: http://www.gov.me/vijesti/104737/strategija- reforme-javne-uprave-u-crnoj-gori-za-period-od-2011-do-2016- godine.html

process. Still, RIA must not be seen as a substitute for decision-making process, but a method used in this process. RIA is not only a quantitative method of costs assessment. It also has a qualitative character in assessing the impact on environment, social groups, gender equality and the society in its entirety. It was first introduced in the USA in the 70s, as a mechanism aiming to diminish the administrative burden imposed by laws, and the costs that had a significant impact on the American economy. RIA acquired a broader use since 1995 when the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) adopted guidelines for RIA and in that manner started promoting this method. Today all countries that implement RIA use OECD Checklist as a basis for RIA. OECD Checklist 4 : 1. Is the problem correctly defined? 2. Is government action justified? 3. Is regulation the best form of government action? 4. Is there a legal basis for regulation? 5. What is the appropriate level (or levels) of government for this action? 6. Do the benefits of regulation justify the costs? 7. Is the distribution of effects across society transparent? 8. Is the regulation clear, consistent, comprehensible and assessable to users? 9. Have all interested parties had the opportunity to present their views? 10. How will compliance be achieved? On EU level this method was introduced in 2003 with an aim to improve the quality of adopted legislation. Lately the interest for RIA increased in EU candidate countries, as well as in potential candidate countries. The use of RIA in these countries differs depending on administrative capacities, legislation and the overall knowledge on the benefits that this mechanism introduces. However, the significance of RIA remains the same. It contributes to adoption 4 OECD Checklist available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/ displaydocumentpdf/?cote=ocde/gd(95)95&doclanguage=en 2 of the good laws, raising the transparency in the government s work, promoting dialog in the society. It also prevents the adoption of laws that can harm the economy, environment and the population itself. Good and bad experiences of the countries from the region can set an example for the practice in Montenegro. Regional experiences - Macedonia and Serbia Macedonia started with the implementation of RIA in 2006 within the project called Building the administrative capacities for EU integration. In this project, RIA was preceded by the Regulatory Guillotine 5. Starting from January 1 st 2009, RIA must be submitted along with the draft law. Each Ministry has the obligation to deliver RIA along with the assessment of the compliance of the law with the EU Acquis. In Macedonia, RIA is applied only to laws, but not to bylaws 6. The RIA form sheet in this country includes an impact assessment on: national competitiveness, socially marginalized groups, gender equality issues, environment, market economy principles and citizen rights 7. Preliminary and Expanded RIA are also used in Macedonia. 8 The project that introduced RIA into Macedonian legislative system included the establishment of the national electronic register of laws (ENER) 9. On this web site, all adopted laws are available and comments on the laws can be posted, in the purpose of consulting the stakeholders. 5 Available at: http://www.vlada.mk/?q=node/65 6 The implementation of RIA is accomplished with the amendments on the Rules of Procedures of the Government of Macedonia, as well as the Strategic plan of the General Secretariat of the Government of Macedonia for the period of 2007-2009. Documents that have also been used are the Methodology of Impact Assessment and the Decision on the shape and content of the RIA form. 7 Regulatory Impact Assessment (2), Analytica, Macedonia. Available at: www.analyticamk.org 8 Preliminary RIA must be applied to every law, and the use of Expanded RIA depends on economic, social impact and the impact on the environment that every law has on one or more areas, that will result with complex reforms. It is also important whether the implementation of that law exceeds 600 million denars. 9 Web site available at: www.ener.gov.mk

Although the RIA implementation process in Macedonia lasted for several years now, the Government of this country has a number of obligations to fulfill so the introduction of this method can be considered as finished. The most common problems that the Macedonian Government encounters are insufficiently trained officers for RIA implementation and the lack of awareness or knowledge in the institutions on benefits and significance of RIA. The cause of this is the shortterm and modest tradition in RIA implementation. 10 One of the problems is also the short deadline that ministries have for the preparation of quality RIA. This is caused by the short procedure that is often used in drafting the laws. In this way, RIA becomes only a formality and it often happens that RIA form sheets are filled out only with no impact clause. The European Commission s Progress Report on Macedonia for 2010 states that: some Ministries still do not conduct wide consultation with all stakeholders, nor a detailed and systematic analysis on draft laws. 11 Serbia also introduced RIA to achieve greater competitiveness with the countries of the region and to become more attractive to foreign investors. Introduction of RIA into the Serbian legislative system was accomplished with the project Regulatory Reform in Serbia Regulatory Impact Assessment Improving efficiency and transparency of the legislative. The project was conducted in cooperation with the World Bank. With the amendments of the Rules of Procedure of the Government of Serbia 12 in October 2004, RIA was prescribed as an obligation. Already in 2005, more than 300 draft laws that included RIA were prepared. 13 The Rules of Procedure provides that RIA must be applied to all draft laws, but it is not required for other acts. Each ministry has the obligation to attach RIA to its draft laws. In the case it does not, it has to explain the reasons behind this. The role of the 10 As it is stated in the Policy Brief: Strengthening the role of RIA in the policy-making process in Macedonia, that was published by Analytica in November 2010. Available at: http://www.analyticamk.org/ index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&item id=60 11 European Commission s Progress Report on Macedonia 2010. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/ mk_rapport_2010_en.pdf 12 Available at: http://www.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_ sekcija.php?id=2432 13 Data gathered from the Handbook on Regulatory Impact Assessment. Available at: http://www.ria.merr.gov.rs/index.php?id=72 3 supervisor on the implementation of RIA in Serbia is given to the Governments Office for Regulatory Reform and Regulatory Impact Assessment. This Office also carries out the training of civil servants. The transparency of this process in Serbia is further promoted with the RIA web site. 14 RIA in Montenegro - first steps 15 Montenegrin Government commenced the work on the regulatory reform in 2009 by adopting the Action plan for regulatory reform and promotion of business environment 16 in December that year. The Council for Regulatory Reform and Promotion of Business Environment (hereinafter the Council) established through the Action plan three pillars of the regulatory reform: Regulatory Guillotine, Ease of Doing Business Reform and Regulatory Impact Assessment. 17 The project of RIA implementation in Montenegro has commenced with the capacity building for regulatory reform. The Division for promotion of the business environment in the Ministry of Finance was established. This Division has the task to provide opinions on draft legislative having in mind its impact on business environment. Its task also consists of serving the Council and cooperating with international organizations and private sector regarding the promotion of business environment. 18 14 www.ria.merr.gov.rs 15 All information about the implementation of RIA in Montenegro has been obtained from Ms Bojana Bošković, Deputy Minister for financial system and promotion of business environment, Ministry of Finance. The interview was held on February 22 nd 2011. 16 Action plan available at: http://www.predsjpol.gov.me/potpredsjednik/ projekti/95495/strategija-regulatorne-reforme. html 17 This project was carried out in cooperation with the International Financial Corporation (IFC) and it was started on the initiative of the Montenegrin Government. The project deadline was prolonged so the project was continued within the Good Governance project of the USAID. 18 Information from the public speech of the former Deputy Minister, now Minister of Finance Mr. Milorad Katnić, at the Regional Conference on business environment reform in Southeast Europe on November 18th 2009. Available at: http://www.mf.gov.me/ vijesti/388 11/177923.html

On the meeting held on April 8 th 2011 the Council adopted the Draft Handbook on RIA implementation and the Draft RIA Pilot in the area of business licensing. These documents have been adopted by the Government, along with the Conclusion of the Government which stipulates RIA as an obligation from January 2012. Also, from July 2012 the law proposer has to fill out the RIA form, along with the draft law. Since November 2010, a number of trainings of civil servants who will implement RIA have been conducted. Additional professional training is needed for improving the knowledge and capacities of civil servants in charge of this task. The Council plans to engage domestic and foreign consultants to conclude the training process. Although the implementation of RIA is at the very beginning in Montenegro, it is significant that the Ministry of Finance has already conducted a practice similar to RIA. Hence, the Council gives an opinion on every regulation that is formulated by any ministry based on impact on business environment. This led to a practice that no legislative can be proposed for adoption unless it gets a positive opinion of the Council. Nevertheless, regardless of the opinion of the Council, the Government has the final decision and it has the right not to take into consideration this opinion if there is a higher economic interest at stake, while a compromise solution can also be reached. This practice is the same in the countries of the region. The procedure, which obligates the Council to give an opinion on draft law regarding business environment, is in force since July 2009, when it was included into Rules of Procedures of the Government of Montenegro. RIA 19 in Montenegro is supposed to be an ex ante control mechanism used while drafting the law. Each Ministry will have to apply RIA to the regulation it is proposing having in mind the 10 OECD principles. 19 It is preceded by the Regulatory Guillotine, which is an ex post legislative analysis. RIA will be applied only on regulations adopted after this mechanism is introduced in Montenegrin legislative system. Regulatory Guillotine will annul all laws and bylaws considered harmful for business environment. In this way an impact analysis of already existing regulations is provided. In Montenegro, RIA will be focused only on economic impact assessment of laws and bylaws 20. This defers from the regional practice where an impact assessment is provided for environment issues, social position of citizens, gender equality, citizen rights, socially marginalized groups and so on. Government considers that the priority of Montenegro is to be competitive to the region and the EU member states from the economic point of view. Likewise, there is a lack of capacities to carry out a complete RIA. The Parliament of Montenegro started a project that should enable it to conduct an oversight over the implementation of the impact assessment of laws. 21 Expert assistance is provided for eight months in the area of harmonizing the regulations and impact assessment. Strengthening the role of the Parliament in monitoring the proposed laws and their compliance with the EU law is the goal of this support. Likewise, the Parliament must be enabled to supervise the appliance of RIA conducted by the Government and to apply RIA to comprehensive amendments and certain regulations. 22 The realization of this project was started in September after the team of experts was selected and necessary preparations were made. 23 Having in mind the constantly growing Montenegrin legislative, especially regarding the process of EU accession, it is important that all stakeholders are included in the decision-making process. Detailed and in-depth analysis of laws, transparency in law adoption process and consultation with all stakeholders will give a proper evaluation of whether Montenegrin citizens need a certain law. 20 The Ministry of Finance considers that bylaws contain a significant number of business barriers. This is why RIA will be applied on bylaws in Montenegro, which is not the case in Macedonia and Serbia. 21 This project was started in cooperation with the Delegation of the EU in Montenegro. 22 This practice is in accordance with the Inter-Institutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment, which is led in the EU by the European Commission, The European Parliament and the European Council. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/governance/ better_regulation/documents/ii_common_approach_to_ia_en.pdf 23 Data gathered from the correspondence with Mrs. Vesna Peković, officer at the Parliament of Montenegro, September 23 rd 2011. 4

Law adoption procedure with RIA included: Step 1. RIA Unit in the Ministry adopts RIA for a certain law Step 2. The Ministry prepares a law with the rationale Step 3. Draft law with rationale and RIA proceeds to public debate Step 4. The Ministry obtains an opinion on draft law from the Secretariat for legislative, relevant Ministries and the Council for regulatory reform Step 5. If the opinion is positive the draft law is being sent to the Secretariat General of the Government Step 6. The Government adopts the draft law Step 7. The Government submits the bill to the Parliament for adoption Step 8. The Parliament adopts the law after the three readings procedure Step 9. The President of Montenegro declares the law adopted and the law published in the Official Gazette of Montenegro RIA in Montenegrorecommendations for future development Bearing in mind the experiences of the countries from the region, as well as those of the EU member states, it is possible to make following conclusions/ recommendations: The political support for RIA in Montenegro should be enhanced. This will provide that RIA is not only seen as a formality, but a document that really contributes to adoption of better laws. The implementation of RIA in Montenegro should not be focused only on the economic impact that laws produce. It is necessary to gradually strengthen the capacities for conducting RIA so it could be used to assess the impact on environment, social position of citizens, as well as minority issues, gender equality, etc. It is necessary to build administrative capacities so RIA can be implemented in its entirety. In this manner, its implementation will bring the best results. This is why there is an evident need of further trainings and education of civil servants. Trainings and education can be conducted in cooperation with various international institutions and organizations that have experience in RIA implementation process. The introduction of RIA should be adequately promoted within all ministries, but also within media and organizations of civil society. This would provide that everyone is familiar with the concept and able to participate in this process as a stakeholder. All stakeholders should be participating in the process of impact assessment of a certain law, since the best results in RIA implementation will be achieved if citizens, NGO-s, entrepreneurs, consumers, etc., are consulted. This will affect the increase of transparency and citizens trust in Government s work. 5 The introduction of RIA would be facilitated by having all relevant information 24 gathered on a single web site. Allowing the option for the public to submit commentaries on the laws is essential in order to make this process inclusive in an easier and a more simple way. 24 All information regarding RIA, RIA Handbook, laws that include RIA, news related to RIA implementation and similar information relevant to all stakeholders.

Sources and literature used: SIGMA, Law drafting and Regulatory Management in Central and Eastern Europe, SIGMA papers: No. 18, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1997. Colin Kirkpatrick, Regulatory impact assessment, International handbook on economic regulation. Available at: http://www.bizimpact.hr/admin/js/filemanager/ files/ia/regulatory_impact_assessment.pdf Colin Kirkpatrick, David Parker, Yin-Fang Zhang, Regulatory Impact Assessment in Developing and Transitional Economies: A Survey of Current Practice, Working Paper Series, Paper No. 83, Centre on Regulation and Competition, Manchester, June 2004 David Parker, Regulatory Impact Assessment, Cranfield Centre for Competition and Regulation Research, Cranfield, UK, August 2006 Regulatory Impact Assessment (2), Policy Report, Analytica, Macedonia. Available at: www. analyticamk.org Strengthening the role of RIA in the policymaking process in Macedonia, Analytica, Macedonia, November 2010. Available at: http://www.analyticamk.org/index. php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1 45&Itemid=60 European Commissions Progress Report on Macedonia for 2010. Available at: http://ec.europa. eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/ package/mk_rapport_2010_en.pdf Rules of Procedure of the Government of Macedonia. Available at: http://www.vlada.mk/files/doc/eng/strategic_ documents/rules.pdf Slavica Panev, Fikret Čaušević, Sanja Filipović, Marijan Madžovski, Ahmet Mancellari, Andreja Marušić, Zhani Shapo, Promotion of the process of the reform of economic legislative in Western Balkan countries, OECD Investment Compact for South East Europe, Economic Institute, Belgrade, GTZ Office for legal reform, Belgrade 2010. Strategy on Public Administration Reform in Montenegro for the period 2011-2016 AURUM, Podgorica, March 2011. Available at: http://www.gov.me/vijesti/104737/strategija- reforme-javne-uprave-u-crnoj-gori-za-period-od- 2011-do-2016-godine.html The Government of Montenegro, Council for regulatory reform and promotion of business environment, Montenegrin Regulatory Guillotine, Podgorica, December 2009 Branko Radulović, Andreja Marušić, Đorđe Vukotić, Regulatory Impact Assessment, Handbook, Belgrade, July 2010. Available at: http://www.ria.merr.gov.rs/index.php?id=72 Rules of Procedure of the Government of Serbia. Available at: http://www.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_sekcija. php?id=2432 Work Report of the Parliament of Montenegro for 2010. Available at: http://www.skupstina.me/ index.php?strana=saopstenja&id=2392 Andreja Marušić, The assessment of RIA Status in business regulation in Montenegro and RIA process follow up - SUMMARY, East West Management Institute, Mach 2011. Ministry of Finance of Montenegro, Handbook on Regulatory Impact Assessment, May 2011. Action plan on regulatory reform and promotion of the business environment. Available at: http://www.predsjpol.gov.me/potpredsjednik/ projekti/95495/strategija-regulatorne- REFORME.html 6

Web sites: The Government of Montenegro: www.gov.me The Ministry of Finance of Montenegro: www.mif.gov.me The Parliament of Montenegro: www.skupstina.me Interviews: Interview with Ms Bojana Bošković, Deputy Minister for financial system and promotion of business environment, Ministry of Finance. This conversation was held on February 22 nd 2011. Parliamentary Service s response to Institute Alternative s memo, dated 23 rd September 2011 The Government of Macedonia: www.vlada.mk Macedonian national electronic register for regulations: www.ener.gov.mk The Government of Serbia: www.srbija.gov.rs Web portal of RIA in Serbia: www.ria.merr.gov.rs 7

Institute Alternative is a non-governmental organization, established by a group of citizens, experienced in the civil society, public administration and business sector. Strategic aims of Institute Alternative are to increase the quality of development of public policy, contribute to the protection of human rights in Montenegro. The mission of Institute Alternative is the strenghthening od democratic processes in Montenegro by indentifying and analyzing public policy options. **** Further information about Institute Alternative is available at: www.institut-alternativa.org