Wellington M. Smith Jr. School

Wellington M. Smith Jr. School 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card Published in 2015-16 our message our teachers our school Mary Magana Principal mamagana@monterey.k12.ca.us 1420 Natiidad Road Salinas, CA 93906 Grades: 7-12 Phone: (831) 755-3979 www.monterey.k12.ca.us CDS Code: 27-10272-2730117 Para español, isita: www.monterey.k12.ca.us Monterey County Office of Education 901 Blanco Circle Salinas, CA 93901 www.monterey.k12.ca.us Nancy Kotowski, Superintendent kotowski@monterey.k12.ca.us Phone: (831) 755-0300 Monterey COE

2 Principal s Message consists of two sites that work closely with Monterey County Probation Department. is located within the walls of Monterey County Juenile Hall, which is a short-term detention facility for jueniles awaiting adjudication of their cases. Juenile Hall is a 114-bed facility that houses minors who are charged with new criminal acts and/or probation iolations. While in custody, jueniles are under constant superision of the facility s juenile institutions officers. Salinas Valley Education Center works within the Monterey County Youth Center. The Probation Department s Youth Center is a medium-security residential treatment facility located in East Salinas. It is one of only a few secured juenile treatment centers in the state. The Youth Center consists of three dormitories with a total capacity of 85 male-only residents. Both school sites work cooperatiely and collaboratiely with probation staff in a team approach. School Mission Statement The mission of the Alternatie Education Program of the Monterey County Office of Education is to prepare our students for future success by proiding a supportie school enironment that focuses on increasing academic and pro-social behaiors and skills, while proiding functional life-skills instruction. We respect and alue the unique contributions of each of our students and our role in assisting them in becoming responsible, stable and contributing members of society. The goal of the Court and Community Schools and Home and Independent Studies Program of the Monterey County Office of Education is to enable all students to progress toward becoming: 1. Engaged learners who read, write, and speak effectiely, think critically and use technology efficiently for lifelong pursuits; 2. Pro-social indiiduals who demonstrate respect, compassion, cooperation, integrity and responsibility; 3. Independently functioning adults who recognize and use their talents and demonstrate daily liing skills in pursuit of ocational and interpersonal deelopment; 4. Healthy human beings who understand the elements of a healthy lifestyle, engage in positie recreational actiities, and practice habits that strengthen body, mind and soul; 5. Global citizens who appreciate cultural diersity, work to strengthen community through serice to others and participate constructiely in the political process. Mission Statement The Monterey County Office of Education proides the leadership, support and serice excellence needed to prepare the dierse students of Monterey County for success in each step of their educational journey. Vision Statement Eery student will be proided an enriched educational experience through the leadership, support and serice of the Monterey County Office of Education that prepares them for success as productie and contributing members of a global society. Parental Inolement Parents are inoled from the first day s intake procedures to the student s return to the home district, transfer to another court or community school, or graduation. Parents are encouraged to attend school isitation days and family days. Most contact with the parents of students on probation is conducted through the probation staff. Monthly newsletters are proided in both Spanish and English. They include information on classroom actiities, schoolwide programs, student recognition, upcoming eents and day-to-day information. Parents receie regular progress reports and announcements of special eents such as open houses, isitation days, etc. Parents, staff members, students and community partners are encouraged to participate in the Court School Site Council. links families to necessary serices. We encourage parents to support school success, although opportunities for parental inolement are more limited because the students are incarcerated. For more information on how to become inoled at the school, please contact Principal Mary Magana at (831) 755-3790. Professional Deelopment offers professional-deelopment workshops, trainings and coaching sessions; Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA); and professional learning communities for administrators, teachers, paraprofessionals and office staff. Teachers are encouraged to participate in Verification Process for Special Settings (VPSS) training to become highly qualified in all core academic areas. Topics include technology skills, classroom-management skills, assessment skills and behaior interention. Professional Deelopment Days 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Monterey County Board of Education Mary Claypool, president Ronald J. Panziera, ice president Sergio Alejo, member Francisco Jaier Estrada, member Judy Pennycook, member John McPherson, member Harey Kuffner, member The Monterey County Board of Education consists of seen members who represent indiidual trustee areas of the county. Each member is elected by the oters of his or her trustee area and seres a four-year term. The board supports and guides the Monterey County Office of Education in proiding leadership and serices to the school districts. Wellington Smith 1 day 1 day 2 days

3 Enrollment by Student Group The total enrollment at the school was 70 students for the 2014-15 school year. The pie chart displays the percentage of students enrolled in each group. Demographics 2014-15 School Year Enrollment by Grade The bar graph displays the total number of students enrolled in each grade for the 2014-15 school year. 2014-15 Enrollment by Grade Asian 1.4% American Indian or Alaska Natie 1.4% Filipino 1.4% White 4.3% Two or more races 1.4% 7 8 9 10 4 1 5 10 11 16 12 34 Hispanic or Latino 90.0% Socioeconomically disadantaged 80.0% English learners 42.9% Students with disabilities 17.1% Foster Youth 5.7% Class Size Distribution The bar graph displays the three-year data for aerage class size and the table displays the three-year data for the number of classrooms by size. Aerage Class Size 8 13 9 English language arts 16 11 7 11 11 11 10 Mathematics Science History/social science 12-13 13-14 14-15 9 8 Suspensions and Expulsions This table shows the school, district, and state suspension and expulsion rates for the most recent three-year period. Note: Students are only counted one time, regardless of the number of suspensions. Suspension and Expulsion Rates Suspension rates Expulsion rates Wellington Smith 12-13 13-14 14-15 3.6% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Monterey COE Number of Classrooms by Size 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Number of Students Subject 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ English language arts 15 5 10 Mathematics 7 1 6 1 14 1 Science 5 1 4 4 1 History/social science 7 1 11 6 Suspension rates Expulsion rates Suspension rates Expulsion rates 12-13 13-14 14-15 1.6% 1.4% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% California 12-13 13-14 14-15 5.1% 4.4% 3.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%

4 Adequate Yearly Progress The federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires all schools and districts meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements. California public schools and districts are required to meet or exceed criteria in the following four target areas: Participation rate on statewide assessments in English language arts and mathematics Percentage of students scoring proficient on statewide assessments in English language arts and mathematics Attendance rates for schools with enrollment in Transitional Kindergarten through grade eight (TK-8) Graduation rate for high schools The table displays whether or not the school, district and state met each of the AYP criteria and made oerall AYP for 2014-15. For more information, isit www.cde.ca.go/ta/ac/ay. Adequate Yearly Progress Criteria 2014-15 School Year Wellington Smith Monterey COE California Met oerall AYP Yes No Yes Met participation rate: English language arts Yes No Yes Mathematics Yes No Yes Met percent proficient: English language arts Mathematics Met attendance rates Ù No Yes Met graduation rate æ Yes Yes Federal Interention Program Schools and districts receiing Title I funding that fail to meet AYP oer two consecutie years in the same content area (English language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator enter into Program Improement (PI). Each additional year that the district or school(s) do not meet AYP results in adancement to the next leel of interention. The percentage of schools identified for Program Improement is calculated by taking the number of schools currently in PI within the district and diiding it by the total number of Title I schools within the district. This table displays the 2015-16 Program Improement status for the school and district. For detailed information about PI identification, please isit www.cde.ca.go/ta/ac/ay/tidetermine.asp. Federal Interention Program Wellington Smith 2015-16 School Year Monterey COE Program Improement status Not Title I In PI First year of Program Improement ² 2011-2012 Year in Program Improement ² Year 3 California Physical Fitness Test Each spring, all students in grades 5, 7 and 9 are required to participate in the California Physical Fitness Test (PFT). The Fitnessgram is the designated PFT for students in California public schools put forth by the State Board of Education. The PFT measures six key fitness areas: 1. Aerobic Capacity 2. Body Composition 3. Flexibility 4. Abdominal Strength and Endurance 5. Upper Body Strength and Endurance 6. Trunk Extensor Strength and Flexibility Encouraging and assisting students in establishing lifelong habits of regular physical actiity is the primary goal of the Fitnessgram. To protect student priacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or fewer. For more detailed information on the California PFT, please isit www.cde. ca.go/ta/tg/pf. Number of Title I schools currently in Program Improement 1 Percentage of Title I schools currently in Program Improement 100.00% Not applicable. Due to the transition to the Smarter Balanced Summatie Assessments, the U.S. Department of Education approed the California Department of Education s waier request to exclude the percent proficient results from AYP determinations. For more information on the AYP reports, please isit http://data1.cde.ca.go/dataquest/. Ù Not applicable. This AYP indicator is only applicable for schools or districts that enrolled 30 or more students in Transitional Kindergarten through grade eight (TK-8) on Fall Census Day. æ The school is not required to meet the graduation rate criteria for AYP because there were fewer than 50 students in the graduation denominator (graduates plus dropouts). ² Not applicable. The school is not in Program Improement.

5 California Standards Tests for All Students: Science (grades 5, 8 and 10) The tables show the percentage of students in grades 5, 8 and 10 who scored at Proficient or Adanced leels (meeting or exceeding state standards) in science. Students Scoring at Proficient or Adanced Leels Wellington Smith Monterey COE California Subject 12-13 13-14 14-15 12-13 13-14 14-15 12-13 13-14 14-15 Science 13% 23% 21% 21% 59% 60% 56% California Standards Tests Results by Student Group: Science (grades 5, 8 and 10) Students Scoring at Proficient or Adanced Leels Group 2014-15 School Year Science All students in the district 21% All students at the school Male Female Black or African-American American Indian or Alaska Natie Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Natie Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or more races Socioeconomically disadantaged English learners Students with disabilities Students receiing Migrant Education serices Foster youth ± California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (grades 3-8 and 11) The table below shows the percentage of students meeting or exceeding the state standards in English language arts/literacy and mathematics. Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding State Standards Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or fewer, either because the number of students tested in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student priacy. ± Information is not aailable at this time. 2014-15 School Year Subject Wellington Smith Monterey COE California English language arts/literacy 28% 44% Mathematics 7% 33% California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/Standardized Testing and Reporting Results Beginning in the 2013-14 school year, the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program was eliminated and replaced by a new set of assessments called the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP). For the 2015 school year, the CAASSP included a mix of online and paper-pencil assessments. The online component contained the Smarter Balanced English language arts/literacy and mathematics tests. The paper-pencil science assessments of CAASPP included the California Standards Test (CST), California Modified Assessment (CMA) and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). There was also the optional Standards-based Tests in Spanish for reading/language arts. The CST is a multiple-choice test in science for arying grade leels. The CMA is a modified assessment for students with disabilities who hae an Indiidualized Education Plan (IEP). The CAPA is an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitie disabilities who are unable to take the CST with accommodations or modifications or the CMA with accommodations. For more information on the CAASPP assessments, please isit www.cde.ca.go/ta/tg/ca. CAASPP by Student Group: English Language Arts and Mathematics The tables on the following page display the information on student achieement at each performance leel in English language arts and mathematics for the school by student groups for grade11. Due to low enrollment scores are not shown for grades 7 and 8. Leels of achieement include: Leel 1 = Standard not met Leel 2 = Standard nearly met Leel 3 = Standard met Leel 4 = Standard exceeded Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receie a score. Howeer, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the performance leel percentages. The performance leel percentages are calculated using students with scores.

6 CAASPP Results by Student Group: English Language Arts and Mathematics - Grade 11 Students Achieing at Each Performance Leel 2014-15 School Year English Language Arts: Grade 11 Percentage Total Number Percent Achieement Tested of Total Group Enrollment Tested Enrollment Leel 1 Leel 2 Leel 3 Leel 4 All students 45 18 40.0% 83% 0% 0% 0% Male 18 40.0% 83% 0% 0% 0% Female 0 0.0% Black or African-American 1 2.2% American Indian or Alaska Natie 0 0.0% Asian 0 0.0% Filipino 0 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 15 33.3% 80% 0% 0% 0% Natie Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0.0% White 2 4.4% Two or more races 0 0.0% Socioeconomically disadantaged 15 33.3% 87% 0% 0% 0% English learners 7 15.6% Students with disabilities 1 2.2% Students receiing Migrant Education serices 0 0.0% Foster youth ± ± ± ± ± ± Mathematics: Grade 11 Percentage Total Number Percent Achieement Tested of Total Group Enrollment Tested Enrollment Leel 1 Leel 2 Leel 3 Leel 4 All students 45 15 33.3% 93% 0% 0% 0% Male 15 33.3% 93% 0% 0% 0% Female 0 0.0% Black or African-American 1 2.2% American Indian or Alaska Natie 0 0.0% Asian 0 0.0% Filipino 0 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 12 26.7% 92% 0% 0% 0% Natie Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0.0% White 2 4.4% Two or more races 0 0.0% Socioeconomically disadantaged 13 28.9% 92% 0% 0% 0% English learners 7 15.6% Students with disabilities 1 2.2% Students receiing Migrant Education serices 0 0.0% Foster youth ± ± ± ± ± ± Leel 1 = Standard not met Leel 2 = Standard nearly met Leel 3 = Standard met Leel 4 = Standard exceeded Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or fewer, either because the number of students tested in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student priacy. ± Information is not aailable at this time.

7 California High School Exit Exam Grade 10 Results The table displays the percentage of students scoring at Proficient or Adanced leels for the most recent three-year period. Note that the score a student must achiee to be considered Proficient is different than the passing score for graduation requirement. Students Scoring at Proficient or Adanced Leels English Language Arts Mathematics 12-13 13-14 14-15 12-13 13-14 14-15 Wellington Smith 18% 7% Monterey COE 29% 37% 45% 21% 37% 34% California 57% 56% 58% 60% 62% 59% California High School Exit Exam Results The California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) is primarily used as a graduation requirement in California. Students are first tested in grade 10 and hae multiple chances to retake the test if the student does not pass the first time. The grade 10 results of this exam are also used to determine AYP for high schools as required by the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law. The CAHSEE has two sections: English language arts and mathematics. For the purposes of calculating AYP, three performance leels are set: Adanced, Proficient and Not Proficient. Ô CAHSEE Grade 10 Results by Student Group: English Language Arts and Mathematics This table displays the percentage of students, by group, achieing at each performance leel in English language arts and mathematics for the most recent testing period. For detailed information regarding the CAHSEE results, isit www.cahsee.cde.ca.go. Students Achieing at Each Performance Leel English Language Arts Mathematics 2014-15 School Year Group Not Proficient Proficient Adanced Not Proficient Proficient Adanced All students in the district 55% 29% 16% 66% 24% 10% All students at the school 82% 18% 0% 93% 7% 0% Male 82% 18% 0% 93% 7% 0% Female Black or African-American American Indian or Alaska Natie Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino 92% 8% 0% Natie Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or more races Socioeconomically disadantaged 82% 18% 0% 93% 7% 0% English learners Students with disabilities Students receiing Migrant Education serices Foster youth ± ± ± ± ± ± Ô Due to Senate Bill 172 passed in July 2015, the CAHSEE has been suspended through the 2017-18 school year. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or fewer, either because the number of students tested in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student priacy. ± Information is not aailable at this time.

8 Admission Requirements for California s Public Uniersities Uniersity of California: Admission requirements for the Uniersity of California (UC) follow guidelines set forth in the Master Plan, which requires that the top one-eighth of the state s high school graduates, as well as those transfer students who hae successfully completed specified college course work, be eligible for admission to the UC. These requirements are designed to ensure that all eligible students are adequately prepared for uniersity-leel work. For general admissions requirements, please isit the UC Admissions Information Web page at http://admission.uniersityofcalifornia.edu. California State Uniersity: Eligibility for admission to California State Uniersity (CSU) is determined by three factors: 1. specific high school courses, 2. grades in specified courses and test scores, and 3. graduation from high school. Some campuses hae higher standards for particular majors or students who lie outside the local campus area. Because of the number of students who apply, a few campuses hae higher standards (supplementary admission criteria) for all applicants. Most CSU campuses hae local admission-guarantee policies for students who graduate or transfer from high schools and colleges that are historically sered by a CSU campus in that region. For admission, application and fee information, see the CSU Web page at www.calstate.edu/admission/admission.shtml. Course Enrollment for UC/CSU Admission The table displays two measures related to the school s courses that are required for Uniersity of California and/or California State Uniersity admission for the most recent year for which data is aailable. For more detailed information, isit http://dq.cde.ca.go/dataquest. UC/CSU Admission Percentage of students enrolled in courses required for UC/CSU admission in 2014-15 Percentage of graduates who completed all courses required for UC/CSU admission in 2013-14 Career Technical Education Programs 2013-14 and 2014-15 School Years Wellington Smith 0.00% 0.00% The Monterey County Office of Education operates two court schools, and the Salinas Valley Education Center. Each of these facilities data lines were upgraded from T1 lines to Customized Switch Metropolitan Ethernet (fiber optic), which increased our computer Internet capabilities by 1,000 percent (Internet speed and traffic). Each site receied new data switches, routers and wireless access points. The Salinas Valley Education Center receied 40 new PC laptops, specifically used by students to enhance instruction. The Salinas Valley Education Center offers two career technical education (CTE) courses in construction and health serices; both are aligned with California s CTE standards. Also, these courses are sequenced and aligned with Mission Trails Regional Occupation Program and Hartnell College s degree certificate programs in health science and construction. Career Technical Education Participation This table displays information about participation in the school s Career Technical Education (CTE) programs. Types of Serices Funded Wellington Smith Jr. School makes eery effort to meet the academic, emotional and physical needs of its students. SPRINT teams address issues that affect the ability of a student to perform at his or her best in school and recommend arious interention strategies and serices to meet the unique needs of referred students. Title I NorD funds are allocated to technology equipment and digital coursework enhancement to establish better access to college and career curriculum and instruction in the court schools. Parents are encouraged to attend school isitation days and family days. Career Technical Education Data 2014-15 Participation Wellington Smith Number of pupils participating in CTE 56 Percentage of pupils who completed a CTE program and earned a high school diploma Percentage of CTE courses that are sequenced or articulated between a school and institutions of postsecondary education 13% 2% links families to necessary serices.

We encourage parents to support school success, although opportunities for parental inolement are more limited because the students are incarcerated. 9 Completion of High School Graduation Requirements This table displays school, district and California data for the percentages of students in the most recent graduating class who met all state and local graduation requirements for grade 12 completion, including haing passed both the English language arts and mathematics portions of the CAHSEE, or receied a local waier or state exemption. The formula for the completion of graduation requirements is the number of grade 12 students who met all graduation requirements, diided by, the number of students enrolled in grade 12 at the time of the Fall Census Day. Therefore, results can include percentages oer 100% if students transferred into the school and graduated but were not there at the time of the Fall Census Day enrollment count. For more information, please isit www.cde.ca.go/ta/tg/hs. Completion of High School Graduation Requirements Graduating Class of 2014 Group Wellington Smith Monterey COE California All students 30.91% 45.20% 84.60% Black or African-American 76.00% American Indian or Alaska Natie 78.07% Asian 50.00% 92.62% Filipino 66.67% 96.49% Hispanic or Latino 32.69% 43.65% 81.28% Natie Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 83.58% White 66.67% 89.93% Adanced Placement Courses No information is aailable for Wellington Smith School regarding Adanced Placement (AP) courses offered. Two or more races 75.00% 82.80% Socioeconomically disadantaged 32.61% 43.77% 81.36% English learners 34.48% 24.56% 50.76% Students with disabilities 31.25% 61.28% Foster youth ± ± ± Graduates and Dropouts This table displays the graduation and dropout rates for the most recent three-year period for which data is aailable. Please isit www2.ed.go/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf for more information. Parents receie regular progress reports and announcements of special eents such as open houses, isitation days, etc. Graduation and Dropout Rates Graduation Rate Dropout Rate 11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14 Wellington Smith 79.13% 80.02% 81.55% 12.30% 10.40% 9.60% Monterey COE 79.13% 80.02% 81.55% 12.30% 10.40% 9.60% California 78.87% 80.44% 80.95% 13.10% 11.40% 11.50% Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or fewer, either because the number of students tested in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student priacy. ± Information is not aailable at this time.

10 Textbooks and Instructional Materials Curriculum Materials Adoption Committee The Curriculum Materials Adoption Committee (CMAC) is responsible for ensuring that the selection of appropriate instructional materials for Alternatie Education Program sites students is conducted in a professional manner by a deliberatie body of teachers, administrators, and parents and community members. The committee consists of the school site principal, classroom teachers (including lead teachers), instructional paraprofessionals, and office support staff. CMAC members are committed to alignment with Common Core State Standards and other applicable state and federal laws and regulations. Members attend monthly committee meetings. Members will reiew materials submitted for consideration, completing reiewer forms within established timelines. The next public hearing of curriculum and materials will take place in February 2016, before the Monterey County Office of Education Board of Education. Aailability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials The following lists the percentage of pupils who lack their own assigned textbooks and instructional materials. Percentage of Students Lacking Materials by Subject 2015-16 School Year Reading/language arts 0% Textbooks and Instructional Materials List 2015-16 School Year Mathematics 0% Subject Textbook Adopted English language arts Character Based Literature, Odysseyware English 2015 Mathematics Mathematics Visions Project 2014 Science Life Science A: The Basis of Life, Globe Fearon-Pearson 2015 Science Life Science B: The Human Body, Globe Fearon-Pearson 2015 Science Science Physical Science A: The Changing Land; Water and Air; Earth and Space; Globe Fearon-Pearson Physical Science B: Chemical Changes; Force, Motion, and Work; Globe Fearon-Pearson History/social science World History, AGS 2015 History/social science United States History, AGS 2015 History/social science World History, Prentice Hall 2015 History/social science A History of US, Oxford Uniersity Press 2015 History/social science United States Goernment, AGS 2015 History/social science Economics, AGS 2015 2015 2015 Science 0% History/social science 0% Visual and performing arts 0% Foreign language 0% Health 0% Science laboratory equipment 0% Currency of Textbook Data This table displays the date when the textbook and instructional materials information was collected and erified. Currency of Textbooks 2015-16 School Year Data collection date 8/2015 Quality of Textbooks The following table outlines the criteria required for choosing textbooks and instructional materials. Quality of Textbooks Criteria Are the textbooks adopted from the most recent state-approed or local goerning-board-approed list? Are the textbooks consistent with the content and cycles of the curriculum frameworks adopted by the State Board of Education? 2015-16 School Year Yes/No Yes Yes Do all students, including English learners, hae access to their own textbooks and instructional materials to use in class and to take home? Yes Public Internet Access Internet access is aailable at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally proided on a first-come, first-sere basis. Other use restrictions include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on aailability), the types of software programs aailable at a workstation and the ability to print documents.

11 School Facility Items Inspected The tables show the results of the school s most recent inspection using the Facility Inspection Tool (FIT) or equialent school form. The following is a list of items inspected. Systems: Gas systems and pipes, sewer, mechanical systems (heating, entilation and air-conditioning) Interior: Interior surfaces (floors, ceilings, walls and window casings) Cleanliness: Pest/ermin control, oerall cleanliness (school grounds, buildings, rooms and common areas) Electrical: Electrical systems (interior and exterior) School Facility Good Repair Status Deficiencies and Repairs School Facilities Restrooms/fountains: Restrooms, sinks and drinking fountains (interior and exterior) Safety: Fire-safety equipment, emergency systems, hazardous materials (interior and exterior) Structural: Structural condition, roofs External: Windows/doors/gates/fences, playgrounds/school grounds This inspection determines the school facility s good repair status using ratings of good condition, fair condition or poor condition. The oerall summary of facility conditions uses ratings of exemplary, good, fair or poor. School Facility Good Repair Status The table lists the repairs required for all deficiencies found during the site inspection. Regardless of each item s repair status, all deficiencies are listed. Deficiencies and Repairs Items Inspected Systems Deficiencies, Action Taken or Planned, and Date of Action 2015-16 School Year Items Inspected Repair Status Items Inspected Repair Status Systems Fair Restrooms/fountains Good Interior Good Safety Good Cleanliness Good Structural Good Electrical Good External Good Oerall summary of facility conditions 2015-16 School Year Heating and air-conditioning systems fixed for minor repairs, and filters were exchanged in Noember 2015 Good Date of the most recent school site inspection 9/30/2015 Date of the most recent completion of the inspection form 9/30/2015 is housed within Juenile Hall. The site proides a clean, safe and functional enironment for learning through proper maintenance and campus superision. Students receie instruction within four classrooms, a gymnasium, and athletic fields. There is ongoing maintenance to ensure for facilities to remain up-to-date and proide adequate space for students and staff. School custodial staff, probation staff and the county maintenance department work together to ensure classrooms and campus grounds are well-maintained and kept safe and functioning for students, staff and isitors. A new school building at the Youth Center opened in the 2008-09 school year. Salinas Valley Education Center is located within the Salinas Youth Center. It offers students instruction with three classrooms. Students also hae access to outdoor physical-education facilities and athletic fields. The facility offers appropriate space for teachers and support staff. School Safety The mission of Alternatie Education Programs at Monterey County Office of Education as it relates to the Comprehensie School Safety Plan is to proide a safe, secure and positie learning enironment for all students and staff through the implementation of a framework of policies, regulations and procedures in accordance with Senate Bill 187, State Department of Education directies and the mandate of the Monterey County Board of Education. The intent of this plan is to be both preentatie and proactie as we seek to ensure that the alued assets of our students and staff are recognized and respected, and that our goals of learning will be more fully realized and respected in a safe and supportie enironment. Throughout the school year, beginning in August, each indiidual school site in the Alternatie Education Programs Department, as a matter of standard procedure, periodically reiews the Comprehensie School Safety Plan. At each interal, this reiew is conducted with the specific objectie of coordinating effectie site-based operational procedures with the requirements of state legislation, Department of Education Code, MCOE Board policy and MCOE Administratie Regulations. Emergency procedures designed to be employed at the site leel were deeloped through the collaboration of the Safety Plan Committee and the faculty at large. Each school in the department was allowed to adapt the general template of emergency procedures (Emergency Procedure Bulletin) to preailing circumstances unique to the site while retaining essential command and control links with the department Emergency Incident Response Team. Safety-related documents that are reiewed and updated annually at the Alternatie Education site include: Alternatie Education Program Faculty Handbook, which contains policies and procedures for nonemergency safety issues; Emergency Procedure Bulletin, focusing on disaster and other potential life- and health-threatening issues of an immediate nature; Emergency Incident Response Team Bulletin, which seres as the primary phone-tree reference for the department command and control center; and Safe Schools Data for 2011-12, reflecting the accumulated incident and crime reports for the year. The school safety plan was last reiewed, updated and discussed with the school faculty in February 2015. It will be reiewed again in February 2016.

12 Teacher Qualifications This table shows information about teacher credentials and teacher qualifications. Teachers without a full credential include teachers with district and uniersity internships, pre-internships, emergency or other permits, and waiers. For more information on teacher credentials, isit www.ctc.ca.go. Teacher Credential Information Monterey COE Wellington Smith Teachers 15-16 13-14 14-15 15-16 With full credential 19 6 8 7 Without full credential 0 0 0 0 Teaching outside subject area of competence (with full credential) 2 0 0 0 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions This table displays the number of teacher misassignments (positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade leel, subject area, student group, etc.) and the number of acant teacher positions (not filled by a single designated teacher assigned to teach the entire course at the beginning of the school year or semester). Please note total teacher misassignments includes the number of teacher misassignments of English learners. Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Wellington Smith Teachers 13-14 14-15 15-16 Teacher misassignments of English learners 1 1 2 Total teacher misassignments 1 1 2 Vacant teacher positions 0 0 0 Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) extended the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to require that core academic subjects be taught by highly qualified teachers, defined as haing at least a bachelor s degree, an appropriate California teaching credential, and demonstrated competence for each core academic subject area he or she teaches. The table displays data regarding highly qualified teachers from the 2014-15 school year. High-poerty schools are defined as those schools with student participation of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced priced meals program. Low-poerty schools are those with student participation of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced priced meals program. For more information on teacher qualifications related to NCLB, isit www.cde.ca.go/nclb/sr/tq. No Child Left Behind Compliant Teachers 2014-15 School Year Percentage of Classes in Core Academic Subjects Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Wellington Smith 81.40% 18.60% All schools in district 84.78% 15.22% High-poerty schools in district 79.00% 21.00% Low-poerty schools in district 100.00% 0.00% Academic Counselors and School Support Staff This table displays information about academic counselors and support staff at the school and their full-time equialent (FTE). Academic Counselors and School Support Staff Data 2014-15 School Year Academic Counselors FTE of academic counselors 0.0 Aerage number of students per academic counselor Support Staff Social/behaioral or career deelopment counselors Library media teacher (librarian) Library media serices staff (paraprofessional) ² FTE 0.0 0.0 0.0 Psychologist 0.5 Social worker 1.0 Nurse 1.0 Speech/language/hearing specialist Resource specialist (nonteaching) Other 0.0 1.0 FTE Postsecondary Coordinator 1.0 Program specialist, Court Liaison 1.0 ² Not applicable.

13 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card Financial Data The financial data displayed in this SARC is from the 2013-14 fiscal year. The most current fiscal information aailable proided by the state is always two years behind the current school year and one year behind most other data included in this report. For detailed information on school expenditures for all districts in California, see the California Department of Education (CDE) Current Expense of Education & Per-pupil Spending Web page at www.cde.ca.go/ds/fd/ec. For information on teacher salaries for all districts in California, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at www.cde.ca.go/ds/fd/cs. To look up expenditures and salaries for a specific school district, see the Ed-Data website at www.ed-data.org. District Financial Data This table displays district teacher and administratie salary information and compares the figures to the state aerages for districts of the same type and size based on the salary schedule. Note: The district salary data does not include benefits. District Salary Data Monterey COE 2013-14 Fiscal Year Similar Sized District Beginning teacher salary µ µ Midrange teacher salary µ µ Highest teacher salary µ µ Aerage elementary school principal salary µ µ Aerage middle school principal salary µ µ Aerage high school principal salary µ µ Superintendent salary µ µ Teacher salaries: percentage of budget µ µ School Financial Data The following table displays the school s aerage teacher salary and a breakdown of the school s expenditures per pupil from unrestricted and restricted sources. School Financial Data Total expenditures per pupil 2013-14 Fiscal Year Expenditures per pupil from restricted sources Expenditures per pupil from unrestricted sources Annual aerage teacher salary Expenditures Per Pupil $9,615 $1,908 $7,707 $69,000 Supplemental/restricted expenditures come from money whose use is controlled by law or by a donor. Money that is designated for specific purposes by the district or goerning board is not considered restricted. Basic/unrestricted expenditures are from money whose use, except for general guidelines, is not controlled by law or by a donor. Administratie salaries: percentage of budget µ µ Financial Data Comparison This table displays the school s per-pupil expenditures from unrestricted sources and the school s aerage teacher salary and compares it to the district and state data. Financial Data Comparison Expenditures Per Pupil From Unrestricted Sources 2013-14 Fiscal Year Annual Aerage Teacher Salary Wellington Smith $7,707 $69,000 Monterey COE $0 $64,000 California $5,348 ± School and district: percentage difference à +7.8% School and California: percentage difference +44.1% u School Accountability Report Card In accordance with state and federal requirements, the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) is put forth annually by all public schools as a tool for parents and interested parties to stay informed of the school s progress, test scores and achieements. µ County Office of Education schools are not required to display this data (Education Code Section 41409.3). ± Data is not aailable. à A percentage cannot be calculated when one of the numbers is zero (site unrestricted expenditures per pupil). u The percentage difference cannot be calculated because California Annual Aerage Teacher Salary is not aailable. Data for this year s SARC was proided by the California Department of Education (CDE), school and district offices. For additional information on California schools and districts and comparisons of the school to the district, the county and the state, please isit DataQuest at http://data1. cde.ca.go/dataquest. DataQuest is an online resource that proides reports for accountability, test data, enrollment, graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing and data regarding English learners. Per Education Code Section 35256, each school district shall make hard copies of its annually updated report card aailable, upon request, on or before February 1 of each year. All data accurate as of December 2015. School Accountability Report Card Published By: www.sia-us.com 800.487.9234

Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Requirements Aligned in Your SARC The tables below outline the state priority areas that are included in the School Accountability Report Card. Conditions of Learning The table below describes information in the SARC that is releant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1). Local Control Accountability Plan Requirements Alignment Between State Priority Areas and the SARC Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching. Education Code (EC) 52060 (d)(1) Pupils hae access to standards-aligned instructional materials. EC 52060 (d)(1) School facilities are maintained in good repair. EC 52060 (d)(1) Pupil Outcomes The table below describes information in the SARC that is releant to Pupil Achieement State Priority (Priority 4) and Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8). Local Control Accountability Plan Requirements Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achieements Statewide assessments (e.g., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress). EC 52060 (d)(4)(a) The Academic Performance Index. EC 52060 (d)(4)(b) The percentage of pupils who hae successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the Uniersity of California and California State Uniersity, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. EC 52060 (d)(4)(c) State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes Pupil outcomes in subject areas such as English, mathematics, social sciences, science, isual and performing arts, health, physical education, career technical education, and other studies prescribed by the goerning board. 1 EC 52060 (d)(8) Engagement The table below describes information in the SARC that is releant to the Parental Inolement State Priority (Priority 3), Pupil Engagement State Priority (Priority 5) and School Climate State Priority (Priority 6). Local Control Accountability Plan Requirements Engagement State Priority: Parent Inolement Alignment Between State Priority Areas and the SARC Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each school site. EC 52060 (d)(3) State Priority: Pupil Engagement High school dropout rates. EC 52060 (d)(5)(d) High school graduation rates. EC 52060 (d)(5)(e) State Priority: School Climate Pupil suspension rates. EC 52060 (d)(6)(a) Pupil expulsion rates. EC 52060 (d)(6)(b) Alignment Between State Priority Areas and the SARC Other local measures including sureys of students, parents and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness. 2 EC 52060 (d)(6)(c) Note: State Priority 2 and 7 are not required in the SARC, as well as certain portions of Priority 4 and 5. For detailed information about LCAP and frequently asked questions, please isit www.cde.ca.go/fg/aa/lc/lcfffaq.asp. 1 English, mathematics and physical education are the only subject areas included in Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8) that are reflected in the SARC. 2 The school safety plan is the only other local measure of School Climate (Priority 6) that is reflected in the SARC.