Public Improvement Districts

Similar documents
Public Improvement Districts (PIDs) Understand to Negotiate

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY

Process of Municipal Bond Debt Issuance

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY SPECIAL DISTRICT FINANCING POLICY

Chapter 25 Utah Residential Rehabilitation Act

Tax Exempt Bond Financing For Affordable Housing Projects

CAPITAL AREA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION

City of San Antonio, Texas. FY 2014 Proposed. Debt Management Plan. Presented by Ben Gorzell, Chief Financial Officer.

Order Authorizing Securitization of Certain Additional Transition Costs and Related Transactions

Chapter 32 Utah Interlocal Financing Authority Act

Tax-Exempt Housing Bond Basics

2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the

SERVICE PLAN FOR METROPOLITAN DISTRICT[S] CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO. Prepared [NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY] [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] [DATE]

CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT POLICY AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 1, 2011

MODEL DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

M E M O R A N D U M EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY ( C-PACE ) AGREEMENT

Debt Management Policies & Guidelines

Module A Introduction to Tax-Exempt Bonds Overview

Section I. Introduction

WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Debt Management Policy Administrative Code Exhibit G January 2015

National Federation of Municipal Analysts

CHAPTER 102. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

PUBLIC FINANCE HANDBOOK FOR TEXAS COUNTIES

SECTION 1 PURPOSE AND POLICIES

MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION FINANCE CORPORATION LOAN POLICY

Priority Senior Secured Income Fund, Inc.

Municipal Advisory Agreement

Yes, subject to certain limitations under the VRA Act and IRS regulations.

Nashua Pre-filed Testimony Of Steven A. Adams First Southwest Company. 1. What is your name and by whom are you employed?

SKAGIT COUNTY DEBT POLICY. Page 1 of 12

RELEVANT GOVT CODE AND ED CODE SECTIONS FOR SCHOOL DIST GO BONDS

Debt Management Policy - Adjustment of the Authority S tenderancing Program

3354: Tax-Exempt Debt Compliance Procedure. Tax-Exempt Debt

References (Statutes/Resos/Policies): Title 32 C.R.S.,, Land Development Regulation, Zoning Resolution; CC92-47; CC97-544;CC03-388, CC05-398

Evergreen INSTITUTIONAL MONEY MARKET FUNDS. Prospectus July 1, 2009

High Yield Trust Deed ( Mortgage ) Investment. The more informed one is the better decisions one makes.

Highlands Ranch Metropolitan District. Investment Policy

Project Financing Tools

City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy December 2009

Form ADV, Part 2A: FIRM BROCHURE

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BOND LAWYERS TELECONFERENCE ON MUNICIPAL ADVISOR RULES. June 25, 2014

Arizona 1. Dependent Public School Systems (14) Arizona ranks 39th among the states in number of local governments, with 639 as of June 2002.

CFDs, SFIDs, and DEVELOPER FEES

REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION

SECTION 7 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET

General. Scope. Objectives. The objective of the Policy is to ensure prudent debt management practices that include:

LONG TERM OBLIGATION (LTO) FINANCING POLICY A Strategy for the Acquisition or Replacement of City Assets

The Roles of. for School District Public Financing

administrative subdivisions of the counties and are not counted as separate governments in census statistics on governments. IOWA

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

State Debt Management Presentation February Kristin A. Hanson, Assistant Commissioner, Treasury

INTERACTIVE BROKERS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR BOND TRADING

Secondary Market Annuities Purchaser s Guide

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. INVESTMENT POLICY for. Claims Paying Fund (Taxable)

ANNUAL DEBT GUIDE. Palm Beach County, Florida

California Tax Disclosure Report

TRANSPORTATION CODE TITLE 6. ROADWAYS SUBTITLE I. TRANSPORTATION CORPORATIONS CHAPTER 431. TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION ACT

AN INTRODUCTION TO MUNICIPAL LEASE FINANCING: ANSWERS TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CONTRACT FOR ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE TOWN OF ADDISON

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. INVESTMENT POLICY for. Liquidity Fund (Taxable)

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GENERAL INFORMATION B-3 CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES B-3 PUBLISHED RATINGS B-7 ADMINISTRATION B-7

CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION FINANCING AUTHORITY Meeting Date: February 18, 2014

Investment Policy Statement

How To Finance School District Debt Financing

State of Arkansas Construction Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Program

Virginia State University Policies Manual. Title: Debt Management Guidelines and Procedures Policy: 1500

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SECOND EXTRA SESSION 1996 H 1 HOUSE BILL 36. Short Title: Lincolnton-Lincoln Airport Auth'y.

SUMMARY PROSPECTUS. BlackRock Liquidity Funds Select Shares California Money Fund Select: BCBXX FEBRUARY 29, 2016

STATEMENT OF POLICY REGARDING CORPORATE SECURITIES DEFINITIONS

T he restrictions of Sections 23A and Regulation W

Financing Business Expansion through Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bonds

CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK INVESTMENT POLICY

Transcription:

R.R. Tripp Davenport, III 100 Crescent Court, Suite 700 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 418-1588

Disclosure FMS ROLE AS UNDERWRITER AND NOT FINANCIAL ADVISOR FMSbonds, Inc., is providing the information contained in this document for discussion purposes only in anticipation of serving as underwriter to the District. The primary role of FMSbonds, Inc., ( FMS ) as an underwriter, is to purchase securities, for resale to investors, in an arm s-length commercial transaction between the District and FMS. FMS may have financial and other interests that differ from those of the District. FMS is not acting as a municipal advisor, financial advisor or fiduciary to the District or any other person or entity. The information provided is not intended to be and should not be construed as advice within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The District should consult with its own financial and/or municipal, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors, as applicable, to the extent it deems appropriate. The District should consider whether to engage an advisor to act in a fiduciary capacity on its behalf in connection with this transaction. Securities offered by FMSbonds, Inc, including annuities, are not insured by the FDIC or any government agency; are not deposits or other obligations of or guaranteed by FMSbonds, Inc. or any of its affiliates; and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal invested. FMSbonds, Inc. is a broker/dealer, member FINRA/SIPC. FMS has a policy that is designed to comply with the disclosure requirements under revised MSRB Rule G-23. In conjunction with these requirements, we are providing the following disclosure to all of our municipal underwriting clients.

Development Using Public Improvement Districts Public Improvement Districts (PID) are tools available to landowners / developers / cities / counties to fund public improvements that benefit the area within the PID boundaries. Creation: Landowners can petition a city or county to establish a PID. Thereafter, PIDs are created by cities or counties. Resources: The financial resources of PIDs are assessments levied on property owners within the PID. The assessments are based on a percentage of benefited property. Additional revenues can be pledged to the project, thereby mitigating assessments. Other revenues include: tax increment, parking, fees, appropriations, etc. Financings: A PID sells assessment revenue bonds and / or can generate annual revenues. Further, the assessment can act as a backstop for a double barreled revenue bond. Governance: Appointed by the city council or commissioner's court (dependent district). Eligible Costs: PIDs can finance a wide array of public infrastructure and development items, including: o landscaping; erection of fountains, distinctive lighting, and signs; o acquiring, constructing, improving, widening, narrowing, or rerouting sidewalks, streets/roadways or rights-of-way; o construction or improvement of pedestrian malls; o acquisition, construction or improvement of libraries; o acquisition, construction or improvement of off-street parking facilities; o acquisition, construction, improvement or rerouting of mass transportation facilities; o acquisition, construction, or improvements of water, wastewater or drainage improvements; o the establishment or improvement of parks; o acquisition, by purchase or otherwise, of real property in connection with an authorized improvement; o special supplemental services for improvement and promotion of the district; and o payment of expenses incurred in the establishment, administration, and operation of the district. 1

Possible Transaction Participants / Process Representing Issuer Developer / Landowner Investors City Staff Developer s Counsel Underwriter Financial Advisor Assessment Consultant / FA Underwriter s Counsel Bond Counsel Engineer Trustee Assessment Administrator (Post-Issue) Market Feasibility Trustee s Counsel Appraiser* Dissemination Agent Appraiser* Dissemination Agent Dissemination Agent * Appraiser will prepare a report for the benefit of the underwriter and issuer Process may take 9 12 Months from introduction of project through close Working Group Meetings/ Conference Calls Transcript to Texas AG Initial Working Group Meeting Prepare Bond Documents Investor Calls/ Site Visits Start Construction PID Petition Public Hearing Project and Finance Plan /Levy Assessments Mail PLOM Close Financing Public Hearing Price Bonds 2

Summary Public Improvement Districts Positive Features Public Improvement Districts are increasingly being utilized by cities and counties to fund and maintain public infrastructure. The increased uses are due to numerous factors, including but not limited to: Revisions to the statute in the 81 st /82 nd Sessions, providing for a more advantageous law for both cities / counties and developers Increased population pressuring smaller communities with limited resources Public policy concerns with proliferation of developer driven ad valorem special districts surrounding cities The City / County has control of development they have the ability to negotiate reasonable development standards The sponsoring entity gets to select the professionals they engage for financing and assessment management Lower overall cost of capital for developers, thereby facilitating greater amenities and higher valued project The districts allocate costs to the citizens being benefitted, therefore the general tax base does not subsidize development City / County may require a maintenance PID to mitigate ongoing costs associated with the development Public Improvement Districts Issues to Consider While there are several benefits of utilizing public improvement districts, there are also factors that a sponsoring jurisdiction should consider before using the development tool. Some factors include: Establishing a debt PID requires an ongoing public-private partnership with the developer AND subsequent ownership Perception among the general tax base may create political issues (i.e., City / County is subsidizing developers) With control comes additional responsibilities. Unlike an ad valorem district, PIDs will require additional staff time / resources As with any public project, construction, market and development risks exist The sponsoring entity must be sensitive to overlapping debt ratios, leverage, and other financial considerations Increased regulatory scrutiny of the municipal market requires the City / County to exhaust due diligence matters While non-recourse to the sponsoring entity, the City / County issues the debt and signs the documents related to financing Ultimately, if any issues arise with the PID, the City / County will need to work with interested parties to mitigate the impact 3

Assessments and Credit Mechanics Assessment Bond Safeguards For successful assessment bond sales, underwriters generally require: 1. Value to Lien typically 3:1 though this is determined on a project by project basis 2. All public approvals, entitlement, and utility service delivery issues be resolved 3. Private sources of funding be fully committed, so that the overall plan of finance (bonds as well as private capital) render necessary finished lots 4. Clean title from environmental and lien standpoint (development related mortgages are OK), normal due diligence matters 5. It is recommend that a third-party market study and engineer s report be conducted 6. Finally, builder contracts are preferred they are the gold standard indicators of market demand and positively effect rate 7. The bond prospectus, deliberately and intentionally includes very little disclosure on the political subdivision. The prospectus also includes strong disclosures and risk factors 8. The bond proceeds are held by a trustee. The developer does not have access to the funds. The political subdivision (or its designee) must approve each construction requisition 9. The bonds are secured by a debt service reserve fund, which serves as a surge-tank funding source should a tax delinquency require enforcement action 10. Typically, 2-3 years interest is funded from the bonds 11. The strict, several nature of special assessments assures every property owner that their assessment cannot increase due to non-payment by another landowner Assessment / Credit Mechanics 1. Assessments are levied against each individual lot or parcel for the life of the PID (lien is known at time of purchase) 2. Assessment liens within the PID are subordinate only to governmental taxes 3. Generally, assessments are paid annually like ad valorem taxes, but the lien can be paid in full (unlike ad valorem taxes) 4. The land / homeowner is responsible for assessment payment (unlike MUD, no impact to owner for non-payment of others) 5. Leverage is based upon the project s appraised value (land + improvements = appraised value). Generally, the bond issue is approximately one-third of the appraised value though numerous factors may change the ratio (other revenue enhancements, credit enhancements, absorption, builder contracts, etc.) 4

Structuring / Pricing / Distribution Once due diligence is complete, the underwriter and its counsel will prepare a marketing document (Preliminary Official Statement, hereinafter POS ). The POS will primarily focus on the development / developer and provide potential investors with material information needed to make an informed investment decision. Prior to entering the market, the underwriter will work with the City and the developer to determine a structure that meets most of the parties objectives. Once in the market, the underwriter contacts a universe of investors that may be interested in the bonds. FMS has a unique client base that crosses all investor classes. This diverse distribution network allows FMS to market The special assessment bonds to investors less sensitive to yield. While each transaction should be analyzed independently, FMS s underwriting services provides a distribution network that allows it to aggressively price its transactions. Moody s S&P Fitch Quality of Bond Issuer / Type Aaa AAA AAA Prime Dallas County (GO) Aa1 AA+ AA+ Aa2 AA AA Aa3 AA- AA- A1 A+ A+ A2 A A A3 A- A- Baa1 BBB+ BBB+ Baa2 BBB BBB Baa3 BBB- BBB- High Grade Upper Grade Lower Medium Grade NR NR NR Non-investment grade City of Garland (GO) City of Austin (Airport) City of Irving Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) Public Improvement Dist (Assessment) 5

What are some of the risks associated with PIDs? Step(s) Risk Issue Mitigation Pre- Formation Formation Financing Post- Issuance Worst-case Administrative (on-going) Political Perception Obligation Market Development Administration Enforcement Foreclosure Some landowners / developers may not be qualified to execute a project of the size and scope requested. There is a required public process. Some City officials and citizens may view the project unfavorably. PIDs are relatively new to Texas market place; therefore, new to City s and City professionals. While PID debt is non-recourse, the team should be cognizant of overlapping debt and rating agency views. PID debt is non-rated and there is a limited universe of buyers. Once bonds are issued, Trustee is responsible for release of funds to developer after City approval. Assessments must be tracked / collected for payment of debt and maintenance. City may establish guidelines, minimum requirements, or a fee prior to negotiating a developer s agreement. Provide as much information on the project and be as transparent as possible. Let the project stand on its own. Be pro-active, transparent and educate the City s staff / professionals. Work with, not against the financing group. Thorough review of overlapping debt and responsible financing structure will minimize the possible risks. Know the market and provide an attractive financing structure to market to investors. Detail the minimum requirements for developer payment / reimbursement in the developer s agreement. Engage assessment professional to administer process / provide ongoing disclosure. Non-payment of assessments. Work with 3 rd party professional and jurisdiction to collect assessments. Inability of landowner to pay assessments Ultimately a bond-holder risk; however, the jurisdiction will need to work with interested parties on foreclosure process. 6

Disclosure FMS ROLE AS UNDERWRITER AND NOT FINANCIAL ADVISOR FMSbonds, Inc., is providing the information contained in this document for discussion purposes only in anticipation of serving as underwriter to the District. The primary role of FMSbonds, Inc., ( FMS ) as an underwriter, is to purchase securities, for resale to investors, in an arm s-length commercial transaction between the District and FMS. FMS may have financial and other interests that differ from those of the District. FMS is not acting as a municipal advisor, financial advisor or fiduciary to the District or any other person or entity. The information provided is not intended to be and should not be construed as advice within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The District should consult with its own financial and/or municipal, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors, as applicable, to the extent it deems appropriate. The District should consider whether to engage an advisor to act in a fiduciary capacity on its behalf in connection with this transaction. Securities offered by FMSbonds, Inc, including annuities, are not insured by the FDIC or any government agency; are not deposits or other obligations of or guaranteed by FMSbonds, Inc. or any of its affiliates; and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal invested. FMSbonds, Inc. is a broker/dealer, member FINRA/SIPC. FMS has a policy that is designed to comply with the disclosure requirements under revised MSRB Rule G-23. In conjunction with these requirements, we are providing the following disclosure to all of our municipal underwriting clients.