Section I: Introduction



Similar documents
School District Appraisal Systems in Texas

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

Appendix B: Accelerated Program Guidelines

Questions and Answers Regarding English Language Learners (ELLs) with Disabilities. Volume 10

Chapter 9 EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION AND SCHOOL NURSE

California University Intermediate Unit 1 ESL Professional Development Project

Master of Education School Counseling Degree Program

Practicum Requirements Special Education Program Old Dominion University

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

SECTION III. The Responsibilities of School Counselors And Other Staff Members

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

Gifted/Talented Education Frequently Asked Questions revised 02/13/12

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

School Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

PART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION

School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING. Master of Arts in Teaching

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding ELL Programs

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS

Roles and Responsibilities Chart ECE Internship for Online Sections

Alternate Route to Interim Teaching Certification Program Application

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

Reevaluation of Special Education Students. 1. If conditions warrant a reevaluation, including improved academic performance

Oak Park School District. School Psychologist Evaluation

LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO

TExES Special Education Supplemental (163) Test at a Glance

Belmont Public Schools Special Education Programs

Verification of Experience Multiple and Single Subject Credential Programs

COUNSELING PRACTICUM HANDBOOK

Comal ISD Bilingual & ESL Program Evaluation. Where Excellence is an Attitude!

SB Individual Graduation Committees Frequently Asked Questions

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

360 Dr. Mike Richie SUPERINTENDENT LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE

Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Internship Manual Educational Specialist (EdS) Florida Gulf Coast University

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework

(i) The program shall prepare candidates who are familiar with the historical foundations of gifted and talented education;

Brazos School for Inquiry and Creativity

Will apply content knowledge, decision-making skills and sound judgments inherent in the learning and teaching process.

GRADUATE HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL EXPERIENCES. M.S.Ed. Early Childhood Education

EDUC SPECIAL EDUCATION: PART I (Six-Credit Course) Additional Qualification Course Distance Study Revised: May, 2011

SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

1. Candidates understand the theoretical and evidence-based foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction as follows:

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

Special Education Teacher

COUNSELOR JOB DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION FORM

Millersville University School Psychology Student Portfolio. This is most current information. Please check with faculty for updates.

Psychologist uses a limited number of psychological instruments with little or no flexibility to evaluate students.

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL EDUCATION AUDIT PROGRAM

ISTE National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers

Print Report Card. Program Information. Section I.a Program Admission. Print Report Card

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

DOMAIN 1 FOR SOCIAL WORKERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. Add on Certification Program English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Endorsement

How To Be A School Social Worker

Master s Credential Cohort Program Supplementary Information for MCC Special Education Candidates

MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION ELEMENTARY EDUCATION COMPACT SPRING 2002

Master s Credential Cohort Program 2015 Supplementary Information for MCC Special Education Candidates

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists

Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent

State Board of Education - Texas Standard Certificates

MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COMPACT

Issuance of the Standard Certificate and Renewal Requirements, Including Continuing Professional Education (19 TAC Chapter 232, Subchapters A and B)

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

2. Recognizing and Promoting Quality in Online Education

IRVING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. Career and Technical Education. Engineering. Aviation and Biomedical Sciences Academy TEACHER JOB DESCRIPTION

STUDENT HANDBOOK. Master of Education in Early Childhood Education, PreK-4 and Early Childhood Education Certification Programs

SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Reasonable accommodation maybe made to enable a person with a disability to perform the essential functions of the job.

GEORGIA TEACHER ACADEMY FOR PREPARATION AND PEDAGOGY (GaTAPP)

ELPS 606 INTERNSHIP PORTFOLIO PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Compliance Audit Report Prairie View A&M University Principal Preparation Program

La Joya ISD Office of Bilingual/ESL Education

QUALITY INDICATORS FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES RESEARCH-BASED REVISIONS, 2004

PRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2001

Session Objectives. What are the goals of Title III, Part A? Analyzing AMAO Data to Improve Instruction for ELL Students

The Framework for Gifted Endorsement Guidelines

Proposal to Offer the Reading Specialist Certificate For Currently Approved Programs

FINAL EVALUATION Professional Phase. Teacher Candidate s Name: ID# Date. Certification area: Special Education. Field Supervisor:

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

State Licensure for Teachers, School Counselors and Administration Professionals

THE FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATIVE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING & MATHEMATICS (STEM) EDUCATION ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES September 2014

ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers

BILINGUAL/ESL EDUCATION PROGRAM

Additional Admission Requirements

BIRTH THROUGH FIVE FLORIDA CHILD CARE PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIAL (FCCPC) TRAINING PROGRAM PROVIDER APPLICATION

DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

California Master Teacher s Legacy: Effective Mentoring Practices in Special Education

Student Teaching Expectations Undergraduate Early Childhood Education/Early Childhood Special Education Program SPCED-UE 1503 Fall Semester Juniors

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND FOUNDATIONS

MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION ELEMENTARY EDUCATION COMPACT

Compliance Audit Report Texas A&M University--Kingsville Principal Certification Program

Transcription:

Section I: Introduction Educators: In order to fulfill the requirements of Texas Education Code 21.045 and Texas Administration Code (TAC) Chapter 229, the Texas Education Agency is required to collect data through the distribution of a survey to all individuals who have completed an educator preparation program. The purpose of this survey, initiated by the Texas Education Agency, is to evaluate the effectiveness of educator preparation programs, in accordance with the requirements of Senate Bill 174. We are interested in learning about the level of preparation you received from your educator preparation program upon completion. This information will be used to promote the preparation of effective teachers and ultimately, Texas students. Please provide feedback regarding how well you were prepared by your educator preparation programs to be successful in the classroom. TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY, YOU WILL HAVE TO IDENTIFY THE NAME OF YOUR EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAM. Most of the questions are Likert type, and the survey should only take 15 minutes to complete. Information from the survey will be provided to TEA in aggregate; no individual names will be connected with the information provided to us. The first page of the survey contains definitions of terms to help you respond as accurately as possible. If you have any questions about the purpose of this survey, you may email: Janice Lopez, PhD Director, Educator Certification and Standards Texas Education Agency edstandards@tea.state.tx.us If you have any problems accessing or submitting this survey, please email: edstandards@tea.state.tx.us PLEASE PRINT THIS PAGE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. Page 1

Definitions Section II: Teacher Background Rural: Less populated geographic areas including small towns, open country, farming or ranch communities, or countryside. Suburban/urban fringe: A residential district located on the outskirts of a major city/transitional area between an urban area and the countryside. Urban: A major city or densely populated area. Section III: Classroom Environment Rapport: A close relationship between the teacher and students that is characterized by polite, respectful, warm, and caring interactions that reflect an understanding of students' cultural and developmental differences. Section IV: Instruction Formative assessment data: Assessment that is embedded in the instruction, and designed to increase feedback to students and teachers, and support data driven decisions about instruction for students. Formative assessment data assists teachers with integrating assessment into their daily teaching practice and utilizing data driven decision making to support instruction; the data should provide the basis for modification of instructional practice. Section V: Students with Disabilities Students with disabilities: These students are defined by the Texas Administrative Code 89.1001. A child is considered a student with disabilities if s/he has a physical, cognitive, behavioral, or other related impairment. Differentiate instruction: Appropriate instruction to ensure each student's success. Individualized Education Program (IEP): For a child with a disability, a written statement of services that includes the child's present levels of performance, measurable annual goals, accommodations, and progress measures. Formal assessments: These include standardized tests and may also encompass alternative assessments. Informal assessments: These pertain to performance based activities, observations of students, teacher created assessments, student portfolios, and content learning logs, etc.; they may also include alternative assessments. Section VI: Limited English Proficient Students Limited English proficient (LEP ELL) students: These students are defined by Texas Education Code (TEC) 29.052. A "student of limited proficiency" means a student whose primary language is other than English and whose English language skills are such that the student has difficulty performing ordinary classwork in English. Academic English: Academic language proficiency is used to define academic English. Academic language proficiency is the ability to understand the English terms that make the learning of academic concepts and skills fully accessible. Language proficiency encompasses both social language proficiency and academic language proficiency. Section VII: Technology Integration Real time content: Synchronous; content that is continuously updated and immediately available to the public. Page 2

Developmentally appropriate: Appropriate for the sensory motor skills based on the growth and development of the student at a particular time. The age and level of exposure the student has to the available technology is part of that definition. Section VIII: Use Technology with Data Formative assessment data: Assessment that is embedded in the instruction, and designed to increase feedback to students and teachers, and support data driven decisions about instruction for students. Formative assessment data assists teachers with integrating assessment into their daily teaching practice and utilizing data driven decision making to support instruction; the data should provide the basis for modification of instructional practice. Section IX: Field Supervision Field Supervisor: A certified educator, preferably with advanced credentials, who observes and monitors candidates and provides them with constructive feedback to improve their professional performance. A field supervisor represents the educator preparation program and cannot be employed by a Texas school district Page 3

Definitions Continued Structural Guidance and Ongoing Support: Is provided by the field supervisor during the field supervision time period. It includes specific, constructive feedback; documentation of feedback; regular conferencing and conversations, especially following classroom observations; field supervisor responsiveness to the teacher candidate's professional needs; and a readily accessible field supervisor. Page 4

Section II: Teacher Background The following questions relate to TEACHER BACKGROUND. Please select your answer. *1. The name of my educator preparation program is (choose one from the drop down list). If you were trained in an in state educator preparation program but you do not see the program name on the list, please email edstandards@tea.state.tx.us. 6 *2. The type of educator preparation program that I am involved in is: Alternative Certification Program Post Baccalaureate Program Traditional Undergraduate University based Program Page 5

*3. Were you employed as a beginning teacher (teacher of record) during the current or previous academic year? Yes No Page 6

*4. If you were a candidate in an alternative certification program, were you employed in the certification area in which you were trained by the educator preparation program? mnjkl Yes, I was employed in the certification area in which I was trained. No, I was not employed in the certification area in which I was trained. I was not a candidate in an alternative certification program. Page 7

*5. The area in which your current teaching assignment is located is best described as (choose one): kjnml rural suburban/urban fringe urban other (please specify) Page 8

Survey Evaluation Descriptors When responding to questions 6 40 in this survey, please refer to the following descriptions: Well prepared Upon completion of my educator preparation program, I feel I have a thorough understanding and the required knowledge and skills. Sufficiently prepared Upon completion of my educator preparation program, I feel I have a general understanding and the required knowledge and skills. Not Upon completion of my educator preparation program, I feel I have a limited understanding and partial required knowledge and skills. Not at all prepared Upon completion of my educator preparation program, I feel I have little to no understanding and minimal required knowledge and skills. Page 9

Section III: Classroom Environment The following questions relate to your preparation to address the CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT. Think about the preparation you received from your educator preparation program when answering the following questions. Please select your answer from the following:,, not, or. *6. To what extent were you prepared to effectively implement discipline management procedures? not *7. To what extent were you prepared to communicate clear expectations for achievement and behavior that promote and encourage self discipline and self directed learning? mlkjn not *8. To what extent were you prepared to provide support to achieve a positive, equitable, and engaging learning environment? not *9. To what extent were you prepared to build and maintain positive rapport with students? mlkjn not Page 10

*10. To what extent were you prepared to build and maintain positive rapport and twoway communication with students families? mlkjn not Page 11

Section IV: Instruction The following questions relate to your preparation to address INSTRUCTION. Think about the preparation you received from your educator preparation program when answering the following questions. Please select your answer from the following:,, not, or. *11. To what extent were you prepared to implement varied instruction that integrates critical thinking, inquiry, and problem solving? mlkjn not *12. To what extent were you prepared to respond to the needs of students by being flexible in instructional approach and differentiating instruction? not *13. To what extent were you prepared to use the results of formative assessment data to guide instruction? not *14. To what extent were you prepared to engage and motivate students through learnercentered instruction? not Page 12

*15. To what extent were you prepared to integrate effective modeling, questioning, and self reflection (self assessment) strategies into instruction? mlkjn not *16. To what extent were you prepared to assume various roles in the instructional process (e.g. instructor, facilitator, audience)? not *17. To what extent were you prepared to set clear learning goals and align instruction with standards based content? not *18. To what extent were you prepared to provide quality and timely feedback to students? mlkjn not Page 13

Section V: Students with Disabilities The following questions relate to your preparation to address the needs of STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES. Think about the preparation you received from your educator preparation program when answering the following questions. *19. Did you have students with disabilities in your classroom as determined by the Texas Administrative Code 89.1001? A child is considered a student with disabilities if he or she has a physical, cognitive, behavioral, or other related impairment. Yes No Page 14

Please select your answer from the following:,, not, or not at all prepared. *20. To what extent were you prepared to differentiate instruction to meet the academic needs of students with disabilities? not *21. To what extent were you prepared to differentiate instruction to meet the behavioral needs of students with disabilities? not *22. To what extent were you prepared to provide appropriate ways for students with disabilities to demonstrate their learning? mlkjn not *23. To what extent were you prepared to understand and adhere to the federal and state laws that govern special education services? not Page 15

*24. To what extent were you prepared to make appropriate decisions (e.g., when and how to make accommodations and/or modifications to instruction, assessment, materials, delivery, and classroom procedures) to meet the learning needs of students who have an Individualized Education Program (IEP)? not *25. To what extent were you prepared to develop and/or implement formal and informal assessments that track students progress toward IEP goals and objectives? not *26. To what extent were you prepared to collaborate with others, such as paraeducators and other teachers, in meeting the academic, developmental, and behavioral needs of students with disabilities? kjnml not Page 16

Section VI: Limited English Proficient Students The following questions relate to your preparation to address the needs of English language learners (ELLs) identified as LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT (LEP) as determined by the Texas Education Code (TEC). Think about the preparation you received from your educator preparation program when answering the following questions. *27. Did you have limited English proficient (LEP ELL) students in your classroom? A student is considered LEP ELL if he or she has a primary language other than English and whose English language skills are such that the student has difficulty performing ordinary coursework in English, as determined by Texas Education Code (TEC) 29.052. Yes No Page 17

Please select your answer from the following:,, not, not at all prepared. *28. To what extent were you prepared to provide appropriate ways for LEP ELL students to demonstrate their learning? not *29. To what extent were you prepared to understand and adhere to federal and state laws that govern education services for LEP ELL students? not *30. To what extent were you prepared to comply with district and campus policies and procedures regarding LEP ELL students? mlkjn not *31. To what extent were you prepared to support LEP ELL students in mastering the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), including the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)? not Page 18

*32. To what extent were you prepared to model and teach the forms and functions of academic English in content areas? mlkjn not Page 19

Section VII: Technology Integration The following questions relate to your preparation to INTEGRATE AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY effectively into curricula and instruction. Think about the preparation you received from your educator preparation program when answering the following questions. Please select your answer from the following:,, not sufficiently prepared, or. *33. To what extent were you prepared to use technology available on the campus to integrate curriculum TEKS and Technology Applications TEKS to support student learning? not *34. To what extent were you prepared to provide technology based classroom learning opportunities that allow students to interact with real time and/or online content? not *35. To what extent were you prepared to teach students developmentally appropriate technology skills? not *36. To what extent were you prepared to use technology to make learning more active and engaging for students? not Page 20

Section VIII: Use Technology With Data The following questions relate to your preparation to USE AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY WITH DATA to increase student achievement. Think about the preparation you received from your educator preparation program when answering the following questions. Please select your answer from the following:,, not sufficiently prepared, or. *37. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to collect, manage, and analyze student data using software programs (such as Excel or an electronic gradebook)? mlkjn not *38. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to collect, manage, and analyze data from multiple sources in order to interpret learning results for students? mlkjn not *39. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to document student learning to determine when an intervention is necessary and appropriate? mlkjn not *40. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to collect and manage formative assessment data to guide instruction? not Page 21

Section IX: Field Supervision The following questions relate to your FIELD SUPERVISOR. Think about the interactions that you had with your Field Supervisor when answering the following questions. Through your responses, you are providing your perception of the structural guidance and ongoing support provided by your Field Supervisor during the Field Supervision time period. Please select your answers from the following: Always/Almost Always All or or almost all of the time the action was performed by the Field Supervisor. Frequently Most of the time the action was performed by the Field Supervisor. Occasionally Some of the time the action was performed by the Field Supervisor. Rarely Infrequently or never the action was performed by the Field Supervisor. *41. To what extent did your Field Supervisor share with you the expectations for your performance in the classroom before each observation? lkjnm Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *42. To what extent did your Field Supervisor base observation feedback on the expectations for your performance in the classroom? Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *43. To what extent did your Field Supervisor provide you with a written report or checklist of his/her observation of your performance in the classroom? lkjnm Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely Page 22

*44. To what extent did your Field Supervisor offer feedback on your performance in the classroom within one week of each observation? lkjnm Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *45. To what extent did your Field Supervisor include specific strategies that address your strengths and weaknesses in his/her feedback about your performance in the classroom? lkjnm Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *46. To what extent did your Field Supervisor hold an interactive conference with you after each observation? Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *47. To what extent did your Field Supervisor help you to solve problems, make specific recommendations for improvement, or act as your advocate? lkjnm Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *48. Did you ever communicate with your Field Supervisor by email, text, or telephone call? Yes No Page 23

*49. To what extent did your Field Supervisor respond to your communications, for example email, text, or telephone call, within two school/business days? lkjnm Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely Page 24

*50. To what extent did your Field Supervisor offer you opportunities to reflect on your performance in the classroom? Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *51. To what extent did your Field Supervisor provide multiple means for you to communicate with him/her, such as email, telephone, texting, video conferencing, or faceto face interaction? Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely *52. To what extent did your Field Supervisor ask you for ways he/she can support you? lkjnm Always/Almost Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely Page 25

Please select Yes or No in answering the following questions about the QUANTITY of field supervision received by the beginning teacher. *53. The Field Supervisor FORMALLY observed me teaching a minimum of three times. Yes No *54. The Field Supervisor observed me teaching for a minimum of 45 minutes during at least 3 of my FORMAL observations. Yes No Page 26

Section X: Overall Evaluation The following question relates to your OVERALL EVALUATION of the educator preparation program. Please select your answer. *55. What is your overall evaluation of how well the educator preparation program prepared you? Select the one statement that most closely matches your current overall perspective on the program. kjnml jlknm I was by the program for the first year of teaching. I was by the program for the first year of teaching. I was not by the program for the first year of teaching. I was by the program for the first year of teaching. Page 27

Thank You Thank you for your cooperation. You have now completed the survey. Please print this page for verification purposes. Page 28