SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME. Terms of reference



Similar documents
SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME

SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME. Terms of reference Policy Learning Mechanisms in Support of Cluster Development

ANNEX Removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links; Ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run;

Cefic Position on Intermodal Transport Network Development

Financing the European Mobility Network with the Connecting Europe Facility

European Strategy 2050 TEN-T Methodology: Italian TEN-T network proposal

Communication «A sustainable future for transport Towards an integrated, technology-led and user friendly system» CEMR position paper COM (2009) 279/4

Proposal Outline: FrOST. Provisional lead partner: Transport for Greater Manchester

Connecting Motorways of the Sea And Ten-T Corridors through Customs 4.0

How To Improve The Rail Transport System In European Union

The European Green Paper on Urban Mobility

Union for Mediterranean Motorways of the Sea Initiative: a way to a re-equilibrium in the Mediterranean. Transport and Urban Development Division

The deployment of public transport innovation in European cities and regions. Ivo Cré, Polis

ALICE Working Groups Descriptions. WG1: Sustainable Safe and Secure Supply Chains. Vision. Mision. Scope: Research and Innovation Areas and Challenges

usage of these types of fuels with production price far higher then diesel and petrol, is also a measure. We can say that in Bulgaria there are

Deufrako Workshop A. Olivier Maurel Chairman Predit Group 4. Intelligent Logistics and Freight Transport

Urban Transport As a Context-aware Cloud of Services (UTACCS) Proposal.

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

The logistics sector s view on the infrastructure in Central-Eastern European Member States Dr László Mosóczi Chairman of HUNGRAIL

Smart and sustainable logistics. Transport Research. Portal. for a competitive Europe. and Innovation COMMUNICATING TRANSPORT RESEARCH AND INNOVATION

Supply-Chain Connectivity Framework

I. Objectives and political priorities

BOLOGNA LEPZIG Business Case BOLI

Capitalisation activities: the policypaperand new proposalsfor improving ELIH-Med capitalisation

Prefeasibility Study for the High Speed Line HU-RO Border Bucharest - Constanta Description and Objectives

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2014/2244(INI) on the implementation of multimodal integrated ticketing in the EU (2014/2244(INI))

The results of this consultation will feed into the Commission impact assessment which will accompany the proposal on an EU coordinated approach.

USB Folder Name Date Description Key Words Source

CAIMANs FINAL COMMITTEE Venice, June 11th 2015

1. INTRODUCTION RESPONDENTS:

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. A call to action on urban logistics. Accompanying the document

How To Analyse And Evaluate The Weastflows Project

CEF Transport (TEN-T) 2014: EU funding to improve cross-border transport connections

programme and its use on Pre-Commercial Procurement of Innovation

IQ-C Action plan for rail freight corridor Rotterdam-Genoa

The key elements of the TEN-T guidelines

REGIONAL DIMENSION OF THE 7th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME. The new Call and Work Programme. Regions of Knowledge

COHESION POLICY

A Greener Transport System in Denmark. Environmentally Friendly and Energy Efficient Transport

A Competitive European Shipping Industry

Belgium Logistics, your competitive gateway to Europe

Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion Programme for Employment and Social Innovation

Terms of Reference. February 2012

Introduction to the 2015 Horizon 2020 Energy Call for Proposals. 14 July 2014

TEN-T guidelines and CEF

INTERREG V-A SLOVAKIA HUNGARY COOPERATION PROGRAMME

new challenges and how its delivery can be improved in order to maximise its impact in the future.

European GNSS Applications in Horizon 2020

Infrastructure & Growth Leadership Pillar Strategy Statements from Existing Plans Developing Florida s Strategic 5-Year Direction, 29 November 2011

Trade & Transport Corridors. European Projects & Initiatives

PREPARATORY STUDY FOR AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR A RAIL NETWORK GIVING PRIORITY TO FREIGHT

D SCW SE. Digital Supply Chains for European SMEs. What is DiSCwise? (by using a Common Framework for ICT in Transport & Logistics)

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

Interreg Europe Programme Manual

Research Infrastructures in Horizon 2020

Transport Infographics

ETP 2010 Conference Urban Mobility the door-to. to-door strategy

MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE: CASE OF CENTROPE

EPN CONSULTING AS YOUR CONSULTANTS

New Financial Instruments for Europe

18.1 million people 1 billion tons of goods moved 2.5 billion dollars of trucking congestion costs

The Transport Infrastructure Context of Northern Sweden

ICT PSP Call Theme 1: ICT for a low carbon economy and smart Mobility

OPINION ON GENDER DIMENSION IN THE NEXT PROGRAMMING PERIOD OF THE STRUCTURAL FUNDS

ECTRI POSITION PAPER. December 2012

CALL PRE ANNOUNCEMENT

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2 Integrated planning. Chapter 2. Integrated Planning. 2.4 State highway categorisation and integrated planning

SUMMARY COOPERATION PROGRAMME INTERREG NORTH-WEST EUROPE Version 11 March 2015

.Policy framework. .Themes and Actions.Civitas and EU funding instrumens.future vision. Overview. Plan on Urban Mobility

Sustainable goods transport in the Fehmarn-Øresund corridor. Per Homann Jespersen ENSPAC, Roskilde University

Urban Mobility Package Support to local authorities action in building sustainable local mobility plans

European Innovation Partnership Smart Cities and Communities Henriette VAN EIJL, European Commission, DG MOVE-C2

9360/15 FMA/AFG/cb 1 DG G 3 C

Unioncamere Veneto - Bruxelles 1/7/2014

Agenda. The Digital Agenda for Europe Instruments to implement the vision EC actions to promote ehealth interoperability

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Towards a roadmap for delivering EU-wide multimodal travel information, planning and ticketing services

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

PLAN OF ACTION MARITIME TRANSPORT

Digital Entrepreneurship & ICT Innovation Vouchers

Declaration of the Union for the Mediterranean ministerial meeting on industrial cooperation

Opportunities for the Automotive Sector in Horizon Cliff Funnell UK FP7/H2020 Surface Transport NCP FP7UK

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

UNCTAD Ad Hoc Expert Meeting on Assessing Port Performance

Environmental footprinting of products The policy outlook

Sustainable Freight Transport Systems: Opportunities for Developing Countries

CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Launch of the 3 rd Call for Proposals

Work Programme Funding priorities for European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI)

SMART DATA AND WELL-BEING 1

Role of seaports as a link between inland and maritime transport

BENDEKOVIC, J. & SIMONIC, T. & NALETINA, D.

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda

The Rail Freight Corridor through Denmark. Formative Years and Future Perspectives for Customers

Environmental footprinting of products. The policy outlook

Chapter 9: Transportation

Florida Transportation Commission: A Meeting of the Modes

2015 CEF Transport Calls for Proposals COUNTRY FICHE. Germany

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. establishing the Connecting Europe Facility {SEC(2011) 1262} {SEC(2011) 1263}

Strengthening Combined Transport in TURKEY

Transcription:

SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME 3 rd Call for Proposals Terms of reference Efficient access to a SEE coordinated multimodal freight network between ports and landlocked countries March 2011

1. Background It was in 2001, when the Commission in the White Paper, European transport policy for 2010: time to decide, 1 included, among its priorities the need to shift the balance and improve the links among modes of transport and secure intermodality, especially by enforcing the connection between sea, inland waterways and rail, to cope with the growing congestion of roads and to eliminate bottlenecks. In the mid-term review of 2006 2, disconnecting mobility from its negative side-effects, shifting to more environmentally friendly mode, and co-modality, i.e. the efficient use of different modes on their own and in combination, became part of the renewed agenda. Lately in 2009, the Commission has launched a reflection on the Sustainable Future for Transport: Towards an integrated, technology-led and user friendly system 3. What came out, vis-à-vis the impressive growth of the transport demand (between 1995 and 2007, 1.7 % per year on average for the passengers and 2.7 % per year on average for freight) point to the need for satisfying a rising demand for accessibility in a context of growing sustainability concerns. The most immediate priorities appear to be the better integration of the different modes of transport as a way to improve the overall efficiency of the system and the acceleration of the development and deployment of innovative technologies 4. The SWOT analysis which has served for the definition of the SEE Programme has highlighted that accessibility of the SEE space and the mobility of passengers and goods inside the Programme area is in the majority of countries - still sub-standard and provides a poor level of service. The reason for this is primarily to be identified in the lags in the quality and quantity of infrastructure, a problem which needs enormous financial investments and a relevant lapse of time to be improved effectively. However there are diverse other possible actions for substantial improvement of the accessibility, as pointed out by the EU strategies mentioned above, that can be put in place. These are directed to optimize the coordination among the existing services, now supplied by different modes of transport, creating intermodal connected systems by existing transport facilities, overcoming discontinuity across borders and finally the lack of infrastructure. The programme has set the enhancement of multimodal transport among its objectives, taking advantage of the possibility offered also by the richness of inland waterways and the vast maritime surrounding waterfront of the Programme area and its relevant ports (in addition to the road and rail network). Multi-modal platforms should be promoted and developed as a potential for consolidation and optimisation of passenger and freight flows to 1 DG Transport (2001) European transport policy for 2010: time to decide, Brussels COM(2001) 370 final 2 DG Transport (2006) Keep Europe moving - Sustainable mobility for our continent - Mid-term review of the European Commission s 2001 Transport White paper [COM(2006)314] 3 DG Transport (2009) A sustainable future for transport: Towards an integrated, technology-led and user friendly system" 17 June 2009 [COM(2009) 279] 4 In line with the flagship initiative Resource Efficient Europe, Europe 2020, A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM(2010) 2020 2

and within the SEE area, with airport, ports, stations and urban centres acting as natural intermodal nodes. Improving intermodal links could effectively help in overcoming the lack of accessibility of the Programme area related to: - scarcity and fragmentation of infrastructure (and high costs and time necessary for restructuring/modernisation) - lack of coordination in procedures and facilities causing impediments and long waiting time at border crossing and subsequently low interest in market operators - increasing road congestion (as cheapest and most flexible transport mode) with strong negative territorial and environmental impact as well as reduction of the quality of life The SEE Operational Programme does not tackle the intermodal accessibility for goods or people separately. However, at advanced stage, they require different approaches and different instruments, thus 2 terms of reference are defined. 3

THEME 3.2: Efficient access to a SEE coordinated multimodal freight network between ports and landlocked countries. The optimal functioning of the transnational transport system requires full integration and synergy of transport modes of the national and individual components of the network, as well as interconnection between the networks of the various transport modes for the creation of potentials for their synergy. This is true for the traffic of passengers, but twice as much for the transportation of goods. The general preference to move the goods by road is a fact, as it represents the cheapest as well as the most flexible mode of transport, which better adapts to the general poor infrastructural network of the SEE Programme area. This, as defined before, is the highest obstacle to the improvement of the accessibility of the region and cannot be solved in limited time and with the limited financial availability of the SEE Programme. However, the predominance of road transportation has important consequences in terms of environmental and territorial impact, but also on the deterioration of the present road network. There are areas of the programme area which are nor origin neither destination of important transit freight flow and are not getting if not minor benefit from the increase exchange of goods between (often) countries or ports at the two opposite ends. In many cases the quality of life of the population is highly affected by the intense and growing traffic of trucks on roads crossing villages. The reasons for a limited use of the alternative transport modes are not only to be found in the lack or poor quality of infrastructures, above all if considering a transnational area. There is a general lack of shared standards and procedures and harmonised legal framework, among the countries of the SEE Programme area; administrative and communication processes if modernised and correctly tackled to the final users (often SMEs), could lead to substantial increase of the share and efficiency of alternative transport modes in the SEE region. Crucial in achieving this result is the improvement of the efficiency of nodal points of the transport networks for transshipment and/or distribution, e.g. hubs, intermodal terminals, multimodal platforms. This will typically be the case in areas with a high activity of freight transport, i.e. where high volume corridors of different modes are intersecting. At a transnational level, this requires coordination among the partner countries; following this approach, relevant results for the programme area - which suffers of low accessibility - can be achieved also without infrastructural development, at an early stage. Transnational cooperation in the SEE Programme area could give an important contribution to seamless accessibility by supporting the improvement and organisation of services and procedures for a quality and less polluting integrated transport system. 4

2. Objectives 2.1 Overall objective The ultimate goal for a strategic project under this ToR is to support the improvement and organisation of intermodal services and procedures for a quality and less polluting integrated freight transport system between the sea and inland ports and the landlocked countries, through a better use of the existing infrastructure for alternative transport modes (railways, inland waterways and maritime) as well as by promoting coordination between the stakeholders and the decision makers, to pave the way to a more flexible and easy-to-access intermodality for the SMEs. 2.2 Specific objectives - To facilitate the access to greener transport modes in transnational pilot routes feeding traffic of goods to, from and across the programme area, with focus on connections between sea and inland ports to landlocked countries. - To improve the institutional framework, through definition of transnational agreements for harmonised simplification of the legislation and custom procedures and waiting times reduction at border crossing for greener modes of transport (railway companies and maritime and inland navigation), also with introduction of one-stop shop solutions. - To improve efficiency, reliability and quality of the greener transport modes by optimisation of organisational procedures and the implementation of shared ICT solutions in multimodal platforms of the pilot transnational network - To make the access to multimodality for SMEs easy and attractive through intense information and promotion programmes, transparency, awareness raising campaigns, flexible solutions and incentives specifically targeted on the end users, also on cross border relations - To decrease road congestion and rebalance the transportation market in the SEE Programme area, by promoting measures for internalisation of external costs taking into account environmental and territorial impact and the quality of life of the affected population - To pave the way for better, more efficient, well organised transportation of goods to and across the SEE programme area, and implement infrastructures used to their full potential, not suffering but designing actively the future infrastructures and priority corridors in line with the EU regulation (in the field of labour, safety, CO2 emission, cabotage). 5

3. Activities The project activities must build on a careful assessment of the previous achievements in the field, including SEE projects approved under the 1st and 2nd call for proposals and other actions implemented through different regional development programmes. Capitalisation of previous results is of outmost importance in order not to duplicate activities and to bring added value to the project. The activities listed under 3.1 Compulsory activities must be included into all proposed strategic projects for consideration. The activities listed under 3.2 Additional indicative activities are optional (and intends to offer a non exhaustive list of possible complementary activities). Additional activities can be added to the minimum set of compulsory activities, however their presence does not automatically ensure higher scores in the quality check of the assessment. Additional activities to the minimum set of compulsory ones are assessed according to the contribution they bring in to the achievements of the objectives of the project, their concreteness, feasibility and adequacy, also in relation to the budget, the partnership and the timeframe foreseen 3.1 Compulsory activities - Census of existing intermodal nodes on a representative freight network (to be proposed by the applicant) connecting ports to landlocked countries, and assessment of the existing legislation, standards, procedures and services, which can be improved in order to increase the competitiveness of the infrastructure and increase attractiveness of multimodal transport. - Discussion platform of the main stakeholders (i.e. public authorities, transport companies, logistics operators) with the aim of harmonising standards and procedures on the pilot freight network to allow multimodal transport be efficient and attractive to operators - Joint pilot implementation of ICT solutions (or systems for harmonization of existing) in the selected multimodal platform of the network based on existing successful systems to be adapted to the specific network (for exchange of data, paperless administrative management, tracking and tracing systems ), targeted on transnational transport and the local level of origins and destinations. - Targeted information and promotion of intermodal transport facilities to the representative of the productive sectors, the SMEs and the other end users, in order to tailor the system on their needs and facilitate their access above all the local entrepreneurs - to alternative and greener transport modes - Concluding transnational agreements on common measures for internalization of external costs of road transport on the pilot transnational network for raising competitiveness of the multimodal transport 6

3.2 Additional indicative activities - Planning future activities for further development of multimodal transport in the network of freight traffic nodes, including possibilities to transfer the best practices to other freight traffic nodes. - Development of common training modules for human resources employed in ports and logistic facilities. - Common strategy for the application of measures for the internalization of external costs of road transport on the pilot transnational network for increasing competitiveness of the multimodal transport - Identification of future investment needs in the multimodal platforms of the network with the purpose of facilitating efficient freight transport - Pilot actions, i.e. launching of experimental services and small infrastructural investments for reinforcing expected impacts of project results 4. Outputs - A discussion platform of the main stakeholders of the intermodal freight in place and functioning with the aim of improving the organisation of existing facilities for improved transnational accessibility via alternative modes of transport - A pilot network of well connected freight multimodal hubs covering relevant part of the programme area, and linking sea and inland ports to landlocked countries, identified, and shared common solutions for a higher synergy of transport modes - Agreements on alignment of legislation and multimodal logistics facilities, procedures and standards at transnational level developed to facilitate access to alternative modes of transport and interoperability of hubs, included agreements on border crossing - Set of harmonized procedures and standards at hubs on the pilot network as a result of shared organisational restructuring towards a common transnational goal - Main ICT and other soft infrastructure solutions implemented harmonically in the pilot network, allowing efficient management of the access to alternative transport modes - Information and promotion activities implemented for the involvement of the SMEs and targeting of the multimodal services to the need of the end users above all the local entrepreneurs -, including information on the impact on the environment and the territory, but also the quality of life of the population affected by the high road transport - Transnational schemes or agreements on internalisation of external costs for rebalancing the transport market towards less polluting modes in the region 7

5. Beneficiaries 5.1 Eligible Partnership Maximum 3 (three) financing partners per country and per project concept can be involved (due to the high number of countries involved in the Programme, developing too large partnerships might hamper a smooth management, leading to strong deficiencies of the implementation). At least 8 (eight) Partner States shall be included (in terms of location of Partners both financing and ASP). 5.2 Further Recommendations A strong partnership consists of a variety of stakeholders with different perspectives, capacities, and roles to play in the strategic project and includes partners with the specific competences to carry on the foreseen tasks per each region involved, towards the best transnational impact. A good partnership is balanced with regard to participation per country, distribution of the budget and responsibility and does include neither silent partners, nor all-purposes partners. A good partnership includes only partners which ensure a clear benefit for the country/region they represent, not only a financial benefit for the partner itself. Each proposed partnership must contain a lead partner, who will manage and coordinate the activities. The lead partner must have some demonstrated capacity (previous projects, etc.) to lead and manage large, international projects of this character. Project partners should consist of the following types of institutions and authorities: - National/ regional authorities with clear competences of development of freight transport and connections with neighbouring countries (included custom procedures) - Customs authorities - Railway freight operators, Port Authorities, inland navigation institutions, shipping operators, logistics operators if eligible according to programme rules - Chambers of commerce and logistics associations if eligible according to the programme rules - Institutes for research and innovation on transport able to support the adaptation of tools and ensure theoretical advice towards the specific project objective In addition, ideally, the proposed partnership specific to this theme: - should consist of maximum 20 (twenty) partners, able to insure high political commitment - at least 4 (four) of the project partners should be sea or river ports - at least 4 (four)of the project partners should be railway freight operators - Business association or chambers of commerce participate to foster the dialogue with the SMEs and the final users 8

- no more than 2 (two) partners should be Institutes for research and innovation on transport or bodies with similar competences and offer scientific support to the whole partnership for the adaptation of the available tools to the specific network - Associations of freight transport operators and providers of intermodal services should be involved preferably as ASPs their role being relate more to harmonization of different procedures/ standards/ policies. 9