PS10-10 6171 Spinosad provides long-term protection for stored wheat



Similar documents
PS Response of eleven stored product pest species to modified atmospheres with high carbon dioxide concentrations.

Bulletin of Insectology 61 (2): , 2008 ISSN

Practical pest control

Integrated storage pest control methods using vacuum or CO 2 in transportable systems

Control of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) with Spinosad Dust Formulation in Different Oilseeds

POWERFUL INSECT CONTROL IN GRAPES

S. Navarro and E. Donahaye Departmenr of Stored Products, ARO, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel

Sajjad Ali, Muhammad Sagheer, Mansoor ul Hassan, Muneer Abbas, Faisal Hafeez, Muhammad Farooq, Dilbar Hussain, Muhammad Saleem and Abdul Ghaffar

Ethyl formate fumigation as a replacement for methyl bromide fumigation in dried vine fruit.

Interpreting Trap Capture Data. James F. Campbell USDA ARS GMPRC 1515 College Ave Manhattan, KS

METAFLUMIZONE: A NEW INSECTICIDE FOR URBAN INSECT CONTROL FROM BASF

Commercially available Technology Test Data from Lab and Field Studies

Integrated Pest Management

Formulation of bio-pesticides and mass culture of natural enemies for pest management. D. Ahangama

Improved Envirosol fumigation methods for disinfesting export cut flowers and foliage crops

Mathematical Modelling of Fumigant Transport in Stored Grain

MIXED EFFECTS OF 1,8-CINEOLE, BOTANICAL CONSTITUENT, AND REDUCED ATMOSPHERE PRESSURE ON STORED PRODUCTS BEETLES IN LABORATORY CONDITION

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TWO STRAINS OF AMERICAN SERPENTINE LEAFMINER (LIRIOMYZA TRIFOLII (BURGESS)) TO REGISTERED AND REDUCED RISK INSECTICIDES IN ONTARIO

Toshihiro IMAI* and Haruyasu HARADA

PROGRESS IN THE USE OF CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERES IN ACTUAL FIELD SITUATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

Stored Product Pests

PS Integrated Pest Management in Italian pasta factories

Innovation in Fumigation. Blaine Timlick Canadian Grain Commission

A NOVEL, LOCALIZED TREATMENT USING SPINOSAD TO CONTROL STRUCTURAL INFESTATIONS OF DRYWOOD TERMITES (ISOPTERA: KALOTERMITIDAE)

Integrated Pest Management

Pest Management For Grain Storage and Fumigation. Seed Treatment. -Pest Control- Grain Storage & Seed Treatment Facilities

Carbon Science and Technology

Management JBiopest 5(1): of 1-6 rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker using some biorational insecticides

Precision Fumigation TM and ProFume gas fumigant

Maize Stored Pests Control by PICS-Bags: Technological and Economic Evaluation

Cloud Mountain Farm Center 6906 Goodwin Rd., Everson, WA (360) voice, (360) fax,

Improved monitoring, threshold development, and control of grape berry moth in wine grapes

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

- A9/1 - Format for the listing of end points to be included in the Tier III overall summary and assessments

Sulfuryl Fluoride Structural Fumigation

Upscaling of locally proven IPM technologies for control of pest of economic importance i

CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERE Application for Milling Industry

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH REFERENCE BOOKS AND MATERIALS ILLINOIS STRUCTURAL PEST CONTROL TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

LOUISIANA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONTROL OF PECAN INSECTS IN COMMERCIAL PECAN ORCHARDS: AN ILLUSTRATED GUIDE

TESTIMONY OF DR. STEVEN BRADBURY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Trade Advice Note on. Glyphosate. in the product. Roundup Ready Herbicide by Monsanto (APVMA Product Number 54112)

Developing effective fumigation protocols to manage strongly phosphine-resistant Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) (Coleoptera: Laemophloeidae)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1. Tom Moriarty Office of Pesticide Programs U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Heat treatment of mills and storage structures

The Feasibility of Using Low-oxygen Atmospheres to Control Insect Pests for Taxidermies in Natural History Museums

ALTERNATIVES TO METHYL BROMIDE TREATMENTS FOR STORED-PRODUCT

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SMALL GRAINS 2016 (Barley, Oats, Wheat) Prepared by Doug Johnson, Extension Entomologist

PREDATION OF CITRUS RED MITE (PANONYCHUS CITRI) BY STETHORUS SP. AND AGISTEMUS LONGISETUS

Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides for the Control of Stripe Rust (Puccinia striiformis) in SRWW in the Northern Texas Blacklands

Insects in the Classroom Lesson Plan No. 101

Hop Pest Control. H. E. Morrison. jpf^vrsiolnrru; - «ibntoj."' «- '',orto JUN 6 I-JJ3

Principles of (phosphine) fumigation

DuPont Altriset Termiticide Technical Bulletin

Stored Peanut Pest Management Strategic Plan

Grasshopper and Bean Leaf Beetle

Managing Sugarcane/Sorghum Aphid (SA) on Sorghum

WHY DO WE NEED TO ELIMINATE RODENTS FROM FOOD PREMISES?

Biological Control of Indianmeal Moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Finished Stored Products Using Egg and Larval Parasitoids

Abstract. Introduction. KPS5-1 Spatial distribution and movement patterns of stored-product insects

Chemical versus Biological Control of Sugarcane. By Abid Hussain Matiari Sugar Mills Ltd.

POLICY REGARDING PEST MANAGEMENT ON CITY PROPERTY

Sulfuryl Fluoride ProFume* Gas Fumigant

Alaska Forest Pest Control Supplemental Information. Category Twelve

GUIDELINES FOR THE REGISTRATION OF BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Cooperative Extension Service The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Athens

Outline. What is IPM Principles of IPM Methods of Pest Management Economic Principles The Place of Pesticides in IPM

COMPARISON OF NEW INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROL OF HELIOTHINE SPECIES IN COTTON

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Roberts & McPherson)

Adoption of GE Crops by U.S. Farmers Increases Steadily

Detia Degesch MARKETING NEWS

Development of Lygus Management Strategies for Texas Cotton

Chemical Control of Spotted Wing Drosophila in Berry Crops

Economic Threshold for Three Lepidopterous Larval Pests of Fresh-Market Cabbage in Southeastern New Brunswick

Ch Pest Control. Outline

Glyphosate Levels in Breakfast Foods: What is safe?

Method and technology to improve the quantity and quality of cereals and legumes in post harvest by microwave

DEGESCH America, Inc. Newsletter

Date Palm Pests and Their Control.

#1: Threshold and Injury Calculations the Theory. #2: Putting Economic Injury Levels and Action Thresholds to Use. Related Topics

MATERIAL FACT SHEET BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS

Department of Biology

Introduction to the concepts of IPM


Pest Control Products Board Nairobi, Kenya PESTICIDE REGISTRATION IN KENYA - BIOPESTICIDES. by P. N. Ngaruiya (Dr)

Statement on a heat treatment to control Agrilus planipennis 1

Transcription:

PS10-10 6171 Spinosad provides long-term protection for stored wheat E.L. Bonjour 1,*, T.W. Phillips 1, J.T. Pitts 2 Abstract Field experiments in metal bins were conducted over a 96-week period to compare the efficacy of spinosad, chlorpyrifos-methyl, and a combination of spinosad and chlorpyrifos-methyl as grain protectants. Each bin contained 4.6 metric tons of hard red winter wheat that was treated as each bin was loaded with grain. Insect populations were monitored and grain samples were collected at 4, 12, 26, 36, 48, and 96 weeks post-treatment. Very few insects were collected in grain trier samples in bins treated with spinosad during the entire storage period. Insect bioassays for adult mortality after a 7-day exposure and progeny production after 7 weeks of development were conducted on grain collected from the bins and held at 28 ºC and ~65 % relative humidity. Both treatments that contained spinosad effectively controlled adult Rhyzopertha dominica and prevented progeny development for 96 weeks. The spinosad-only treatment controlled Cryptolestes ferrugineus adults and prevented progeny development. Spinosad effectiveness against Tribolium castaneum adults decreased through time but very few progeny were produced. All pesticide treatments were effective against Plodia interpunctella except chlorpyrifos-methyl at 96 weeks. Combining chlorpyrifos-methyl with spinosad did not improve efficacy, and in some cases the combination decreased the effectiveness of spinosad, especially against C. ferrugineus. Official U.S. standards of field samples taken at 96 weeks determined that bins treated with spinosad had 0-2 insect damaged kernels (IDK), combination treated bins had 2-18 IDK, chlorpyrifos-methyl treated bins had 575-1309 IDK, and untreated control bins had 62-202 IDK per 100 g sample. Spinosad will be an effective alternative insecticide for stored wheat when a labeled product becomes available. Spinosad received U.S. EPA registration in January 2005 for use on stored grain at an application rate of 1.0 mg/kg with an allowable residue tolerance of 1.5 mg/kg but commercialization is delayed until all international trade agreements are received. Key words: spinosad, chlorpyrifos-methyl, protectants, hard red winter wheat, stored grain insects. Introduction Chlorpyrifos-methyl is registered for use on stored wheat at 6 mg/kg but it will not control all pests, especially Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Guedes et al., 1996) and its future is uncertain because of stricter standards set by the U.S. 1996 Food Quality Protection Act. Phosphine gas is the primary fumigant of stored grain but R. dominica have demonstrated resistance (Bell et 1 Oklahoma State University, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, 127 Noble Research Center, Stillwater, Oklahoma, 74078-3033, U.S.A. 2 Bayer CropScience, 3209 Desiderata Court, Plano, Texas 75023, U.S.A. * Corresponding author: e-mail, edmond.bonjour@okstate.edu; Fax number, 405-744-6039 1189

9 th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection al., 1977). Alternative insecticides are needed for controlling stored product pests, especially in raw grain. Spinosad is a broad-spectrum insecticide that is derived from two metabolites of a naturally occurring actinomycete soil bacterium Saccharopolyspora spinosa Mertz & Yao and is produced by fermentation (Mertz and Yao, 1990). It is registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a reduced risk pest control product and the active ingredient is registered for use on more than 250 different crops. Studies conducted by Fang et al. (2002a) in the laboratory have shown that spinosad is highly effective as a grain protectant against several stored grain insect species. Fang et al. (2002b) also demonstrated that spinosad residues on wheat placed in mesh pouches and exposed in farm bins for 12 m degraded very little. In 2002, the U.S. EPA authorized, under FIFRA section 5, an experimental use permit for spinosad on stored grains in Oklahoma and six other states. The objective of our research was to determine the effectiveness of spinosad alone or in combination with chlorpyrifos-methyl as a grain protectant on wheat in metal grain bins and to assess the residual activity of these treatments on pests of stored wheat at various times after treatment up to 96 weeks. Materials and methods of each of three species was added weekly for eight consecutive weeks. Insects added included R. dominica, Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens), and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) from colonies reared in the laboratory. Grain samples were collected from the bins by combining two grain trier samples per bin at 4, 12, 26, 36, 48, and 96 weeks post-treatment. These samples were sifted, all insects removed, and then the samples were frozen before using in laboratory bioassays. The live insects that were removed were identified, counted, and expressed on a per kg basis. After the grain was frozen for two weeks, approximately 100 grams of treated grain were placed in each of three jars (0.24 liter) for each bin (three reps per treatment per species). A total of 50 R. dominica, T. castaneum, or C. ferrugineus adults that were 2-3 weeks old was added to each jar for a specific species. Adult mortality was evaluated after seven days of exposure and progeny were counted after 7 weeks. Bioassays were conducted in an environmental chamber at 28.0 C and ~65 % relative humidity. Plodia interpunctella were also evaluated at 12, 26, 36, 48, and 96 weeks post-treatment by placing 20 eggs on a sticky black paper strip placed on 5 grams of half-crushed wheat from each treatment. Larvae were counted after 2 weeks. There were three replications for each treatment. Each steel bin for this study contained 4.6 metric tons of hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that was treated as each bin was loaded with grain in July 2002. The four treatments were: untreated control, spinosad (SpinTor 2SC) alone at 1 mg/kg, chlorpyrifosmethyl alone at 6 mg/kg, and a combination treatment of chlorpyrifos-methyl at 3 mg/kg and spinosad at 1 mg/kg. There were three replications for each treatment for a total of 12 grain bins in the study. To challenge the treatments, stored grain insects were added to the bins instead of relying on natural infestations. A total of 500 adult insects 1190 Results Very few insects were collected in grain trier samples in bins treated with spinosad during the entire storage period (Table 1). Along with the insects that were introduced, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) adults were also found in samples. No insects except R. dominica were detected in bins treated with chlorpyrifos-methyl alone until 96 weeks after treatment. In the laboratory bioassays, both treatments that contained spinosad effectively controlled adult R. dominica and prevented progeny

development for 96 weeks (Table 2). The spinosad-only treatment controlled C. ferrugineus adults and prevented progeny from developing. The effectiveness of spinosad against T. castaneum adults was poor throughout the study but very few progeny were produced through 36 weeks. After 36 weeks, T. castaneum was able to produce some progeny although less than in the untreated grain. All insecticide treatments were effective against P. interpunctella with > 98 % mortality except for the chlorpyrifos-methyl treatment at 96 weeks for which the mortality was only 20 %. The mortality of P. interpuntella on the controls was < 8 % throughout the study. Combining chlorpyrifos-methyl with spinosad did not significantly improve efficacy for any insect except against T. castaneum at 4 weeks post-treatment only (Table 2). For C. ferrugineus, the combination was significantly less effective than spinosad alone beginning with the 26 weeks post-treatment through the end of the study. Insect damaged kernels (IDK) were seen in samples collected from the bins and are caused by insects that feed inside the kernel. If more than 32 IDK are found per 100 grams of wheat, the value of the grain is greatly decreased. Official U.S. standards of samples taken at 96 weeks posttreatment determined that bins treated with spinosad alone had 0-2 IDK, bins treated with the combination of insecticides had 2-18 IDK, chlorpyrifos-methyl treated bins had 575-1309 IDK, and bins receiving no treatment had 62-202 IDK per 100 g sample. Table 1. Mean number of live adults per kg wheat recovered from grain trier samples. Weeks after R. C. T. O. Treatment Treatment dominica ferrugineus castaneum surinamensis 4 Control 1.6 1.0 0.5 0 Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0 0 0 0 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0 0 0 0 26 Control 9.0 12.6 0.7 0.5 Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0 0.2 0 0 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 3.9 0 0 0 36 Control 0 0 0 0 Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0 0 0 0 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0 0 0 0 48 Control 6.6 18.9 0 7.0 Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0 0.3 0 0 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 38.9 0 0 0 96 Control 20.9 32.6 0 2.3 Spinosad 0 0.3 0 0 Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0 0.3 0 0.5 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 683.2 132.7 0 6.9 1191

9 th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection Table 2. Adult mortality at 7 days to chlorpyrifos-methyl and spinosad, and number of F1 progeny after 7 weeks. Mean % Adult Mortality (n = 3) Mean Number of F1 Progeny (n = 3) Wk Treatment R. C. T. R. C. T. dominica ferrugineus castaneum dominica ferrugineus castaneum 4 Control 2.0 c 0 b 0 c 940.7 a 302.3 a 80.0 a Spinosad 100 a 99.3 a 1.3 c 0 b 0 b 0 b Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 100 a 100 a 25.5 b 0 b 0 b 0 b Chlorpyrifos-methyl 78.0 b 100 a 81.9 a 8.5 b 0 b 0 b 12 Control 52.0 c 1.3 c 3.3 a 931.3 a 365.0 a 387.0 a Spinosad 100 a 99.3 a 3.3 a 0 b 1.0 b 0.3 b Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 100 a 97.3 a 3.3 a 0.3 b 0 b 0 b Chlorpyrifos-methyl 92.9 b 87.0 b 14.0 a 10.0 b 0 b 0 b 24 Control 14.8 c 8.0 c 0 b 1068.3 a 292.0 a 321.0 a Spinosad 100 a 100 a 1.8 a 0.3 b 0.3 b 0.7 b Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 100 a 81.0 b 0 b 0.3 b 0.7 b 0 b Chlorpyrifos-methyl 93.2 b 64.7 b 2.0 a 16.5 b 0 b 0 b 36 Control 4.1 c 7.3 d 0 a 1184.0 a 150.7 a 451.0 a Spinosad 100 a 100 a 0 a 0.3 b 0 b 0 b Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 100 a 83.6 b 0.7 a 0 b 0 b 0.3 b Chlorpyrifos-methyl 88.8 b 49.5 c 8.0 a 20.5 b 2.5 b 0 b 48 Control 19.2 c 9.0 d 0 a 578.7 a 161.3 a 245.3 a Spinosad 98.7 a 97.9 a 0 a 0 b 0 b 25.3 b Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 99.3 a 75.0 b 0.7 a 0 b 0 b 0 c Chlorpyrifos-methyl 50.1 b 44.6 c 1.0 a 32.5 b 4.5 b 0 c 96 Control 7.5 b 28.2 c 0 a 1299.0 a 268.0 a 371.7 a Spinosad 100 a 98.7 a 0 a 0 c 0 b 13.7 b Spinosad + Chlorpyrifos-methyl 100 a 78.3 b 0.7 a 0 c 1.0 b 3.3 b Chlorpyrifos-methyl 14.0 b 26.8 c 1.0 a 257.0 b 244.0 a 403.5 a Means within a column within a post-treatment period followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05; Fisher s least significant difference test). Percentage data were transformed (arcsin sqrt[%/100]) before analysis; untransformed values are presented. Spinosad will be an effective alternative insecticide for stored wheat when a labeled product becomes available. Spinosad received U.S. EPA registration in January 2005 for use on stored grain at an application rate of 1.0 mg/kg with an allowable residue tolerance of 1.5 mg/kg but commercialization is delayed until all international trade agreements are received. Discussion Storing grain for long periods of time may be beneficial in obtaining higher prices when there is less of a supply than selling grain at time of harvest. The challenge is to protect the grain from becoming damaged by insects which feed on stored grain. Few commercially available products can give long-term protection. This study demonstrated that spinosad can provide protection of stored wheat for at least 96 weeks against three insect species tested, especially against the IDK-causing insect R. dominica. Mortality for R. dominica was 100 % at 96 weeks post-treatment and no progeny were 1192

produced. Preventing this insect from infesting stored grain will decrease the chance of having IDK at the time of sale and potentially eliminate discounts from the price received. Although spinosad is reported to quickly degrade when exposed to ultra-violet light (Liu et al., 1999), it is protected from sunlight in most grain storage facilities. The long-term protection seen in our study demonstrates that spinosad is persistent and does not degrade under normal grain storage conditions. Therefore, spinosad will be an effective insecticide for protecting stored wheat when a labeled product becomes available. Spinosad received a registration from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in January 2005 for use on stored grain but commercialization is delayed until all international trade agreements are received. Acknowledgements We thank Dow AgroSciences for providing the spinosad and chlorpyrifos-methyl insecticides. Thanks are expressed to Erin Harris, Philip Morton, Andrew Puckette, and Stacy Sanders for assistance in processing samples. References Bell, C.H., Hole, B.D., Evans, P.H., 1977. The occurrence of resistance to phosphine in adult and egg stages of strains of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 13, 91-94. Fang, L., Subramanyam, Bh., Arthur, F., 2002a. Effectiveness of spinosad on four classes of wheat against five stored-product insects. Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 640-650. Fang, L., Subramanyam, Bh., Dolder, S., 2002b. Persistence and efficacy of spinosad residues in farm stored wheat. Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 1102-1109. Guedes, R.N.C., Dover, B.A., Kambhampati, S., 1996. Resistance to chlorpyrifos-methyl, pirimiphos-methyl, and malathion in Brazilian and U.S. populations of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 89, 27-32. Liu, T.X., Sparks Jr., A.N., Hendrix III, W.H., Yue, B., 1999. Effects of SpinTor (spinosad) on cabbage looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): toxicity and persistence of leaf residue on cabbage under field and laboratory conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 92, 1266-1273. Mertz, P.P., Yao, R.C., 1990. Saccharopolyspora spinosa sp. nov. isolated from soil collected in a sugar mill rum still. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 40, 34-39. 1193