TransCelerate's Role in Transforming Pharmaceutical Trials Presentation to PCORNet



Similar documents
In the largest and perhaps the most ambitious collaborative

CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OPTIMIZATION

Clinical Trials: The Crux of Cancer Innovation

Electronic Submission of Regulatory Information, and Creating an Electronic Platform for Enhanced Information Management

through advances in risk-based

RBM as Competitive Advantage for Mid-sized CROs

Technology and Expertise Add Operational Value to Medical Device Trials

Therapeutic Area Standards (TAS) Initiative Project Plan

HOT TOPICS IN IN HEALTH CARE REFORM

The Role of the CRO in Effective Risk-Based Monitoring

Transforming CliniCal Trials: The ability to aggregate and Visualize Data Efficiently to make impactful Decisions

Managing and Integrating Clinical Trial Data: A Challenge for Pharma and their CRO Partners

Accenture Accelerated R&D Services: CDISC Conversion Service Overview

Why Monitoring Is More Than Just SDV

Welcome to the training on the TransCelerate approach to Risk-Based Monitoring. This course will take you through five modules of information to

An information platform that delivers clinical studies better, faster, safer and more cost effectively

Risk based monitoring using integrated clinical development platform

Data Standards in Clinical Trials, A Regulatory Perspec9ve

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH

The NIH Roadmap: Re-Engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise

How Global Data Management (GDM) within J&J Pharma is SAVE'ing its Data. Craig Pusczko & Chris Henderson

Product Lifecycle Management for the Pharmaceutical Industry

Rationale and vision for E2E data standards: the need for a MDR

What We Are..!

Product Life Cycle Management in Life Sciences Industry

CDISC and Clinical Research Standards in the LHS

Roadmap for study startup

Drug Pooling in Clinical Trial Supply Chain

Moving from Compliance to Competency for the Clinical Research Professional

Singapore Clinical Trials Register. Foo Yang Tong Director Clinical Trials Branch Health Products Regulation Group HEALTH SCIENCES AUTHORITY

Software: Driving Innovation for Engineered Products. Page

THE EHR4CR PLATFORM AND SERVICES

Software: Driving Innovation for Engineered Products

Implementing a Third-Party Management Solution: 5 Steps for Success

Taking Strategic Partnerships to the Next Level: An Alternative Approach to Licensing Your Development Asset

Joint Position on the Disclosure of Clinical Trial Information via Clinical Trial Registries and Databases 1 Updated November 10, 2009

2014 Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference June 17, 2014 NYSE: Q

Drug Development Models in China and the Impact on Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies

Population Health for Pharma: Perspectives from Aetna/Healthagen

How to Increase Site Productivity with a CTMS. Manage financials, meet timelines, increase compliance, and more...

The New EU Clinical Trials Regulation: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly

Bringing Safe and Cost Effective Products to Market

Strategic Consulting Services

Points to Consider When Developing a TMF (Trial Master File) Strategy

Monitoring Clinical Trials with a SAS Risk-Based Approach

Overview of the EHR4CR project Electronic Health Record systems for Clinical Research

National Health Research Policy

GOVERNANCE AND THE EHR4CR INSTITUTE

Global Policy on Interactions with Healthcare Professionals

A Cost Effective Way to De Risk Biomarker Clinical Trials: Early Development Considerations

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCH

Making Ontario a Preferred Location for Global Clinical Trials

History and Principles of Good Clinical Practice

ehealth Collaborative Office (ehco) HIE Planning Project Charter

Project, Program & Portfolio Management Help Leading Firms Deliver Value

OPERATIONALIZING EXCELLENCE IN THE GLOBAL REGULATORY SUBMISSIONS PROCESS

ORACLE AGILE PLM FOR THE MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRY

2015 Initiatives for Proactive Quality Management. Progress through Collaboration

What Lies Ahead? Trends to Watch: Health Care Product Development in North America

Novartis Investigator Initiated Trials (IITs) Guidelines

Accenture Accelerated R&D Services:

TALENT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS TO THE CRA SHORTAGE: Investing in a Global Talent Pool

Software Development for Medical Devices

EURORDIS-NORD-CORD Joint Declaration of. 10 Key Principles for. Rare Disease Patient Registries

Accelerating Clinical Trials Through Shared Access to Patient Records

Manufacturing CUSTOM CHEMICALS AND SERVICES, SUPPORTING SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES FOR HUMAN HEALTH

Enterprise Architecture (Re)Charter Template

UPDATE ON THE CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD (CTSA) PROGRAM

Richard T. Clark Chief Executive Officer and President. Executing on Our Strategy

The Importance of Good Clinical Data Management and Statistical Programming Practices to Reproducible Research

Integrated Clinical Data with Oracle Life Sciences Applications. An Oracle White Paper October 2006

Agile Master Data Management TM : Data Governance in Action. A whitepaper by First San Francisco Partners

Quality by Design Concept

The Clinical Trials Directive in the EU: Present and Future Elisabethann Wright, Partner Maurits Lugard, Partner. May 2010

Workshop on Quality Risk Management Making Trials Fit for Purpose

Strategic Benefits of an Online Clinical Data Repository

Transforming study start-up for optimal results

How to Implement MDM in 12 Weeks

White Paper CLINICAL RESEARCH IN POLAND AN INTRODUCTION

WHITE PAPER BUILDING THE NEXT GENERATION IRT: AN EXCLUSIVE LOOK UNDER THE HOOD OF IXRS 3

EMC PERSPECTIVE. The Private Cloud for Healthcare Enables Coordinated Patient Care

Logistics. Drug Pooling in the Clinical Trial Supply Chain

Transcription:

TransCelerate's Role in Transforming Pharmaceutical Trials Presentation to PCORNet Dalvir Gill, PhD - Chief Executive Officer 17 October, 2014

Presentation Objectives + TransCelerate History + Participating Member Companies + Projects & Accomplishments + Future Vision + Q&A how we can collaborate 2

Pharmaceutical R&D Leaders Identified Collaboration As A Key Opportunity For Generating Industry-wide Efficiencies Value Conducted an industry survey on areas amenable to collaboration Clinical Trial Execution Target Validation Translational Endpoints Data Sharing Doability 3

To Drive Collaboration Opportunities Into Implementation, TransCelerate Was Incorporated Existing collaboration organizations within the life sciences industry were evaluated for their ability to successfully execute the selected opportunities in clinical trial execution and it was determined that no existing vehicles met the necessary criteria. Therefore Transcelerate was formed to promote a high-level of member accountability and a results-driven approach. The new organization embodies the following defining characteristics: + Broad industry membership from Pharma and Biotech + Lean, non-profit entity with sufficient funding by member companies + High level of member company control and accountability + Board of Directors composed of senior R&D leadership + Member FTE contributions of experienced and skilled resources 4

TransCelerate is a Not For Profit Entity Created To Drive Collaboration Vision To improve the health of people around the world by accelerating and simplifying the research and development of innovative new therapies. Mission To collaborate across the global research and development community to identify, prioritize, design and facilitate implementation of solutions designed to drive the efficient, effective and high quality delivery of new medicines. Our core values + Quality + Transparency & Openness + Trust & Integrity + Collaboration + Courage 5

19 Pharmaceutical Companies* providing their best talent to collaborate and develop solutions to overcome industry Inefficiencies * 10 Pharmaceutical Companies chartered TransCelerate and 9 additional companies joined in 2013/2014

Regulatory Bodies Industry Initiatives TransCelerate is often a catalyst to open the doors for collaboration amongst industry groups outside of TransCelerate Investigative sites Research and CRO Community The intent is not to recreate, but partner whenever feasible

Five Opportunities Were Chosen For Action Based On Industry Readiness And Ability To Execute In 2013 1 2 3 4 5 Model Approach for High-Quality, Risk-Based Monitoring Shared Site Qualification and Training Shared Investigator Platform Clinical Data Standards Efficacy (in partnership with CFAST)* Comparator Drugs for Clinical Trials *Original initiative which began in 2012 8

Model Approach for High-Quality, Risk-Based Monitoring Unmet Need: No model framework existed to provide implementation considerations for organizations to successfully adopt and scale the riskbased monitoring methodology Objective: Develop Guidelines for targeted, risk based clinical trial monitoring Benefits: Improvement in data quality and patient safety for clinical trials; reduction in effort expended on lowvalue activities 9

Shared Site Qualification and Training Unmet Need: Disparate and redundant GCP training, and collection of non-study specific information, are pain points for investigators and sites, as well as for biopharmaceutical companies Objective: Program established for mutual recognition of GCP training and site qualification credentials Benefits: Realization of improved quality of clinical sites and accelerated study start-up times 10

Shared Investigator Platform Unmet Need: Communication between sponsors and clinical trial sites are often cumbersome and difficult requiring investigator sites to use many different websites / login credentials to communicate with their sponsors Objective: Establish a single, intuitive interface for investigators to use across the industry Benefits: Ease of use and harmonized delivery of content and services for investigators and sponsor companies 11

Clinical Data Standards Efficacy (in partnership with CFAST) Unmet Need: Clinical data is reported in individual trials in various ways, without benefit of an industry-wide set of standards Objective: Accelerate current efforts underway through CFAST to establish therapeutic area (efficacy) data standards Benefits: Increased quality of clinical data and enablement of industry end-to-end data flow 12

Comparator Drugs for Clinical Trials Unmet Need: Mechanisms to acquire clinical trial comparator drugs and cotherapy drugs were inefficient and unpredictable; supply chain intermediaries frequently decreased security, introduced delays, and couldn t provide access to key drug documentation Objective: Establish a supply network to source comparator drugs between companies for use in clinical trials Benefits: Enhanced patient safety due to known product source and acceleration of study timelines 13

Through innovation and collaboration, TransCelerate has accomplished much success in two years Workstream Accomplishments Risk Based Monitoring The published methodology has received 2,000 + unique downloads from the website The RBM Framework is currently being utilized by multiple member companies with over 40 ongoing studies launched, including 8 ongoing pilots in collaboration with the FDA Site Qualification & Training Shared Investigator Platform Clinical Data Standards Efficacy (in partnership with CFAST) Over 62,000 GCP training certificates have been issued by 7 member companies 12 member companies have participated in over 100 GCP training courses submitted by 88 external training providers who are eligible for mutual recognition The Shared Investigator Platform (SIP) workstream finalized scope and requirements for the Platform which will allow investigators and site staff a single point of access to harmonized processes across multiple clinical trial sponsors. The SHARE Environment (metadata repository, which will be a central place to store, manage, and govern data standards)has been deployed Published data standard user guides for Asthma, Alzheimer s, Multiple Sclerosis and Diabetes and plans to publish three more by end of year Comparator Drugs for Clinical Trials The network has successfully completed over 40 commercial product transactions, and completed 60 product document exchanges

The Future - Our Roadmap With The Future State In Mind Current State + Disconnected interfaces + Manual processes and interventions + Limited standardization + Lot of customization + Rework + Variable quality + Wait time + Missing information + High costs + Long cycle times Roadmap Future State + Patient-centric clinical trial design + End-to-end electronic data flow + Seamless interfaces + Automated + Transparent + Standardized + Less rework + Quality by design + Shorter cycle times + Cost efficient + Integration of Regulatory, Safety, and Medical Sciences + Conducting clinical trials together + Colossal Data Analytics 15

Six new project were added in 2014 that complement the Portfolio and support accelerating and simplifying the research and development of innovative new therapies. 6 Common Protocol Template 7 Investigator Registry 8 Pediatric Trial Efficiencies 9 10 11 Clinical Trial Diversification Clinical Data Transparency Quality Management System 16

Common Protocol Template Unmet Need: There is increasing complexity in clinical protocols as well as a lack of consistency within and across sponsors Objective: Create a common template for clinical protocols to ease interpretation & enable downstream automation of many clinical processes; develop industry-wide & regulator accepted endpoint definitions Benefits: Enhance quality of study conduct, facilitate data interpretation and enable down-stream automation of many clinical processes 17

Investigator Registry Unmet Need: Sponsors invest resources, significant time and budget in identifying qualified investigators and setting up study sites Objective: To create a shared repository of investigators Benefits: Reduced cost and time of setting-up and running clinical trials 18

Pediatric Trial Efficiencies Unmet Need: There are often an insufficient number of pediatric patients accessible to sponsors that can participate in clinical trials within the required timeframe Objective: Lead the development and implementation of solutions which improve the operative feasibility and conduct of pediatric clinical trials Benefits: Faster access to new drugs for pediatric patients, reduce burden on patient, faster and more efficient site contracting and reduced trial costs 19

Clinical Trial Diversification Unmet Need: Ethnic minority representation in clinical trial populations is often not reflective of the prevalence of the disease being treated Objective: To enhance the ability of sponsors and sites to achieve representative diversity within clinical trial populations Benefits: Broader understanding of drug safety and effectiveness. Increased ability to access, recruit and retain patients in clinical trials. Greater number of effective and high quality minority serving sites 20

Clinical Data Transparency Unmet Need: With increased transparency, there is a need to standardize the approach to protecting the privacy of individuals involved in clinical trials Objective: Develop a consistent approach for redacting privacy information found in clinical study reports and an approach for the anonymization of patient level data shared with the broader healthcare community Benefits: Enhance transparency and facilitate future research preserving the privacy of patients, investigators and clinical trial staff for operational transparency issues related to privacy 21

Quality Management System Unmet Need: Clinical QMS requirements are fragmented across multiple guidances contributing to quality issues Objective: Identify ways to improve quality industrywide through partnerships with regulatory agencies and other industry stakeholders Benefits: Enhanced patient safety by improved quality, assure data integrity, minimize delays in clinical trials, and bring drugs to market more quickly 22

www.transceleratebiopharmainc.com 23