Model Regulation Service April 2005 GUIDELINES ON CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE

Similar documents
Model Regulation Service - January 1993 GUIDELINES ON GIFTS OF LIFE INSURANCE TO CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS

Model Regulation Service October 1993

STANDARD NONFORFEITURE LAW FOR INDIVIDUAL DEFERRED ANNUITIES

Model Regulation Service January 2006 DISCLOSURE FOR SMALL FACE AMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES MODEL ACT

ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE AND LONG TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM LAWS: CITATIONS, BY STATE

NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION

Model Regulation Service July 2005 LIFE INSURANCE MULTIPLE POLICY MODEL REGULATION

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATE STATUTORY

Table A-7. State Medical Record Laws: Minimum Medical Record Retention Periods for Records Held by Medical Doctors and Hospitals*

50-State Analysis. School Attendance Age Limits. 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO Fax:

Table of Mortgage Broker (and Originator) Bond Laws by State Current as of July 1, 2010

MODEL REGULATION TO REQUIRE REPORTING OF STATISTICAL DATA BY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES

GROUP LIFE INSURANCE DEFINITION AND GROUP LIFE INSURANCE STANDARD PROVISIONS MODEL ACT

MASS MARKETING OF PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE MODEL REGULATION

Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse 6/2009 State Mandatory Reporters Language on Privilege Notes Alabama

LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY LANGUAGE SIMPLIFICATION MODEL ACT

PRENEED LIFE INSURANCE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING RESERVE LIABILITIES AND NONFORFEITURE VALUES MODEL REGULATION

Video Voyeurism Laws

This chart accompanies Protection From Creditors for Retirement Plan Assets, in the January 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser.

NEWBORN AND ADOPTED CHILDREN COVERAGE MODEL ACT. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Newborn and Adopted Children Coverage Act.

Postsecondary. Tuition and Fees. Tuition-Setting Authority for Public Colleges and Universities. By Kyle Zinth and Matthew Smith October 2012

Default Definitions of Person in State Statutes

UNFAIR LIFE, ACCIDENT AND HEALTH CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES MODEL REGULATION

STATE BY STATE ANTI-INDEMNITY STATUTES. Sole or Partial Negligence. Alaska X Alaska Stat Except for hazardous substances.

State Income and Franchise Tax Laws that Conform to the REIT Modernization Act of 1999 (May 1, 2001). 1

Chart Overview of Nurse Practitioner Scopes of Practice in the United States

NONJUDICIAL TRANSFER OF TRUST SITUS CHART 1

SURVEY OF THE CURRENT INSURANCE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR AFFINITY MARKETIG 1 A

APPENDIX 4. A. State Courts. Alaska Superior Court. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alabama Circuit Court. Arizona Superior Court

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

ADULT PROTECTION STATUTES DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS QUICK REFERENCE 2008 & 2009

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

PUBLIC INSURANCE ADJUSTER FEE PROVISIONS 50 STATE SURVEY AS OF 6/29/07. LIKELY YES [Cal. Ins. Code 15027]

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

PROPERTY INSURANCE DECLINATION, TERMINATION AND DISCLOSURE MODEL ACT

UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

COLLISION DAMAGE WAIVER MODEL ACT. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Collision Damage Waiver Model Act.

D.C. Code Ann. Prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of tobacco use except where

False Claims Act Regulations by State

LEGAL BARRIERS FOR PEOPLE IN RECOVERY FROM DRUG AND ALCOHOL ADDICTION: LICENSES AND CREDENTIALS

NAIC AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE DECLINATION, TERMINATION AND DISCLOSURE MODEL ACT

Listing of Mortgage Broker Definitions

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

LIFE INSURANCE DISCLOSURE MODEL REGULATION

PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMMERCIAL RATE AND POLICY FORM MODEL LAW (Condensed)

Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP) February 2010

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

STANDARD NONFORFEITURE LAW FOR LIFE INSURANCE

GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE STANDARDS MODEL ACT

STATE SECURITY DEPOSIT LAWS

Licensure Resources by State

Uniform Cost-Sharing Regulations

PRODUCER MILK MARKETED UNDER FEDERAL MILK ORDERS BY STATE OF ORIGIN, 2005

CRS Report for Congress

PRIMARY SOURCES BY JURISDICTION

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

State Asset Protection Statutes for Life Insurance, Annuity and IRA exemptions.

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State

Prime Aviation Opinion Aviation Insurance Minimum Requirements (By State, from West Coast to East Coast)

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds

VCF Program Statistics (Represents activity through the end of the day on June 30, 2015)

American C.E. Requirements

State Tax of Social Security Income. State Tax of Pension Income. State

LAWS ON RECORDING CONVERSATIONS IN ALL 50 STATES

INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Contributions by Source and Year: (Billions of dollars)

CAREGIVER DEFINITIONS: PROVISIONS AND CITATIONS IN ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES LAWS, BY STATE

MARKETING AND SALE OF TRAVEL INSURANCE GETS TOUGHER IN NEW YORK

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010

PPD Benefits by State

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network

IWLA - STATEMENT OF FACTS

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements

********************

Education Commission of the States 700 Broadway, Suite 1200 Den ver, CO Fax: State Textbook Adoption

2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide

Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption?

State Tax Information

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

HEALTH CARE INTERPRETERS: ARE THEY MANDATORY REPORTERS OF CHILD ABUSE? 1

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

SERVICE CONTRACTS MODEL ACT

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona NOTICE TO: DEBTOR ATTORNEYS, BANKRUPTCY PETITION PREPARERS AND DEBTORS

(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production.

Notices of Cancellation / Nonrenewal and / or Other Related Forms

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona

STATE INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INFORMATION DOCUMENT

Transcription:

Model Regulation Service April 2005 Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI) is life insurance a corporate employer buys covering one or more employees. With COLI, the employer is generally the applicant, owner, premium payer and beneficiary of the policy. COLI can be acquired on an individual or group basis and can take many forms. For example, it can be used to indemnify the employer for the loss of earnings or costs of replacing a key employee who becomes disabled or dies, or to finance the cost of a stock redemption agreement or a deferred compensation plan. COLI has also increasingly been used as a financing vehicle for broad-based welfare benefit plans, such as health benefit plans. This relatively new application of the principals of corporate owned life insurance to retiree health benefits is largely attributable to the promulgation of Statement 106 by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Under FASB 106, post-retirement benefits, including retiree health benefits, are required to be accrued as they are earned over the working lifetime of the employee, rather than as they are paid after retirement. Unfunded accrued benefits create a growing balance sheet liability. COLI or a variation thereof, Trust Owned Life Insurance (TOLI), where the insurance is purchased by a trust, typically a VEBA trust established under Section 501(c)(9)IRC, create a balance sheet asset which the employer can use to finance the cost of the benefit. COLI and TOLI are attractive methods of financing liabilities such as an employer s obligations under a retiree health benefit plan. When for example, retiree health benefits are provided through an insured health benefit plan, the policy s cash values can be used to finance the after-tax cost of the health insurance premiums for the retired employees. When an insured retired employee dies, the policy death benefit allows the company to recover part or all of the costs of the plan. The policy values and death benefit also represent a source of funds which can be used to pay premiums for other employees who are covered under the plan. When an employer provides health benefits to retired employees on a self-insured basis, the cash values and death benefits of the coverage are used to finance the coverage. Moreover, contributions to the VEBA Trust may, within well defined limits, be deductible to the employer. Because of COLI s and TOLI s attractiveness in financing an employer s obligation under a plan established to provide broad-based welfare benefits to retirees, there has been increased interest in the use of COLI and TOLI for this purpose. There has also been increased interest in assuring that COLI and TOLI arrangements satisfy insurable interest requirements. Business entities traditionally have been found to have insurable interests in the lives of their officers, managers and key employees. This is because the business may reasonably expect to benefit from the continuance of their lives or to suffer a loss if these individuals die. Many states have also recognized an insurable interest in the lives of non-key employees, particularly in the context of financing broad-based welfare benefit plans. Some states have enacted laws that either specifically recognize an insurable interests in a COLI-TOLI arrangement, including those whose purpose is the financing of broad based welfare plan arrangements. Other states have found such insurable interests in their common law; in interpretations of existing statutes and case law without specific COLI-TOLI enabling language. Citations to state statutes relating to insurable interests of employers in their employees can be obtained by contacting the Legal Division of the NAIC. States considering a legislative response to insurable interest concerns regarding employers and their employees should consider the following elements for inclusion in their law: 2005 National Association of Insurance Commissioners 602-1

COLI Guidelines 1. The law should recognize that employers have a lawful and substantial economic interest in the lives of key employees and in other employees who have a reasonable expectation of benefiting from an employee welfare benefit plan. 2. Employers should be required to notify eligible employees of their proposed participation in the plan and the employees should be given an opportunity to refuse to participate. On a prospective basis, employers should obtain written consent of each individual being insured. Consent would include an acknowledgement that the employer may maintain the life insurance coverage even after the insured individual s employment has terminated. 3. An employer shall not retaliate in any manner against an employee or a retired employee for refusing consent to be insured. 4. For non-key or non-managerial employees, the amount of coverage should be reasonably related to the benefits provided to the employees. 5. With respect to employer provided pension and welfare benefit plans, the life insurance coverage purchased to finance the plans should only be allowed on the lives of those employees and retirees who, at the time their lives are first insured under the plan, would be eligible to participate in the plan. Chronological Summary of Actions (all references are to the Proceedings of the NAIC). 1993 Proc. I 7, 10, 780, 782-783 (adopted). 2002 Proc. 3 rd Quarter 12, 13, 116, 118, 119 (amended and reprinted). 602-2 2005 National Association of Insurance Commissioners

These charts are intended to provide the readers with additional information to more easily access state statutes, regulations, bulletins or administrative rulings which are related to the NAIC model. Such guidance provides the reader with a starting point from which they may review how each state has addressed the model and the topic being covered. The NAIC Legal Division has reviewed each state s activity in this area and has made an interpretation of adoption or related state activity based on the definitions listed below. The NAIC s interpretation may or may not be shared by the individual states or by interested readers. This state page does not constitute a formal legal opinion by the NAIC staff on the provisions of state law and should not be relied upon as such. Every effort has been made to provide correct and accurate summaries to assist the reader in targeting useful information. For further details, the laws cited should be consulted. The NAIC attempts to provide current information; however, due to the timing of our publication production, the information provided may not reflect the most up to date status. Therefore, readers should consult state law for additional adoptions and subsequent bill status. 2013 National Association of Insurance Commissioners ST-602-1

This page is intentionally left blank ST-602-2 2013 National Association of Insurance Commissioners

KEY: Model Regulation Service April 2013 MODEL ADOPTION: States that have citations identified in this column adopted the most recent version of the NAIC model in a substantially similar manner. This requires states to adopt the model in its entirety but does allow for variations in style and format. States that have adopted portions of the current NAIC model will be included in this column with an explanatory note. RELATED STATE ACTIVITY: States that have citations identified in this column have not adopted the most recent version of the NAIC model in a substantially similar manner. Examples of Related State Activity include but are not limited to: An older version of the NAIC model, legislation or regulation derived from other sources such as Bulletins and Administrative Rulings. : No state activity on the topic as of the date of the most recent update. This includes states that have repealed legislation as well as states that have never adopted legislation. NAIC MEMBER MODEL ADOPTION RELATED STATE ACTIVITY Alabama ALA. CODE 27-14-3 (1971/1994). Alaska ALASKA STAT. 21.42.020 (1966/2002). American Samoa Arizona ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. 20-1104 (1954/1989). Arkansas ARK. CODE ANN. 23-79-103 (1959/2003). California CAL. INS. CODE 10110.1 (1990/1994). Colorado Connecticut CONN. GEN. STAT. 38a-291 (1992/2004). Delaware DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 18, 2704 (1953/2002). District of Columbia D.C. CODE ANN. 31-4716 (1934/1995). Florida FLA. STAT. 627.404 (1959/1992). 2013 National Association of Insurance Commissioners ST-602-3

NAIC MEMBER MODEL ADOPTION RELATED STATE ACTIVITY Georgia Guam GA. CODE ANN. 33-24-3(c) (1933/2003). Hawaii HAW. REV. STAT. 431:10-202 (1987/1988). Idaho IDAHO CODE ANN. 41-1804 (1961). Illinois 215 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/224.1 (1937/1992). Indiana IND. CODE 27-1-12-17 to 27-1-12-17.1 (1935/1995). Iowa Kansas KAN. STAT. ANN. 40-452 (1993). Kentucky KY. REV. STAT. 304.14-040 (1970). Louisiana LA. REV. STAT. ANN. 22.613 (1953/1995). Maine ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 24-1, 2404(D) (1969/2003). Maryland MD. CODE ANN., INS. 12-201 (1957/2001). Massachusetts MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 175, 123A (1996). Michigan MICH. COMP. LAWS 500.2210 (1956/1997). Minnesota MINN. STAT. 61A.074 (1992/1994). Mississippi MISS. CODE ANN. 83-5-251 (1992/1993). Missouri MO. REV. STAT. 376.531 (1992/1994). ST-602-4 2013 National Association of Insurance Commissioners

NAIC MEMBER MODEL ADOPTION RELATED STATE ACTIVITY Montana MONT. CODE ANN. 33-15-201 (1959/1991). Nebraska NEB. REV. STAT. 44-373 (1927). Nevada NEV. REV. STAT. 687B.040 (1971/1997) New Hampshire New Jersey N.J. STAT. ANN. 17B:24-1.1 (1991/1992). New Mexico N.M. STAT. ANN. 59A-18-4 (1984). New York N.Y. INS. LAW 3205 (1984/2001); N.Y. COMP. CODES R. & REGS. tit. 11, 48.0 to 48.2 (Regulation 180) (2004/2005). North Carolina N.C. GEN. STAT. 58-58-75 to 58-58-85 (1951). North Dakota N.D. CENT. CODE 26.1-29-09.1 (1985/2003). Northern Marianas Ohio OHIO REV. CODE ANN. 3911.091 (1995). Oklahoma OKLA. STAT. tit. 36, 3604 (1957/1999). Oregon Pennsylvania 40 PA. CONS. STAT. ]37-121 (1921/1992). Puerto Rico PR. LAWS. ANN. tit. 26, 1104. Rhode Island R.I. GEN. LAWS 27-4-27(3) (1990/1992). South Carolina 2013 National Association of Insurance Commissioners ST-602-5

NAIC MEMBER MODEL ADOPTION RELATED STATE ACTIVITY South Dakota Tennessee S.D. CODIFIED LAWS 58-10-4 to 58-10-6 (1966/2000). Texas TEX. INS. CODE ANN. 1103.053 (2003/2005). Utah Vermont UTAH CODE ANN. 31A-21-104 (1985/2002). Virginia VA. CODE ANN. 38.2-301 to 38.2-302 (1986/1993). Virgin Islands Washington WASH. REV. CODE ANN. 48.18.030 to 48.16.060 (1947/1992). West Virginia W. VA. CODE 33-6-2(2) (1957/1992). Wisconsin WIS. STAT. 631.07 (1975/2002). Wyoming WYO. STAT. ANN. 26-15-102; 26-15-106 (1967/1983). ST-602-6 2013 National Association of Insurance Commissioners