Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Anti-Spam Legislation. What is the definition of a commercial electronic mail message?



Similar documents
CAN-SPAM Policy & Data Verification Guide

Privacy, Data Collection and Information Management Practice Team November 13, 2003

Marketing: CAN- SPAM Act Compliance David J. Ervin and Christopher M. Loeffler, Kelley Drye and Warren LLP

How To Comply With The Can-Spam Act

Marketing: CAN- SPAM Act Compliance

Do-Not-Call Q&A Pennsylvania Law/Federal Rules

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC LAW THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003

ANTI-SPAM LAWS IN WESTERN COUNTRIES: A COMPARISON

Federal Regulations on Advertising:

Questions or a need for further clarification should be directed to your College or department administrator.

Mailworks Anti-Spam Policy

Congress Passes New Anti-Spam Legislation

Privacy Bulletin. Key Differences between US and Canadian Anti-Spam Laws

The DMA s Analysis of Can Spam Act of 2003

Office of Legal Counsel

The Virginia Joint Commission. on Technology and Science

Canadian Anti-Spam Act Survey Bill C-28. May 2012

Unica OnDemand. Unica and deliverability. Getting to the inbox. Publication Date: January 19, 2010

Anti-SPAM Policy v

BBB Wise Giving Alliance & The International Committee of Fundraising Organizations Advancing Trust in the Charitable Sector Federal Trade

Can Spam Be Legislated?

MODEL POLICY CONCERNING SOLICITATIONS SENT BY

and Text Message Campaigns. Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup

ARE YOU DOING MARKETING? LEGALLY?

1. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act

DISCLAIMER. Included on the following pages are questions marketers should be thinking about relative to CASL: Determining if you are affected

Senate. File No Approved by the Legislative Commissioner May 3, 2014

Trext Details: Texting Best Practices, Legality and Security 1 For questions contact Kira McCoy: (303) kira@trext.com

OHA BACKGROUNDER Canada s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL)

Crawford Chondon &Partners LLP. Is your Business Ready for Canada s Anti Spam Law?

How To Get A Phone Call From A Telemarketing Company

Arthur Rotatori, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC Jason Romrell, LeadsMarket.com Dustin Alonzo, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC. #LEND360 LEND360.

Anti-Spam Toolkit February 2014

What personal information do we collect from the people that visit our blog, website or app?

Do It In Durham is a celebration of Global Entrepreneurship Week. 40 events to celebrate, inspire and grow entrepreneurship allowing businesses to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) Magistrate Judge Sidney I.

Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007

Telemarketing, , and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits

Enterprise Managing Risks and Liabilities Avoiding Common Pitfalls under the Federal CAN-SPAM Act

New Federal Regulation of Tax Resolution, Tax Negotiation and Tax Settlement Services: FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule

Avoiding Internet Advertising and Recruitment Pitfalls

whitepaper Marketing CAN-SPAM Compliance Overview

13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act."

Finally! HHS Issues Proposed Rule Implementing Changes to the HIPAA Privacy, Security and Enforcement Rules under HITECH

A SIMPLIFIED EXPLANATION OF CANADA S NEW LAW ON SPAM

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Protecting the public and your company

Regulation P: Privacy of Consumer Financial Information. Frequently Asked Questions

The Do Not Call Register Act 2006 and The Spam Act 2003

Canada s New Anti-Spam Legislation: Overview and Implications for Businesses

CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C et. seq.

Direct Edge Regulatory Notice #12-03: Telemarketing Rules - Effective June 29, 2012

Canada Anti-Spam Legislation: Obligations and Opportunity. Presenters: Matthew Wansink Chris Bakker

How to Keep Marketing Out of the Spam Folder A guide for marketing managers and developers

S. 877 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Testimony of Eric Menhart. Re: District of Columbia Spam Deterrence Act of Council of the District of Columbia

2014 Virginia Credit Union League Spring Compliance Conference

F FCC Proposed Digital Telephone Number Registry and Its Impact on NPRM

Broadband Acceptable Use Policy

June 10, Legislative Amendments to the Indiana Code Relating to First Lien Mortgage Act (the Act )

TITLE IV - CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS''

AVOIDING THE PITFALLS OF MASS MARkETING b y J o n a t h a n K. S t o c k 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act

TCPA. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227), regulations promulgated at 47 CFR Jackson Lewis P.C.

Spam Act 2003: A practical guide for business

Introduction to the UEM Ordinance and the Regulation

PARTNER GUIDELINES

On the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA

Public Law th Congress An Act

SERVICES ADDENDUM TO EULA

Creating Measurable Success Business-to-Business E-Marketing

The Department of Labor & Economic Growth opposes the bill.

CREDIT REPAIR SERVICES (California Civil Code et seq.; 15 U.S.C.A et seq.)

Credit Repair Organizations Act

Title IV of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (Public Law , 82 Stat. 164) is amended to read as follows:

CHAPTER 2--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS SEC REGULATION OF CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS.

TABLE OF CONTENTS KEEPING OUR PRIVACY PROMISE TO CONSUMERS 3

COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT. Table of Contents COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT... 1

If You Purchased Relacore From January 1, 2000 through November 10, 2014, You Could Receive a Payment From a Proposed Class Action Settlement.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Canada s New Anti-Spam Regime: Guidance for Your Organization

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Trade Commission amends 16 CFR part 310 as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Telephone Solicitation

Avoiding Legal Pitfalls in Online Advertising. Background

Online Marketing 101. Introduction to Marketing. TwistofLime.biz

nexusfordevelopment.org Privacy Policy

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC or Commission )

Telephone Consumer Protections Act (TCPA)

Spam is Not Delicious An Update on the CAN-SPAM Act of Charles R. B. Stowe*

Title 9-A: MAINE CONSUMER CREDIT CODE

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Determining Whether Debt Relief Service Complies with FTC Rule (Telemarketing Sales Rule 16 C.F.R. Part 310) INTERNAL BBB IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

MCH Channel_e Best Practices for Marketers

(c) Providing advice or assistance to a buyer with regard to either subdivision (a) or (b) of this paragraph.

Hibbett Sports Messaging Service (SMS) Terms and Conditions

Acceptable Use Policy

Marketing Best Practices in a Mobile World. Ruth Presslaff President ruth@presslaff.com

Buying Smart / Selling Smart The 10 Biggest Legal Pitfalls in Lead Generation

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Transcription:

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Anti-Spam Legislation On December 16, 2003, the President signed the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (S.877) into law, which went into effect January 1, 2004. Though the legislation ultimately targets the peddlers of pornography, false business opportunities, and body enhancing solutions and those that use fraudulent or deceptive practices, there are implications for the association community. ASAE is pleased to offer the following FAQ on the CAN-SPAM Act. (Please note that this information is based on ASAE s reading of the law. This information should not be taken as either legal advice or a legal opinion.) What is the definition of a commercial electronic mail message? The term commercial electronic mail message is defined as any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service (including content on an Internet website operated for a commercial purpose). What must senders of commercial e-mail messages do to comply with the rules of the legislation? The law establishes 3 criteria for e-mail when messages are commercial in nature: 1) Clear and conspicuous identification that the message is an advertisement or solicitation 2) An ability to opt-out electronically from future emails of this nature 3) A valid postal address of the sender Associations may allow message recipients to opt-out by replying to the message, or by providing a link to an Internet web page. Opt-out lists, which allow recipients the opportunity to select from among various types of messages that the recipient may or may not want to receive (e.g., conference messages, advertising messages, sponsorship messages, etc.) are allowed, as long as the list contains one option that allows the recipient to select not to receive any messages from the association (i.e., a select all option). Also note that once someone opts out of receiving future commercial e-mail messages, the new law prohibits the sender of the e-mail from transferring or releasing that opted out e-mail address to anyone for any purpose.

Additionally, the sender has 10 days from receipt of an opt-out request to remove the e-mail address from the appropriate e-mail lists. Are there any exceptions to this definition of commercial e-mail? Yes. The definition does not cover what has been termed transactional or relationship messages. These messages are deemed to be non-commercial in nature and are not subject to the requirements of the Act. A transactional or relationship message is defined in the CAN-SPAM Act as a message the primary purpose of which is to deliver goods or services that the recipient is entitled to receive under the terms of a transaction that the recipient has previously agreed to enter into with the sender. (Emphasis added.) Other messages, which fit neither the commercial or transactional or relationship categories, are referred to as non-commercial messages, which are not subject to CAN-SPAM. In comments to the FTC, ASAE took the position that a member of a nonprofit organization or association is entitled to receive the messages, information, and other materials sent to its members, and so such messages should not be covered by the Act. To view the full text of our comments, please visit the ASAE Web site at http://info.asaenet.org/pdf/ftc_spam.pdf. What is the Federal Trade Commission s primary purpose test for determining if an e-mail is commercial in nature or not? On December 16, 2004, the FTC published its final regulations on determining the primary purpose of a commercial e-mail. The CAN-SPAM Act required the FTC to issue regulations "defining the relevant criteria to facilitate the determination of the primary purpose of an electronic mail message." The FTC s final regulations are almost identical to the proposed regulations published earlier this year on August 13, 2004 in the Federal Register. ASAE submitted comments to the FTC on the proposed rules asserting that all e- mails from non-profits to members should be deemed "transactional or relationship" messages and therefore not commercial in nature. The FTC has, to date, been unwilling to carve out any exemption for messages sent by nonprofits and regardless of whether the message is sent to members or nonmembers.

In the Federal Register from August 13, the FTC proposed three criteria for determining if an e-mail message's primary purpose is commercial. These criteria are included in the final regulations that have been published: - If the e-mail's content solely advertises or promotes a product or service, it would be deemed commercial. - Should the e-mail contain both commercial content and also content that falls under the FTC's "transactional or relationship message" category, which is not deemed commercial by nature, then the e-mail would be considered commercial in nature if either a) the recipient deems from its subject line that the message advertises or promotes a product or service or b) the "transactional or relationship" content is not located at or near the beginning of an e-mail. - If the e-mail contains both commercial and non-commercial content, the e- mail would then be deemed commercial if a) from the subject line the recipient concludes that the e-mail advertises or promotes a product or service or b) if the recipient concludes from the text that the main purpose is to advertise or promote a product or service. One new addition included in the final regulations is that any message containing only transactional or relationship content will be deemed to have a transactional or relationship primary purpose. For more information, including December 16th register notice, feel free to visit http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/12/canspamfrn.htm. When do these new rules go into effect? The FTC s primary purpose rules will become effective on February 18, 2005. CAN-SPAM s requirements have been effective since January 1, 2004. Who enforces CAN-SPAM Act violations? The Federal Trade Commission, the States, and Internet Service Providers all have enforcement authority under the CAN-SPAM Act. Penalties may include injunctions and fines up to $6 million. CAN-SPAM does not provide a private right of action, so individual plaintiffs cannot enforce its provisions.

In ASAE s view, what effect does this test have on e-mails to association members? The FTC stated in its December 16 notice that it is possible or even likely that messages between a nonprofit and its members could constitute transactional or relationship messages. Though not providing a blanket exception for nonprofit organizations, this statement by the FTC makes it clear that the FTC considers messages from a nonprofit organization to its members to likely be transactional or relationship and thus not subject to the requirements of the Act. The FTC does point out, however, that if the recipient of the message deems the subject line to be an advertisement or promotion, or if the transactional and relationship content is not at the beginning of the message, the message would then be considered commercial in nature. However, ASAE believes that the FTC s statement noted above provides very solid support for the position that e-mails to members would be considered as transactional or relationship messages. This result would be enhanced by clearly noting in the subject line of the message that the message is being sent to association members, and also by including the transactional and relationship information at the beginning of the message. Associations should also be aware that no private right of action is provided under the Act to individuals, but only to the FTC, internet service providers, and state attorneys general. Associations that wish to avoid any legal uncertainty in messages to members could instead treat questionable e-mails as commercial and make sure to include the following three provisions on these e-mails: 1) Clear and conspicuous identification that the message is an advertisement or solicitation 2) An ability to opt-out electronically from future emails of this nature 3) A valid postal address of the sender As noted above, if any member decided to opt-out, the association would have to comply with that request, although a menu of items that could be selected for opting-out would be permissible (e.g., conference messages, advertising messages, sponsorship messages, etc.). The email addresses of any opting-out

members would then also have to be removed from directories and lists and no longer released. What about e-mails to non-members? Commercial e-mails to non-members are not subject to the exemption and would have to comply with the provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act, which include: 1) Clear and conspicuous identification that the message is an advertisement or solicitation 2) An ability to opt-out electronically from future emails of this nature 3) A valid postal address of the sender A non-member opt-out request would have to be respected and the nonmember s email addresses removed and not released, as discussed above. What about email messages from an association s for-profit subsidiary? ASAE contended in its comments that messages from an association s forprofit subsidiary should also be considered transactional or relationship, since members should be entitled to receive messages, information, and materials from all organizations in the association s family. Because the FTC did not address this, associations are advised to consult legal counsel, as with implementation of any actions under the CAN-SPAM Act. What happens to current and pending state laws on Spam? The CAN-SPAM Act generally pre-empts all existing and pending state laws on Spam. However, state laws concerning false and deceptive practices are still valid. Will there be a do-not-spam registry? The FTC had 6 months to report back with a plan on establishing a do-notspam registry, similar to the popular do-not-call registry, and reported its belief that e-mail does not lend itself to this type of registry.

End Notes If you have any other questions you feel should be added to this list, please contact Chris Merida, ASAE s Manager of Public Policy, at 202-626-2831 or by e-mail at cmerida@asaenet.org.