Federal Regulations on Advertising:
|
|
- Harriet Johns
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Federal Regulations on Advertising: Phone, Fax, or By Jordan B. Hansell 700 Walnut, Suite 1600 Des Moines, Iowa Telephone: Facsimile:
2 Disclaimer The following presentation does not represent legal advice. If you have specific questions concerning specific circumstances, please consult your attorney.
3 Modern Advertising Techniques With the explosion of technology in the recent decades, companies have found new ways to reach potential consumers Telemarketing Direct Fax
4 Modern Advertising Techniques (cont.) Though each of these new methods of advertising are cheap and efficient, they carry with them several compliance risks with the Federal laws regulating them Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) Junk Fax Prevention Act ( Fax Act ), which amended the TCPA Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act ( CAN-SPAM ) Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act ( TCFAP ) This presentation only discusses the TCPA, Fax Act and CAN-SPAM; the TCFAP generally prohibits deceptive and other abusive telemarketing acts or practices and is not covered in this presentation.
5 Modern Advertising Techniques (cont.) Public Opinion: Telemarketers. The public hates them. It hates them even more than it hates France, low-flow toilets, or customer service. Dave Barry This presentation will hopefully help you stay on the good side of both the public and the law
6 Telemarketing and the TCPA
7 Telemarketing and the TCPA The TCPA, the Federal Communication Commission s ( FCC ) Rules, and the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) Rules regulate telemarketing These regulations cover some basic areas: The time of day telemarketers (businesses and individuals) may call The content of the call The use of automatic telephone equipment The creation of a National Do-Not-Call list
8 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) First some definitions: Telephone solicitations are defined as the initiation of a telephone call or message for the purpose of encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment in, property, goods, or services, which is transmitted to any person Calls or messages made to any person with that person s prior express permission or pursuant to an Established Business Relationship or EBR are excluded from this definition, as well as calls by a tax-exempt nonprofit organization
9 (cont.).) Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) Definitions (cont.): Established Business Relationship ( EBR ) in relation to telemarketing is: A prior or existing relationship formed by a voluntary two-way communication between a person or entity and a consumer either: On the basis of the consumer s purchase or transaction with the entity within the prior 18 months; or On the basis of an inquiry or application regarding products or services within the prior 3 months Businesses that use lead generators, i.e., businesses that search for prospective customers for others, do not have a valid EBR with a consumer when that consumer submits his contact information to the lead generator. If however, the lead generator were to clearly and conspicuously disclose, before the consumer gave his information, that the consumer may receive telemarketing calls as a result, as well as the maximum number of entities who may call, then there may be an EBR or express permission
10 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) Basic Rules: Telephone solicitations are prohibited to phone numbers placed on the Do Not Call Registry, discussed in detail below All calls to residential telephones are prohibited between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. This includes telephone solicitations and Calls to a person with an EBR or a person who gave consent In other words, although EBRs and calls based on express consent are excepted from the definition of telephone solicitations, even these calls are prohibited between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m.
11 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) Basic Rules (cont.): All calls, whether live or recorded, must include: The caller s name; The organization for which the caller is working; and The contact information for the organization. The contact information for the organization. All the above information, as well as a business phone number, must be able to be displayed on a caller ID The phone number must be one that the consumer may call during regular business hours to request that the company no longer call the consumer
12 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) Rules regarding automated telephone equipment: The TCPA prohibits using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or recorded voice to call: An emergency telephone line The telephone line of a guest room or patient room of a hospital, health care facility, elderly home or similar establishment Cellular phones, pagers, mobile radio services or other radio common carrier service or any service for which the party is charged for the call
13 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) Rules regarding automated telephone equipment (cont.): Artificial or prerecorded voice messages may not be used to call home phone numbers unless: Emergency call to ensure safety Prior express consent was given Non-commercial call Calls that don t include or introduce any unsolicited advertisements or constitute telephone solicitations, e.g. political ads Calls by tax-exempt nonprofit organizations; or Calls to consumers with an EBR with the caller
14 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) Further TCPA prohibitions: May not disconnect an unanswered telemarketing call prior to at least 15 seconds or four rings May not abandon more than three percent of all telemarketing calls that are answered live by a person, measured over a 30-day period A call is abandoned if it is not connected to a live salesperson within two seconds of the called person s completed greeting If a salesperson is not available, a prerecorded message must be played within the two seconds, stating the name and telephone number of the entity on whose behalf the call was placed, and that the call was for telemarketing purposes ; after this statement, the call can be disconnected Use any technology to dial a number for the purpose of determining whether it is a fax or telephone line
15 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry Created in 2003, the registry is nationwide, covering both interstate and intrastate calls Currently, the Registry has over 137 million phone numbers registered Consumers may register their personal phone numbers, including wireless phone numbers, on this list Once registered, callers are prohibited from making telephone solicitations to those numbers, with few exceptions
16 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Exemptions: Calls from political organizations Calls from charities (must be true nonprofits) FTC v. National Consumer Council, Inc.: National Consumer Council ( NCC ), a purported nonprofit, solicited customers through calling numbers on the Do Not Call Registry and other methods promising free debt counseling. In fact, NCC was simply trying to generate leads for for-profit firms, who then charged the consumers thousands of dollars in fees to enroll in their debt negotiation programs. A federal district court put NCC into receivership. The receiver has returned approximately $24 million in consumer funds and is winding down NCC s operations. Additional fines and fees were imposed in the millions of dollars.
17 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Exemptions (cont.): Calls from charities (cont.) FTC v. Debt Management Foundation Services, Inc. essentially the same facts as with NCC, a purported nonprofit was really attempting to generate leads for for-profit firms the final order included a suspended monetary judgment of $11,035,065; this included funds that were falsely taken from consumers Lesson the FTC will look beyond the label nonprofit Calls from telephone surveyors Calls from companies with an EBR with the consumer Calls between businesses
18 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Callers must access the Do Not Call Registry at least once every 31 days to synchronize their calling lists with an updated version of the Registry Callers may not call a number within a given area code unless the caller has first subscribed to and accessed that portion of the Registry that contains that area code
19 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Accessing the registry: The Registry can be accessed online at The telemarketer must create a profile and provide identifying information Data can be accessed either by paying for certain area codes or for the entire database The access fees must be paid annually Current rates are $62 per area code (the first five area codes are free), and $17,050 for the entire database
20 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Penalties: Violators of the Do Not Call regulations and the other regulations discussed above may be subject to fines of up to $11,000 per violation Each call may be considered a separate violation There is a Safe Harbor for inadvertent mistakes In addition, individuals may sue in state court and seek injunctive relief and the greater of actual damages or $500 (which can be tripled if the violation was willful or knowing ) Class actions are permitted
21 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Safe Harbor provision: The offending telemarketer must show that: It has written procedures to comply with the Do Not Call requirements It trains its personnel in those procedures It monitors and enforces compliance with these procedures It maintains a company-specific list of telephone numbers that it may not call It accesses the Registry no more than 31 days before calling any consumer, and maintains records documenting this process Any call made in violation of the Do Not Call rules was the result of an error
22 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Examples of recent fines: FTC settlement with DirecTV included payment of a $5.3 million fine for violating the Do Not Call rules The telemarketers calling for DirecTV called consumers whose names were on the Do Not Call Registry One telemarketer failed to have a live sales representative respond to consumers greeting within two seconds, thus resulting in abandoned calls The complaint alleged DirecTV continued to employ the telemarketer even after it knew of the violations FTC settlements with two of DirecTV s telemarketers included fines for $50,000 and $25,000
23 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) National Do Not Call Registry (cont.) Preemption The Federal Do Not Call rules preempt any less- restrictive state do not call regulations But states may adopt more restrictive intrastate regulations essentially free from federal interference E.g. Utah has defined telephone solicitations more broadly: Includes financial donations in the definition Includes certain solicitations from charitable organizations involving prizes, gifts, subscriptions, or other such incentives in the definition
24 Telemarketing and the TCPA (cont.) Company-Specific Do Not Call Lists: A consumer may request not to receive any future telephone solicitations from a telemarketer The organization making the call is then required to place them on a list, which must be maintained for five years
25 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act
26 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act The Junk Fax Prevention Act ( Fax Act ) is actually part of the TCPA
27 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) The TCPA, as amended by the Fax Act, prohibits any person, including a business, individual, or tax-exempt nonprofit organization, from using a fax machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement (known as junk fax ) to another fax machine This includes both business fax machines and residential fax machines Unlike with telephone solicitations, nonprofit organizations are not exempt under the Fax Act An unsolicited advertisement is any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods, or services that is transmitted to any person without that person s prior express invitation or permission Note the similarity to the definition of telephone solicitations This definition includes: Rate sheets on financial products transmitted to a potential borrower or potential broker Advertisements that promote goods or services at no cost
28 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) A company is allowed to send commercial faxes without prior permission if the sender and the recipient have an EBR; or If the recipient s fax number was provided by the recipient, i.e. express permission; or If the recipient s fax number was made publicly available, as in a directory, advertisement, or website Unless the recipient has noted on such materials that it does not accept unsolicited advertisements at the fax number in question If the number is from the recipient s own directory, ad, or website, the sender can assume it has voluntarily made the number available If it is from another public source, the sender must take reasonable steps to verify that the recipient consented to having the number listed, such as by calling or ing the recipient
29 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) EBR under the Fax Act and the FCC rules is defined in almost the same way as under the general provisions of the TCPA, however, the Fax Act subjects the duration of an EBR s existence to any time limitations that the FCC determines appropriate. Currently the FCC has placed no time limit on the EBR, unlike the 3 month and 18 month limits for telemarketing EBRs The sender has the responsibility of proving an EBR As with telephone solicitations, a recipient may terminate an EBR at any time simply by requesting the sender refrain from sending further faxes
30 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) An EBR or Express Permission is required: The FCC fined The Hot Lead, LLC $2,168,500 for sending 356 different unsolicited advertisements to at least 110 different consumers without having an existing EBR or express permission The FCC fined Extreme Leads, Inc. $1,377,000 for sending 218 different unsolicited advertisements to at least 132 different consumers without having an existing EBR or express permission Mexico Marketing, LLC was fined $1,133,000 in July of 2007 for sending unsolicited faxes and again in December of 2007 for $335,000, both times because it sent ads via fax to consumers without having an EBR or express permission
31 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Additional requirements of the Fax Act: Unsolicited commercial faxes must include a clear and conspicuous opt-out provision on the first page and provide a free twenty-four hour means for recipients to request removal from the distribution list The FCC regulations require the opt-out provision to be included on all fax advertisements, whether solicited or unsolicited Fax numbers to which any unsolicited advertising is delivered must be obtained either directly from the recipient or from a public source to which the recipient gave the number for publication Fax numbers already in the possession of the sender prior to July 9, 2005, are grandfathered in and thus may be used
32 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Additional requirements of the Fax Act (cont.): All faxes must identify the registered name and telephone number of the entity on whose behalf the fax is being sent and the date and time the fax was transmitted The Opt-out notice must be on the first page of the fax and explicitly state that the recipient can request that the sender not send any future faxes and that such request will be complied with within thirty days The opt-out means must be cost-free to the recipient Available 24 hours a day any day of the week The sender must comply with an opt-out request in the shortest reasonable time, at least within thirty days
33 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Professional or Trade Organizations There is no exemption for nonprofits from the Fax Act However, a message does not fall under the act if it is not commercial in nature Messages involving political or religious discourse are not prohibited under the Fax Act or the TCPA
34 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Preemption and State Law States clearly may regulate the transmission of fax advertisements intrastate and impose stricter standards E.g. Arizona have only three days to take a requester off company list E.g. Minnesota company must establish a number for the consumer to call to request removal from the company list, the number must be displayed in 9 point font It is unclear whether state regulation of interstate transmission will be preempted
35 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Jurisdiction under the TCPA and the Fax Act The TCPA states that a private right of action is available in state court if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a State State courts are split in interpreting this: Majority view creates a private right of action unless a state affirmatively acts to eliminate it Minority view no private right of action exists unless state affirmatively acts to create it There is also a split on whether state courts have exclusive jurisdiction or whether such cases may be brought or removed to federal court
36 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Penalties: As with telemarketing violations, the FCC has authority to impose fines of up to $11,000 for each violation Again, as with telemarketing violations, an aggrieved individual may file a complaint in state court And, class actions are permitted They have become common See and for examples Unlike the Do Not Call provisions, there is no safe harbor in the Fax Act for errors The GOA has encouraged the FCC to improve its enforcement efforts; this is likely to result in heightened enforcement by the FCC
37 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Penalties (cont.): Fax broadcasters (those who send on behalf of others) can be liable if they have actual notice of the illegality or a high degree of involvement in the sender s fax message E.g. supplying the fax numbers, providing a source of fax numbers, making representations about the legality of faxing those numbers, or advising about how to comply with the junk fax rules. If the fax broadcaster is highly involved, it must provide its name on the fax. The sender is always liable, whether it uses a fax broadcaster or not. The sender is responsible for complying with opt-out notice requirements and honoring opt-out requests, even if the fax broadcaster doesn t forward those requests to the sender The sender should deal with this contractually
38 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Examples: First Choice Healthcare: FCC issued a notice of apparent liability to First Choice Healthcare, Inc. including a proposed fine of $776,500 for transmitting unsolicited fax advertisements First Choice had sent at least 98 unsolicited ads to 37 different consumers The faxes advertised health benefits at $59.95 per month! Unlimited PPO savings nationwide Call now for this yearly promotion!! This promotion ends Friday None of the recipients had EBRs with First Choice, nor did they give express permission to First Choice to send ads In fact, 22 consumers actually contacted First Choice to request that they stop sending the fax ads The notice of apparent liability was filed after First Choice sent back the initial citation to the FCC marked unclaimed
39 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Examples: Hooters of Augusta, Inc.: The class-action lawsuit, filed in 1995, finally went to the jury in March of 2001 after a long battle in the courts with various appeals and maneuvering by Hooters. As the jury determined that each of the 1,321 class members received six unsolicited faxed advertisements, Hooters was ordered to pay $9,000 each, for a total of $11,889,000 Dallas Cowboys: The Dallas Cowboys agreed to pay $1.73 million to settle a class-action lawsuit claiming the team violated state and federal consumer protection laws by hiring a telemarketing company to fax unsolicited advertising to thousands of people Plaintiff's lawyer said American Blast Fax sent the fax at least once to 125,000 locations. Those recipients were eligible for up to $500 for each unsolicited fax If any funds remain, the Cowboys agreed to donate it to charity
40 Marketing Via Facsimile and the Fax Act (cont.) Even the FCC is not immune from Junk Fax: The FCC sent this notice of citation to a Junk Fax Sender: Dear Mr. Katz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Communications Act), for possible violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of (TCPA) and the Federal Communications Commission's rules that implement that Act. It has come to our attention that your company recently transmitted to a telephone facsimile machine at the Federal Communications Commission an unsolicited advertisement for products, goods, or services offered by Advanced Cellular Communications, Inc. (see attachment). Pursuant to the TCPA and the Commission's Rules, it is unlawful to use a ``telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine.
41 Advertising and CAN-SPAM The CAN-SPAM Act was enacted in December of 2003 and became effective in January of 2004 CAN-SPAM seeks to create a uniform, national standard for the regulation of commercial electronic mail Commercial is defined as whose primary purpose is to advertise or promote a commercial product or service, including content on a website operated for commercial purpose Commercial does not include transactional and relationship messages It does include business to business It may include employee recruiting if the contains a link to the business website or touts the financial success and plans for growth of the company
42 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) There is no EBR exception under commercial definition The transactional/relationship exemption is not the same as an EBR It is defined narrowly and only includes s that facilitate, confirm, or complete a transaction that the recipient previously entered into with the sender; or Provide information concerning an ongoing relationship between the sender and the recipient
43 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) CAN-SPAM seeks to limit fraudulent or abusive activity conducted over the Internet by: Establishing requirements for those who send commercial ; Enumerating penalties for violators, including both spammers and companies whose products are advertised by spammers; and Giving consumers the right to request ers to stop sending them spam
44 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Mixed Messages: that includes both a commercial purpose and transactional/relationship purpose or a purpose that is neither commercial nor transactional/relationship is commercial if: A recipient would reasonably interpret the subject line to be a message promoting a product or service; The message s transaction or relationship content does not appear at or near the beginning of the message; or A recipient would reasonably interpret the body of the message as primarily being to advertise or promote a product or service
45 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Specific Rules: Senders of commercial may not provide headers or subject lines (i.e. From and To routing information) that are materially false or misleading; Senders must: Clearly and conspicuously describe as an advertisement or commercial solicitation; Include a clear and conspicuous notice that the recipient can opt-out of receiving further commercial from the sender; and Provide the sender s valid physical postal address and a functioning return address (or another Internet-based response mechanism) that remains operational for at least thirty days after the transmission of the
46 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Specific Rules (cont.): Senders and any person acting on the sender s behalf must honor opt-out requests within ten business days and may not transmit or assist in the transmission of commercial to that recipient absent the recipient s subsequent, affirmative consent Senders may not sell or transfer any addresses belonging to individuals who have opted-out, unless such transfer is to enable the entity to comply with CAN-SPAM Senders must mark containing sexually explicit material with the exact phrase SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT- CONTENT
47 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Specific Rules (cont.): Commercial s that are sent with the affirmative consent of the recipient still must contain the postal address of the sender and an opt-out mechanism, but they may eliminate the content identification statement In giving express consent to receive commercial , recipients must have an active choice to accept commercial solicitations, e.g. clicking an acceptance box, i.e., the box cannot be pre-selected
48 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Enforcement: The FTC and the FCC have promulgated regulations based on CAN-SPAM The FTC has generally targeted senders of mass amounts of spam who violate multiple parts of CAN-SPAM, but recently it settled a case with Kodak Imaging Network, Inc. for simply failing to provide the required disclosures in its s Penalties include fines of $250 per violation, up to a maximum of $2 million, the fine may be tripled for willful or knowing violations or aggravated violations Unlike with the TCPA and Fax Act, there is no private right of action for individuals and class actions are prohibited
49 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Enforcement (cont.): There are additional penalties for commercial e- mailers who take further steps to circumvent the law, aggravated violations, such as by: Using scripts or other automated means to register multiple addresses to send commercial (address harvesting and dictionary attacks); Relaying s through a computer or network without permission; and Using a computer without authorization to send commercial
50 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Enforcement (cont.): Example: In 2004, the FTC sued Phoenix Avatar for marketing a bogus diet patch through large amounts of spam The parties settled for $20,000, which suspended the $230,000 judgment that likely would have resulted Combating spam has proven to be the most difficult consumer protection problem the FTC has faced Technology, according to the FTC, may be the best protection available
51 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) CAN-SPAM authorizes the US Department of Justice to pursue criminal sanctions, including imprisonment, for senders of commercial who: Use another computer without authorization to send Commercial Use a computer to relay commercial so as to deceive or mislead recipients or ISPs about their true origin Falsify header information and transmit such , or register for multiple accounts or domain names using information to falsify the identity of the true registrant; and Falsely represent themselves as owners of multiple ISP addresses, which are used to transmit commercial messages
52 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) ISPs are also permitted to sue violators in federal district court to enjoin further violations and/or recover actual or statutory damages Statutory damages are set at: $100 per violation for transmitting materially false or misleading header information $25 per violation for any other violation Up to a maximum of $1 million
53 Advertising and CAN-SPAM (cont.) Preemption CAN-SPAM preempts state law, but states are allowed to enforce parts of CAN- SPAM State laws regarding fraudulent and deceptive acts and computer crimes remain in effect
54 Best Practices
55 Best Practices TCPA: Synchronizing calling lists with the Do Not Call Registry every 30 days Develop company procedures and train employees to comply with the TCPA to ensure no calls are made to numbers on the Do Not Call list Maintain a Company Do-Not-Call list for those consumers who make specific requests Disclose all material information in the call, included the caller s name, company name, goods or services being offered, and any information that would affect the consumers decision to purchase Maintain records for at least 24 months Call only between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m.
56 Best Practices (cont.) Fax Act: Develop a list of fax numbers belonging to consumers with whom or from whom: You have an EBR; or You received express permission to send fax ads Ensure any fax ads sent contain: Company s registered name and telephone number Date and time of fax Opt-out notice on the first page with a toll-free number or address to reply to, both must be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week When an opt-out request is received, immediately add the number to a Company Do Not Fax list
57 Best Practices (cont.) CAN-SPAM: Clearly identify the sender of the Disclose the sender s actual point-of-origin address Do not use false or misleading routing information Do not conceal routing information Do not use false or misleading information in the subject line of the message Provide a mechanism for opting-out, including a return address, toll-free number, and physical address
58 Best Practices (cont.) CAN-SPAM (cont.): Immediately remove an individual from ing lists when an opt-out request is received Maintain records of recipients who opt-out Do not harvest addresses from an Internet website without first reading the website s terms of use Train personnel and maintain records of the training Maintain records of compliance with the law
(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity
Telephone Consumer Protection Act 47 U.S.C. 227 SEC. 227. [47 U.S.C. 227] RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT (a) DEFINITIONS. As used in this section (1) The term automatic telephone dialing
More information13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act."
13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act." Enacted by Chapter 26, 1996 General Session 13-25a-102. Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Advertisement"
More informationE-mail Marketing: CAN- SPAM Act Compliance David J. Ervin and Christopher M. Loeffler, Kelley Drye and Warren LLP
E-mail Marketing: CAN- SPAM Act Compliance David J. Ervin and Christopher M. Loeffler, Kelley Drye and Warren LLP This Practice Note is published by Practical Law Company on its PLC Law Department web
More informationHow To Get A Phone Call From A Telemarketing Company
CLIENT MEMORANDUM From: West Corporation Re: New Federal Communication Commission Rule for Autodialed and Prerecorded Message Telemarketing Calls and Abandoned Call Provisions Date: February 17, 2012 Federal
More informationCongress Passes New Anti-Spam Legislation
DECEMBER 2003 Congress Passes New Anti-Spam Legislation On December 16, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (the CAN-SPAM Act
More informationFEDERAL TELEMARKETING AND OUTBOUND CALLING COMPLIANCE GUIDE. October 2013
FEDERAL TELEMARKETING AND OUTBOUND CALLING COMPLIANCE GUIDE October 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 3 II. TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT REQUIREMENTS... 4 III. TELEMARKETING SALES RULE REQUIREMENTS...
More informationTelemarketing, E-mail, and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits
Telemarketing, E-mail, and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits LeadsCouncil December 11, 2012 2 pm 3 pm ET Webinar Ari N. Rothman, Esq., Co-Presenter Molly T. Cusson, Esq., Co-Presenter Jonathan
More informationPrivacy, Data Collection and Information Management Practice Team November 13, 2003
Overview of Current Anti-Spam Regulations Privacy, Data Collection and Information Management Practice Team The proliferation of unsolicited commercial e-mail, more commonly known as spam, has prompted
More informationDo-Not-Call Q&A Pennsylvania Law/Federal Rules
Do-Not-Call Q&A Pennsylvania Law/Federal Rules The Pennsylvania Telemarketer Registration Act, ( Pennsylvania Act ), as amended, applies to telephone solicitation and marketing activities performed by
More informationThe Virginia Joint Commission. on Technology and Science
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: JCOTS CYBERCRIMES ADVISORY COMMITTEE PATRICK CUSHING, JOINT COMMISSION ON TECH NOLOGY AND SCIENCE HB 1354 - WIRELESS DEVICES; UNSOLICITED MESSAGES AND IMAGES SENT THERETO; PENALTY DATE:
More informationTCPA. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227), regulations promulgated at 47 CFR 64.1200. Jackson Lewis P.C. www.jacksonlewis.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227), regulations promulgated at 47 CFR 64.1200 TCPA www.jacksonlewis.com ABOUT JACKSON LEWIS Founded in 1958, Jackson Lewis is dedicated to representing
More informationSUMMARY OF PUBLIC LAW 108-187 THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC LAW 108-187 THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003 On December 16, 2003, President Bush signed into law the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. CAN-SPAM stands for "Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography
More informationCAN-SPAM Policy & Data Verification Guide
BIZ SERVICE PROVIDER CAN-SPAM Compliance & Data Verification Policy Document BSP CAN-SPAM Policy & Data Verification Guide BSP Page 1 of 5 Version 8.1 Effective Date; May 2015 BIZ SERVICE PROVIDER I. Summary
More informationDirect Edge Regulatory Notice #12-03: Telemarketing Rules - Effective June 29, 2012
Published Date : 5/15/2012 Direct Edge Regulatory Notice #12-03: Telemarketing Rules - Effective June 29, 2012 Overview This Regulatory Notice (the Notice ) serves to inform Members of EDGA Exchange, Inc.
More informationThe Telemarketing Sales Rule. Related Items. Sign Up for the Do Not Call Registry. PreviousNext. Robocalls. National Do Not Call Registry
The Telemarketing Sales Rule Related Items Sign Up for the Do Not Call Registry PreviousNext 12 Robocalls National Do Not Call Registry The Federal Trade Commission s (FTC) Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR)
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 75 Article 4 1
Article 4. Telephone Solicitations. 75-100. Findings. The General Assembly finds all of the following: (1) The use of the telephone to market goods and services to the home is now pervasive due to the
More informationEmail and Text Message Campaigns. Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup
2012 Email and Text Message Campaigns Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup What s the Risk? Effective and active marketing area This makes it a target for litigation and enforcement action Consumer
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Anti-Spam Legislation. What is the definition of a commercial electronic mail message?
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Anti-Spam Legislation On December 16, 2003, the President signed the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (S.877) into law, which went into effect January 1, 2004. Though the legislation
More informationHow To Prevent A Telephone Solicitation In North Dakota
CHAPTER 51-28 TELEPHONE SOLICITATIONS 51-28-01. Definitions. In this chapter, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires, the terms shall have the meanings as follows: 1. "Automatic dialing-announcing
More informationSenate. File No. 757. Approved by the Legislative Commissioner May 3, 2014
Senate General Assembly File No. 757 February Session, 2014 (Reprint of File No. 191) Substitute Senate Bill No. 209 As Amended by Senate Amendment Schedule "A" and House Amendment Schedule "A" Approved
More informationThe DMA s Analysis of Can Spam Act of 2003
The DMA s Analysis of Can Spam Act of 2003 December 11, 2003 The following is a Direct Marketing Association analysis of the Can Spam Act of 2003 (S. 877), which Congress sent to the President for signing
More informationSuggested National Do-Not-Call Registry Policy
Purpose: The federal regulations issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulate telephone solicitation activities performed by REALTORS. The State and Federal laws apply to all telephones,
More informationTelephone Solicitation
Office of the Attorney General Telephone Solicitation LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General 700 West Jefferson Street Boise, ID 83720-0010 www.ag.idaho.gov State of Idaho Office of Attorney General Lawrence
More informationHow To Comply With The Can-Spam Act
FTC FACTS for Business ftc.gov FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION FOR THE CONSUMER 1-877-FTC-HELP The CAN-SPAM Act: A Compliance Guide for Business D o you use email in your business? The CAN-SPAM Act, a law that
More information* * * * * No member or person associated with a member shall initiate any outbound
Below is the text of FINRA Rule 3230 (marked to show changes from NASD Rule 2212; NASD Rule 2212 is deleted in its entirety from the Transitional Rulebook). New language is underlined; deletions are in
More informationAVOIDING THE PITFALLS OF MASS MARkETING b y J o n a t h a n K. S t o c k 8
Avoiding the Pitfalls of Mass Marketing by Jonathan K. Stock 8 o matter how great a company s product or service, promoting that product or service to customers can be essential. Many businesses depend
More informationPage 67 TITLE 47 TELEGRAPHS, TELEPHONES, AND RADIOTELEGRAPHS 227
Page 67 TITLE 47 TELEGRAPHS, TELEPHONES, AND RADIOTELEGRAPHS 227 (June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, 226, as added Pub. L. 101 435, 3, Oct. 17, 1990, 104 Stat. 987; amended Pub. L. 101 555, 4, Nov. 15,
More informationMODEL POLICY CONCERNING SOLICITATIONS SENT BY E-MAIL
MODEL POLICY CONCERNING SOLICITATIONS SENT BY E-MAIL Disclaimer concerning the Use of this Model Policy: The following is a model that Texas REALTORS may use as a guide to develop an office policy related
More informationFCC PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CLARITY ABOUT RULES UNDER THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT
August 3, 2015 FCC PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CLARITY ABOUT RULES UNDER THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT The Issue: On July 10, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released an order addressing a
More informationTelephone Consumer Protections Act (TCPA)
Telephone Consumer Protections Act (TCPA) Guideline for Aspect customers on the latest FCC Report and Order Serge Hyppolite, VP, Sales Development October 8, 2013 Disclaimer The purpose of this document
More informationNew Rules for Telemarketing and the National Do Not Call List Telecom Decision 2007-48. Important Implications for IIAC Members
New Rules for Telemarketing and the National Do Not Call List Telecom Decision 2007-48 Important Implications for IIAC Members What are the National Do Not Call Legislation and Unsolicited Telecommunications
More informationPrivacy Bulletin. Key Differences between US and Canadian Anti-Spam Laws
Privacy Bulletin April 2014 Key Differences between US and Canadian Anti-Spam Laws Canada's Anti-Spam Law (or "CASL") will be in effect in July 2014, about ten years after the U.S. has enacted its anti-spam
More informationTelephone Consumer Protection Act for Nonprofits
Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Nonprofits The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) was enacted in 1991 and codified in Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934. The FCC adopted updated
More informationANTI-SPAM LAWS IN WESTERN COUNTRIES: A COMPARISON
PRB 09-24E ANTI-SPAM LAWS IN WESTERN COUNTRIES: A COMPARISON Alysia Davies Legal and Legislative Affairs Division 18 January 2010 PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICE SERVICE D INFORMATION ET
More informationFor the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Trade Commission amends 16 CFR part 310 as follows:
VI. Final Amendments List of Subjects in 16 CFR part 310 Telemarketing, Trade practices. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Trade Commission amends 16 CFR part 310 as follows: TELEMARKETING
More informationOn the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA
Ifrah Law Whitepaper On the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA IfrahLaw Hands-on Counsel, Gloves-off Litigation PREPARED BY: Rachel Hirsch 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Suite
More informationE-mail Marketing: CAN- SPAM Act Compliance
PRACTICE NOTES E-mail Marketing: CAN- SPAM Act Compliance The following is an excerpt from a Practice Note on our website that examines the federal Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography
More informationDISCLAIMER. Two important things to note: Thanks for your Cooperation!
DISCLAIMER Two important things to note: The materials in this Presentation are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. These materials are intended, but not promised
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) ) ) ) CG Docket No. 02-278 NOTICE
More informationFILED 2012 Dec-05 PM 04:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA
Case 2:12-cv-04033-JEO Document 1 Filed 12/05/12 Page 1 of 11 FILED 2012 Dec-05 PM 04:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN
More informationThe Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Protecting the public and your company
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Protecting the public and your company About AnswerNet AnswerNet is the largest privately held telemessaging company in the world and a fullservice provider
More informationDo-Not-Call, Do-Not-Fax, Do-Not-Email Laws Affecting REALTORS
Do-Not-Call, Do-Not-Fax, Do-Not-Email Laws Affecting REALTORS Member Legal Services Tel 213.739.8282 Fax 213.480.7724 January 4, 2007 Copyright 2007 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS (C.A.R.). Permission
More informationCase 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 2-1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.
Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 2-1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts
More information201 CMR: OFFICE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS REGULATION 201 CMR 12.00 THE MASSACHUSETTS DO NOT CALL REGISTRY
201 CMR: OFFICE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS REGULATION 201 CMR 12.00 THE MASSACHUSETTS DO NOT CALL REGISTRY Section 12.01 Definitions 12.02 General Telephone Solicitation Regulations 12.03 Maintaining
More information2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22
2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION LINDA KENZIK, individually and on behalf of others
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Request of ACA International for Clarification
More informationPublic Law 108 187 108th Congress An Act
117 STAT. 2699 Public Law 108 187 108th Congress An Act To regulate interstate commerce by imposing limitations and penalties on the transmission of unsolicited commercial electronic mail via the Internet.
More informationJAIME M. HAWLEY, NAN X. ESTRELLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i~, I:, ~lsn~ict FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORID CQU?
r J UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i~, I:, ~lsn~ict FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORID CQU?T. r'f,'$ble D1STH1CT FLOfUOA ORLANDO DIVISION GHUJ;;}O. FL FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, JPMACCELERATED
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA H.L. WATKINS AND COMPANY, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. ) ) 06-CV8980-3 THE HOT LEAD COMPANY, LLC, ) ROBERT MICHAEL HORNE, )
More informationWrong Number: Hot Topics In TCPA Compliance & Litigation
Wrong Number: Hot Topics In TCPA Compliance & Litigation Yaron Dori Covington & Burling LLP Nancy Thomas Morrison & Foerster LLP Julie O Neill Morrison & Foerster LLP International Association of Privacy
More informationCase3:11-cv-00043-RS Document34 Filed07/28/11 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-000-RS Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 Sean Reis (SBN 00 sreis@edelson.com EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 00 Tomas Street, Suite 00 Rancho Santa Margarita, California Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Michael
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A settlement will provide a $4,500,000 fund from which claims
More informationNebraska Loan Broker Act Chapter 45, Article 1, Section f 45-189 to 45-193
45-189 Loan brokers; legislative findings. The Legislature finds that: Nebraska Loan Broker Act Chapter 45, Article 1, Section f 45-189 to 45-193 (1) Many professional groups are presently licensed or
More informationCan Spam Be Legislated?
Journal of Applied Business and Economics Can Spam Be Legislated? Karen L. Hamilton Columbus State University Robert A. Fleck, Jr. Columbus State University Spam, the unsolicited email that shows up in
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Westfax, Inc. Petition for Consideration and Clarification Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer
More informationDetermining Whether Debt Relief Service Complies with FTC Rule (Telemarketing Sales Rule 16 C.F.R. Part 310) INTERNAL BBB IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE
Determining Whether Debt Relief Service Complies with FTC Rule (Telemarketing Sales Rule 16 C.F.R. Part 310) INTERNAL BBB IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE The FTC amended its Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R. Part
More informationAvoiding Internet Advertising and Recruitment Pitfalls
Avoiding Internet Advertising and Recruitment Pitfalls Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities November 17, 2011, 1 pm 2 pm ET Webinar Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. Alexandra Megaris, Esq. Venable
More informationMEMORANDUM. Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages
MEMORANDUM DATE: August 26, 2008 RE: Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages The following sets forth the individual state and federal requirements regarding express consent for the
More informationBBB Wise Giving Alliance & The International Committee of Fundraising Organizations Advancing Trust in the Charitable Sector Federal Trade
BBB Wise Giving Alliance & The International Committee of Fundraising Organizations Advancing Trust in the Charitable Sector Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection Allison M. Lefrak, Attorney,
More informationCase 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES
More informationTelephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Guide for Contact Centers
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Guide for Contact Centers September 2013 Sponsored By: - 1 - DMG Consulting LLC 2013 DMG Consulting LLC. All rights reserved. This Report is protected by United
More informationwhitepaper Email Marketing CAN-SPAM Compliance Overview www.exacttarget.com
Design Email Marketing Tips for Outlook CAN-SPAM 2007Compliance whitepaper Email Marketing CAN-SPAM Compliance Overview The CAN-SPAM Act (the Act ) passed with a nearly unanimous vote in both the House
More informationCase: 1:15-cv-05781 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-05781 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and ) ) STATE OF
More informationa. a person offering or selling a security as defined in Section 2 of Title 71 of the Oklahoma Statutes if:
Oklahoma Statutes Citationized Section 775A.1 - Legislature Finds, Determines and Declares. The Legislature hereby finds, determines and declares that the use of telephones for commercial solicitation
More informationFCC s Amendments to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA )
{00141492;v1}{00127001;v7}{00127001;v6} FCC s Amendments to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) Mitchell N. Roth, Esquire Roth Doner Jackson, PLC 8200 Greensboro Drive, Suite 820 McLean, Virginia
More informationMaybe You Can t Hear Me Now: Autodialer Restrictions
Maybe You Can t Hear Me Now: Autodialer Restrictions Child support programs across the county are considering various new technologies to enhance collections and services. The federal Office of Child Support
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION PAUL BARRETT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. : CLASS ACTION
More informationEnterprise Email: Managing Risks and Liabilities Avoiding Common Pitfalls under the Federal CAN-SPAM Act
Enterprise Email: Managing Risks and Liabilities Avoiding Common Pitfalls under the Federal CAN-SPAM Act These materials do not constitute specific legal advice and may not address all aspects of a legal
More informationCase 8:12-cv-02184-JST-MLG Document 5 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:41
Case :-cv-0-jst-mlg Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK F. SULLIVAN, State Bar No. GEORGE P. GALBRAITH-ALBUTT, State Bar No. 00 SULLIVAN TAKETA LLP Townsgate Road Suite 0 Westlake Village, California
More informationThe Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act Recent Developments in Litigation, Regulation and Insurance Coverage June 13, 2013 Presenters Henry Pietrkowski Partner Chicago +1 312 207 3904 hpietrkowski@reedsmith.com
More informationCase 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual, on
More informationSection 28 Marketing by Means of Telemarketing 1. Generally
Deviation from permitted usages will put the relationship at risk and potentially damage Herbalife's brand and business reputation. For this reason, violations of the following guidelines will result in
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY CHAPTER 1220-04-11 TELEPHONE SOLICITATION REGULATIONS - DO NOT CALL REGISTER
RULES OF TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY CHAPTER 1220-04-11 TELEPHONE SOLICITATION REGULATIONS - DO NOT CALL REGISTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1220-04-11-.01 Definitions 1220-04-11-.06 Public Education about the
More informationCanada s New Anti-Spam Legislation: Overview and Implications for Businesses
dentons.com Focus on Communications Canada s New Anti-Spam Legislation: Overview and Implications for Businesses January, 2011 Contact Margot Patterson Dentons Canada LLP Counsel, Ottawa margot.patterson@dentons.com
More informationConsent to Call? Internet Leads and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Whitepaper
Consent to Call? Internet Leads and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Whitepaper Consent to Call? Internet Leads and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Introduction On October 16, 2013, new FCC
More informationLexisNexis Public Access Portal: www.lexisnexis.com/njoal
PLEASE READ Rules and regulations of the Division of Consumer Affairs, the boards and committees in, and other units of, the Division are codified in Title 13 of the New Jersey Administrative Code, published
More informationRecent Developments in TCPA Litigation. April 5, 2013 Aaron Van Oort Eileen Hunter Erin Hoffman
Recent Developments in TCPA Litigation April 5, 2013 Aaron Van Oort Eileen Hunter Erin Hoffman Why Pay Attention To The TCPA? 2 TCPA Arithmetic: Banks More Debtors + More Cell Phones + $500-$1500 Statutory
More informationOPINION 2013-2 Issued April 5, 2013. Direct Contact with Prospective Clients: Text Messages
RICHARD A. DOVE SECRETARY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov
More informationChecks written out to cash being negotiated by the elder s caregiver. Checks signed by the senior but filled out by someone else
Elder Financial Abuse Litigation Guide California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform Inappropriate banking activity, such as unusually large withdrawals or withdrawals from automated banking machines when
More informationS. 877 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
II TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION S. To regulate interstate commerce by imposing limitations and penalties on the transmission of unsolicited commercial electronic mail via the Internet. IN THE SENATE OF THE
More informationComplying with the revised TCPA Law pertaining to fax transmissions
COPIAFACTS Complying with the revised TCPA Law pertaining to fax transmissions Copia International Informational White Paper Written by Brian Gaden Published in October 2003 Abstract This white paper provides
More informationComplying with the Telemarketing Sales Rule FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Complying with the Telemarketing Sales Rule FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Table of Contents Introduction.....................................................................4 The Amended TSR at a Glance......................................................5
More informationCase 6:14-cv-00008-JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974
Case 6:14-cv-00008-JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationStudent Recruitment, Third-Party Vendors, and the Federal Trade Commission
Student Recruitment, Third-Party Vendors, and the Federal Trade Commission June 6, 2013, 3:45 pm 5 pm ET Rosen Shingle Creek Hotel, Orlando, Florida Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. Alexandra Megaris, Esq. Venable
More informationCase 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES OF COLORADO, FLORIDA, INDIANA, KANSAS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, NORTH CAROLINA, OHIO, TENNESSEE,
More informationGeneral David N. Kirkman of the North Carolina Department of Justice. Defendants were
NORTH CAROLINA ::\'... :~\ i L....._... ~ \ IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE WAKE COUNTY nll:.,~..., ~n ".-. \''' I)\ J i.1 I, :; u 1 ',u 1 '-I t SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION File No. 13 CVS 014147 STATE OF
More informationBroadband Acceptable Use Policy
Broadband Acceptable Use Policy Contents General... 3 Your Responsibilities... 3 Use of Email with particular regards to SPAM... 4 Bulk Email... 5 Denial of Service... 5 Administration of Policy... 6 2
More informationIf You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal
More informationDO NOT CALL REQUIREMENTS. homeowners facing foreclosure, some REALTORS may have forgotten about the do not
DO NOT CALL REQUIREMENTS With all of the attention given to the new consumer regulations directed at protecting homeowners facing foreclosure, some REALTORS may have forgotten about the do not call rules.
More informationChapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act
Chapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act 13-21-1 Short title. This chapter is known as the "Credit Services Organizations Act." Enacted by Chapter 29, 1985 General Session 13-21-2 Definitions -- Exemptions.
More informationLAKE COUNTY BOARD OF DD/DEEPWOOD BOARD POLICY I. SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS PREVENTION AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION
File: E-11 LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF DD/DEEPWOOD BOARD POLICY Reviewed and Adopted by the Board: Date: February 28, 2011 Signature on file Elfriede Roman, Superintendent I. SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS PREVENTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ENTREPRENEURIAL STRATEGIES, LTD.; and Civil No. 2:06-CV-15 (WCO) DALE ALLISON,
More information1. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Hello. Here at MailChimp, we only allow you to send SMS messages through our SMS app, Gather. Since we're dipping our toe into the SMS-messaging pool, we wanted to give you some information about SMS rules.
More informationA Federal Court authorized this notice. You are not being sued. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you received a call on your cell phone promoting a Nuance software product between May 8, 2009 and May 12, 2015, a class action settlement
More informationFederal Advertising Law
Order Code RL32177 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Federal Advertising Law: An Overview Updated October 5, 2005 Henry Cohen Legislative Attorney American Law Division Congressional
More informationTHE NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL LIST. Information for REALTOR members
THE NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL LIST Information for REALTOR members TABLE OF CONTENTS What is the National Do-Not-Call List?... 1 Are there exceptions to the National Do-Not-Call List?... 2 Is the National Do-Not-Call
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division JONATHAN F. OLIN Deputy Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL S. BLUME Director,
More informationAN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify
More information(H.299) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: * * *
No. 44. An act relating to amending consumer protection provisions for propane refunds, unsolicited demands for payment, bad faith assertions of patent infringement and failure to comply with civil investigations.
More information