S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 20207 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37202. December 19, 2006. Opinion No.



Similar documents
S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE March 23, Opinion No.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE April 16, Opinion No.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE September 4, Opinion No.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE January 10, Opinion No.

STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 26, Opinion No

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE July 15, Opinion No.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE November 26, Opinion No.

March 20, The Honorable Michael A. Pitts Representative, District C Blatt Building Columbia, SC Dear Representative Pitts:

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to provide for the adoption of the Surrey Consolidated Financial Plan.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE August 8, Opinion No.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 425 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE April 9, Opinion No.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE May 28, Opinion No.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE August 2, Opinion No.

49 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 2

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE July 15, Opinion No.

June 25, Thus, you request an opinion of this Office on the following issues:

STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 24, Opinion No QUESTIONS

February 3, Marvin C. Jones, Esquire Jasper County Attorney Post Office Box 420 Ridgeland, South Carolina Dear Mr.

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE October 8, Opinion QUESTIONS

How To Make A Law That Will Help The Disabled In The United States

S T A T E OF T E N N E S S E E. August 24, Opinion No

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-12

How To Get A City Hall Tax Information From A County To A City Tax Account

September 12, Opinion No. GA-l 079

VOLUME NO. 51 OPINION NO. 11

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE April 29, Opinion No.

STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Title 2 Tribal Government Chapter 9 Charter of Swinomish Fish Company

I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following questions:

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE May 22, Opinion No.

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS. August 14, 2015

Senate Bill No. 285 Senator Hardy

OFFICE OF CITY OF SAN DIEGO. Michael J. Aguirre CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM OF LAW. Tammy Rimes, Acting Director, Purchasing and Contracting

Authorized By: Donald Bryan, Acting Commissioner, Department of Banking and Insurance.

Ability of a School District to make Payments on Bonds From Funds Other than a Tax Levied for the Payment of Debt Service

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

To: A. Hal Key, Jacqueline E. Schafer May 9, Question Presented

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Index No.: Number: Release Date: 6/11/1999. CC:DOM:FI&P:1 - PLR March 11, 1999 LEGEND:

Homestead Property Tax Discount for Disabled Veterans

Home Rule Handbook. For County Government Supplement File With the 2013 Home Rule Handbook. Published by South Carolina Association of Counties

January 18, Darrel W. Staat, President South Carolina Technical College System 111 Executive Center Drive Columbia, South Carolina 29210

STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. November 30, Opinion No

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION NORTH POINT MINISTRIES, INC. A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE I. NAME NORTH POINT MINISTRIES, INC. ARTICLE II.

Michigan surplus lines premium tax -- liability of group self-insurance basis I. BACKGROUND

98 [89 Op. Att y EDUCATION. April 28, 2004

Watson v. Price NO. COA (Filed 19 April 2011) Medical Malpractice Rule 9(j) order extending statute of limitations not effective not filed

STATE OF ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION ONE

December 17,2002. Opinion No. GA-0001

Fund = Corporation = Act A = Act B =

Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02)

ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL. January 24, 1991

AN OVERVIEW OF ARKANSAS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT LAW. Tax increment financing districts, otherwise known as "redevelopment" or "TIF"

MEMORANDUM. Managers, Administrators, Clerks, Attorneys, and Planners

CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE CITY HALL, 435 RYMAN MISSOULA, MT Phone: (406) Fax: (406) LEGAL OPINION

September 18, 1998 FIRST QUESTION PRESENTED ANSWER GIVEN SECOND QUESTION PRESENTED ANSWER GIVEN THIRD QUESTION PRESENTED ANSWER GIVEN DISCUSSION

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE 1 RULING #98-41

A JOINT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. Section 5, Article VII, Texas Constitution, is amended to read as follows:

Motorcycle Safety Nstruction Program - A Good Deal?

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2012 COA 55. In re the complaint filed by the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, ORDER AFFIRMED

STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. April 10, Opinion No

TO: Mike Kadas, Mayor; City Council; Janet Stevens, Chief Administrative Officer; Department/Division Heads

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 99-08

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SECOND EXTRA SESSION 1996 H 1 HOUSE BILL 36. Short Title: Lincolnton-Lincoln Airport Auth'y.

LETTER OPINION 2012-L-06. May 25, 2012

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 11, 2015 Session

with regard to building contractor services, effective 30 days after its passage and approval on April 12, 1984; and

Section 12 - TAXATION

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General :

LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE

REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING

154 [92 Op. Att y COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES. November 7, 2007

STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. September 18, Opinion No

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING #00-03

ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO Timothy J. Chambers Reno County Attorney Law Enforcement Center 210 West First Street Hutchinson, Kansas 67501

ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 2: TAX EXEMPTED ARTICLE 3: DEFINITIONS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 7, 2003 Session

Office of the Attorney General

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA

Jesse White Illinois Secretary of State

January 23, Re: IHS s Interpretation of IHCIA Section 402 Should Be Rescinded or Amended

S13Q0212. WILSON et al. v. THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

ATTORNEY GENERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE NO APPENDIX B

VOLUME NO. 49 OPINION NO. 22

CHAPTER 234 HOUSE BILL 2131 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS , AND , ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING TO TAX ADJUDICATIONS.

January 2, Counties and County Officers County Treasurer County Treasurer; Deputy Treasurers; Budget; Limitation of Personnel Action

STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 3, Opinion No QUESTIONS

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING

Office of the Prosecuting Attorney of Lewis County, West Virginia

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS. June 28, 2015

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-04

- : -._.. #~... ~ ..,,... ~ '.. '...-~... ~~...

WASTE SERVICES & DISPOSAL AGREEMENT. By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title:

July 26, The Honorable Jenny A. Horne Member, House of Representatives I 07 S. Main Street Summerville, South Carolina 29483

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 22, 2014 Session

Denver City Council. David W. Broadwell, Assistant City Attorney

September 22, Taxation--Kansas Retailers' Sales Tax--Exempt Sales. Taxation--Income Tax--Taxable Income

Transcription:

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 20207 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37202 December 19, 2006 Opinion No. 06-177 State Tax Relief Program and Exemption from Storm Water User Fees QUESTION Do the legislative bodies of counties and/or municipalities have authority to exempt those who qualify for the State tax relief program from the collection of storm water fees? No. OPINION ANALYSIS Legislative bodies of counties and/or municipalities do not have the authority to exempt those who qualify for the State tax relief program from collection of storm water fees. Tennessee law 1) authorizes municipalities to establish a storm water user fee, 2) requires that a certain methodology be used in determining the storm water fee that is to be paid, and 3) sets forth an exemption from this user fee. Tennessee s tax relief program applies to property taxes but not to user fees. Exempting those who qualify for the State tax relief program does not fall within the bounds of the statutory user fee exemption and is inconsistent with the user fee methodology mandated by state law. Tennessee s tax relief program affords property tax relief; it does not provide relief from user fees. The tax relief program is constructed upon a foundation laid by Article II, Section 28 of the Tennessee Constitution. The Constitution states that [t]he Legislature shall provide, in such manner as it deems appropriate, tax relief to elderly low-income taxpayers through payments by the State to reimburse all or part of the taxes paid by such persons on owner-occupied residential property, but such reimbursement shall not be an obligation imposed, directly or indirectly, upon Counties, Cities, or Towns. Tenn. Const. art. II, 28. Furthermore, [t]he Legislature may provide tax relief to home owners totally and permanently disabled, irrespective of age, as provided herein for the elderly. Id. Through a constitutional amendment approved by Tennessee voters in November of 2006, the available avenues of tax relief were expanded: (a) The legislative body of any county or municipality may provide

Page 2 by resolution or ordinance that: (1) Any taxpayer who is sixty-five (65) years of age or older and who owns residential property as the taxpayer s principal place of residence shall pay taxes on such property in an amount not to exceed the maximum amount of tax on such property imposed at the time the ordinance or resolution is adopted; (2) Any taxpayer who reaches the age of sixty-five (65) after the time the ordinance or resolution is adopted, who owns residential property as the taxpayer s principal place of residence, shall thereafter pay taxes on such property in an amount not to exceed the maximum amount of tax on such property imposed in the tax year in which such taxpayer reaches age sixty-five (65); and or (3) Any taxpayer who is sixty-five (65) years of age older, who purchases residential property as the taxpayer s principal place of residence after the taxpayer s sixty-fifth birthday, shall pay taxes in an amount not to exceed the maximum amount of tax imposed on such property in the tax year in which such property is purchased. (b) Whenever the full market value of such property is increased as a result of improvements to such property after the time the ordinance or resolution is adopted, then the assessed value of such property shall be adjusted to include such increased value and the taxes shall also be increased proportionally with the value. (c) Any taxpayer or taxpayers who own residential property as their principal place of residence whose total or combined annual income or wealth exceeds an amount to be determined by the General Assembly shall not be eligible to receive the tax relief provided in subsection (a) or (b). Article II, Section 28 of the Tennessee Constitution, to which the above described constitutional provision has been added, is brought into effect by Tenn. Code Ann. 67-5-701 through 67-5-705. These statutes, like the constitutional provision to which they give effect, provide relief from residential property taxes.

Page 3 Tennessee law authorizes municipalities to establish a storm water user fee. All municipalities constructing, operating, or maintaining storm water or flood control facilities are authorized to establish a graduated storm water user's fee which may be assessed and collected from each user of the storm water facilities provided by the municipality. Tenn. Code Ann. 68-221- 1107(a). This user fee is not a tax, much less a property tax to which the tax relief program would be applicable. In a previous Attorney General s Opinion, this Office indicated that the graduated storm water user fee is not a tax on real property. Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 93-57, *1 (Sept. 3, 1993). In fact, the storm water fee is not a tax at all but is instead a user fee. Id. at *1-2; see also Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 94-039, *1-2 (Mar. 21, 1994) (concluding that the storm water user fee is properly limited to its stated purpose and clearly meets the definition of a user fee. ). A fundamental distinction between a user fee and a tax is that [t]he fee is not imposed for the purpose of raising general revenue. Rather, the fee is a charge for a particular service that happens to be rendered by the government. Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 94-039, *1 (Mar. 21, 1994). Simply stated, a municipality acting pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 68-221-1107(a) imposes a fee, not a tax.... Vandergriff v. City of Chattanooga, 44 F. Supp. 2d 927, 941 (E.D. Tenn. 1998). The storm water user fee provision also expressly mandates that a certain methodology be used in determining the fee that is to be charged. Tennessee law requires that [s]uch a graduated storm water user's fee shall be based on actual or estimated use of the storm water and/or flood control facilities of the municipality, and each user or user class shall only be required to pay its proportionate share of the construction, administration, operation and maintenance including replacement costs of such facilities based on the user's actual or estimated proportionate contribution to the total storm water runoff from all users or user classes. Tenn. Code Ann. 68-221-1107(a) (emphasis added). In order [t]o ensure a proportionate distribution of all costs to each user or user class, the user's contribution shall be based on factors such as the amount of impervious area utilized by the user, the water quality of user's storm water runoff or the volume or rate of storm water runoff. Id. (emphasis added). Accordingly, this Office has noted that the amount of the fee must be based on actual (or estimated) use of the storm water and/or flood control facilities of the municipality and each user (or user class) shall only be required to pay for its share of the facilities used. Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 94-039, *2 (Mar. 21, 1994). Whatever costs are allocated through the user fees, those who do not qualify for the State tax relief program will necessarily pay a higher percentage than their proportionate use if users of the storm water service who qualify for the State tax relief are not included in the distribution of costs. If the exemption were permitted, there would not be a proportionate distribution of all costs to each user or user class. Providing an exemption to those qualifying for the tax relief program necessarily violates the mandatory proportionality requirement. The Attorney General s Office has also previously concluded that entities otherwise exempt from taxation are not exempt from a user fee. In considering whether a religious institution would be exempt from the storm water user fee, the Attorney General concluded that [b]ecause the storm

Page 4 water user fee is not a tax, and because there is no constitutional exemption for religious or charitable entities from paying fees for the services being rendered to them by the government, an otherwise tax-exempt entity is not exempt from paying a fee. Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 94-039, *1 (Mar. 21, 1994). Furthermore, there is no provision in this law which permits a church to be exempt from the payment of this fee. Accordingly, it is the opinion of this Office that the storm water user fee applies to such an entity. Id. at * 2. Additionally, [t]here does not appear to be any authority in the applicable law to permit property which is exempt from taxation to also enjoy an exemption from the user fee. Moreover, the fee for storm water drainage control is for a particular service much like landscaping and other grounds maintenance. Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 93-57, *4 (Sept. 3, 1993). This Office has concluded that [t]here does not seem to be any reason why property should be exempt from such a fee merely because it is also exempt from taxation, particularly when the property has received such a direct benefit from storm water drainage control. Id. at *4. The legislature did carve out an exemption from the storm user fee but did not extend this exemption to those who qualify for the tax relief program. Persons, including, but not limited to, owners and operators of agricultural land, whose storm water runoff is not discharged into or through the storm water or flood control facilities, or both, of the municipality shall be exempted from payment of the graduated storm water user fee authorized by this section. Tenn. Code Ann. 68-221-1107(a). The Tennessee Supreme Court has indicated that when interpreting statutes, [it] has routinely followed the Latin maxim of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, meaning the expression of one thing implies the exclusion of all things not mentioned. State v. Adler, 92 S.W.3d 397, 400 (Tenn. 2002). Applied to exemptions, it is a long-standing principle of Tennessee law that [a]n express exception, exemption or saving excludes others. Where a general rule has been established by statute with exceptions, the court will not curtail the former nor add to the latter by implication. Exceptions strengthen the force of a general law, and enumeration weakens it as to things not expressed. Turner v. Eslick, 240 S.W. 786, 787 (Tenn. 1922); see also Penley v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 31 S.W.3d 181, 185-86 (Tenn. 2000). Tennessee law expressly provides for an exemption for those whose storm water runoff is not discharged into or through the storm water or flood control facilities, or both.... Tenn Code Ann. 68-221-1107(a). Tennessee law does not provide for an exemption from user fees for those who qualify for the tax relief program. Tennessee law does not exempt those who qualify for the State tax relief program from storm water user fees. In fact, Tennessee law mandates a certain methodology be used in determining what storm water user fee will be charged, which would include charging a user fee to those who qualify for the tax relief program. Municipal ordinances in conflict with and repugnant to a State law of a general character and state-wide application are universally held to be invalid. Southern Ry. Co. v. City of Knoxville, 442 S.W.2d 619, 621 (Tenn. 1968). No implied power to pass by-laws, and no express general grant of the power, can authorize a by-law which conflicts either with the national or State constitution, or with the statutes of the State, or with the general principles of the common law adopted or in force in the State. City of Bartlett v. Hoover, 571 S.W.2d 291, 292 (Tenn. 1978). Accordingly, if a municipality has utilized the mechanism of charging storm water

Page 5 1 user fees, it is obligated to utilize the methodology set forth by the State for determining the amount to be paid. That methodology does not include an exemption for those who qualify for Tennessee s tax relief program. ROBERT E. COOPER, JR. Attorney General MICHAEL E. MOORE Solicitor General JEFFREY O. USMAN Assistant Attorney General Requested by: The Honorable Ward Crutchfield State Senator Suite 13 Legislative Plaza Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0210 1 Compare Tenn. Code Ann. 68-221-1107(a) with Tenn. Code Ann. 6-2-201 (19) (providing that [e]very municipality incorporated under this charter may: Collect and dispose of drainage, sewage, ashes, garbage, refuse or other waste, or license and regulate their collection and disposal, and the cost of collection, regulation or disposal may be funded by taxation, special assessment to the property owner, user fees or other charges.... ).