TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING
|
|
|
- Abner Copeland
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is informational only. Rulings are made in response to particular facts presented and are not intended necessarily as statements of Department policy. SUBJECT The application of the Tennessee sales and use tax to software configuration services. SCOPE This letter ruling is an interpretation and application of the tax law as it relates to a specific set of existing facts furnished to the Department by the taxpayer. The rulings herein are binding upon the Department and are applicable only to the individual taxpayer being addressed. This letter ruling may be revoked or modified by the Commissioner at any time. Such revocation or modification shall be effective retroactively unless the following conditions are met, in which case the revocation shall be prospective only: (A) The taxpayer must not have misstated or omitted material facts involved in the transaction; (B) Facts that develop later must not be materially different from the facts upon which the ruling was based; (C) The applicable law must not have been changed or amended; (D) The ruling must have been issued originally with respect to a prospective or proposed transaction; and (E) The taxpayer directly involved must have acted in good faith in relying upon the ruling; and a retroactive revocation of the ruling must inure to the taxpayer s detriment. FACTS [TAXPAYER] is [REDACTED INFORMATION]. [REDACTED INFORMATION], the Taxpayer has for [TIME PERIOD] been in the process of consolidating its various [REDACTED] systems into a single centralized system at its [LOCATION IN TENNESSEE]. This centralization of functions involves the [SYSTEM] offered by [COMPANY]. The initial necessary [COMPANY] software was purchased by the Taxpayer in [REDACTED]; the software is located on the Taxpayer s servers in Tennessee. The Taxpayer paid
2 Tennessee sales tax on the purchase and installation of this software. Repair, maintenance, and installation of the software is covered by the [COMPANY] software license agreement. The Taxpayer also purchases a significant amount of software consulting services in order to maintain an optimal level of functionality. Consultants working with the Taxpayer assist in utilizing the functionalities in the software to best meet a particular business unit s needs. The consultants also input data and access capabilities present within the software that are most advantageous to the Taxpayer s business requirements in general. The software configuration services are purchased by the Taxpayer from many vendors, including [COMPANY]. When purchased from [COMPANY], the software configuration services are acquired at the Taxpayer s option, separate and apart from software licenses or maintenance agreements. The [COMPANY] license agreement contains no provision regarding the furnishing of software configuration services to the Taxpayer. Professional service agreements are generally entered into at the outset of the Taxpayer s relationship with a vendor and cover statements of work for various services as well as schedules of deliverables. Multiple statements of work for services or other deliverables may be executed under a single professional service agreement. Each statement of work operates independently and separately from other statements of work under a single professional service agreement. Each statement of work is invoiced separately. Many of the Taxpayer s software consulting contracts are related to [REDACTED]. The Taxpayer contracts with two categories of consultants to work on this project. The first category of consultants, custom [SOFTWARE] development consultants, includes those individuals with authority to develop additional code complimentary to the [COMPANY] standard delivered software. 1 These consultants work during the development phase of a project to create or customize programming to fit the Taxpayer s particular needs. The taxability of software development services provided by the custom [SOFTWARE] development consultants is not at issue in this letter ruling. The second category of consultants, software configuration consultants, is comprised of persons who do not have the authority to create new code or to amend or alter existing code. Software configuration [REDACTED], which some software services contracts may refer to as customizing, is the act of setting pre-defined software toggles or switches or building tables that give direction within the standard delivered application software. Software configuration consultants do not develop, modify, or create software code. In addition, the software configuration services include troubleshooting and resolving customer issues, as well as coordinating discussions between [COMPANY] and the Taxpayer s customers to help resolve product issues. Persons who are authorized to perform software configuration services are not authorized to perform custom [SOFTWARE] development work. The Taxpayer has imposed security authorizations to control this distinction. Furthermore, from an organization viewpoint, one technology management group controls software configuration work, and a separate group controls software development work. 1 [REDACTED]. 2
3 QUESTIONS 1. Are the services provided by the software configuration consultants subject to the Tennessee sales and use tax? 2. To the extent the Taxpayer and its vendors are able to separate nontaxable services from taxable services purchased, is the vendor permitted to charge Tennessee sales and use tax on the portion of the sales attributable to the nontaxable services? 3. If a vendor has incorrectly charged Tennessee sales and use tax on previous sales of nontaxable services, what procedures must be employed in the event that the Taxpayer requests a refund of sales taxes previously paid? RULINGS 1. No. The services provided by the software configuration consultants as described herein are not subject to the Tennessee sales and use tax. 2. No. If a vendor sells an optional nontaxable service independent of the sale of taxable goods or services and separately charges for the various goods and services sold, the vendor may not charge sales tax with respect to the independent nontaxable service. 3. In the event that the Taxpayer requests a refund of sales taxes previously paid with respect to nontaxable services, the Taxpayer s vendors must follow the procedure for claiming refunds set forth under TENN. CODE ANN (Supp. 2010). ANALYSIS 1. Services provided by the software configuration consultants The services provided by the software configuration consultants as described herein are not subject to the Tennessee sales and use tax. For the reasons discussed below, to be subject to the Tennessee sales and use tax, the services provided by the software configuration consultants must constitute: 1) a sale of prewritten or custom computer software; 2) services involving the fabrication of, or customized modifications or enhancements to, computer software; 3) services sold as part of the sale of computer software; and/or 4) services involving the repair, maintenance, or installation of computer software. Retail sales of tangible personal property in Tennessee are subject to the sales and use tax under the Retailers Sales Tax Act, TENN. CODE ANN et seq. TENN. CODE ANN (79) (Supp. 2010) defines a retail sale as any sale, lease, or rental for any purpose other than for resale, sublease, or subrent. The term sale is defined under the Tennessee sales and use tax laws in pertinent part as any transfer of title or possession, or both... of tangible personal property for a consideration. TENN. CODE ANN (81)(A). TENN. CODE ANN (92)(A) defines tangible personal property in pertinent part as personal property that can be seen, weighed, 3
4 measured, felt, or touched, and specifically includes prewritten computer software. 2 Additionally, TENN. CODE ANN (a) (Supp. 2010) specifically provides that the retail sale, lease, licensing or use of computer software in this state, including prewritten and custom computer software, is subject to the sales and use tax, regardless of whether the software is delivered electronically, delivered by use of tangible storage media, loaded or programmed into a computer, created on the premises of the consumer or otherwise provided. Finally, the Tennessee Supreme Court has stated that the fabrication of, or customized modification or enhancement to, computer software is considered a taxable sale of computer software. 3 See Creasy Sys. Consultants, Inc. v. Olsen, 716 S.W.2d 35, 36 (Tenn. 1986). The Retailers Sales Tax Act also imposes the sales tax on certain services. The sales tax does not apply to all services; rather, it only applies to retail sales of those services specifically enumerated by the statute. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Huddleston, 1994 WL (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 1994). Even if a service is not specifically enumerated by the statute, however, the service may be subject to the sales tax where charges for the service are included in the sales price of a taxable good or service. Specifically, TENN. CODE ANN (82)(A) provides that the sales price of a good or service equals the total amount of consideration... for which personal property or services are sold. Thus, when the sale of a non-enumerated service is part of the sale of a taxable good or service, the charges for the non-enumerated service are included in the sales price of the taxable good or service and as such are subject to taxation. With respect to particular enumerated services, TENN. CODE ANN (c)(4) (Supp. 2010) imposes the sales tax on the service of repairing tangible personal property. Similarly, TENN. CODE ANN (c)(6) imposes the sales tax on the service of installing tangible personal property that remains tangible personal property following installation. Accordingly, the repair or installation of software is a taxable service for purposes of the Tennessee sales and use tax. While consulting services are not enumerated under the Retailers Sales Tax Act and are generally not subject to the sales tax, the consulting services will nevertheless be subject to taxation if the services involve the repair, upgrade, maintenance, or installation of computer software. Additionally, as explained above, charges for consulting services will be subject to taxation when the sale of the services is part of the sale of computer software. In summary, to be subject to the Tennessee sales and use tax, the services provided by the software configuration consultants must constitute: 1) a sale of prewritten or custom computer software; 2) services involving the fabrication of, or customized modifications or enhancements to, computer software; 3) services sold as part of the sale of computer software; and/or 4) services involving the repair, maintenance, or installation of computer software. In the Taxpayer s case, none of these requirements is met. First, the services provided by the software configuration consultants do not constitute the sale of prewritten or custom computer software to the Taxpayer. [COMPANY] is the only party that makes sales of software to the Taxpayer. 2 Prewritten computer software is computer software that is not designed and developed by the author or other creator to the specifications of a specific purchaser and includes prewritten upgrades. TENN. CODE ANN (71). 3 Note that TENN. CODE ANN (Supp. 2010) exempts from the Tennessee use tax the fabrication of computer software by a person for that person s own use and consumption. 4
5 Second, the software configuration consultants do not create or otherwise fabricate computer software for the Taxpayer, nor do they perform customized modifications or enhancements to the [COMPANY] software. Rather, the consultants set pre-defined software toggles or switches and build tables that give direction within the [COMPANY] application software. Significantly, these activities do not involve the modification or enhancement of software code; the consultants simply activate features already coded within the existing software, configuring the software to optimize its functionality. Third, the services provided by the software configuration consultants are not purchased as part of the sale of a software product or license. This is obviously the case when the software configuration consultant is employed by a vendor that does not sell software to the Taxpayer. See Austin Co. v. Woods, 620 S.W.2d 73, 76 (Tenn. 1981) (holding that sales price of tangible personal property does not include related services provided by third party). Under the facts provided, this conclusion is likewise applicable in instances where the software configuration consultant is employed by a vendor that also makes sales of software to the Taxpayer. The sale of software may occur when [COMPANY] sells its prewritten software to the Taxpayer or when custom [SOFTWARE] development consultants develop additional code complimentary to [COMPANY] prewritten software. In the case of [COMPANY], the software configuration services are acquired at the Taxpayer s option, separate and apart from [COMPANY] s software licenses or maintenance agreements. The [COMPANY] license agreement in fact makes no mention of software configuration services. Rather, the Taxpayer and [COMPANY] enter into a separate agreement for the purchase of services; specific orders for services are made pursuant to individual statements of work. Importantly, each statement of work operates independently and separately from the others under the service agreement. The sale of software configuration services is therefore not dependent upon, or otherwise connected with, the sale of other types of services, some of which may involve the sale of software. Additionally, the Taxpayer may, and in fact does, opt to acquire software configuration services from a vendor other than [COMPANY]; this fact further indicates that [COMPANY] s sale of software and [COMPANY] s sale of configuration services are separate and distinct transactions. In the case of other vendors, as with [COMPANY], a professional service agreement is generally entered into at the outset of the Taxpayer s relationship with the vendor. The professional service agreement covers statements of work for various services as well as schedules of deliverables. Multiple statements of work for different services may be executed under a single professional service agreement. Thus, a single vendor may provide software configuration services pursuant to one statement of work and custom [SOFTWARE] development services pursuant to another. Importantly, each statement of work operates independently and separately from the others under the professional service agreement; the sale of software configuration services is therefore not dependent upon or otherwise connected with the sale of custom [SOFTWARE] development services. The vendor s sale of software (in the form of custom [SOFTWARE] development services) and the vendor s sale of configuration services are thus properly characterized as separate and distinct transactions. The distinctness of the sales is further underscored by the fact that a single person will never perform both custom [SOFTWARE] development services and software configuration services. Persons who are authorized to perform software configuration services are not authorized to perform custom [SOFTWARE] development work. Similarly, from an organization viewpoint, one technology management group controls software configuration work, and a separate group controls software 5
6 development work. There is therefore no overlap of software development services and software configuration services. Fourth, the software configuration consultants do not repair, maintain, or install the [COMPANY] software for the Taxpayer. Repair, maintenance, and installation of the [COMPANY] software is covered by the [COMPANY] software license agreement. Accordingly, the services provided by the software configuration consultants are not subject to the Tennessee sales and use tax. Note, however, that if a statement of work were to include both software configuration services and custom [SOFTWARE] development services (or any other service that involves the creation, fabrication, installation, upgrade, or repair of software), the software configuration services would be subject to taxation as part of the sale of software. 2. Charges for services The Retailers Sales Tax Act, TENN. CODE ANN et seq., imposes the sales tax on the sales price of certain services enumerated by the statute. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Huddleston, 1994 WL (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 1994). Charges for a service that is not enumerated by the statute may nevertheless be subject to the sales tax if such charges are included in the sales price of taxable services or tangible personal property. TENN. CODE ANN (82)(A) provides in pertinent part that the sales price of taxable services or tangible personal property is the total amount of consideration... for which personal property or services are sold, including any services necessary to complete the sale, with no deduction for the seller s costs, labor, and so on. Thus, if the seller charges a lump sum for all the goods and services sold, the sales price of the taxable goods and services will be the total amount of consideration paid. However, when the vendor sells an optional nontaxable service independent of the sale of taxable goods or services and separately charges for the various goods and services sold, the seller may not charge sales tax with respect to the independent nontaxable service. Accordingly, in the Taxpayer s case, if a vendor separately charges for the software configuration services, the software configuration services are optional and sold independent of any taxable goods or services, and the software configuration services are not subject to taxation for the reasons set forth in the response to Question #1, the vendor may not charge Tennessee sales and use tax with respect to those services. 3. Procedure for claiming refunds of Tennessee sales tax paid In the event that the Taxpayer desires a refund of sales taxes previously paid with respect to the services provided by the software configuration consultants, the Taxpayer s vendor must follow the procedure for claiming refunds set forth under TENN. CODE ANN (Supp. 2010). With respect to a refund of sales taxes paid, TENN. CODE ANN (a)(1) requires that the vendor first refund or credit the sales tax to its customer (in this case, the Taxpayer). TENN. CODE ANN (a)(1) also requires that the vendor submit its claim for refund within three years from December 31 of the year in which the tax payment was made. The claim must set forth each ground upon which a refund is claimed, the amount of such refund, the tax period, the tax type, and any other information reasonably sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of Revenue of the general 6
7 basis for the refund claim. 4 It is recommended that the vendor include a copy of this letter ruling with any claims for refund of sales taxes paid with respect to the services provided by the software configuration consultants. If a claim is not determined within the six-month period following receipt of the claim by the Commissioner, the claim shall be deemed denied for the purpose of filing suit in chancery court. TENN. CODE ANN (b)(2). The vendor must file suit on a denied refund claim in the appropriate Tennessee chancery court within one year from the date that the refund claim was filed with the Department. TENN. CODE ANN (b)(1). Kristin Husat Senior Tax Counsel APPROVED: Richard H. Roberts Commissioner of Revenue DATE: 06/23/ A Tennessee sales and use tax refund claim form is available on the Department s website at 7
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-58 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-58 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-24 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-24 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 08-48 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 08-48 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-21
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-21 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-05
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-05 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #07-35 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #07-35 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 06-09 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 06-09 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING 02-20 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING 02-20 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-10
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-10 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-44 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-44 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-11
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-11 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #96-22
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #96-22 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 04-20 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 04-20 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 02-14 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 02-14 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 97-19
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 97-19 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-04
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 13-04 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-43 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-43 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-15
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-15 Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This ruling is based on the
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-10 THIS LETTER RULING # 11-10 RESCINDS AND REPLACES LETTER RULING # 11-09 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 11-10 THIS LETTER RULING # 11-10 RESCINDS AND REPLACES LETTER RULING # 11-09 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 07-05 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 07-05 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 14-14
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 14-14 Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This ruling is based on the particular facts and circumstances presented, and is an interpretation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 02-17 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 02-17 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 11-59 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 11-59 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Tax Policy Analysis Taxpayer Guidance Division Novemer 14, 2007 STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION REGULATORY SERVICES BRANCH TECHNICAL BULLETIN
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION REGULATORY SERVICES BRANCH TECHNICAL BULLETIN TB - 72 ISSUED: 7-3-13 TAX: TOPIC: SALES AND USE TAX CLOUD COMPUTING (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS) This Technical Bulletin addresses the
INFORMATION BULLETIN #8 SALES TAX NOVEMBER 2011. (Replaces Bulletin #8 dated May 2002)
INFORMATION BULLETIN #8 SALES TAX NOVEMBER 2011 (Replaces Bulletin #8 dated May 2002) DISCLAIMER: SUBJECT: Information bulletins are intended to provide nontechnical assistance to the general public. Every
INFORMATION BULLETIN #2 SALES TAX MARCH 2013 (Replaces Bulletin #2 dated January 2013) Effective Date: 1 March 2013
INFORMATION BULLETIN #2 SALES TAX MARCH 2013 (Replaces Bulletin #2 dated January 2013) Effective Date: 1 March 2013 SUBJECT: Original Manufacturer Warranties, Optional Maintenance Contracts, and Optional
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #95-39
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #95-39 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO.S980428A On April
State of South Carolina Department of Revenue 301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214 Website Address: http://www.sctax.
State of South Carolina Department of Revenue 301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214 Website Address: http://www.sctax.org SC PRIVATE LETTER RULING #10-2 SUBJECT: Online Subscription
BEFORE THE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) On June 13, 2008, the staff of the Sales Tax Audit Bureau (Bureau) of the Idaho State
BEFORE THE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO In the Matter of the Protest of, Petitioner. DOCKET NO. 21395 DECISION On June 13, 2008, the staff of the Sales Tax Audit Bureau (Bureau of the Idaho State
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO. S970806E On August
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Janice K. Brewer Governor PRIVATE TAXPAYER RULING LR13-002 John A. Greene Director The Department issues this private taxpayer ruling in response to your letters
SC PRIVATE LETTER RULING #07-7. Sales of Photograph Prints via an Internet Website (Sales and Use Tax)
State of South Carolina Department of Revenue 301 Gervais Street, P.O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214 Website Address: http://www.sctax.org SC PRIVATE LETTER RULING #07-7 SUBJECT: Sales of Photograph
November 26, 2013. 1. COMPANY 1 (The Company) sells Software as follows:
ST 13-0076-GIL 11/26/2013 COMPUTER SOFTWARE If transactions for the licensing of computer software meet all of the criteria provided in subsection (a)(1) of Section 130.1935, neither the transfer of the
State & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas ALJ Holds Software Delivered to Texas Is Taxable Use On July 2, 2015, a Texas Comptroller Administrative
This letter concerns tangible personal property transferred incident to sales of service. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.01. (This is a GIL.
ST 08-0176-GIL 12/10/2008 SERVICE OCCUPATION TAX This letter concerns tangible personal property transferred incident to sales of service. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.01. (This is a GIL.) December 10, 2008
State and Local Tax: Up in the Air: Sales Taxation of Cloud Computing. National State and Local Tax Practice
State and Local Tax: Up in the Air: Sales Taxation of Cloud Computing Craig Williams Managing Director Marshal Kline Managing Director National State and Local Tax Practice Objectives Provide an overview
Title 61 REVENUE AND TAXATION Part I. Taxes Collected and Administered by the Secretary of Revenue * * *
RULE Department of Revenue Policy Services Division Definition of Tangible Personal Property (LAC 61:I.4301) Under the authority of R.S. 47:301 and R.S. 47:1511 and in accordance with the provisions of
INFORMATION BULLETIN #51T. (Replaces Information Bulletin #51T dated April 2010)
INFORMATION BULLETIN #51T SALES TAX SEPTEMBER 2010 (Replaces Information Bulletin #51T dated April 2010) DISCLAIMER: SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE: Informational bulletins are intended to provide nontechnical assistance
Cloud Computing: The Answer Is Still No
Cloud Computing: The Answer Is Still No by Arthur R. Rosen, Leah Robinson, and Hayes R. Holderness Arthur R. Rosen and Leah Robinson are partners at McDermott Will & Emery LLP, New York. Hayes R. Holderness
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Rhode Island Department of Revenue Division of Taxation. Public Notice of Proposed Rule-Making
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Rhode Island Department of Revenue Division of Taxation Public Notice of Proposed Rule-Making Pursuant to the provisions of 42-35-3(a)(1) of the General
How To Get A City Hall Tax Information From A County To A City Tax Account
STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL May 6, 2015 Opinion 15-44 Disclosure of Returns and Tax Information to Officials of Local Government Question 1 Assuming that a city is located half in
The State Board of Equalization Welcomes You to the Basic Sales and Use Tax Seminar
The State Board of Equalization Welcomes You to the Basic Sales and Use Tax Seminar Welcome to the California State Board of Equalization s presentation on Basic Sales and Use Tax. 1 About This Presentation
Section 1: Georgia Sales and Use Tax Principles Presented by Ned A. Lenhart, CMI, CPA
Page 1 of 9 Section 1: Georgia Sales and Use Tax Principles Presented by Ned A. Lenhart, CMI, CPA The objective of this section is to introduce and review some of the foundational components of Georgia
STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Counsel Advisory Opinion Unit STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO. S120425A The De partment of
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 06-27 WARNING
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REVENUE RULING # 06-27 WARNING Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made
March 18, 2015. Dear XXXX:
ST 15-0020 GIL 03/18/2015 SALE OF SERVICE If no tangible personal property is transferred to the customer, then no Illinois Retailers Occupation Tax or Service Occupation Tax would apply. See 86 Ill. Adm.
How To Pay For A Backup Computer In The United States
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO. S951219A On December
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue
STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Janice K. Brewer Governor TAXPAYER INFORMATION RULING LR11-011 Gale Garriott Director The Department issues this taxpayer information ruling in response to your letter
This letter concerns the taxation of computer software transactions. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.1935. (This is a GIL.
ST 10-0077-GIL 08/23/2010 COMPUTER SOFTWARE This letter concerns the taxation of computer software transactions. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.1935. (This is a GIL.) August 23, 2010 Dear Xxxxx: This letter
Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Taxpayer Services Division Technical Services Bureau STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO.S980122B On January
Are the following services subject to sales tax as sales of taxable tangible personal property,
TAX POLICY DIVISION RICK MILLER, DIRECTOR HOM MMISSION PHONE ( 405) 521-3133 FACSIMILE ( 405) 522-0063 RE: LR -12-019 ( Sales Tax Inquiry) Dear This is in response to your request regarding the applicability
ARIZONA TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX AND USE TAX
ARIZONA TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX AND USE TAX DEFINITION TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX Commonly referred to as sales tax, TPT is tax on the retail sale of tangible personal property and certain services. Retail
TAXING BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALES. By Bruce A. Emard 1
TAXING BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALES I. Introduction By Bruce A. Emard 1 California taxes liquidation sales of tangible personal property (TPP) under its Sales and Use Tax Law (the Sales and Use Tax Law
