Munich Cancer Registry



Similar documents
Munich Cancer Registry

Table 16a Multiple Myeloma Average Annual Number of Cancer Cases and Age-Adjusted Incidence Rates* for

Measures of Prognosis. Sukon Kanchanaraksa, PhD Johns Hopkins University

UICC World Cancer Congress. Cancer Staging and Quality of Care

Secondary Cancer and Relapse Rates Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate-Confined Cancer

Early mortality rate (EMR) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

NEOPLASMS OF KIDNEY (RENAL CELL CARCINOMA) And RENAL PELVIS (TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA)

Seton Medical Center Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patterns of Care Study Rate of Treatment with Chemoembolization N = 50

Six Degrees of Separation No More: Using Data Linkages to Improve the Quality of Cancer Registry and Study Data

Temporal Trends in Demographics and Overall Survival of Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients at Moffitt Cancer Center From 1986 to 2008

Effect of Risk and Prognosis Factors on Breast Cancer Survival: Study of a Large Dataset with a Long Term Follow-up

The effect of the introduction of ICD-10 on cancer mortality trends in England and Wales

THE AUSTRALIAN MESOTHELIOMA REGISTRY (AMR)


National Cancer Institute

October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month!

PROTOCOL OF THE RITA DATA QUALITY STUDY

Mesothelioma in Northeastern Minnesota and Two Occupational Cohorts: 2007 Update. December 7, 2007

Mesothelioma in Northeastern Minnesota and Two Occupational Cohorts: 2007 Update. December 7, 2007

Tips for surviving the analysis of survival data. Philip Twumasi-Ankrah, PhD

Cancer Data for South Florida: A Tool for Identifying Communities in Need

Incorrect Analyses of Radiation and Mesothelioma in the U.S. Transuranium and Uranium Registries Joey Zhou, Ph.D.

L Lang-Lazdunski, A Bille, S Marshall, R Lal, D Landau, J Spicer

9. Discuss guidelines for follow-up post-thyroidectomy for cancer (labs/tests) HH

DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER. Cancer Program Annual Report

The Ontario Cancer Registry moves to the 21 st Century

Mesothelioma in Australia: Incidence (1982 to 2013) and Mortality (1997 to 2012)

The Ontario Cancer Registry and its Data Quality. Diane Nishri Senior Research Associate, Surveillance February, 2011

Number. Source: Vital Records, M CDPH

If several different trials are mentioned in one publication, the data of each should be extracted in a separate data extraction form.

Ovarian Cancer. in Georgia, Georgia Department of Human Resources Division of Public Health

Chapter 21: Managing Abstracting Assignments

Chapter I Overview Chapter Contents

Colorectal cancer. A guide for journalists on colorectal cancer and its treatment

chapter 5. Quality control at the population-based cancer registry

Dealing with Missing Data

Analysis of Prostate Cancer at Easter Connecticut Health Network Using Cancer Registry Data

Research Article Frequency of Surgery in Black Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Cancer in Ireland 2013: Annual report of the National Cancer Registry

Surgical Management of Papillary Microcarcinoma 趙 子 傑 長 庚 紀 念 醫 院 林 口 總 院 一 般 外 科

Prostate cancer statistics

New Hampshire Childhood Cancer

Evaluation of Treatment Pathways in Oncology: Modeling Approaches. Feng Pan, PhD United BioSource Corporation Bethesda, MD

The New International Staging System Lung Cancer

Life Tables. Marie Diener-West, PhD Sukon Kanchanaraksa, PhD

Instructions for Filing Claims

Instructions for Filing Claims

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures Kidney Cancer 2016

Komorbide brystkræftpatienter kan de tåle behandling? Et registerstudie baseret på Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

Burns and Roe Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust Instructions for Filing Claims

BRAF as a prognostic marker in papillary thyroid cancer

Missing data and net survival analysis Bernard Rachet

GENERAL CODING. When you review old cases that were coded to unknown, make corrections based on guidelines in effect at the time of diagnosis.

Evidence tabel Lokaal palliatieve behandelingen

Where Are Mesothelioma Claims Heading?

7. Prostate cancer in PSA relapse

Finnish Cancer Registry Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research. Survival ratios of cancer patients by area in Finland

Instructions for Filing Unliquidated Asbestos Personal Injury Claims

Estimated New Cases of Leukemia, Lymphoma, Myeloma 2014

Instructions for Filing Unliquidated Asbestos Personal Injury Claims

Insurance: an important part of your financial plan

SPONTANEOUS MESOTHELIOMA DATA: AN INTERPRETATION. Robin Howie, Robin Howie Associates, Edinburgh.

Instructions for Filing Asbestos Personal Injury Claims

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Singapore

Terminal illness pricing considerations. Steve Varney

An Introduction to the. cancer registry. instructor s guide

Big Data and Oncology Care Quality Improvement in the United States

Likelihood of Cancer

Chapter 4. Planning a cancer registry

Instructions for Filing Claims

SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER SURGERY GRAND ROUNDS February 28, 2013 VERENA LIU, MD ROSEANNA LEE, MD

Gen Re Dread Disease Survey Initial Results

Instructions for Filing Unliquidated Asbestos Personal Injury Claims

Childhood cancer incidence and mortality in Canada

Transcription:

Munich Cancer Registry Baseline statistics Selection Matrix Homepage Deutsch Munich Cancer Registry at Munich Cancer Center Marchioninistr. 15 Munich, 81377 Germany http://www.tumorregister-muenchen.de/en Cancer statistics: Survival Year of diagnosis 1988-213 Patients 1,265 Diseases 1,268 Cases evaluated 621 Creation date 5/13/215 Export date 12//214 Population 4.64 m BERLIN GERMANY BAVARIA MUNICH http://www.tumorregister-muenchen.de/en/facts/surv/surv_c45 E.pdf

Survival Page 2 of 7 Period of diagnosis % Relative survival 1988-213 N=621 1 8 4 2 1 Period of diagnosis 1988-1997 n=82 13.2% 1998-26 n=354 57.% 27+ n=185 29.8% SEER 1998-211 n=7,419 1 2 3 4 5 Years Figure 1a. Relative survival of patients with mesothelioma by period of diagnosis. Included in the evaluation are 621 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 213. The survival results of the SEER program (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) of the American National Cancer Institute (NCI) are summarized as the period of diagnosis from 1998 to 211, and are represented by gray diamonds in order to facilitate comparisons between MCR and SEER. The presented survival curves are derived from clinical records with valid follow-up informations, which means that death certificate cases (DCO) cases are omitted from the analysis. With this one restriction, the MCR has provided populationbased statistics since 1988, collecting data on all cancer cases in the region of southern Bavaria. Historical data of previous time periods can be heavily selected, therefore, univariate survival comparisons of the presented time periods must be carefully considered. Nonetheless, all calculable survival curves are depicted to facilitate the comparison of long time follow-up analyses of relative survival between particular cancers. Period of diagnosis 1988-1997 1998-26 27+ n=82 n=354 n=185 Years obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1..2 51.1 52.6 61.9 63.5 2 22. 22.4 28. 29.3.5 32.1 3 14.8 15.6 15.9 17.3 4 9.6 1. Table 1b. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with mesothelioma by period of diagnosis for period 1988-213 (N=621).

Survival Page 3 of 7 Gender % Survival 1988-213 N=621 1 Gender 8 Male n= 8.5% Female n=121 19.5% 4 2 1 Observed Expected Relative 1 2 3 4 5 Years Figure 2a. Survival of patients with mesothelioma by gender. Included in the evaluation are 621 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 213. Gender Male Female n= n=121 Years obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % 1. 1. 1. 1. 1 54. 55.7 52. 52.4 2 27.3 28.7 29.8. 3 13.8 14.9 18.9 19.1 4 8.3 8.7 5 5.5 5.9 Table 2b. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with mesothelioma by gender for period 1988-213 (N=621).

Survival Page 4 of 7 Age category % Relative survival 1988-213 N=621 1 8 4 2 1 Age category -59 yrs n=141 22.7% -69 yrs n=2 37.% + yrs n=2 4.3% 1 2 3 4 5 Years Figure 3a. Relative survival of patients with mesothelioma by age category. Included in the evaluation are 621 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 213. Age category -59 yrs -69 yrs + yrs n=141 n=2 n=2 Years obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.1 59.9 61.6 62.6 42.3 44.3 2 35.3 35.7 34.2 35. 17.3 18.8 3 22. 21.6 17.2 17.7 4 15.9 15.8 Table 3b. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with mesothelioma by age category for period 1988-213 (N=621).

Survival Page 5 of 7 Post-progression survival % Observed survival 1988-213 N=245 1 8 4 2 1 Type of progression All types n=245 1.% Locoregional progress n=39 15.9% 6 12 18 24 36 42 48 54 Months Figure 5a. Observed post-progression survival of 245 patients with mesothelioma diagnosed between 1988 and 213 (incl. M1). These 245 patients with documented progression events during their course of disease represent 39.5% of the totally 621 evaluated cases. Patients with cancer relapse documented via death certificates only were excluded (n=236, 38.%). Multiple progression types on different sites are included in the evaluation even when not occuring synchronously. Medical record documentation often lacks the linguistic severity to distinguish between local relapse, regional lymph node metastasis and distant spread in solid cancers. Frequently, the statement not specified is the only information in registries regarding relapse of the disease. The category All types denotes all cases who suffered from at least one relapse during the course of disease (incl. primary M1-status). Although, the real number of relapsed patients is likely to be much higher. The accumulated percentage of patients with local relapse or distant metastasis exceeds the 1% value because patients are potientially considered in more than one subgroup. Type of progression All types Locoregional progress n=245 n=39 Months % % 1. 1. 12 36.9 24 14.1 Table 5b. Observed post-progression survival of patients with mesothelioma for period 1988-213 (N=245).

Survival Page 6 of 7 Shortcuts MCR Munich Cancer Registry, Germany (Tumorregister München) NCI National Cancer Institute, USA SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, USA UICC Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva DCO Death certificate only. The death certificate provides the only notification to the registry. NA Not available NOS Not otherwise specified OS Observed/overall survival (Kaplan-Meier estimate) RS Relative survival, compared to the general population, ratio of observed to expected survival (Ederer II method), reflecting excess mortality among cancer patients AS Assembled survival chart (observed, expected, relative) PPS Post-progression survival, survival since first relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate) Date of entry: Date of first locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, unspecified progression Event: Death of all causes CS Conditional survival, survival probability under the condition of surviving a given period of time Recommended Citation Munich Cancer Registry. Survival [Internet]. 215 [updated 215 May 13; cited 215 Jul 1]. Available from: http://www.tumorregister-muenchen.de/en/facts/surv/surv_c45 E.pdf Copyright The content of the public web site provided by the Munich Cancer Registry is available worldwide and free of charge. All documents are free to download, utilize, copy, print-out and distribute, providing that the MCR is referenced. Disclaimer The Munich Cancer Registry reserves the right to not be responsible for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of the information provided. Liability claims regarding damage caused by the use of any information provided, including any kind of information which is incomplete or incorrect, will therefore be rejected.

Survival Page 7 of 7 Fig./Tbl. Index of figures and tables Page 1a Relative survival by period of diagnosis (chart) 2 1b Survival by period of diagnosis (table) 2 2a Survival by gender (chart) 3 2b Survival by gender (table) 3 3a Relative survival by age category (chart) 4 3b Survival by age category (table) 4 5a Observed post-progression survival (chart) 5 5b Observed post-progression survival (table) 5