RI Office of Management and Budget Performance Report

Similar documents
Using Data to Inform Evidence-Based Decision Making. January 8, 2013

SANTA CLARA COUNTY REENTRY SERVICES SEAMLESS SYSTEM OF SERVICES, SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION Ready to Change: Promoting Safety and Health for the Whole

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

RHODE ISLAND SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL

Criminal Justice Study Consensus Questions

The Second Chance Act Frequently Asked Questions

Massachusetts Department of Correction SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT 103 DOC 446. Table of Contents Definitions General Policy...

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

Report on Adult Drug Court: eligibility, procedure, and funding Prepared for the State of Rhode Island General Assembly revised April 26, 2007

Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs

Testimony of Adrienne Poteat, Acting Director Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Reentry & Aftercare. Reentry & Aftercare. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators

Criminal Justice Cross-Training Conference: Community Safety and Crime Reduction via Successful Offender Re-entry into the Community

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections

ABA COMMISSION ON EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL SANCTIONS

How To Get A Drug Sentence In New York

CHAPTER 7 REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS

Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Justice Research and Performance Drug Law Reform Preliminary Update on Early Implementation

All the Way Home: Re-entry and Housing. NAEH Conference July 13, 2005 Richard Cho

City and County of San Francisco. Monthly Report for March 2016

An Overview Of The Windham School District

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

Population Challenges at the Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (DRC) Analyst: Kevin Stockdale, OBM

Working Paper # March 4, Prisoner Reentry and Rochester s Neighborhoods John Klofas

STATE OF OHIO. DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION RELATED ACA STANDARDS: EFFECTIVE DATE: AND CORRECTION February 19, 2011 I. AUTHORITY

Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

Corrections Rehabilitative Programs Effective, But Serve Only a Portion of the Eligible Population

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

Results First Adult Criminal and Juvenile Justice Evidence-Based Program Inventory

Consumer ID Theft Total Costs

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

COMMUNITY SAFETY VICTIM RESPECT OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017

Justice Reinvestment in New Hampshire

Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION 103 DOC 445 SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS Definitions...

Victims of Crime Act

PUBLIC SAFETY ACTION PLAN. Prepared for Governor Haslam by Subcabinet Working Group

ARIZONA ADULT PROBATION

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

Fund 117 Alcohol Safety Action Program

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SECOND CHANCE ACT (SCA)

Governor Jennifer M. Granholm,

Public Law th Congress An Act

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE

YORK COUNTY TREATMENT COURTS COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015

Residential Substance Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners

Department of Corrections DOC (FL)

State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Budget. Fiscal Year Volume II Health and Human Services. Gina M. Raimondo, Governor

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

Part I Improvements to Existing Programs

Young Adult Justice Programs Concept Paper January 10, 2011

Michigan Drug Court Recidivism. Definitions and Methodology

WASHINGTON STATE JUVENILE JUSITCE PROFILE (courtesy of the NCJJ web site)

It s all apples and oranges. January 31, 2012 Nathan Brady OLRGC

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT of CORRECTIONS

Probation is a penalty ordered by the court that permits the offender to

Community-based Youth Services Division. Director Dennis Gober

CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRENDS

How To Save Money On Drug Sentencing In Michigan

Information about the Criminal Justice System**

REDUCING STATEWIDE RECIDIVISM: CHECKLIST FOR STATE REENTRY COORDINATORS

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

Evaluation of the Performance of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Tier Programs

JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION

SPECIAL OPTIONS SERVICES PROGRAM UNITED STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JUVENILE DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

How To Participate In A Drug Court

PAROLE/PROBATION OFFICER

Redeploy Illinois Annual Report Implementation and Impact May 2007

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE

The Collaborative on Reentry

Redirection as Effective as Residential Delinquency Programs, Achieved Substantial Cost Avoidance

State Spending for Corrections: Long-Term Trends and Recent Criminal Justice Policy Reforms

To protect the safety of all citizens of Cherokee County: An Evaluation of the Cherokee County DUI & Drug Court

Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Maricopa County

Criminal Justice Quarterly Report January 2009-March 2009

Transcription:

Annual Overtime Expenditures (in millions) Average Hourly Wage RI Office of Management and Budget Performance Report RI Department of Corrections April 11, 213 Corrections Budget Fiscal Year 213 Expenditures for the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) in FY 213 are primarily funded from general revenue (93.5 percent), with federal funds, restricted receipts and operating transfers accounting for 6.5 percent. RIDOC s largest category of expenditure is personnel (86.3 percent) followed by operating expenses (7.9 percent) and capital purchases (5.2 percent). The tables below illustrate budgeted expenditures in FY 213. 1 Corrections Expenditures by Source, FY 213 Corrections Expenditures by Category, FY 213 General Revenue $184,546,757 93.5% Personnel $17,387,873 86.3% Federal Funds 3,34,94 1.5% Operating Supplies & Expenses 15,558,73 7.9% Restricted Receipts 73,362.% Assistance & Grants 1,193,98.6% Operating Transfers 9,723,19 4.9% Capital Purchases & Equipment 1,238,395 5.2% Total $197,378,249 1.% Total $197,378,249 1.% RIDOC projects $15. million in general revenue expenditures for overtime in FY 213. 2 Because overtime is a significant component of personnel costs, RIDOC has been working to decrease overtime usage among correctional officers. RIDOC has reduced overtime expenditures from $23.3 million in FY 21 to a projected $15. million in FY 213 a decline of 35.7 percent. This reduction is noteworthy in light of the 13.4 percent increase in the average hourly wage rate of correctional officers during that period, from $25.51 in FY 21 to an estimated $28.92 in FY 213. The graph below illustrates the reduction in overtime expenditures in RIDOC s budget and the change in average hourly wages. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will continue to work with RIDOC to improve overtime management, including enhancements to data collection and analysis. Corrections Overtime Expenditures & Hourly Wage Rates $24. $22. $2. $18. $16. $14. $23.3 $25.51 $21.5 $27.21 $28.73 $28.92 $18.6 $15. $3. $29. $28. $27. $26. $25. $. $1. 21 211 2 213 (proj.) $24. $23. Institutional Corrections OT Expenses Correctional Officers Avg. Hourly Wage 1 Budget data are based on Governor Chafee s FY 213 revised budget request, submitted January 16, 213. Additional budget information for RIDOC is available at http://www.budget.ri.gov/documents/currentfy/budgetvolumeiv/2_department%2of%2corrections.pdf. 2 For this analysis, RIDOC s overtime expenditures are defined as those associated with Institutional Corrections operations that are funded by general revenue. FY 213 Overtime expenditures based on projections at the close of the third fiscal quarter (March 31, 213).

INMATE CLASSIFICATION This measure assesses any delays in the inmate classification process and the transfer of classified inmates to the sentenced facilities, as defined under RI General Laws 42-56-29. Figure A: Number of Inmates Not Classified Within Days of Sentencing 1 9 9 11 8 6 4 2 1 6 2 3 3 1 6 4 4 4 RIDOC was previously involved in a federal lawsuit over the conditions of inmate confinement. It was noted that newly sentenced inmates were being held for long periods of time at the Intake Service Center before they were classified and sent to a sentenced facility. This measure and data are under review, as technicalities in the definition of classified status can skew the numbers. EDUCATION SERVICES This measure reflects the level of program participation for education programs in the Department of Corrections. These programs are intended to prepare inmates for reintegration into the community with improved skill sets. Figure B: Number of Inmates Enrolled in Academic Programming 5 4 3 2 1 All inmates with educational attainment of some high school or less than ninth grade are determined to have an educational need because they lack a diploma. As of March 213, 47.3 percent of sentenced inmates did not have a high school diploma or a GED.

PAROLE BOARD The Parole Board conducts hearings where members evaluate eligible inmates for possible release on parole into the community. Meetings are held on a monthly basis and aggregated annually. Figure C: Total Number of Parole Board Hearings 14 1 8 6 4 2 Decision stayed Granted parole Denied parole In general, the Board is authorized by statute (R.I.G.L. 13-8-1 et seq.) to consider the early release of incarcerated offenders who have been sentenced to be imprisoned for a period of more than six months and who have served not less than one-third of the term for which they have been sentenced. Since January 211, 28.6 percent of hearings have resulted in the granting of parole. VICTIM NOTIFICATION SYSTEM RIDOC uses the voluntary Victim Notification System (VINES) to inform victims about the status of certain offenders. Victims may inquire about a particular individual through the phone line or the VINES website. Figure D: Number of Inquiries into VINES 8, 6, 4, 2, VINES provides registered users notice of a particular inmate s release upon completion of sentence, upcoming parole hearings, inmate escape, return from escape, death, transfer to transitional housing, qualification for work release, transfer to an out-ofstate-facility, and furlough. Other notifications may be added in the future. To register for VINES notifications, call (877) RI-4-VINE or log onto www.vinelink.com

ADULT PROBATION In addition to the 3,2 inmates located on the grounds of the Pastore Center, the Department oversees more than 25, adult probation offenders that are based in the community. Figure E: Number of Offenders on Probation 6,5 6,3 6,1 5,9 6,3 6,334 6,236 6,334 6,182 6,43 5,7 5,5 The number of offenders on probation affects caseload ratios, measured by the average number of offenders overseen by one probation officer. The Department has had a history of high caseloads but has brought averages down over the last several years. This improvement was driven by a reduction in the number of offenders as well as caseload management techniques that moved some offenders to lower levels of supervision when appropriate. FIELD VISITS In addition to the individuals on probation and parole, the Department oversees the Community Confinement program. Figure F: Percentage of Home Confinees Receiving at Least One Field Visit per Month 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% 46% 52% 1% 69% 57% 59% 84% 64% 97% 87% 84% 95% 1% % Community Confinement is a community-based program that provides an alternative to placement in the Adult Correctional Institutions (ACI). The District, Superior and Family Courts may order home confinement for selected inmates who pose a manageable risk to the community and require structured supervision. The Department expects that more frequent visits to home confinees will ensure compliance with conditions set by the Court.

SEX OFFENDER CLASSIFICATION The Sex Offender Board of Review examines those inmates convicted of sex offenses who are being released from RIDOC. The Board assigns a level that determines statutory notification requirements. Figure G: Classification Levels of Rhode Island Sex Offenders Released (June 2 January 213) Level III High Risk Offenders 19.1% 32.2% Level I Low Risk Offenders Level II Moderate Risk Offenders 48.7% According to Rhode Island statute, the level assigned by the Board is associated with an offender s risk level and indicates what type of communication with the public is required upon release. SEX OFFENDER COMMUNITY NOTIFICATIONS Notifications indicate the number of sex offenders determined to be a Level II or Level III, and information is sent to local police departments. Notifications help make the public aware when offenders move into their community. 1 8 Figure H: Number of Sex Offender Community Notifications Completed 6 4 2 Released from incarceration Moved to new community In addition to these notifications, a listing of Rhode Island Level II and Level III sex offenders is available at http://www.paroleboard.ri.gov In the past, RIDOC tracked only community notifications for individuals being released from incarceration (shown in red). In November 211, RIDOC began tracking notifications for offenders moving from one community to another (shown in blue).

INMATE FIGHTING Alongside other data, this measure can reflect inmate climate within the institutions. RIDOC seeks to maintain a safe environment and minimize violence. Figure I: Number of Inmate-on-Inmate Fights 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 4 24 21 29 17 9 14 18 16 2 13 24 RIDOC works to minimize the likelihood of violence through prison management techniques, including identifying gang or other enemy issues and classifying inmates to the appropriate level of security. USE OF FORCE ON INMATES Alongside other data, this measure can reflect inmate climate within the institutions. RIDOC seeks to maintain a safe environment and minimize violence. Figure J: Number of Instances Requiring Immediate Use of Force 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 3 6 26 23 18 3 32 29 2 19 23 19 The use of force within RIDOC s institutions is guided by the Department s use of force policy and U.S. Supreme Court requirements. Under these terms, correctional officers may use only the amount of force necessary to restore order.

Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan-13 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Comprehensive substance abuse assessments analyze an inmate s need for treatment services. This measure, when considered along with risk and need data, ensures that treatment slots are being used appropriately for those in need. Figure K: Number of Inmates Receiving Substance Abuse Assessment and Treatment 14 1 8 6 4 2 Inmates Assessed Inmates Admitted Since October 211, of the 1,32 inmates assessed as needing substance abuse services, 99 (95.9%) were admitted for treatment. PHYSICIAN ENCOUNTERS RIDOC provides medical services to inmates via department staff and contracted providers. Figure L: Number of Physician Encounters per Month 2, 1,5 1, 5 The data above illustrate the number of inmate encounters with physicians or physician assistants in a given month. RIDOC uses this measure to determine its responsiveness to the health needs of inmates. Early intervention by medical providers can reduce costs incurred through inmate hospitalization and emergency room usage.

HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS Hospital level care is a significant cost to the Department as it involves supervision and medical treatment costs. Figure M: Number of Hospital Admissions 25 2 15 1 1 15 14 8 13 16 8 13 17 14 11 17 22 22 19 5 RIDOC aims to reduce inmate hospitalization through early intervention in health services when appropriate. RIDOC tracks this measure and analyzes patient data to determine the reason for any increases whether from greater hospitalization by multiple inmates or intensive use by a few inmates. HOSPITAL DAYS Variations in the number of hospital-level care days is partially indicative of the health of the inmate population. Figure N: Number of Hospital Days 2 15 135 157 142 14 1 5 81 111 94 96 88 74 68 3 49 97 19 69 RIDOC aims to reduce inmate hospitalization through early intervention in health services when appropriate. RIDOC tracks this measure and analyzes patient data to determine the reason for any increases whether from greater hospitalization by multiple inmates or intensive use by a few inmates.

Recidivism Rate PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHT Recidivism Reduction Improving Rehabilitation of Offenders The RIDOC s mission includes providing a range of control and rehabilitative options for criminal offenders. Providing appropriate treatment and services to offenders decreases the likelihood that they will commit additional offenses after release, known in criminal justice as recidivating. Reducing the state s recidivism rate improves the safety of our communities and saves taxpayer dollars by reducing costs associated with incarceration. Recidivism Rates Declining in Recent Years RIDOC assesses recidivism rates by cohort examining all offenders released in a single year and then tracking their progress over a period of time. RIDOC has examined three release cohorts from 1995, 24 and 29 to gauge recidivism rates. 3 In 1995, 34 percent of ex-offenders returned to RIDOC s facilities within one year a rate that declined to 32 percent in 24 and 31 percent in 29. After two years, 46 percent of the 24 cohort returned to custody, compared to only 42 percent in the 29 cohort. While additional analysis is necessary, the four percentage point change between 24 and 29 suggests that RIDOC s efforts to provide better rehabilitative services are having a positive impact. Plans for Additional Improvement 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % Recidivism Rates by Cohort 46% 34% 32% 31% No 2-year data 1995 24 29 Cohort Year 1-year 2-year Building on recent progress, RIDOC has established aggressive targets for further reducing recidivism rates. One of the most effective ways to reduce recidivism is to provide offenders with access to the appropriate rehabilitation programs while ensuring that rehabilitation programs follow national best practices and provide the expected outcomes. In 2, RIDOC was awarded $8, in a Second Chance Act Recidivism Reduction Grant from the U.S. Department of Justice to improve reentry services and substantially reduce recidivism. This grant will help RIDOC improve service delivery so that medium- to high-risk offenders are targeted for the most intensive case management and programming services in prison and in the community. RIDOC expects to reduce recidivism rates by an additional 15 percent within two years of completion of the grant. In April 213, Rhode Island was selected to be a partner state in the Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative, which helps states assess the costs and benefits of adult and juvenile justice programs and use that data in budget and policy planning to maximize results. As part of Results First, RIDOC will collaborate with the Department of Children, Youth and Families, OMB and other stakeholders to determine the most effective rehabilitation programs in reducing recidivism rates in Rhode Island. 42% 3 Of the three cohorts, only 24 has three complete years of data. The 1995 cohort has data only from the first year after release; the 29 cohort has two years of data through 211, with the third year data under review. For more information about RIDOC s recidivism studies, please see http://www.doc.ri.gov/administration/planning/docs/ridoc%229%2recidivism%2study%2year%22.pdf.