Environmental Radiation Monitoring



Similar documents
Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources

The attachment to this letter contains a supplemental corrective update to the referenced report for calendar year 2004.

Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan

Minnesota Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Emergency Worker Handbook

EPA Radionuclides Rule and the RadNet Program

THE RESULTS OF THE LITHUANIAN RADON SURVEY. Gendrutis Morkunas 1, Gustav Akerblom 2

Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life

DOSES TO EYES AND EXTREMITIES OF MEDICAL STAFF DURING INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES

Radiation Safety at LLNL General Employee Radiological Training GERT HS6001-W

National Academy of Science Report on Uranium Mining in Virginia By Patrick M. Wales January 24, Fuel for America Jobs for Southside

WM2012 Conference, February 26-March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30 March 2011

WM2010 Conference, March 7-11, 2010, Phoenix, AZ

PERSONNEL MONITORING AND DOSIMETRY POLICIES

REAC/TS Radiation Accident Registry: Update of Accidents in the United States. Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Canada. Record of Proceedings, Including Reasons for Decisi'on. In the Matter of. Applicant. Royal MiHtary CoHege of Canada

SECTION TWO PACKAGING, TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

Chemistry 1000 Lecture 2: Nuclear reactions and radiation. Marc R. Roussel

centre for radiation protection

Hiroshima and Nagasaki Occupation Forces

Chapter 15 Radiation in the Environment 1

notes MERRTT IS-302 Radiological Survey Instruments and Dosimetry Devices

Questionnaire for NORM service providers

INFORMATION NOTICE: USE OF XRF DEVICES CONTAINING RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL North Dakota Department of Health Radiation Control Program (2/06)

UNDERSTANDING THE AIR SAMPLING DATA

Maine Yankee INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL INSTALLATION (ISFSI) OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL CHANGE NO. 32. Approved: Approval Date: 0"/06

Working Safely With Nuclear Gauges

GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WELL LOGGING OPERATIONS IN KENTUCKY

A radiation weighting factor is an estimate of the effectiveness per unit dose of the given radiation relative a to low-let standard.

Introduction. Chapter 15 Radiation Protection. Regulatory bodies. Dose Equivalent. Regulatory bodies. Main Principles of Radiation Protection

medical diagnostics caesium-137 naturally occurring radio nuclides in the food radon in indoor air potassium in the body

APP C1 NAVAL RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL PERMIT REVIEW CHECKLIST NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMAND: PERMIT NUMBER: TYPE OF ACTION:

Q Environmental Emissions Data for Pickering Nuclear ONTARIO POWER GENERATION ONT

Naturally Occurring Radioactivity in the Nordic Countries Recommendations

C-10 Radiation Monitoring Network

Sandia National Laboratories- Albuquerque Special Exposure Cohort Petition Evaluation Report 188

RN-222 RELEASE TO THE ENVIRONMENT: COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT GRANITE SOURCES

United States Office of Radiation and October 1998 Environmental Protection Indoor Air Agency. Radiation and Indoor Environments National Laboratory

August 31, 2010 Revision: 1. Energy Fuels Resources Corporation Prepared By: 44 Union Boulevard, Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228

Comparison of natural radioactivity removal methods for drinking water supplies: A review

Radiological Worker Training

ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL DATA RELATING TO THE 2000 WILDFIRE AT HANFORD

Radioactive Contamination Uranium Legacy in CA

POLICY ISSUE NOTATION VOTE

Examination of National and International Impacts of Adoption of ICRP Recommendations

Guidance on Radioactive Materials in Sewage Sludge and Ash at Publicly Owned Treatment Works

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Public Affairs Washington, DC Phone Fax

WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT

October 20, 2004 LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING PLAN

OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE FROM U.S. NAVAL NUCLEAR PLANTS AND THEIR SUPPORT FACILITIES

CRIIRAD report N Analyses of atmospheric radon 222 / canisters exposed by Greenpeace in Niger (Arlit/Akokan sector)

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURE 88045

DOSE RATES EVALUATION ON ENVIRONMENT AROUND ALMIRANTE ALVARO ALBERTO NUCLEAR POWER STATION AFTER ANGRA 2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT S OPERATION

ARMED FORCES RADIOBIOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 6901 WISCONSIN AVENUE BETHESDA, MARYLAND

Wisconsin Chapter DHS 157- Radiation Protection Regulatory Guide May, 2010

Q1 What types of radiation are there? A1 There are two main types of radiation:

X-ray Radiation Safety Course. James Kane & Rob Deters Office of Radiological Control

Radiological Worker Training Radiological Safety Training for Radiation Producing (X-Ray) Devices

Radiological Protection Principles concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2013/51/EURATOM

Radiation Protection Guidance For Hospital Staff

EA1202: Monitoring unusual pathways for the transfer of radioactivity from the Sellafield site into the environment.

National Radiation Air Monitoring Network National Environmental Monitoring Conference San Antonio -- August 6, 2013

SRS Maps. Site Sampling Locations Doses Groundwater

CHAPTER 4 RADIATION MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT

Ground Water Investigation and Remediation

Nuclear Emergency Response Program

Radiation Dose Limits. Radiation Safety Training Module 3

RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY TRAINING FOR RADIATION-PRODUCING (X-RAY) DEVICES

Recognition. Radiation Survey Objectives. Objectives. Part 1 Documentation Radiation Source Survey Objectives Radiation Detectors Techniques

ANNEX E. Occupational radiation exposures

Society of Nuclear Medicine 1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, VA

COMMENTS ON THE CADIZ CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility

SOIL AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN For Site Located at 420 South Avenue Rochester, New York NYSDEC Spill No PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:

Development of a Real-Time Radiological Area Monitoring Network for Emergency Response at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Natural radioactivity in waste from former non-uranium mining areas in Norway

REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH. REGULATORY GUIDE 8.4 (Draft was issued as DG-8036, dated April 2010)

INSTRUCTION CONCERNING RISKS FROM OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

Exposures from the Events at the NPPs in Fukushima following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

DOE Policy- Reporting of. Update

IAEA Safety Standards

States Environmental Monitoring at Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear Safety. Policy

Dissolved Mineral Radioactivity in Drinking Water


1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

(

Expanded Monitoring Program

Postgraduate Educational Course in Radiation Protection and the Safety of Radiation Sources Standard Syllabus

Environmental Radiation Risk Assessment

1. In the general symbol cleus, which of the three letters. 2. What is the mass number of an alpha particle?

Letter Health Consultation

The objective of this chapter is to provide criteria with which to assess the safety of

TABLE OF CONTENTS HEALTH PHYSICS REGULATIONS

Comparison of Medical and DOE Health Physics Programs. Kevin Lee Radiation Safety Officer Palmetto Health

LA-UR Title: Author(s): Green, Andrew A. Schlemann, Shea A. Young, Daniel L. Intended for:

Azeri, Chirag & Gunashli Full Field Development Phase 3 Environmental & Socio-economic Impact Assessment. A10.1 Introduction...

Transcription:

Environmental Radiation Monitoring Barbara C. Fields Introduction Monitoring Locations A variety of radioisotopes are used at LLNL for biomedical, general, and nuclear weapons research. These include transuranics, tritium, and mixed fission products. In accordance with federal regulations, DOE Orders 5400.1 and 5400.5, and Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Section 30250, LLNL monitors direct gamma radiation to establish background radiation levels in its vicinity and to determine the direct environmental radiological impact of its operations. Gamma radiation results from natural background sources of terrestrial or cosmic origin and from man-made sources, such as fallout from past nuclear weapons testing and any contribution from LLNL operations. Because environmental radiological monitoring is used as one measure of the potential direct radiation dose the public receives as the result of LLNL operations, LLNL has developed an extensive radiological monitoring network for the Livermore site perimeter, the Livermore Valley, and the perimeter. Direct gamma radiation has been measured at the Livermore site since 1973, and a direct environmental radiation monitoring program was implemented at in 1988. Direct gamma radiation is measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), which provide a measure of the total amount of gamma radiation at a particular location. Environmental neutron monitoring, which was also started in 1973, was discontinued at the end of 1994. Currently, environmental exposure to neutrons is not a concern at LLNL. However, should it become necessary for LLNL to start up operations that produce neutrons at significant levels, environmental neutron monitoring can be resumed. As a result of a gamma network assessment, the number of monitoring locations was reduced in 1995 (Harrach et al. 1996). External doses from direct gamma radiation were monitored at 14 Livermore site perimeter locations (shown in Figure -1), and 23 Livermore Valley locations (Figure -2) in 1997. These off-site locations are used for background comparison with perimeter locations. Similarly, gamma doses were monitored at nine perimeter monitoring locations at (Figure -3), five in areas near, and two LLNL Environmental Report for 1997-1

Environmental Radiation Monitoring locations in nearby Tracy. Six monitoring locations near were added as part of a special study in 1993. Monitoring has continued at these locations to provide data from areas not likely to be affected by LLNL operations. Sampling at locations 84 and 95 was discontinued in 1996. N 16 4 5 6 Patterson Pass Road 42 Greenville Road 43 Vasco Road 1 47 52 14 East Avenue 68 69 56 Gamma dosimeters Scale: Meters LLNL perimeter 0 200 400 Figure -1. Gamma dosimeter locations, Livermore site, 1997. -2 LLNL Environmental Report for 1997

Environmental Radiation Monitoring Livermore Avenue 76 580 N 84 77 74 19 Vasco Road New Patterson Pass Road 18 22 24 28 27 73 Patterson 30 Pass Road 32 45 Lupin Way Altamont Pass Road 35 33 72 580 Flynn Road 37 70 75 East Avenue Tesla Road 66 61 57 60 Greenville Road Gamma dosimeter locations LLNL perimeter Scale: Kilometers 0 1 2 Figure -2. Gamma dosimeter locations, Livermore Valley, 1997. Results of Gamma Monitoring In 1995, all of the quarterly gamma radiation data points were normalized to standard 90-day quarters, as is the practice of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (Struckmeyer 1994). This practice was continued in the 1997 data processing and analyses. By using the same standard-quarter reporting method, data from other DOE and NRC facilities and data from intercomparison studies can be more easily compared. As shown in Figure -4, when our data are adjusted to standard quarters, the variability in exposures that was previously reported in 1995 is reduced. LLNL Environmental Report for 1997-3

Environmental Radiation Monitoring Patterson Pass Road 120 99 Alameda County 121 San Joaquin County 86 85 N 82 Tracy 90 81 Livermore 94 88 91 89 78 96 Corral Hollow Road Gamma dosimeter locations perimeter Scale: Kilometers Off-site locations 0 1 2 Figure -3. Gamma dosimeter locations, and vicinity, 1997. Livermore Site Table -1 presents a summary of the quarterly and annual TLD gamma radiation dose equivalents for the Livermore site perimeter locations and Livermore Valley off-site locations. The mean 1997 dose equivalent from external direct radiation exposure at the Livermore site perimeter, 0.59 msv (59 mrem), is statistically the same as background external dose measured in the Livermore Valley, 0.60 msv (60 mrem). Table -2 lists the yearly doses due to direct gamma radiation at the LLNL site perimeter. All doses fall within the predicted range for background radiation, and no LLNL operational impacts are discernible. -4 LLNL Environmental Report for 1997

Environmental Radiation Monitoring Radiation dose (msv) Livermore site perimeter 0.26 0.24 Livermore Valley 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Year 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 Radiation dose (mrem) Figure -4. Gamma measurements at the Livermore site perimeter, Livermore Valley, and, 1988 to 1997. As seen in Table -1, the measured perimeter average dose in 1997 was 0.72 msv (72 mrem), the measured dose at the off-site locations near was 0.77 msv (77 mrem), and the measured doses in and near Tracy were 0.62 msv (62 mrem). All doses are within the predicted range for background radiation, and no LLNL operational impacts are discernible. At, the initial TLD network design limited monitoring to the perimeter and two locations in and near the city of Tracy, which were chosen to represent background radiation levels. However, the Tracy locations are located on a geological substrate different from that at. The region around has higher levels of naturally occurring uranium, which is present in the Neroly Formation. The mean dose measured in the off-site locations of the area around, which is used to represent the high end of background radiation from this formation, was 0.77 msv (77 mrem) and is greater than the perimeter dose of 0.72 msv (72 mrem). The Tracy area, with a dose of 0.62 msv (62 mrem), is at a lower elevation, with geological constituents composed of alluvial deposits of clays, sands, and silts overlying the bedrock. The difference in doses can be directly attributed to the difference in geologic substrates. LLNL Environmental Report for 1997-5

Environmental Radiation Monitoring Table -1. Summary of dose calculations for gamma monitoring locations at all sites in 1997 (in msv). (a) Location Quarter Livermore site Livermore Valley Tracy Other off site Mean Std. dev. Mean Std. dev. Mean Std. dev. Mean Std. dev. Mean Std. dev. First 0.145 0.012 0.144 0.014 0.168 0.016 0.148 0.018 0.183 0.026 Second 0.156 0.013 0.157 0.016 0.188 0.018 0.161 0.018 0.210 0.028 Third 0.153 0.013 0.152 0.016 0.187 0.019 0.162 0.012 0.200 0.028 Fourth 0.146 0.0 0.156 0.013 0.178 0.014 0.151 0.013 0.189 0.029 Total (b) 0.601 0.599 0.722 0.621 0.772 a b 1 msv = 100 mrem. The total represents annual totals given in the Data Supplement, which accounts for missing data by averaging data given for each site. Table -2. Annual dose by year at the Livermore site perimeter due to direct gamma radiation. (a) Year msv mrem 1988 0.59 59 1989 0.58 58 1990 0.58 58 1991 0.56 56 1992 0.56 56 1993 0.57 57 1994 0.56 56 1995 0.56 56 1996 0.55 55 1997 0.59 59 a Data normalized to standard 90-day quarters (360-day years). The adjusted doses at the Livermore site perimeter and in the Livermore Valley are comparable and lack significant trend from 1988 to 1997. However, while doses are similarly without trend, they continue to measure slightly higher direct gamma doses than the Livermore site and the Livermore Valley, which is expected given the differences in geology between these sites. -6 LLNL Environmental Report for 1997

Environmental Radiation Monitoring In reviewing the trends of the standard quarter data as shown in Figure -4, it appears that seasonal variation can occur during the rainy season, most likely because of a decrease in radon emanation from the moist soil. As shown in the figure, the variation was absent during the severe drought years in Northern California (1990/1992) but is apparent when rainfall returned to normal (1994/1995) and above-normal levels (1993). Environmental Impact Based on past measurements (Lindeken et al. 1973), environmental terrestrial (geologic) radiation doses in the Livermore Valley vary from 0.25 to 0.60 msv/y (25 to 60 mrem/y). Cosmic radiation, as calculated for the local elevation and geomagnetic latitude according to the data of Lowder and Beck (1966), is about 0.35 msv/y (35 mrem/y). This combination results in a typical total direct radiation dose level of 0.60 to 0.70 msv/y (60 to 70 mrem/y); however, local geological and meteorological factors will impact these dose levels. Direct radiation doses measured at the Livermore site perimeter in 1997 are near these predicted values and are statistically equivalent to the Livermore Valley doses, which are considered natural background levels. This indicates that any dose from LLNL operations is not large enough to be seen within the wide range of natural variation in background levels in different locations. LLNL Environmental Report for 1997-7