ATTACHMENT B: TELE-CAUSE AMENDMENTS



Similar documents
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

AT&T: A Natural Monopoly Worth Preserving or Destroying?

Kelly Cameron +1(301) janvier 2015

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION OF COMPETITION IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS FIELD

1291B0. Time of Request: Wednesday, April 07, :05:00 EST Client ID/Project Name: Number of Lines: 1505 Job Number: 2861:

BEFORE THE SENATE COMMUNICATIONS AND HIGH TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

Regulation of Interconnection

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

Licensing Options for Internet Service Providers June 23, 2001 Updated September 25, 2002

Analysis and Recommendations Regarding the Regulation of FairPoint Communications, LLC Report Required By Act 53 of the Legislative Session

Decree Law No. (34) of 2006 on the promulgation of the Telecommunications Law

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Washington, D.C

UNDERSTANDING YOUR TELEPHONE BILL

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Sunset of Title 37, Chapter 15 of the Wyoming Statutes

Telecommunications Deregulation: Updating the Scorecard for 2013

H. R To promote and enhance public safety and to encourage the rapid deployment of IP-enabled voice services. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Payment Systems Regulation Call for Inputs. 5 March 2014

Retransmission Consent

CONSULTATION. National Numbering Plan Review. A short Consultation issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority 28 August 2007

Testimony Of. ROBERT ALAN GARRETT Arnold & Porter LLP Washington D.C. On Behalf of Major League Baseball. Before the

IPR Policy as Strategy ISBN: December The Battle to Define the Meaning of FRAND

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

&RPSHWLWLRQDQGGHUHJXODWLRQLQ )LQODQGDQGLQ(8

An Oligopoly Analysis of AT&T s Performance in the Wireline Long- Distance Markets After Divestiture


May 3, Statement of Anne K. Bingaman Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division Department of Justice

Everything You Need to Know about Lifeline Supported Cell Phones.

Joseph P. Benkert, P.C.

Real Competition? Proposed Deregulation of Local Telephone Service in Illinois

Position Statement on Cable Television Regulation in Maine. Submitted by New England Cable and Telecommunications Association ( NECTA ) June 2009

Washington Parish Communications District 805 Pearl Street Franklinton, Louisiana (985)

Deregulation And its Effects On PLDT s Financial Performance By Arthur S. Cayanan. Abstract

Designation of BT and Kingston as universal service providers, and the specific universal service conditions

How To Respect The Agreement On Trade In Cyberspace

SWEDISH COMPETITION AUTHORITY. Deregulation of the Swedish Electricity Market

S [Report No ] To promote and enhance public safety and to encourage the rapid deployment of IP-enabled voice services.

Let the Free Market Work and Reject Government Intervention In the Local Television Market

CHAPTER 13 TELECOMMUNICATIONS. commercial mobile services means public telecommunications services supplied through mobile wireless means;

NORTHERN TERRITORY ELECTRICITY RING-FENCING CODE

DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

CHAPTER 15 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS Short title; sunset.

March 13, Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced matter, please find Reply Comments of the Michigan Cable Telecommunications Association.

Best Practices for Telecommunications Reform May 2002

(202) FCC ADOPTS ORDER TO ENABLE LAW ENFORCEMENT TO ACCESS CERTAIN BROADBAND AND VoIP PROVIDERS

Utah. Medicare Cuts to Skilled Nursing Facility Care

GAO. Federal and State Universal Service Programs and Challenges to Funding TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP and the Scope of Antitrust Protection for Telecommunications

RULES OF TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY CHAPTER REGULATIONS FOR LOCAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROVIDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS, THE INTERNET AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

Telecom Audit Training Module. Understanding Telecom Taxes, Fees, and Surcharges

PUBLIC NOTICE. News media information Internet: (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202)

OVERVIEW OF CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY

Transcription:

ATTACHMENT B: TELE-CAUSE AMENDMENTS Effective Comoeti.tion. S.. 898 : currently requires the- FCC to. find that effective competition exists before services or facilities- may be transferred from. AT&T's reg.ulated parent to its unregulated "fully separated affiliate" (FSA). This amendment would remedy a serious deficiency in the bill by not allowing similar services or facilities to be created by the unregulated FSA until the- finding of. effective competition is made. Without such a provision, the effective competition principle of S. 398 would be meaningless. Outside- Financing- Tae purpose of creating an FSA, is- to puc. AT&T's unregulated activities- on. an equitable footing- with those- of its. competitors by requiring that the FSA compete: on. its own merits. S. 898, however, currently would permit AT&T to use its financial power and resources ($50 billion in revenues and $6 billion., in profits each year), achieved thraugh. its" publicly regulated monopoly activities, to support the private ventures of the.- FSA through virtually unfettered provision of funds- to the FSA. The bill should be. amended to requ-ire financing to come from independent sources. This would limit incentives for preferential self-dealing- and. enhance the prospects for comnetition withou.t disturbing AT&T's- overall control af its FSA. Customer-Premises Equipment. S. 898 currently would permit the immediate trans.fer of all of AT&T's equipment now in service, such as basic telephones or business switchboards, to an unregulated FSA. To prevent the transfer of AT&T's monopoly power to its -unregulated FSA, this equipment, representing some 80% of the U.S. total, should be kept under regulation, in the interest of the subscribers for whom it was acquired, for its "remaining life" an accounting procedure already in use by the FCC for the regular amortization of telephone investment.

Manufacturing Separation. The line which - S. 898 draws between AT&T's- regulated and unregulated, activities extends to manufacturing by such Bell System, companies.as Western Electric- Although manufacturing for regulated services and products; is ostensibly distinct, from that for unregulated enterprises,, the bill allows six years for the boundary to be established, and permits the FSA to obtain all of the "components and sub assemblies" that go into, a final product from AT&T forever. The six-year period should be shortened, and components and sub: assemblies should be treated no. differently than, end* products. Tariff and Pricing P.roblems*. Tariffs are a public meass of. setting prices and other terms for providing regulated telecommunications services, and for ensuring non-discriminatory application, of these terms. S".. 898, however, would abridge certain basic rights of".the- public to participate in the tariff process now available under the present: Act. S» 898's tariff provisions should be amended to maintain existing rights and. improve meaningful public participation with respect to regulated telecommunications services. AT&T FSA Relationships. S. 898 recognizes that AT&T's huge revenues derived from monopoly services, as well, as its other resources, could be used to finance the FSA's competitive enterprises r even at a loss, until smallet competitors are- driven from, the marketplace. Nevertheless, the bill would permit AT&T's regulated carriers and unregulated. FSA to jointly use property and technical information, engage in joint ventures, and to cooperate in other ways which invite "crosssubsidy" destructive of competition. The TELE- CAUSE amendments are designed to reduce the risks of cross-subsidy, tying, and other forms of unfair competition, and to enhance competition.

Universal Interconnection. Under S. 898, some telecommunications services will remain regulated, but others will not- The bill requires carriers to allow users to connect their own equipment and other services to carrier-provided regulated telecommunications services, but.it does not afford similar user flexibility to^unregulated services. TELE-CAUSE believes that universal interconnection among all services and facilities will maximize efficiency- and diversity of use, as well as facilitate competition.. *s Exchange Access and Surcharges. S. 898 establishes the framework for charges; and other:- terms for delivery of long distance telecommunications services to the, customer using monopoly local, tele phone? companies. The bill seeks to protect local users:,, especially in high-cost areas, from disruptive, increases in. rates. TELE-CAUSE believes that the exchange access and surcharge provisions should be clarified- to ensure that long-distance services and users are not subjected to discriminatory or unjustified charges. Redefinition of Basic Telecommunications Services and Information Services. The FGC recently defined these services in a proceeding popularly called "Computer IT," although it used the terms differently, to draw a line between what were to be considered'"basic" or pipeline transmission services, subject to regulation, and what were "enhanced" telecommunications or information services, not subject to regulation. TELE-CAUSE believes the FCC's definitions most closely approximate the realities of the marketplace, and should be more closely mirrored by the bill. These FCC

- 4 - standards, appropriately recognize the- role of telecommunications in the entire- national economy, and are- designed to promote- competition in appropriate industry sectors* AT&T Procurement. The Bell System, is not only a, huge, supplier of services and products, but also 3L large purchaser* of telecommunications, equipment through, its Long- Lines and local telephone- operating companies. This TELE-CAUSE amendment will assure that AT&T's broad purchasing power is exercised fairly and openly. The proposed amendment requires AT&T" companies- to satisfy a specified portion of their equipment needs- from independent suppliers. S-. 898 has no comparable provision* Transition Period. S. 898 generally contemplates a two-year period in which currently regulated pro.ducts and services- may be readied for deregulation^ Recognizing that two years may well be consumed by the process of determining" which services are to be deregulated, TELE-CAUSE suggests that: the period should be extended to a more realistic faur year period, to prevent sudden disruptions of service, and to ensure users che continued availability of vitally needed services on fair and reasonable terms. Exemption from Regulation. Nothing: in S. 898 ~~ would prevent the FCC from exempting AT&T from any or all of the complex, and painstakingly constructed statutory provisions governing the relationship between AT&T's regulated and unregulated activities. TELE-CAUSE believes that the Congressional classification of AT&T as "dominant," as well as the accompanying- competitive safeguards, must remain in the hands of Congress, and that the FCC should not be given carte blanche to exempt the dominant carrier from the Act.

Patent- Policies.' S. 898. specifies that certain patent-licensing requirements of the 1956 Consent Decree, which currently apply to AT&T, shall not apply to any Bell FSA. TELE-CAUSE believes that this is appropriate, as long as: (1) AT&T patents, developed under regulation with monopoly revenues, are not allowed to be transferred to the FSA, and (2) patents, held by the FSA are truly the. subsidiary's own creation, not the parent's. The- parent, however,. could license its. patents to the- FSA,. as it would to any third, party, A. related amendment would help equalize the currently unequal bargaining advantage of- AT&T in. relation: to its- patent licensees- if the bill were: to allow, as the. Consent Decree presently does not, a five year limit on patent license grants, at the option of the patent-holder.