The Texas Municipal Retirement System



Similar documents
Texas Municipal Retirement System TMRSFACTS. A brief overview of your retirement plan

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Notes to Basic Financial Statements December 31, 2014

Illinois Downstate Police and Fire Pension Plans. Jason Franken, FSA, EA, MAAA

Public Pension Issues and Trends

THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Policy Brief June 2010

Pension Sustainability Consensus Proposal Presentation to Task Force

FY10 Illinois Pension Reform Proposals SURS Implications Fact Sheet 5/22/09

Understanding Montana's Public Employee Retirement Plans

Connecticut State Employee Collective Bargaining and Retirement Benefits

FUNDING NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

HOW TO EFFECTIVELY REDESIGN BENEFIT PLANS TO BALANCE YOUR BUDGET CONSTRAINTS AND YOUR EMPLOYEES NEEDS. Robert D. Klausner Klausner & Kaufman, P.A.

Analysis of PERS Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts February 14, 2013

Selection of Partial Lump Sum Distribution

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) Pension Options for Local Governments

The Truth about the State Employees Retirement System of Illinois

San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund Fire & Police Pre Funded Health Care Trust Fund

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Pension Plan Benefits on Retirement

Governmental Accounting Standards Series

GAO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT RETIREE BENEFITS. Current Funded Status of Pension and Health Benefits. Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S.

Other Postemployment Benefits: A Plain-Language Summary of GASB Statements No. 43 and No. 45

TESTIMONY BY KANOE MARGOL INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE OF HAWAII

After reviewing this publication, if you have questions or concerns, contact the TMRS Support Services Department:

The Cost of Doing Nothing: Maine s Pension Payments are Crowding-Out Other Spending. By J. Scott Moody

RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES

An Overview of TRS and ORP

Retirement sustainability for defined contribution plan participants

An Overview of TRS and ORP For Employees Eligible to Elect ORP

GAO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT PENSION PLANS. Economic Downturn Spurs Efforts to Address Costs and Sustainability. Report to Congressional Requesters

Introduction. Valuation Policy. Employee Contributions. Employer Contributions. Actuarial Cost Method

Actuarial Speak 101 Terms and Definitions

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Group Life Insurance Program

Retirement Plan Participants and/or Beneficiaries. Harvard Human Resources, Benefits. Annual Funding Notice Harvard University Retirement Plan

v02979gl.doc PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2002

Understanding the Basics of Actuarial Methods

Glossary for Use with the Comprehensive Benefit Funding Plan

Fundamentals of Current Pension Funding and Accounting For Private Sector Pension Plans

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015

CITY OF AVENTURA POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLAN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, AND 2013

Kansas City 4Life Insurance Company

WEST PALM BEACH RESTATED EMPLOYEES' DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT SYSTEM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 AND 2013

Generic Local School District, Ohio Notes to the Basic Financial Statements For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

CASH BALANCE PLAN PRIMER

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF DEFINED BENEFIT AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLANS

South Dakota Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014

PENSION PLAN OPTIONS. July 1, 2014 CITY OF MEMPHIS. Copyright 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program

Actuarial Speak 101 Terms and Definitions

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (MPSERS) REFORM SB 1040 PA 300 OF Bethany Wicksall, Senior Fiscal Analyst September 7, 2012

Regional Transportation Authority Pension Plan (A Pension Trust Fund of the Regional Transportation Authority)

RUTLAND TOWNSHIP NONUNIFORMED PENSION PLAN TIOGA COUNTY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT FOR THE PERIOD

Controls and accounting policies

Cash Balance Plan Overview

What Small Employers (and their Boards) Need to Know About IMRF

Report of the Actuary on the Annual Valuation of the Retirement System for Employees of the City of Cincinnati. Pension Report

ND TFFR Funding Challenges: What does the Future Hold?

Pension Sustainability

SIMPLIFIED EMPLOYEE PENSION (SEP) PLAN

CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS POLICE PENSION FUND ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. For the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Transcription:

The Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) Understanding Benefits, Funding, and Economic Impact TMRS provides valuable benefits that help cities attract and retain quality employees. It is important to understand how the TMRS program provides benefits through a combination of employee deposits, city contributions, and investment income. September 2011

Copyright 2011, Texas Municipal Retirement System This brochure is an informal presentation of information about TMRS and related issues. If any specific questions of fact or law should arise, the statutes will govern. TMRS and the TMRS logo are registered trademarks of the Texas Municipal Retirement System.

TMRS Plan Design TMRS Hybrid Plan Design Unlike most public retirement systems, TMRS is a hybrid retirement plan. Instead of a defined benefit based on a percentage of salary, the basic TMRS retirement benefit is cash balance in nature, meaning it is based on the contributions made by an employee, the matching amount agreed to by the city, and interest income credited to the employee s account over the employee s career. Flexibility Each TMRS city designs its own plan from a menu of available options. Each city chooses its employee deposit rate and city match, as well as other provisions like COLAs and Updated Service Credit. Sources of Funding TMRS benefits are funded by employee contributions, city contributions, and investment earnings generated from TMRS portfolio. Employees covered by TMRS contribute a percentage of their pay (5%, 6%, or 7%). Employee deposits are combined with city contributions and invested by the System. Investment earnings are the largest source of funding for the employee s retirement benefit. Interest to Member Accounts Guaranteed By law, TMRS member accounts are credited with 5% interest each year (and retiree accounts are similarly credited when the retirement annuity is calculated). The primary source for this 5% credit is investment income. City accounts receive interest based on the System s annual investment return. The actuarial assumed rate of return is 7%. Low Administrative Costs TMRS assesses no administrative fee to employees or cities. TMRS administration is funded from a small portion of the System s annual investment earnings. For 2010, the total annual administrative budget for TMRS, including investment costs, was approximately 0.13% of the retirement fund s assets. By comparison, according to a Deloitte study, the median all in participant and employer fee for 401(k) plans in 2009 was 0.72% of the amount under management. 1

Municipal Employee Salaries and Benefits Public Employee Compensation When examining the pension benefits of Texas municipal employees, it is important to remember that retirement is only part of the total compensation package. Compared with other Texas workers, local government employees, on average, earn less during their working years. A 2010 study for the Center for State and Local Government Excellence and the National Institute on Retirement Security found that Texas local public sector workers earned 17.6% less than the state s private employees with comparable experience and education, for the period 2000 2008. Benefit Payment Amounts A city employee under TMRS only receives the city match at retirement usually after 20 or 25 years of service. In 2010, the average benefit payment to a new TMRS retiree with 20 to 25 years of service was approximately $1,414 a month. COLAs In those TMRS cities that choose to provide a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) to retirees, COLAs are tied directly to annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The highest COLA a retiree can receive is limited to 70% of the change in the CPI. 2

TMRS Funding Benefits are Funded over Time TMRS benefits generally are funded over a 30-year period for most cities. The ratio of a pension plan s assets to its total liability is called a funded ratio. Individual cities participating in TMRS have their own funded ratio. The funded ratio for the System as whole as of 12/31/10 was 82.9%. Amortizing Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Is Similar to a Mortgage A plan has an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) when its accumulated liabilities exceed accumulated assets. A retirement plan should not be considered financially or actuarially unsound by the mere existence of a UAAL or the level of its funded ratio at any one point in time. Financial condition should be measured by the direction in the trends of these indicators from year to year and over several years. For example, a plan with a 90% funded ratio that has steadily declined over the last five years is of more concern than a plan with a 70% funded ratio that has steadily increased each year. The Actuarial Cost Method Ensures Future Funding In 2008, TMRS changed its actuarial cost method (the funding arrangement that determines the annual cost of benefits) from the Unit Credit Method to the Projected Unit Credit Method to ensure that all benefits, including COLAs, are prudently advance funded. Account Restructuring Improved TMRS Funding In the 2011 legislative session, SB 350 by Williams (House sponsor Truitt), enacted fund restructuring for TMRS. A more efficient internal accounting structure resulted in the System s funded ratio rising from 75.8% to 82.9%. Unfunded actuarial accrued liability was reduced from $5.2 billion to $3.5 billion. Restructuring produced similar reductions and lowered required contributions for many cities and will result in less volatility in city contribution rates for future years. TMRS Cities are Making Funding Progress Even before restructuring, TMRS cities that paid their full contribution rate showed steady annual improvement in their funded ratios. Funded ratios may decline if a city grants new benefits or experiences actuarial experience losses, such as lower than expected turnover rates, payroll shrinkage, or salary increases higher than the actuary s assumed rates. 3

Economic Impact of TMRS National Economic Impact TMRS invests billions of dollars in the stocks and bonds of private sector companies and government agencies, providing valuable capital to the economy. Annuities and Local Economies TMRS paid $743.5 million in benefits in 2010. TMRS benefits paid to retirees flow back into local municipal economies. Most TMRS retirees live in Texas and spend their retirement dollars in the same communities where they served as active employees. An economic study performed by the Perryman Group in 2006 (when TMRS paid $554.8 million to retirees) showed that TMRS benefits resulted in $1.32 billion flowing into the economy from annual spending by retirees and through the multiplier effect as dollars pass through the economy. These effects are more pronounced in small communities and rural areas. 4

For More Information Phone Center 800.924.8677 Toll free 512.476.7577 Local 512.476.5576 Fax E-mail phonecenter@tmrs.com Website www.tmrs.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 149153 Austin, Texas 78714-9153 Headquarters Building 1200 North Interstate 35 Austin, Texas 78701 5