2014 Nuts & Bolts Seminar Des Moines



Similar documents
Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

AMENDED ORDER GOVERNING COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION COURT PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA

CURRICULUM VITAE. Edward H. Pappas

Business Court 2012 Annual Report

How To Get A Job At A Law Firm In California

(Name of Court) Plaintiff Case #:

CL Form Civil Cover Sheet

LOCAL RULES OF THE HARRIS COUNTY CIVIL COURTS AT LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

Fla. R. Civ. P Civil Cover Sheet

PPA v. Lease. What is a PPA?

Present Situation of IP Disputes in Japan

Iowa Unauthorized Practice of Law:

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

ATTORNEY SPECIALIST MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION JOB SPECIFICATION

rdd Doc 1181 Filed 08/10/15 Entered 08/10/15 11:09:58 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

Kimberlie K. Ryan, Esq. Ryan Law Firm, LLC 283 Columbine St. #157 Denver, CO (303)

Advice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

CHAPTER 2. COLORADO COURT SYSTEM Updated by Honorable Julie E. Anderson

Telephone: Fax: EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS

Large Law Firm structure

In January 2009, Judge Smith became board certified as a Family Law Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy.

FORECLOSURE DIVERSION PROGRAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction 3 Overview 4 Key Results 5 Performance Plan Results 7 Resource Reallocations 8 Agency Contacts 9

Lawrence D. Finder. Practice description. Practice focus

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

Plymouth Office: Downtown Minneapolis Office:

F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Erica B. Garay Member of the Firm

CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CIVIL DIFFERENTIATED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Medical Malpractice Reform

AN ACT related to medical malpractice mediation. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky:

Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer

THE COMMERCE COURT S FIRST DECADE. Photo by Paul Bencivengo. By Lee Applebaum

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

E-Discovery and Data Management. Managing Litigation in the Digital Age. Attorney Advertising

Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York (212) (212) FAX

Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program

Grievances Against Lawyers & Judges

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

FAIR, TIMELY, ECONOMICAL JUSTICE ACHIEVING JUSTICE THROUGH EFFECTIVE CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney

Collaborative Law Participation Agreement

Special Report Digital Bonus Distribution Closing Dates

Model Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees in the State of Nevada

NOTICE TO THE ASBESTOS BAR

Index to Rules. Local Probate Rule 1...Hours of Court. Local Probate Rule 2...Examination of Files, Records and Other Documents

THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) AND DISCOVERY TWO DIFFERENT AVENUES FOR ACCESSING AGENCY RECORDS AND THE BENEFITS OF LEVERAGING E-

RESUME OF HENRY J. SILBERBERG

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOMINATING COMMISSION DISTRICT JUDGE - DOUGLAS COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

Commencement of a Deficiency Proceeding and Pretrial Practice

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

1962 B.S., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey L.L.B., Rutgers University School of Law, Newark, New Jersey

LITIGATING CLAIMS UNDER THE CONTRACT DISPUTES ACT

Bankruptcy 101 A Guide to Personal Bankruptcy. Brought to you by Jon Martin, Esq.

In March, 2012, Judge Robinson was appointed to fill the Third Circuit Court vacancy.

Should the commission desire to adopt the proposed settlement agreement, the following resolution is presented for your consideration:

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY TRIAL DIVISION. General Court Regulation No.

TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET ADDRESS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : :

Section Council Scope Notes Revised September 2006

5/12/2015 AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS PURPOSE OF AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS

Founder, Senior Patent Attorney/Founder, AV-Rated Law Offices of Brett J. Trout P.C., Des Moines, Iowa, 2001 to present.

litigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISON

CASE MANAGEMENT REFORM: THE PHILIPPINE EXPERIENCE

Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;

JUSTICE LINDA S. JAMIESON COMMERCIAL DIVISION RULES

RULES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, STATE OF ILLINOIS (BOND AND MADISON COUNTIES)

Full name: Residence address: Phone No.: Street/P.O. Box City State Zip. Office address: Phone No.: Street/P.O. Box City State Zip

EIGHTEEN ATTORNEYS FROM RICHMAN GREER, P.A. NAMED 2013 FLORIDA SUPER LAWYERS

ASSOCIATES, LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W

Finance Education: Jury Services Other:

2012 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Adrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

IRS Administrative Appeals Process Procedures

How To Counsel A Law Firm

Case 6:10-cv DNH-ATB Document 76-1 Filed 08/22/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case4:13-cv KAW Document64 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 5

Transcription:

2014 Nuts & Bolts Seminar Des Moines Business Court 101 9:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Presented by Haley R. Van Loon BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA 50309-2510 Phone: 515-242-2400 Fax: 515-283-0231 E-mail: vanloon@brownwinick.com TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2014

Iowa Business Specialty Court Pilot Program Haley R. Van Loon BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA 50309-2510 Telephone: 515-242-2400 Facsimile: 515-283-0231 E-mail: vanloon@brownwinick.com

Establishment On December 21, 2012, the Honorable Mark S. Cady, Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, issued a Supervisory Order and accompanying Memorandum of Operation establishing the Iowa Business Specialty Court pilot program (the Program ). In doing so, Iowa became the 24 th state to implement a business specialty court program.

Purpose The primary aims of the Iowa Business Specialty Court will be to move business or complex commercial litigation cases through the court system more expeditiously, with lower costs for litigations and the court system. Businesses and attorneys will benefit from the business court s published body of case law and providing guidance and promoting risk assessment for fair and costeffective resolution of such cases.

Purpose (cont.) Judges will benefit from the development of specialized judicial expertise to be shared with their judicial colleagues. All Iowans should benefit from the creation of a more attractive and cost-effective environment for the resolution of complex business disputes. Non-business case dockets will benefit from the removal of timeconsuming, complex business cases from the general docket. The court system as a whole should benefit from the business court s role as an incubator of innovative court practices that may be applied generally across the justice system.

Details The Program will operate for a three-year period from May 1, 2013 to May 1, 2016. The Program will consist of a statewide docket of cases that qualify for, and are voluntarily transferred to, the Program. Cases in the Program will be tried in the county in which they were filed. Qualifying cases will only be transferred to the Program where all parties involved consent. The Program will accept pre-existing and new cases.

Business Court Judges The Iowa Supreme Court, with assistance from the Iowa State Court Administrator, selected three Iowa District Court judges to handle cases assigned to the business court during the three-year pilot project. The judges are: Michael D. Huppert, Des Moines, District Court Judge for the Fifth Judicial District of Iowa. Annette J. Scieszinski, Albia, District Court Judge for the Eighth Judicial District of Iowa. John D. Telleen, LeClaire, District Court Judge for the Seventh Judicial District of Iowa.

Qualifications To qualify for the Program, a case must have an amount in controversy of at least $200,000.00 and meet one or more of the following criteria: (1) arise from technology licensing agreements, including software and biotechnology licensing agreements, or any agreement involving the licensing of any intellectual property right, including patent rights;

Qualifications (cont.) (2) relate to the internal affairs of businesses (i.e., corporations, limited liability companies, general partnerships, limited liability partnerships, sole proprietorships, professional associations, real estate investment trusts, and joint ventures), including the rights or obligations between or among business participants, or the liability or indemnity of business participants, officers, directors, managers, trustees, or partners, among themselves or to the business;

Qualifications (cont.) (3) involve claims of breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation, or statutory violations between businesses arising out of business transactions or relationships; (4) be a shareholder derivative or commercial class action; (5) arise from commercial bank transactions;

Qualifications (cont.) (6) relate to trade secrets, non-compete, nonsolicitation, or confidentiality agreements; (7) involve commercial real property disputes other than residential landlord-tenant disputes and foreclosures; (8) be a trade secrets, antitrust or securities-related action; or (9) involve business tort claims between or among two or more business entities or individuals as to their business or investment activities relating to contracts, transactions, or relationships between or among them.

Application of Iowa Court Rules Existing Iowa Rules of Civil Procedure, rules of evidence, and other applicable Iowa Court Rules shall be applicable in Iowa Business Specialty Court proceedings. The parties, with the approval of the presiding business court judge, may, however, agree to such streamlined rules of pretrial procedure and discovery as will promote the fair, prompt, and efficient resolution of cases.

Evaluation of Pilot Program The State Court Administrator shall conduct, or cause to be conducted, a periodic review of the Iowa Business Specialty Court pilot program assessing whether the program is achieving its purpose and meeting its goals.

Eligibility Criteria in Current Business Court Cases Ten cases have been assigned to the business court pilot program since May 2013. The cases have met a variety of criteria for eligibility in the pilot program.

Eligibility Criteria in Current Business Court Cases (cont.) Must meet one or both threshold criteria: a. Damages over $200,000, or 8 b. Injunctive or declaratory relief sought 5 AND must meet one or more of these criteria: a. Technology licensing agreement 1 b. Internal affairs of a business 6 c. Business transactions e.g., breach of contract 7 d. Shareholder derivative or commercial class 1 action e. Commercial bank transactions 1 f. Trade secrets, non-compete, confidentiality 2 g. Commercial real property 0 h. Anti-trust or securities 0 i. Business tort claims 7 Number of cases

Current Status of Business Court Cases As of August 7, 2014, seven of the ten cases have settled. The court is waiting for final settlement and dismissal documents in two of those cases. Three business court cases remain active and are scheduled for trial during 2014 (one case) or the first two months of 2015 (two cases).

Judges Time on Business Court Cases Two important aspects of the pilot program evaluation are to determine the amount of judge time generally required to manage these types of complex business litigation and whether the program imposes an undue burden on any judicial districts where a business court judge resides.

Judicial Work Time on Business Court Cases Three judges spent 471 hours working on the 10 cases, which is approximately 24% of a full-time equivalent (FTE) judge. Judge Scieszinski spent 232 hours. Judge Huppert spent 136 hours. Judge Telleen spent 105 hours.

Business Court Judges Time Spent on Training, Administration, and Promotion of the Business Court Pilot Project The business court judges attended three meetings for planning and evaluating the pilot program. They also addressed meetings of state and local bar groups, educating attorneys about the business court. Judges Huppert and Telleen attended a business courts training program at the National Judicial College (NJC), and Judge Scienszinski attended an E-Discovery Summit at the NJC.

Business Court Judges Time Spent on Training, Administration, and Promotion of the Business Court Pilot Project (cont.) Finally, the judges attended at least one training session on the use of Court Call, a video conference system and service that is used in many courts throughout the U.S. The Court Call system will be installed and available for use by the three business court judges for their business court cases and their regular district court cases, as appropriate.

Need for a Video Conference System for Business Court Cases State court administration has agreed to pilot test services provided by Court Call, Inc., for the business specialty court. Court call will provide all of the equipment necessary for its coordination and initiation of conference calls in pending business court cases. There is no cost to the judicial branch, but the participating parties will pay a fee for each conference call.

Questions?

Website: www.brownwinick.com Toll Free Phone Number: 1-888-282-3515 OFFICE LOCATIONS: 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2510 Telephone: (515) 242-2400 Facsimile: (515) 283-0231 616 Franklin Place Pella, Iowa 50219 Telephone: (641) 628-4513 Facsimile: (641) 628-8494 DISCLAIMER: No oral or written statement made by BrownWinick attorneys should be interpreted by the recipient as suggesting a need to obtain legal counsel from BrownWinick or any other firm, nor as suggesting a need to take legal action. Do not attempt to solve individual problems upon the basis of general information provided by any BrownWinick attorney, as slight changes in fact situations may cause a material change in legal result.

Iowa Business Specialty Court Pilot Program Haley R. Van Loon BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA 50309-2510 Telephone: 515-242-2400 Facsimile: 515-283-0231 E-mail: vanloon@brownwinick.com Establishment On December 21, 2012, the Honorable Mark S. Cady, Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, issued a Supervisory Order and accompanying Memorandum of Operation establishing the Iowa Business Specialty Court pilot program (the Program ). In doing so, Iowa became the 24 th state to implement a business specialty court program. Purpose The primary aims of the Iowa Business Specialty Court will be to move business or complex commercial litigation cases through the court system more expeditiously, with lower costs for litigations and the court system. Businesses and attorneys will benefit from the business court s published body of case law and providing guidance and promoting risk assessment for fair and costeffective resolution of such cases. 1

Purpose (cont.) Judges will benefit from the development of specialized judicial expertise to be shared with their judicial colleagues. All Iowans should benefit from the creation of a more attractive and cost-effective environment for the resolution of complex business disputes. Non-business case dockets will benefit from the removal of timeconsuming, complex business cases from the general docket. The court system as a whole should benefit from the business court s role as an incubator of innovative court practices that may be applied generally across the justice system. Details The Program will operate for a three-year period from May 1, 2013 to May 1, 2016. The Program will consist of a statewide docket of cases that qualify for, and are voluntarily transferred to, the Program. Cases in the Program will be tried in the county in which they were filed. Qualifying cases will only be transferred to the Program where all parties involved consent. The Program will accept pre-existing and new cases. Business Court Judges The Iowa Supreme Court, with assistance from the Iowa State Court Administrator, selected three Iowa District Court judges to handle cases assigned to the business court during the three-year pilot project. The judges are: Michael D. Huppert, Des Moines, District Court Judge for the Fifth Judicial District of Iowa. Annette J. Scieszinski, Albia, District Court Judge for the Eighth Judicial District of Iowa. John D. Telleen, LeClaire, District Court Judge for the Seventh Judicial District of Iowa. 2

Qualifications To qualify for the Program, a case must have an amount in controversy of at least $200,000.00 and meet one or more of the following criteria: (1) arise from technology licensing agreements, including software and biotechnology licensing agreements, or any agreement involving the licensing of any intellectual property right, including patent rights; Qualifications (cont.) (2) relate to the internal affairs of businesses (i.e., corporations, limited liability companies, general partnerships, limited liability partnerships, sole proprietorships, professional associations, real estate investment trusts, and joint ventures), including the rights or obligations between or among business participants, or the liability or indemnity of business participants, officers, directors, managers, trustees, or partners, among themselves or to the business; Qualifications (cont.) (3) involve claims of breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation, or statutory violations between businesses arising out of business transactions or relationships; (4) be a shareholder derivative or commercial class action; (5) arise from commercial bank transactions; 3

Qualifications (cont.) (6) relate to trade secrets, non-compete, nonsolicitation, or confidentiality agreements; (7) involve commercial real property disputes other than residential landlord-tenant disputes and foreclosures; (8) be a trade secrets, antitrust or securities-related action; or (9) involve business tort claims between or among two or more business entities or individuals as to their business or investment activities relating to contracts, transactions, or relationships between or among them. Application of Iowa Court Rules Existing Iowa Rules of Civil Procedure, rules of evidence, and other applicable Iowa Court Rules shall be applicable in Iowa Business Specialty Court proceedings. The parties, with the approval of the presiding business court judge, may, however, agree to such streamlined rules of pretrial procedure and discovery as will promote the fair, prompt, and efficient resolution of cases. Evaluation of Pilot Program The State Court Administrator shall conduct, or cause to be conducted, a periodic review of the Iowa Business Specialty Court pilot program assessing whether the program is achieving its purpose and meeting its goals. 4

Eligibility Criteria in Current Business Court Cases Ten cases have been assigned to the business court pilot program since May 2013. The cases have met a variety of criteria for eligibility in the pilot program. Eligibility Criteria in Current Business Court Cases (cont.) Must meet one or both threshold criteria: Number of cases a. Damages over $200,000, or 8 b. Injunctive or declaratory relief sought 5 AND must meet one or more of these criteria: a. Technology licensing agreement 1 b. Internal affairs of a business 6 c. Business transactions e.g., breach of contract 7 d. Shareholder derivative or commercial class 1 action e. Commercial bank transactions 1 f. Trade secrets, non-compete, confidentiality 2 g. Commercial real property 0 h. Anti-trust or securities 0 i. Business tort claims 7 Current Status of Business Court Cases As of August 7, 2014, seven of the ten cases have settled. The court is waiting for final settlement and dismissal documents in two of those cases. Three business court cases remain active and are scheduled for trial during 2014 (one case) or the first two months of 2015 (two cases). 5

Judges Time on Business Court Cases Two important aspects of the pilot program evaluation are to determine the amount of judge time generally required to manage these types of complex business litigation and whether the program imposes an undue burden on any judicial districts where a business court judge resides. Judicial Work Time on Business Court Cases Three judges spent 471 hours working on the 10 cases, which is approximately 24% of a full-time equivalent (FTE) judge. Judge Scieszinski spent 232 hours. Judge Huppert spent 136 hours. Judge Telleen spent 105 hours. Business Court Judges Time Spent on Training, Administration, and Promotion of the Business Court Pilot Project The business court judges attended three meetings for planning and evaluating the pilot program. They also addressed meetings of state and local bar groups, educating attorneys about the business court. Judges Huppert and Telleen attended a business courts training program at the National Judicial College (NJC), and Judge Scienszinski attended an E-Discovery Summit at the NJC. 6

Business Court Judges Time Spent on Training, Administration, and Promotion of the Business Court Pilot Project (cont.) Finally, the judges attended at least one training session on the use of Court Call, a video conference system and service that is used in many courts throughout the U.S. The Court Call system will be installed and available for use by the three business court judges for their business court cases and their regular district court cases, as appropriate. Need for a Video Conference System for Business Court Cases State court administration has agreed to pilot test services provided by Court Call, Inc., for the business specialty court. Court call will provide all of the equipment necessary for its coordination and initiation of conference calls in pending business court cases. There is no cost to the judicial branch, but the participating parties will pay a fee for each conference call. Questions? 7

Website: www.brownwinick.com Toll Free Phone Number: 1-888-282-3515 OFFICE LOCATIONS: 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2510 Telephone: (515) 242-2400 Facsimile: (515) 283-0231 616 Franklin Place Pella, Iowa 50219 Telephone: (641) 628-4513 Facsimile: (641) 628-8494 DISCLAIMER: No oral or written statement made by BrownWinick attorneys should be interpreted by the recipient as suggesting a need to obtain legal counsel from BrownWinick or any other firm, nor as suggesting a need to take legal action. Do not attempt to solve individual problems upon the basis of general information provided by any BrownWinick attorney, as slight changes in fact situations may cause a material change in legal result. 8