Progress Report December 8, 2011



Similar documents
Best Lawns News. Late Spring 2014 Edition Virginia Cooperative Extension Prince William Unit. Featured in This Issue

Lawn Insects. Identification, Biology & Principles of Control. Annual White Grub Species. Major Cool-Season Lawn Turfgrass Insect Pests

Fertilizer, Weed Control, Grubs, and General Application Questions

LAWN GUARDIAN GRUB CONTROL

OSU Extension Service Master Gardener Program. Organic Pest Control. Weston Miller OSU Extension Service Community and Urban Horticulture faculty

It can be easy..without using pesticides you can increase the health of your landscape allowing it to naturally fight insects and diseases.

suscon Green One application. 3 years control against grass grub. Grass grub damaged pasture

Biological solutions for chafer grub and leatherjacket control in turf.

Stanley Park Bowling Green

SAMPLE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL PEST CONTROL SERVICES

Integrated Pest Management

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY

EVER RE-TREAT EVER SURRENDER

Undergraduate Degree Turfgrass Management

Date CEU's Contents Course # Distribution

Management JBiopest 5(1): of 1-6 rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker using some biorational insecticides

Phone: x 304 Caro MI URL: aslagh@tisd.k12.mi.us

Crane Fly and Bill Bug Control in the Pacific Northwest

Fungal Entomopathogens: An Enigmatic Pest Control Alternative

Plant Biology (776) Expanded Course Description 11:776:408 TURFGRASS PEST SCIENCE

Pest Management Centre Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

What is Integrated Pest Management?

BENEFITS OF A HEALTHY LAWN

Integrated Pest Management

Integrated Pest Management Strategies 1

How To Care For A Lawn

Hard Decisions Ahead With Ash Trees

Garden Journal Natural Products for Your Organic Home, Lawn, Garden, Farm and Pets.

Alaska Forest Pest Control Supplemental Information. Category Twelve

White Grubs in Texas Turfgrass

White Grub Management in Turf 1

on Sports Fields New (and Newer) Options for Insect Control OTF Member Intro: Mark Jordan, Westfield Group C.C.

UTAH CERTIFIED NURSEY PROFESSIONAL UCNP TEST SYLLABUS

Summer Stress Arrives Early on Cool Season Lawns

Our Organi-Green All Natural Lawn Care System - Overview -

Insects That Kill Trees. Diane G. Alston Extension Entomologist Utah State University 2004 Professional Tree Care Workshops

WHITE GRUBS IN TEXAS TURFGRASS

An Introduction to Ecological Design and Plant Selection

Introduction to Integrated Pest Management. John C. Wise, Ph.D. Michigan State University MSU Trevor Nichols Research Complex

POLICY REGARDING PEST MANAGEMENT ON CITY PROPERTY

PS Spinosad provides long-term protection for stored wheat

Factors Contributing to Major Problems in St. Augustinegrass Lawns

Biology, importance and management. the redheaded pasture cockchafer

POLISH JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY (Pol. J. Ecol.) Andrzej BEDNAREK 1, El bieta POPOWSKA-NOWAK 2, El bieta PEZOWICZ 1, Marta KAMIONEK 1

Turf: Insects 6-5. Table Insecticides for White Grubs (larval stage)

#1: Threshold and Injury Calculations the Theory. #2: Putting Economic Injury Levels and Action Thresholds to Use. Related Topics

DIABLO VALLEY COLLEGE CATALOG

Pest Control Products Board Nairobi, Kenya PESTICIDE REGISTRATION IN KENYA - BIOPESTICIDES. by P. N. Ngaruiya (Dr)

Lawn Care in North Texas

JOB ANNOUNCEMENT. Nursery Manager DEGREE AND CURRICULUM:

Introduction to the concepts of IPM

Frequently asked Questions about Weeds

earth-wise guide to Is damage patchy or not patchy? Patchy (throughout lawn) Not Patchy Are problems occurring during wet or dry conditions?

PREVALENCE OF INSECT PESTS, PREDATORS, PARASITOIDS AND ITS SURVIVAL IN GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CORN IN PAKISTAN

ORGANIC. PEST MANAGEMENT POLICY for. Turf and Landscape

Formulation of bio-pesticides and mass culture of natural enemies for pest management. D. Ahangama

Using the Termiticide Transport 50 WP to Control Subterranean Termites around Structures in Southern Arizona

PEST MANAGEMENT (CSP Enhancements) January 2006 Enhancement Activity Task Sheet

Attachment I. Santa Barbara County Integrated Pest Management Strategy

Table 1. Non-favored and Favored plants. Table 2. Insecticides for control of adult Japanese beetles

Karen J. English Graphic and Web Designer. Please click the thumbnails on the following pages to view larger versions of the images.

Priority Turf Research Needs

Landscape Maintenance

WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY LAWN?

COMMERCIAL TURF GOLF COURSES

BENEFITS OF USING IPM

SAMPLE CONTRACT LANGUAGE FOR SOUTHWEST LANDSCAPES

Organic Landscape Management

NORTH COUNTY TRANSFER CENTER METRO Contract Numbers 01756/ % - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SECTION NEW PLANTING MAINTENANCE

Integrated Pest Management

Application of ecological models in entomology: a view from Brazil

WHITE GRUBS IN TEXAS TURFGRASS

Evaluation of efficacy of different insecticides and bioagents against Sesamia inferens Walker in maize.

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Learning Objectives. What is Integrated Pest Management (IPM)? After studying this section, you should be able to:

TURFGRASS INSECT CONTROL. W. E. Wallner Extension Specialist in Entomology Michigan State University

Integrated Pest Management At Boise State University

Integrated Pest Management Regulation - Summary of Requirements and Explanatory Notes. for. Landscape Pest Managers

Landscape Technician - Environmental

Efficacy of Dual Gene Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cotton for Control of Bollworm, Helicoverpa Zea (Boddie)

Advanced Intelligence Report Tree & Shrub Insect Control: Protecting Trees from Emerald Ash Borer

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Roberts & McPherson)

TransGrid Pesticide Use Notification Plan For Community Consultation

What is a pest? How Insects Become Pests. How do insects become pests? Problems with Pesticides. What is most commonly used to control insect pests?

Upscaling of locally proven IPM technologies for control of pest of economic importance i

Integrated Pest Management Policy Ashland Parks and Recreation Commission

Robson Forensic Engineers, Architects, Scientists & Fire Investigators

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

Tracking turkeys. Biosecurity and traceability technology advance a third-generation farm

J&L Garden Center. Lawn Care Guidelines

Preventative, IPM, and Organic Management Systems for Schools and Municipalities. Definitions are important. Definitions are important

Identifying & Managing Weeds in Gardens. Todd Mervosh Valley Laboratory - Windsor The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station

Plant Doctor as IPM Consultant. Dr. Christian F. Miller Glades Crop Care, Inc.

Entomology 101 Integrated Pest Management IPM. Terminology Related to Pests. Types of damage. Strategies of Pest Control or Management

Distance Education Entomology Degree Tracks, with Course Requirements

March Madness & Avid for Nematode Control

We are committed to providing the very best quality service for all of our clients first time, every time.

AGRICULTURE CREDIT CORPORATION CASH WHEN YOU NEED IT MOST

Tree Integrated Pest Management. Dan Nortman Virginia Cooperative Extension, York County

How can we make Biological Control more economical?

Transcription:

Efficacy Evaluation of All-Natural Corn Gluten Blends in Turf for the Control of White Grubs Michael Brownbridge Vineland Research and Innovation Centre Horticultural Production Systems Progress Report December 8, 2011 SUMMARY This project was established to provide critical information on the effectiveness of corn glutenbased formulations supplemented with neem seed cake for the control of white grub in turf. Lab tests completed in 2010 showed that the product inhibited feeding of chafer grubs; small scale field trials set up in Oct 2010 were concluded in spring 2011. Chafer grub numbers declined in plots treated with the corn gluten-neem seed cake blend, although observed effects were not statistically significant. Additional field trials were set up on a commercial sod farm in Sept 2011, incorporating a new formulation of the neem/corn gluten blend. Treatments were applied to infested turf to determine the utility of the product against an existing chafer grub infestation. Earlier application to turf in areas where there is a history of chafer infestation (June/July) may have additional benefits, and could be adopted at the home-lawn level, but this strategy was not incorporated into the current trials which focused on demonstrating efficacy. Use of the product on home lawns will be evaluated in 2012, with early applications being made at selected sites that were infested in 2011. BACKGROUND Ontario s Cosmetic Pesticide Ban left the general public and landscaping community with few proven tools to combat pests in turfgrass. The current 2-year study was developed in response to calls by lawncare and turf companies for research into the development of new products that are compliant with the pesticide ban. The primary objectives of the study, which started in April 2010, are to: Evaluate the efficacy of novel corn-gluten based products against European chafer grubs To assess possible beneficial interactions with other candidate products (biological controls) and determine their utility within an integrated management program for turf pests. Three species of white grubs commonly infest lawns and amenity turf in Ontario but the European chafer, Rhizotrogus majalis, is the most common. Larvae preferentially feed on organic matter and the fibrous roots of grasses, causing serious turf damage, particularly during spring and early fall. Insecticides have traditionally been used for their control but the Ban severely restricts the control products available to the lawn-care industry. Processed corn gluten meal is a 100% natural fertilizer. With an N-P-K rating of 10-0-0 it is actively used in turf production. The product is also a pre-emergent herbicide, suppressing Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, ON L0R 2E0 Page 1

germination of dandelion and large crabgrass seed when used within a turf maintenance program. Neem seed cake is used as a fertilizer but also has insecticidal and anti-feedant properties (Schmutterer 1990, Lale and Abdulrahman 1999, Cowles 2004, Shah et al. 2008). The trials proposed aim to combine neem with corn gluten, to develop a product with a range of beneficial attributes for turfgrass production and protection. Project outputs are targeted to Ontario s turfgrass and lawn care industries, with the goal of providing new turf protection products for application to lawns, turf, recreational areas and golf courses. There is also potential to apply promising technologies in commercial sod production. References Cowles RS 2004. Impact of azadirachtin on vine weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) reproduction. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 6: 291-294. Lale NES, Abdulrahman 1999. Evaluation of neem seed oil obtained by different methods and neem powder for management of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in stored cowpea. Journal of Stored Products Research 35: 135-143. Schmutterer H 1990. Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadiracta indica. Annual Review of Entomology 35: 271-297. Shah FA, Gaffney M, Ansari MA, Prasad M, Butt TM 2008. Neem seed cake enhances the efficacy of the insect pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae for the control of black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biological Control 44: 111-115. GOALS (2010-2011) i. Susceptibility of chafer larvae and chinch bugs to a neem-corn gluten blend formulation determined; ii. Effective neem concentration defined; iii. Prototype neem-corn gluten blend formulation available for field evaluation. Progress: Assay techniques were developed to quantify effects of the corn gluten-neem products and to evaluate compatibility with candidate biocontrol agents. Compatibility of these formulations with the fungal biopesticide Met52 (Metarhizium brunneum) was demonstrated. Laboratory and greenhouse trials using field-collected European chafer larvae confirmed the activity of the corn gluten-neem formulation. Larvae fed on the corn gluten granules but there were obvious anti-feedant effects with those formulations containing the neem seed cake (Table 1). Based on these results, field trials were carried out against using the 100% neem seed cake granules and the 70:30 corn gluten-neem blend. Chafer trials were set up in Oct 2010, testing the corn gluten-neem blend alongside other biopesticides, including nematodes (Heterorhabditis bacteriophoria Nemasys G) and fungi (Met52). Several treatments, including the corn gluten-neem blend, had a measurable (although not statistically significant) effect on chafer grub populations and performance on par with or better than the standard insecticide treatment, Merit (Figure 1). Results of these trials were presented to the turf industry at the Landscape Ontario IPM Symposium in Jan 2011 and at the Ontario Turfgrass Symposium in Feb 2011. An article (Beating the Ban) was also produced for the summer edition of Sports Turf Manager magazine. Key Outcome: Prototype neem-based formulation identified for future field validation trials Efficacy demonstrated against European chafer Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, ON L0R 2E0 Page 2

Table1. European chafer larvae feeding assay: Mean % weight-gain (±SE) of larvae presented with carrot cubes (Control), corn gluten or corn gluten-neem blend pellets. Results were analyzed by ANOVA. Larval mortality rates were not significantly different among treatments. % weight-gain Control 100% 30% 70% 100% F-value & Gluten Neem Neem Neem p-value n 39 37 41 41 35 F [4, 188] = 5.76 Mean 13.3±1.5 12.2±1.9 4.4±2.6 4.9±2.7 0.98±2.2 p = 0.0002 * Larval mortality total n 45 48 48 48 47 dead 6 11 7 7 12 % 13.3 22.9 14.6 14.6 25.5 * Significantly different at α = 0.05 GOALS (2011-2012) 1. Validate the efficacy of a refined neem-corn gluten formulation against white grubs under field conditions 2. Engage with the PMRA towards registration of the product for commercial use if promising effects confirmed. 3. Extend findings to the turf industry. Progress: Locating suitable and untreated (with insecticides) sites for these research trials remained a challenge, so that some of the treatment regimes proposed could not be made. The corn gluten-neem product was applied against late second instar European chafer, effectively assessing the efficacy of the product as a curative treatment for the pest. Field trials were established at an infested turf site in Newmarket. Initial grub densities were >100 grubs/1x0.3m turf strips. All treatments were applied in late September 2011, testing a refined formulation of the 30:70 corn gluten:neem blend alongside other biopesticides, including nematodes (Nemasys G and Steinernema glaseri) and a spray treatment of Met52. Preliminary data (populations 3 and 6 weeks after treatment) are presented below (Fig. 2); a final assessment of efficacy will be made in May 2012. Currently, Amaizeingly Green initiating registration procedures with the PMRA on the blended product and have engaged with a major lawn care company to commercialize the product for lawn turf use. Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, ON L0R 2E0 Page 3

Mean of scored R. majalis counts 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 ** 3 weeks post treatment 6 weeks post treatment after Winter (7 months post) Fig. 1. R. majalis larval population change over three post-treatment sampling periods (Oct 2010-May 2011). The scores were assigned by dividing the post-treatment counts by the pretreatment counts; scores of <1 indicate an effect on the chafer population. Means calculated from 6 replicate plots per treatment. ** A significant difference in R. majalis larval population among the three sampling dates (one-way ANOVA, F [3, 20] = 3.12, p = 0.049). Key Anticipated Outcomes: Effects of a refined neem-corn gluten formulation against white grubs validated under field conditions PMRA engaged towards registration of the product for commercial use Knowledge transferred to industry through workshops and other communication pathways (Landscape Ontario IPM Symposium, Ontario Turfgrass Symposium, Sports Turf Manager) Conclusions To date, the corn gluten:neem blend has not demonstrated a major curative effect on chafer grubs. However, as-applied it seems to have had a more chronic effect on the larvae and its use may increase their susceptibility to natural pathogens and environmental factors. Use of the product may promote the efficacy of applied biocontrol agents such as nematodes and fungi. These effects have been observed in experimental trials but remain to be confirmed in a home lawn or turf production setting. The product has other benefits, in terms of it functioning as a fertilizer and (owing to the corn gluten content) a pre-emergent herbicide. Refinements are Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, ON L0R 2E0 Page 4

obviously needed to optimize use rates and timing. However, as a granular product it is readily applied using existing equipment and appears to have a role to play in an integrated lawn management program. The findings highlight difficulties all turf and lawn care companies have in dealing with subterranean pests: that of predicting and detecting infested sites early enough to allow preventative treatments to be applied to best effect. With information gained from 2010/11 trials, in 2012 we propose to apply one selected treatment as a fertilizer/preventative treatment to home lawns and/or turf where high grub populations were observed in 2011, anticipating subsequent infestations in 2012. These will be applied in June to correspond with normal lawn fertilization activities and to coincide with chafer adult emergence and egg-laying; additional treatments will be applied in late August, targeting the developing young larvae. 1.4 1.2 1 Pre treatment 4 weeks post 8 weeks post 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Control Merit 0.5G Neem/Gluten granule 70:30 Fig. 2. R. majalis larval population change 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment (Oct Nov 2011). The scores were assigned by dividing the post-treatment counts by the pre-treatment counts; scores of <1 indicate an effect on the chafer population. Means calculated from 6 replicate plots per treatment. Contribution to Education and Training Undergraduate student training Paul Côté (Undergraduate student, University of Waterloo, ON) summer technician fulltime May 1 to August 31, 2011 Scott McGinley (Undergraduate student, University of Waterloo, ON) coop student fulltime Sept 5 to Dec 22, 2011 Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, ON L0R 2E0 Page 5