reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).



Similar documents
NAEYC SUMMARY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATOR/PROGRAM PROVISIONS IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY ACT OF 2008 PUBLIC LAW

Higher Education Opportunity Act Reauthorization

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

To: New Jersey School Psychologists From: Terri Allen, NJASP President; Barry Barbarasch, Chair, Government and Professional Relations (GPR) Committee

ESEA Reauthorization Update 113 th Congress

Policy Guide Supporting Student-centered Learning

Special Education & Student Services

The Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act: Proposed Action Steps For School Psychologists

School Social Work and Related Services as Delineated within Federal Law

SPECIALIZED INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORTS IN SCHOOLS

Allowable Costs for IDEA Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS)

Belmont Public Schools Special Education Programs

School Counseling Programs and Services

WikiLeaks Document Release

Model for Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services

Public Policy Update

Planning a NCLB Title VA Program ODE April 2007

Under the Start Your Search Now box, you may search by author, title and key words.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Summary of Significant Spending and Fiscal Rules in the Every Student Succeeds Act

RENEWING CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION IN COLORADO

White Paper. School Psychologists: Qualified Health Professionals Providing Child and Adolescent Mental and Behavioral Health Services

Model for Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services

III. FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE)

Allowable Use of Funds Titles IIA, IID, IV, and V. Title II, Part A: Teacher and Principal Training Fund

Charles A. Szuberla, Jr.

A Review of Teacher Induction in Special Education: Research, Practice, and Technology Solutions

IRA Legislative Update August 11, Overview

Appendix E. Role-Specific Indicators

TITLE II New Grant Programs

Serving Preschool Children Through Title I

MEETING NCLB S HIGHLY QUALIFIED GUIDELINES. An NEA-AFT Publication

Strategy Brainstorm. Recognize teachers' accomplishments (e.g., Golden Apple awards, TN teacher ambassador) Stop negative narration

Supplement, Not Supplant Handbook A Guide for Grants Administered by the Texas Education Agency

Position Description

A Comparative Analysis of Local Public, County-based, and Private Special Education Programs

Excerpts from Part 200 of the Regulations Regarding Consultant Teacher Services

How To Be A School Psychologist

CASE s ESEA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Response to Intervention (RTI): Funding Questions and Answers

THE ROLE OF THE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST IN GENERAL EDUCATION

How To Be A School Counselor

Dear Chairman Alexander, Ranking Member Murray, Chairman Kline, and Ranking Member Scott:

CURRENT HOT TOPICS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION

Special Education Program Descriptions

TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to autism spectrum disorders. (BDR 54-67)

Cambridge Public Schools Office of Student Services Comprehensive Staffing Analysis

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING PROGRAMS AND SCHOOLS GRADES K-12

Special Education / NY State Education Department Issues

The following table details the requirements applicable to practice a discipline in California for the positions listed.

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Teachers Special Education

AUTHORITY: 20 U.S.C. 1022d, unless otherwise noted. (a) This subpart establishes regulations related to the

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

EPPING SCHOOL DISTRICT JOB DESCRIPTION

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SCHOOL - BASED DAY TREATMENT PROGRAMS GUIDELINES

ASHA s Public Policy Agenda 2011 Development Process Based on ASHA member input to the Government Relations & Public Policy Board

CALIFORNIA SPECIAL EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (CASEMIS) SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS. San Diego Unified SELPA

Position Statement IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT. April 26, 2011

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1989 H 2. HOUSE BILL 320* Committee Substitute Favorable 4/5/89. February 22, 1989

Wisconsin Highly Qualified Teacher Plan 2009 Equity Plan Update Wisconsin s Equity Plan Update

Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Section 31a Program for At-Risk Pupils Allowable Uses of Funds

M D R w w w. s c h o o l d a t a. c o m

Human Resource Management

Testimony of Secretary Laura W. Fornash Commonwealth of Virginia before the U.S. House Committee on Education and Workforce February 5, 2013

To help improve the educational experience and general wellbeing of those students who are unable to profit from the existing school program.

MCCORMICK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT JOB DESCRIPTION

HOPKINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONTINUUM OF ALTERNATIVE SERVICES AND PLACEMENTS

DPS Transformation Our Mission

Formula Grants to States for Neglected or Delinquent Children (CFDA No )

State of Colorado K-12 Mandate

HR 2272 Conference Report STEM Education Provisions Summary

Statement for the Record. American Physical Therapy Association

Resources Promoting Wellness and Resiliency in Schools

Nebraska State Plan For Career Technical Education

Frequently Asked Questions Contact us:

State University of New York Charter Renewal Benchmarks Version 5.0, May 2012

To register for these online modules go to

Analysis of the Impact of the Earnings Limitation on the Recruitment and Retention of Nurses in Community Colleges. Prepared By:

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) Current Approved State Plan Language

Questions and Answers On Highly Qualified Teachers Serving Children With Disabilities

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

IAC Ch 27, p.1. conducting classroom sessions with middle and secondary school students. The practicum consisting

TEACH PLUS AGENDA FOR TEACHER PREPARATION REFORM

Charles A. Szuberla, Jr.

a GAO GAO SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Planning for Program Changes and Future Workforce Needs Is Incomplete

CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT. Pennsylvania Special Education Funding Commission of 2013 July 25, 2013 Dave Matyas, PRSBA Business Administrator

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Office of Innovation

Hudson Middle School Hudson City School District

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

This section incorporates requirements found in Section of the School Code. Preparation and Licensure Board

Early Childhood; Elementary/Middle Grades; Special K-12; and Teacher Leader Endorsements

SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC HEALTH EDUCATION 10 G Street, Suite 605 Washington, DC Phone 202/ Fax 202/ Website

February Prepared for. The Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative. By Allison Gruner

The Impact of State and Local Human Capital Policies on Illinois School District U-46. September 2009

THE ROLE OF THE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST IN GENERAL EDUCATION

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2015 Session

EPPING SCHOOL DISTRICT OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST JOB DESCRIPTION

Transcription:

Page 1 May 7, 2010 The Honorable Tom Harkin, Chairman The Honorable Mike Enzi, Ranking Member Health Education Labor Pensions Committee U.S Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Chairman Harkin and Ranking Member Enzi: On behalf of the undersigned organizations who are members of the National Coalition on Personnel Shortages in Special Education and Related Services (NCPSSERS), we are pleased to provide you with key recommendations for the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Our recommendations focus on how ESEA can better support recruitment and retention of special education and related services personnel. Over the last decade, research conducted by the American Association for Employment in Education has concluded that there is, and has been, a significant shortage of special education teachers and specialized instructional support personnel who directly contribute to the academic success of America s 7.1 million students with disabilities, in addition to providing services and supports to children without disabilities. Such shortages result in caseloads/workloads that are inconsistent with recommended practices and jeopardize the timely delivery of high quality services and supports, especially a concern in times of record state budget deficits. Addressing personnel shortages in special education and related services requires a multi pronged approach; collaboration within and among the federal, state, local education agencies; changes to Federal laws to promote, enhance, and encourage individuals to become special educators and specialized instructional support personnel and to retain professionals over the long term. Significant steps have been taken to address this issue within the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and most recently in the student loan forgiveness programs within the Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA). However, there is also an opportunity to reinforce and enhance these existing efforts in the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). With that in mind, the undersigned organizations are pleased to provide the attached recommendations for ESEA reauthorization. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) American Counseling Association (ACA) American Federation of Teachers (AFT) American Music Therapy Association (AMTA) American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) American Physical Therapy Association (APTA)

Page 2 American School Counselor Association (ASCA) American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Council of Administrators of Special Education (CASE) Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) Georgetown University Graduate School of Education (GWU) George Washington University Graduate School of Education (GWU) Higher Education Consortium for Special Education (HECSE) Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) Montgomery County Public Schools Board of Education (MCPS BD of ED) National Association of School Nurses (NASN) National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) National School Boards Association (NSBA) Prince Georges County Public Schools (PGCPS) Progressus Therapy, LLC School Social Work Association of America (SSWAA) About the The mission of the NCPSSERS is to sustain a discussion among all stakeholders on the need for and value of special education, related services, and early intervention; and to identify, disseminate, and support implementation of national, state, and local strategies to remedy personnel shortages and persistent vacancies for the benefit of all children and youth. Co Chair: Susan Karr, American Speech Language Hearing Association 2200 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 Phone: (800) 498 2071 Fax: (301) 879 7356 Email: skarr@asha.org www.specialedshortages.org

Page 3 Strengthening ESEA to Address Diverse Learners and Professionals Who Work on Their Behalf ISSUE: Over the last decade, research conducted by the American Association for Employment in Education has concluded that there is, and has been, a significant shortage of special education teachers and specialized instructional support personnel who directly contribute to the academic success of America s 7.1 million students with disabilities, in addition to providing services and supports to children without disabilities. Personnel shortages in special education and related services exist due to two primary conditions: 1) a shortage of professionals to fill available positions (supply and demand); and 2) a shortage of funding for positions to meet the growing demand for services. Additionally, high attrition rates often attributed to poor mentoring and induction programs, lack of support from school leadership and difficult working conditions contribute directly to shortages in special education. Such shortages result in caseloads/workloads that are inconsistent with recommended practices and jeopardize the timely delivery of high quality services and supports, especially a concern in times of record state budget deficits. SOLUTION: Addressing personnel shortages in special education and related services requires a multipronged approach; collaboration within and among the federal, state, local education agencies; changes to Federal laws to promote, enhance, and encourage individuals to become special educators and specialized instructional support personnel and to retain professionals over the long term. While there are many Federal laws which can and do address this issue including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) there is also an opportunity to reinforce and enhance existing efforts in the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act/No Child Left Behind (ESEA). As the reauthorization of ESEA moves forward, the National Coalition on Shortages in Special Education and Related Services, a Coalition consisting of over thirty national, state, and local organizations working to remedy the critical issue of personnel shortages in special education and related services, urges Congress to consider the following package of recommendations. Recommendations for ESEA Reauthorization General Recommendations ESEA Should Rectify Conflicting Terminology, Definitions, and Roles of Pupil/Related Services Personnel by Renaming Pupil Services to Specialized Instructional Support Services, and Recognize that the List of Providers is Not Exhaustive. These personnel are known as "pupil services personnel" in the ESEA and as "related services personnel" in the IDEA, despite the fact that they are exactly the same

Page 4 professionals. This difference in terminology continues to cause confusion for school districts. Establishing one common statutory term would ease this confusion and would more accurately reflect the nature and purpose of the services that these professionals provide to students in schools. Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Education consistently has interpreted, through the IDEA regulations, that the list of "related services personnel" is not exhaustive. Since the IDEA definition is incorporated by reference into the ESEA definition of "Pupil Services," this interpretation also should be incorporated explicitly into the ESEA. Specifically, if students require the services of other therapists or service providers to assist them to be successful in school, school districts, within reason, must provide those services. All ESEA Programs Addressing Personnel Shortages, Recruitment, and Retention Must Include Specialized Instructional Support Personnel (SISP), in Addition to Teachers and Principals. Currently, there is a shortage of many fully licensed and certified SISPs in schools. These professionals provide services that address barriers to learning and assist students to be successful in school. These vital services are focused on prevention and intervention activities that promote effective classroom teaching and learning. These professionals work collaboratively with teachers, administrators, and other school staff to ensure that students receive high quality instruction that is responsive to the diverse array of students' learning and developmental needs and challenges. Therefore, any program included within ESEA addressing personnel shortages, recruitment, and retention should include SISPs. ESEA and IDEA Programs Addressing Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention Must Complement Each Other and Become Better Aligned. ESEA s Title II and IDEA s Part D State Personnel Development Grants, address many of the same issues, such as addressing personnel shortages and supporting high quality systems of professional development, though the focus remains on general education and special education professionals, respectively. ESEA reauthorization presents an opportunity to reinforce collaboration between general and special education through themes such as: Addressing Diverse Learners: The importance of providing professional development for special education teachers, general education teachers, SISPs, and administrators which addresses diverse learners, and aligning such professional development to ongoing activities provided by IDEA. Professional Development Examples Include: Informing successful teaching practices and model curricula for the education of students with disabilities.

Page 5 Aligning instructional strategies for diverse learners to common core standards. Encouraging collaborative and consultative model of providing early intervening services, special education, and specialized instructional personnel services. Integrating technology into curricula and instruction to drive academic improvement and facilitate in making data driven decisions. Training in positive behavioral interventions and supports, universal design for learning, and response to intervention. Planning, developing, and implementing effective and appropriate IEPs and IEP meetings to ensure effective and appropriate participation by all team members, including general educators. Strategies for special/general educators and specialized instructional support personnel to support students with disabilities in accessing the general education curriculum. Training to assist administrators in supervising, supporting, and strengthening the collaboration between general/special education teachers and specialized instructional support personnel. Training in functional or non traditional assessment strategies to determine appropriate services for special education teachers and SISPs. Training in effective and appropriate workload management strategies. Training in appropriate use and supervision of support personnel. Training in effective service delivery models. Mentoring/Induction Programs and Strategies that Support Special/General Education Collaboration: Mentoring/induction programs and strategies should mirror the collaborative model between special and general education that is desired in the classroom. Additionally, such programs should have a focus on individuals new to the field, but should also provide opportunities for seasoned educators and SISPs to participate. To that end, key elements of mentoring/induction programs should include: Mentoring teams which include special and general education teachers, specialized instructional support personnel, and administrators to support and reinforce collaborative strategies for addressing the needs of diverse learners. Developing mentoring/induction programs in consultation with school personnel, including special educators and specialized instructional support personnel, to establish programs that reinforce collaborative efforts between general and special education. Pairing mentors with mentees who work with similar student populations. (For example: a special educator who works with students

Page 6 who have low incidence disabilities would benefit from a mentor who has had similar professional experiences) Support for creative initiatives which may utilize technology or other methods to reinforce the mentor/mentee relationship. Professionals employed in shortage areas (both geographic and content related) may have to use non traditional methods to identify and build a successful mentor/mentee relationship. Programs for new professionals and seasoned educators which are differentiated to address their needs and allow for implementation of various strategies such as coaching programs. Repurpose Existing IDEA/ESEA Data Initiatives to Develop a Comprehensive Needs Assessment Data System to Centralize Data Regarding Personnel Shortages and Working Conditions Revise the current ESEA Title II needs assessment requirement of local education agencies (sec. 2122(c)) to address issues beyond professional development and hiring to include: Alignment with relevant IDEA data collected on personnel serving children and youth ages birth through 21. Alignment with relevant ESEA data collected in Title II. Alignment with relevant data collected by the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools School Climate Metrics. Data findings should be used to develop an action plan detailing initiatives to address personnel shortages, including an analysis of school climate factors, recruitment, retention, and induction/mentoring strategies. Data collection and analysis should include the impact on SISPs. Differential Pay Systems Must Not Be Viewed as the Sole Remedy to Address Shortages, Recruitment, and Retention Teachers, administrators, and specialized instructional support personnel deserve to be compensated at a rate that recognizes their value, contribution, and impact on the academic, social, and developmental success of students who are our nation s future leaders. Differential pay systems which seek to reward effective teachers and principals cannot be viewed as the sole remedy to solving shortages in teacher and specialized instructional support personnel fields. Research has demonstrated 1 that the leading causes in shortages in special education are working conditions and lack of supportive leadership. 1 Primary Sources: America s Teachers on America s Schools (2010) Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Scholastic, Inc. http://www.scholastic.com/primarysources/pdfs/scholastic_gates_0310.pdf (Retrieved March 19, 2010)

Page 7 If differential pay systems are to be included in ESEA reauthorization, they must at a minimum include SISPs, in addition to teachers and principals. Alternate Route to Certification Programs Should be Rigorous and Held to High Standards Alternate route to certification programs must include high quality pre service training; sustained, intensive, and classroom focused professional development; and intensive supervision that consists of structured guidance and regular ongoing support for teachers and/or SISPs. Alternate route to certification programs must be of high rigor comparable to that of traditional route programs and lead to full certification as prescribed by the state. Individuals participating in alternate route to certification programs should not be deemed highly qualified before demonstrating mastery of content and pedagogical methodologies.

ESEA Should Include Legislative Language from the Following Bills Which Address Shortages of Specialized Instructional Support Personnel/Services Page 8 Positive Behavior for Safe and Effective Schools Act (H.R. 2597) amends the Department of Education Organization Act to establish, within the Department of Education, an Office of Specialized Instructional Support Services to oversee, implement, and ensure adequate evaluation of, the provision of specialized instructional support services in schools by school counselors, social workers, psychologists, and other qualified professionals. Additionally, this legislation would allow states to allocate school improvement funds under Title I of the ESEA for coordinated, early intervening services for all students, such as schoolwide positive behavior supports. Reducing Barriers to Learning Act (H.R. 3800) amends the Department of Education Organization Act to create an Office of Specialized Instructional Support Services within the Department of Education to improve specialized instructional support services in schools. Additionally, the legislation provides competitive matching grants to states to (1) establish or expand specialized instructional support services and programs at the state level that are designed to provide technical assistance, coordination, and support to specialized instructional support services and programs addressing barriers to learning within local educational agencies and individual schools; and (2) hire and support specialized instructional support services coordinators to provide such assistance, coordination, and support. H.R. 3800 replaces references to pupil services and pupil services personnel with references to specialized instructional support services and specialized instructional support personnel and defines such services as those provided by school counselors, social workers, psychologists, and other qualified professionals that provide assessment, diagnosis, counseling, educational, therapeutic, and other necessary services as part of a comprehensive program to meet student needs. The Student to School Nurse Ratio Improvement Act of 2009 (H.R. 2730/S.2750) would directly address the current shortages of school nurse positions by creating a pilot grant program allowing federal assistance for states most in need of improving their student to school nurse ratio. School nurses contribute directly to the academic success of students by providing health care services that remove barriers to learning. All students have the right for their health needs to be safely met while in the school setting. Although students today have greater medical needs than in past generations, caseload assignments for nurses vary greatly throughout the U.S. and within states. Far too often, due to fiscal constraints, school nurses are forced to serve multiple schools. Including this legislation in ESEA will work towards ensuring that schools are staffed with nurses who will be able to address the health needs of all students. Increased Student Achievement Through Increased Student Support Act (H.R. 1361) directs the Secretary of Education to award competitive, renewable, five year grants to partnerships between low income local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools offering graduate programs

Page 9 in school counseling, social work, or psychology to increase the number of program graduates employed by low income LEAs. This legislation allows the use of grant funds to: (1) provide program graduate students with field training at partnership LEA schools; (2) contribute to program graduates' salaries at such schools for up to three years after they graduate; (3) increase the number of school counselors, social workers, and psychologists per student, and from underrepresented backgrounds, in such schools; (4) enhance the capacity of partnership graduate schools to train such professionals; (5) develop course work designed to facilitate such graduates' service to low income LEAs and atrisk students; and (6) provide tuition credits to such graduate students and student loan forgiveness to program graduates employed as school counselors, social workers, or psychologists by low income LEAs for at least five consecutive years. H.R. 1361 directs the Secretary to establish a program providing student loan forgiveness to non participants in this Act's grant program who have been employed for at least five consecutive years as school counselors, social workers, or psychologists by low income LEAs. This bill requires the Secretary to identify a formula for future use in designating regions as eligible for benefit programs because of having a shortage of such school personnel. About the The mission of the NPCSSERS is to sustain a discussion among all stakeholders on the need for and value of special education, related services, and early intervention; and to identify, disseminate, and support implementation of national, state, and local strategies to remedy personnel shortages and persistent vacancies for the benefit of all children and youth. Co Chair: Susan Karr, American Speech Language Hearing Association 2200 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 Phone: (800) 498 2071 Fax: (301) 879 7356 Email: skarr@asha.org www.specialedshortages.org