Indemnity Payment at 30 Months Maturity



Similar documents
2012 Workers Compensation Data Call Summary Insurance Oversight Part A

WCIRB REPORT ON THE STATE OF THE CALIFORNIA WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE SYSTEM

State of Connecticut Insurance Department

Minnesota Workers' Compensation. System Report, minnesota department of. labor & industry. research and statistics

WCIRB Report on June 30, 2014 Insurer Experience Released: September 11, 2014

WCIRB Workers Compensation Conference. California Workers Compensation System in 2012 A WCIRB Perspective Dave Bellusci, WCIRB Chief Actuary

CHAPTER 1. Wyoming Workers Compensation. Workers Compensation Programs Benefit Injured Workers and Employers

Analysis of Changes in Indemnity Claim Frequency January 2015 Update Report Released: January 14, 2015

MINNESOTA AGGREGATE FINANCIAL DATA REPORTING GUIDEBOOK. Annual Calls for Experience Valued as of December 31, 2015

2007 Medical Malpractice Claims Report

The California Workers Compensation System A WCIRB Perspective

Report on 2013 California Workers Compensation Losses and Expenses Released: June 26, 2014

Comparison of Multiple (Cross) Data Types

The State of Competition in the Workers' Compensation Market 2015

Workers Compensation Cost Data

Overview of Tennessee s s Workers Compensation Market Conditions and Environment

Arizona Workers Compensation At A Glance

Minnesota Workers' Compensation. System Report, minnesota department of. labor & industry. Policy Development, Research and Statistics

Reporting of Deductible Programs

Title 24-A: MAINE INSURANCE CODE

California Workers Compensation Update WCIRB Perspective

Workers Compensation Insurance Overview

Workers Compensation. Are Costs Controllable?

STATE OF TENNESSEE. Workers Compensation Advisory Council. REPORTS TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY and THE SPECIAL JOINT COMMITTEE ON WORKERS COMPENSATION

VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, INSURANCE, SECURITIES, AND HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION

Workers Compensation: USA and California

WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS

Reinsurance, Risk Corridors, and Risk Adjustment Final Rule

Comparative Review of Workers Compensation Systems in Select Jurisdictions

LIMITED-SCOPE PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

Massachusetts General Law Chapter 152, 25O and 53A. Classification of risks and premiums: distribution of premiums among employers.

Analysis of Changes in Indemnity Claim Frequency

The only Workers Compensation Services Provider with a Mission to Protect & Grow Ohio Manufacturing

MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE MANDATORY REPORTING OF DETAILED CLAIM INFORMATION

How To Get A Workers Compensation Rate Decrease In Florida

ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED BILLS TO REFORM THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Maryland Insurance Administration s 2005 Report on Workers Compensation Insurance

STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT

TITLE 85 EXEMPT LEGISLATIVE RULE WORKERS' COMPENSATION RULES OF THE WEST VIRGINIA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

NEGOTIATED WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS (NWCP) A win-win for Employers, Insurers, Union Employees, and their Joint Health Funds.

United States General Accounting Office Testimony

64th Legislature AN ACT ALLOWING SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE PRODUCERS TO CHARGE A FLAT FEE IN

Workers compensation rate filing by the national council on compensation insurance

Does Texas Need a Workers Compensation System? Bill Peacock Texas Public Policy Foundation

Assessment and Collection of Selected Penalties. Workers Compensation Board

State of Connecticut Insurance Department

Ratemaking Methods in Insurance Operations Part 2. Factors to Consider When Developing Credible Premiums

Frequently Asked Questions

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLOSED CLAIM DATA COLLECTION UNDER CONNECTICUT PUBLIC ACT

At NCCI, producing and delivering

THE BEACON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY CHARTER

Legislative Update. legal challenge to new law. significant changes to oklahoma work comp

Strategic Plan Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2013 June 30, 2017

Primary Casualty Claims Advantages

All Insurers Authorized to Transact Workers Compensation in California. Christine Baker, Director, Department of Industrial Relations

SURVEY OF SERVICE CONTRACT LEGISLATION

Iowa Medical Malpractice Annual Report For Calendar Year 2010

How To Rate Workers Compensation In Texas

Workers' Compensation

Construction Industry Workers Compensation Coverage Act. Approved by the NCOIL Executive Committee on November 22, 2009.

Insurance Litigation Class Actions, Coverage, Bad Faith and Claim Disputes

1 copyright 2012 workers compensation research institute

Diana Ferriter, Administrator Employment Relations Division Montana Department of Labor & Industry. A Little History

Professional Liability Insurance Issues for CRNAs

Transcription:

2013 Workers Compensation Insurance Oversight Report INTRODUCTION: Revisions to the Illinois Workers Compensation Act (820 ILCS 305/29) in the summer of 2011 require the Department of Insurance (Department) to annually prepare submit to the Governor, the Chairman of the Commission, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives a written report detailing the state of the workers compensation insurance market in Illinois. Section 29.2 of the Workers Compensation Act, (Act) titled Insurance Oversight is organized into two distinct areas. Section 29.2(a) addresses issues conditions primarily related to the overall market mechanisms, while Section 29.2(b) of the Act addresses company specific details. This report examines both aspects of the workers compensation market available to Illinois consumers. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: A total of 326 different insurance companies wrote a total of $2.6 billion in workers compensation insurance premium in Illinois during 2012. At 326 different companies, Illinois had more licensed insurers than any other state in the country. Pennsylvania ranked second with 325 companies Indiana was third with 319 different companies. A review of the nationwide workers compensation market indicated that Illinois ranked third in written premium at 5.41 percent of the nationwide market, behind California (18.73 percent) New York (9.89 percent). Companies that cannot obtain insurance through the voluntary insurance market may obtain coverage through the assigned risk market. There were a total of 23,829 assigned risk policies in force as of December 31, 2012. The assigned risk market share, defined as the percentage of assigned risk policies issued in Illinois to all workers compensation policies issued in Illinois was 2.70 percent. The National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) files advisory rates on behalf of workers compensation insurers in Illinois. The advisory rates effective as of January 2014, is 13.7 percent lower than the advisory rate level prior to the 2011 workers compensation reform legislation. The estimated average voluntary manual rate for policies effective in 2012 was $2.45. That estimate was based on a payroll weighted average of NCCI advisory rates effective January 1, 2012, in Illinois. The payroll weighting was the latest available, based on policies effective between April 1, 2009, March 31, 2010, in the voluntary market. The estimated average assigned risk manual rate for policies effective in 2012 was $4.91. That estimate was based on a payroll weighted average of NCCI advisory rates effective January 1,

2012, in Illinois. The payroll weighting was the latest available, based on policies effective between April 1, 2009, March 31, 2010, in the voluntary market. NCCI reports indemnity payments paid in Illinois during 2011 were approximately $863 million, down approximately $5 million from 2010. Medical payments totaled $787 million during 2011, up slightly from 2010. This information is based on NCCI Financial Call data from those carriers reporting to NCCI on policies effective in 2011 prior, for transactions occurring through December 31, 2011. This excludes data for large deductible policies; self-insured companies; underground coal mine federal classes; excess policies; maritime FELA classes for policies effective January 1, 2003, subsequent; National Defense Projects Rating Plan; Reinsurance assumed. (SOURCE: NCCI) The workers compensation market within Illinois experienced a profit of 0.3 percent during 2011. It should be noted that this profit was a reversal of the 10.8 percent loss experienced within the Illinois market during 2010. Profits also improved on a national basis. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) reported a profit of 7.4 percent for the nationwide market during 2011, compared to a 1.2 percent return during 2010. These figures are not yet available for 2012. NAIC data also reflects a general improvement in the loss ratio for the workers compensation market in Illinois. According to data collected by the NAIC, the loss ratio associated with the Illinois workers compensation market dropped from 75.05 percent in 2011 to 70.87 percent in 2012. On a national basis, the loss ratio for the market remained stable in 2011 (62.33 percent) 2012 (64.55 percent). The following graph illustrates the amount of disability payments by type of disability. To compare year to year, payments are reported on a policy-year basis as of a 30 month maturity. For example, a total of $597,720,450 was paid in disability benefits for all policies issued between April 1, 2008, March 31, 2009, as of September 30, 2011.

Indemnity Payment at 30 Months Maturity $700,000,000 $600,000,000 $500,000,000 $400,000,000 $300,000,000 $200,000,000 Total Disability Temp. Total Disability Perm. Partial Disability $100,000,000 $0 04/04-3/05 4/05-3/06 4/06-3/07 4/07-3/08 4/08-3/09 Total Disability $2,677,858 $3,041,457 $2,347,612 $3,431,865 $2,622,053 Temp. Total Disability $148,947,420 $150,209,960 $154,139,218 $161,304,785 $147,028,783 Perm. Partial Disability $385,843,719 $419,632,851 $445,411,168 $468,630,618 $448,069,614 TOTALS: $534,791,139 $569,842,811 $599,550,386 $629,935,403 $595,098,397 In addition to overall market related data the Department has collected company-specific data from all insurers that wrote workers compensation insurance in Illinois during the survey period of January 1 through December 31, 2012. The following is a summary of the data. The 2013 Workers Compensation Data Call consisted of 26 different data elements as outlined in Section 29.2 of the Workers Compensation Act. A total of 324 individual insurers reported positive written premium for workers compensation coverage during the survey period. All of these insurers were surveyed during the data collection process. A total of 317 companies have submitted data as requested, while seven companies requested received an exemption from filing data for various reasons. The chart below summarizes the participation levels described above. Status Company Count % Company 2010 Written Count Premium(WP) % of WP Data Filed: 317 97.5% 2,410,325,309 99.99% Exempt: 7 2.16% 247,292 0.01% TOTALS: 324 2,410,572,601

SUMMARY RESULTS: The following is a summary of the company specific-data collected from the 317 companies referenced above. A total of 142,808 workers compensation claims were opened during 2012, compared to 139,119 claims opened during 2011, an increase of 2.65 percent. Of the 142,808 total claims, companies indicated that 83,828 (58.70 percent) were medical-only claims. A comparison of the medical-only claims reported in 2012 to the 85,189 medical-only claims reported during 2011 indicates a decrease of 1.6 percent. Medical-only claims are defined as any request for recovery that was limited to medical expenses only. The companies reported a total of 11,629 contested claims during the survey period. This number is virtually unchanged from the 11,910 contested claims reported during 2011. Contested claims are defined as any claim where resolution was delayed due to a dispute regarding policy language or litigation was involved. A total of 66,027 of the claims opened during the survey period included lost work by the insured claimant. A breakdown of these claims reveal o 38,888 (58.90 percent) involved a loss of less than 3 working days o 9,792 (14.83 percent) involved a loss of between 3 14 working days o 17,347 (26.27 percent) involved a loss of greater than 14 working days CONCLUSION This 2013 report is hereby submitted pursuant to Sections 29.2 (a) 29.2 (b) of the Workers Compensation Act. The improvement in both profits loss ratio within the workers compensation market should be noted. The Department will continue to monitor the market in order to identify long-term trends of the overall workers compensation market. It should be noted that both the Department insurers continue to address issues related to the collection of accurate information for several elements contained in this data call. All possible efforts are being taken to provide complete meaningful results to the specific items outlined in the Act; however, the Department continues to have difficulties identifying any source or collection procedure capable of producing credible data for several of the topics within the Act. The following table identifies describes each data element included in the survey. Data Field Data Definition Number of claims opened A formal request for payment related to an event or situation that is covered under an in-force insurance policy received by the insurer during the survey period.

Number of reported medicalonly claims The number of claims that are opened during the survey period in which recovery was limited to medical expenses only. Number of contested claims Number of claims for which the employee has attorney representation. Number of claims with lost time Number of claims for which temporary total disability was paid. Number of claim adjusters employed to adjust workers' compensation claims. Number of claims for which temporary total disability was not paid within 14 days from the first full day off, regardless of reason. Number of medical bills paid 60 days or later from date of service the average days paid on those paid after 60 days for the previous calendar year. Number of claims in which inhouse defense counsel participated, total amount spent on inhouse legal services. The number of claims that are opened during the survey period in which resolution was delayed due to a dispute regarding policy language or litigation was involved. The number of claims that are opened during the survey period in which the insurer has received notice that the insured has retained legal counsel. a) The number of claims that are opened during the survey period in which the insured incurred time off of less than 3 working days. b) The number of claims that are opened during the survey period in which the insured incurred time off of between 3 14 working days. c) The number of claims that are opened during the survey period in which the insured incurred time off of greater than 14 working days. The total number of man-hours allocated to adjust workers compensation claims received by the company during the survey period. The number of temporary total disability claims that are opened during the survey period in which temporary total disability benefits were not paid within 14 days from the first full day off, regardless of reason. The total number of medical bills paid during the survey period where the time between the date of service the date paid was greater than 60 days. The average number of days for all claim payments identified above. The total number of claims in which internal defense counsel expenses were paid on, applied to, or associated with during the survey period. The total amount of all internal defense costs associated with the above claims.

Number of claims in which outside defense counsel participated, total amount paid to outside defense counsel. Total amount billed to employers for bill review. Total amount billed to employers for fee schedule savings. Total amount charged to employers for any all managed care fees. Number of claims involving in-house medical nurse case management, the total amount spent on inhouse medical nurse case management. Number of claims involving outside medical nurse case management, the total amount paid for outside medical nurse case management. Total amount paid for Independent Medical Examinations. Total amount spent on inhouse Utilization Review for the previous calendar year. The total number of claims in which external defense counsel expenses were paid on, applied to, or associated with during the survey period. The total amount of all defense costs associated with the above claims. a) The total amount billed to employers for all medical bill review services provided by the insurer during the survey period. b) The total allocated expenses for bill review paid on behalf of employers for all medical bill review services during the survey period. The total amount of allocated expenses for all fee schedule review services provided by the insurer during the survey period. The total amount of allocated expenses for all managed care fees provided by the insurer during the survey period. The total number of claims in which internal medical nurse management expenses were applied to or associated with during the survey period, regardless of when the claim was opened. The total amount of all internal nurse management expenses associated with the above claims. The total number of claims in which external medical nurse management expenses were applied to or associated with during the survey period, regardless of when the claim was opened. The total amount of all outside nurse management expenses associated with the above claims. The total amount paid for all independent medical exams by the insurer during the survey period. The total amount of all internal Utilization Review expenses incurred by the insurer during the survey period.

Total amount paid for outside Utilization Review for the previous calendar year. The total amount of all external Utilization Review expenses incurred by the insurer during the survey period.