ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Respondents.



Similar documents
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

WHEREAS, the Division has determined that evidence exists to support the following SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND. PARIS G. MILLS * Case No ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

South Carolina (the "Division"), pursuant to authority granted in the South Carolina Uniform

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT ORDER

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

SUMMARY ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

STATE OF MISSOURI OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

STATE OF MISSOURI OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND FINAL ORDER TO CEASE & DESIST ORDER OF BAR

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Chapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

STATE OF MISSOURI OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE

MRSI International, Inc.; Michael C. Rabanne - S CO01 - Consent Order

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

STATE OF MAINE BUREAU OF BANKING SECURITIES DIVISION. SUMMARY ORDER TO Michael L. Hancock ALLEGATIONS, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES P.O. Box Halsey St.. 6t1 Floor Newark, New Jersey (973) IN THE MATTER OF:

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES 153 Halsey Street P.O. Box Newark, New Jersey (973)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES

INTRODUCTION. 1. The State of Maine and Securities Administrator (hereinafter collectively

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND. JOSEPH V. SMITH, * Case Number * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND WOLVERINE ENERGY, L.L.C., * FILE NO

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION SDO

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT ORDER

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Fraudster From Selling Securities In Idaho

STATE OF ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY ORDER OF PROHIBITION

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION INTRODUCTION

BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

State of Missouri Office of Secretary of State

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

1. The Division of Securities is a unit within the Department

and Cease and Desist Order ( Order ), and makes the

~)

Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION

OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

State of New Hampshire Banking Department ) ) ) ) ) Cease and Desist Order Department, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: NOTICE OF ORDER

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * Consent Order

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

CONSENT ORDER (As to Respondents North America Marketing, LLC and TM Multimedia Marketing, LLC)

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS. This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into between the U.S.

Case 2:13-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2013 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

Case 3:15-cv D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. In the Matter of NAL Insurance ) Docket No SO Agency )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OF FINANCE AND CORPORATE SECURITIES

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION. Rodney (Rod) Alain Carol Lawson

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION

Anna M. Lascurain Deputy Attorney General

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

State of California Department of Corporations

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER INTRODUCTION

Regular Session, ACT No To amend and reenact R.S. 9:3573.1, (A), (1), (8), (9) and (10), ,

State of California - Department of Corporations

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SECURITIES DIVISION. This matter comes before the Securities Commissioner upon the Report and

Nebraska Loan Broker Act Chapter 45, Article 1, Section f to

STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Defendants.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

He was registered with the Bureau as an agent of

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

APPLICATION FOR CROWDFUNDING EXEMPTION Pursuant to Montana Code Annotated Section (22)

CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement

STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OF FINANCE AND CORPORATE SECURITIES

The Securities Division of the South Carolina Office of the Attorney General ("the

INSURANCE REGULATION 115 LIFE SETTLEMENTS

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION. Respondents STATEMENT OF CHARGES

rrej(as State Securities <Joard DAVID A. APPLEBY

NASAA REGULATIONS REGARDING SOLICITORS 1956 Act Model Rule 401(g)(4)-1

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER

Transcription:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: Imperia Invest IBC, Global Wealth Lifepath, Inc., Werner Jahnsen, Steve Baker, and Jody Dunn Respondents. ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST File No. 10042 WHEREAS, the Securities Division of the Office of the Attorney General of the State of South Carolina (the ''Division", pursuant to authority granted in the South Carolina Uniform Securities Act of 2005 (the "Act", S.C. Code Ann. 35-l-l 0 l to 35-l-703 (Supp. 2009, on or about June ll, 2010, received information regarding alleged activities of Imperia Invest IBC, ("Imperia", Global Wealth Lifepath, Inc., ("OWL", Werner Jahnsen ("Jahnsen", Steve Baker ("Baker", and Jody Dunn ("Dunn'' (collectively, the "Respondents" which, if true, could constitute violations of the Act; and WHEREAS, the information led the Division to open and conduct an investigation of the Respondents pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. 35-l-602; and WHEREAS, in connection wi th the investigation, the Division has determined that evidence exists to support the following findings and conclusions: t. Respondent Imperia operates a website accessible from within South Carolina with the URL http:/, www.impcriaim: ~.:st.n ct. Imperia's website lists the following address for Respondent Imperia: International Trade Building, P.0. Box 1460, Port Highway, Vanuatu.

2. Imperia is not registered to do business with the South Carolina Secretary of State. 3. Upon information and belief, Imperia is not registered to do business with any state or territory of the United States. 4. Respondents Jahnsen and Baker are named on the Imperia website as representatives of Imperia. No titles or contact information for these individuals is offered anywhere on the website. 5. On the Imperia website, Respondents Jahnsen and Baker describe the history of Imperia and offer Imperia's alleged strengths as an investment opportunity. 6. Respondent Dunn is an affiliate of Imperia who has received money on behalf of Imperia from South Carolina residents. Dunn's last known address is 2407 Juneau Ct., Corinth, Texas 76210-2204. 7. Respondent Dunn is also the director, president, and treasurer ofgwl. 8. GWL is registered to do business in the State of Nevada. Its registered agent is Dunn World Enterprises, Ltd., 848 N. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 1636, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107. 9. GWL is not registered to do business in South Carolina. 10. Imperia's website claims that Imperia is a company located in the Bahamas which offers financial instruments such as "Traded Endowment Policies" or ''TEPs" 1 to the public. The website also references "Forex" or foreign exchange trading as another source of profit tor investors in Imperia's operation. ll. Imperia's website makes the following statements and assertions, one or more of which is false or misleading as to a material fact: 1 Traded Endowment Policies are life insurance policies wbich pay a specified lump sum after a certain term or upon the death of the policy holder, and which may be sold to a third party prior to term. 2

a. "[A] TEP investor can receive a loan of 80,000 US$ with a one-time investment of US$ 50. Plain And Simple. This loan should be used for trading on the tinancial markets emphatically. We have created a proper platform for that issue to give you daily profits of 1.2%, which are guaranteed by money market arbitrage situations." b. "After approval of your TEP policy, which is as (sic online form, your loan of 80,000 US$ in your account on the portal will be working immediately - without any doubts - as soon as your policy online form is being filled in and delivered back to us in good order by E-mail. After this step your profits run smoothly with 1.2% daily on your trading account. These yields will be compounded for 6 months." c. "Payout: Profit Target after 6 months approx. ca.+ 335.000,00 US-Dollar." d. Upon (I opening an account with Imperia, (2 depositing the $50 fee, and (3 Imperia's acceptance of the "TEP application", participants will have $80,000 deposited in their personal mperia account which will automatically be used in Imperia's investment plan paying 1.2% interest daily. e. Participants can also receive commissions for recruiting or referring additional participants. In an example provided on the website, a participant who recruits 100 new participants would receive $400,000 in referral commissions. f The banks involved in the TEPs cannot be disclosed because Imperia is "binded (sic on NON-Disclosure agreements and cannot give further informations (sic to third parties." 3

g. The coordinating bank for Imperia's investment scheme is "a european (sic 100 top premium bank with first class ranking!" 12. Imperia's website openly states that Imperia has sought to avoid a heavily regulated environment for securities transactions, and is not registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC". 13. Imperia's "strategy," published on its website, involves the use of investor money and the promise of financial gain to those investors through no significant efforts of their own, by means of various financial instruments which constitute "securities" under the laws of South Carolina. 14. Respondent GWL solicited business from South Carolina residents in conjunction with solicitations to open accounts with Imperia. Specifically, in published flyers, GWL offered a "Flex Direct Visa 2 Credit Card for your Imperia Invest Depot Account". 15. GWL purports that its "Flex Direct Visa cards" offer purchase limits of up to $50,000 per month, and work like debit cards. GWL further purports that the cards are subject to transaction fees all over the world and receive the "domestic" rate - as opposed to the higher international rate - for A TM and monetary transaction fees only in South America. 16. On information and belief, GWL's cards were promoted as the payment medium by which participants in Imperia would receive their investment proceeds. 17. Imperia, by and through its website, by and through Respondent Dunn, and by and through other individuals, has solicited business from South Carolina residents. 18. Imperia, Dunn, and/or other agents or affiliates of Imperia have received payment from South Carolina residents seeking to join Imperia. 2 On infom1ation and belief, Visa, Inc. is not associated with a product known as a "Flex Direct Visa Credit Card." 4

19. Imperia accepted payment from South Carolina residents, whereupon it gave those residents access to a password-protected website which purports to show the value of the South Carolina residents' holdings in Imperia. 20. GWL has solicited business from South Carolina residents in conjunction with Imperia's investment solicitations. 21. GWL has received payment from one or more South Carolina residents requesting a Flex Direct Visa card in connection with an Imperia account. 22. On information and belief, Imperia and GWL have specifically targeted one or more identifiable groups, including deaf and hearing-impaired individuals. 23. Imperia is not registered in South Carolina as a broker-dealer or tssuer, and no exemptions from registration have been claimed on its behalf. 24. Imperia has not registered the offering described above in South Carolina, nor has any claim been made on Imperia's behalf that it is offering exempt or federal covered securities. 25. GWL is not registered in South Carolina as a broker-dealer or issuer, and no exemptions from registration have been claimed on its behalf. 26. GWL has not registered its security offering in South Carolina, nor has any claim been made on GWL's behalf that it is offering exempt or federal covered securities. 27. Respondents Jahnsen, Baker, and Dunn are not registered in South Carolina as agents, and no exemptions from registration have been claimed on behalf of any of them. 28. Respondents Imperia, Jahnsen and Baker have previously been ordered to Cease and Desist offering and/or selling investments in the State of Maine by order of the Maine Office of Securities dated May 5, 2010. 5

29. Respondent Imperia has previously been investigated by the Securities Commission of the Bahamas, which issued a public advisory on April 20, 2009, informing the public that Imperia's securities activities in the Bahamas were unregistered and illegal. 3 WHEREAS, the Respondents are offering "securities" within the meaning of S.C. Code Ann. 35-l-1 02(29; and WHEREAS, Respondents Imperia and GWL acted as broker-dealers and/or issuers in offering and selling securities in South Carolina; and WHEREAS, Respondents Imperia and GWL are not registered as broker-dealers in South Carolina or exempt from registration within the meaning of the Act; and WHEREAS, Respondents Jahnsen, Baker and Dunn, as described above, acted as agents by effecting and/or attempting to effect sales of securities in or from this State; and WHEREAS, Respondents Jahnsen, Baker and Dunn were not registered m South Carolina or exempt from registration as agents within the meaning of the Act; and WHEREAS, Respondent Imperia utilized Respondents Jahnsen, Baker and Dunn, who were not registered or exempt agents, to offer and sell its securities in South Carolina; and WHEREAS, the securities Respondents offered and sold in and from South Carolina were not (i registered, (ii federal covered securities, or (iii otherwise exempt within the meaning of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Respondents, in connection with the solicitation of participants described above, made untrue statements of material facts and/or omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and 1 The public advisory further stated that no company named Imperia was operating from #53 Sandyport Drive, Nassau, Bahamas - an address Imperia allegedly claimed at that time. 6

WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the Division has determined that the Respondents have engaged, are engaging, and/or are about to engage in acts and practices which violate S.C. Code Ann. 35-1-301, 35-l-402(a and (d, and 35-1-501; and WHEREAS, after due deliberation, the Division finds that it is necessary and appropriate, in the public interest, for the protection of investors, and consistent with the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act to issue the following Order: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. 35-1-604(a(l, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents and every successor, affiliate, control person, agent, servant, and employee of Respondents, and every entity owned, operated, or indirectly or directly controlled by or on behalf of the Respondents: a. Immediately cease and desist from transacting business in this State in violation of the Act, and in particular, S.C. Code Ann. 35-1-301, 35-1-402(a and (d, and 35-1-501 thereof; and b. Specifically, cease and desist (i soliciting new Imperia accounts in or from South Carolina, (ii offering any other securities in or from South Carolina, and (iii collecting fees in or from South Carolina, and c. Pay a civil penalty in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($1 0,000.00 per Respondent if this Order becomes effective by operation of law, or, if any Respondent seeks a hearing and any legal authority resolves this matter, pay a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($I 0,000.00 for each violation of the Act by that Respondent, and the actual cost of the investigation or proceeding. REQUIREMENT OF ANSWER AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING 7

The Respondents are hereby notified that they have the right to a hearing on the matters contained herein. To schedule such a hearing, a Respondent must file with the Securities Division, Post Office Box 11549, Rembert C. Dennis Building, Columbia, South Carolina 29211-1549, attention: Thresechia Navarro, within thirty (30 days after the date of service of this Order a written Answer specifically requesting that a hearing be held to consider rescinding the Order. In the written Answer, the Respondent, in addition to requesting a hearing, shall admit or deny each factual allegation of the Order, shall set forth specific facts on which the Respondent relies, and shall set forth concisely the matters of law and affirmative defenses upon which the Respondent relies. If the Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an allegation, he shall so state. Failure by a Respondent to file a written request for a hearing in this matter within the thirty (30 day period stated above shall be deemed a waiver by that Respondent of his right to such a hearing. Failure of a Respondent to file an Answer, including a request for a hearing, shall result in this Order, including the stated civil penalty, becoming final as to that Respondent by operation of law. CONTINUING TO ENGAGE IN ACTS DETAILED BY THIS ORDER AND/OR SIMILAR ACTS MAY RESULT IN THE DIVISION'S FILING ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS AND/OR SEEKING FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE FINES. WILLFUL VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. REGARDING MA TIERS DESCRIBED HEREIN, THIS ORDER DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE FILING OF PRIVATE CAUSES OF ACTION OR THE FILING OF 8

CRIMINAL CHARGES UNDER S.C. CODE ANN. 35-1-508 OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE CODE SECTION. SO ORDERED, This ~day of Assistant Attorney General Securities Division Office of the Attorney General Rembert C. Dennis Building 1000 Assembly Street Columbia, S.C. 29201 9