Practical E/M Audit Form: Established Outpatient Visit (p.1)



Similar documents
Evaluation & Management. Guidelines. Presented by: Kristi A. Gutierrez CCS-P, CPC, CEMC

(For use with 1995 and 1997 CMS Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation & Management Coding )

Patient Progress Note & Dictation Standard

A GUIDE TO EVALUATION & MANAGEMENT CODING AND DOCUMENTATION

The file and the documentation should create a clean chronological record of the patient and their interactions with the provider.

1995 DOCUMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Maximizing Third Party Reimbursement Through Enhanced Medical Documentation and Coding. Installment One of the Webinar Series

Coding for the Internist: The Basics

E/M Learning Tips INTRODUCTION TO EVALUATION. Introduction to Evaluation and Management (E/M) Coding for the Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist

Coding Flow Charts. What is Medical Coding? 9/17/2012. Diagnosis Codes ICD-9-CM. Volume 1 & 2* Speakers

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM PHYSICIAN PROCEDURE CODES. SECTION 2 MEDICINE, DRUGS and DRUG ADMINISTRATION

2014 E&M Oncology Documentation & Coding Basics Working Smarter, Not Harder!

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Code Changes for 2013

E&M Coding- It s All About The Documentation

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM MIDWIFE PROCEDURE CODES

E/M LEVEL WORKSHEET. Category. Subcategory (if applicable) (new/established, etc.)

Documentation Guidelines for Physicians Interventional Pain Services

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM NURSE PRACTITIONER PROCEDURE CODES

Stuart B Black MD, FAAN Chief of Neurology Co-Medical Director: Neuroscience Center Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas

Evaluation & Management Place of Service

Medical Compliance with Billing and Coding 2013: Will your Records Survive an Audit from a Third Party Payer or the OIG?

Codes and Documentation for Evaluation and Management Services

Empire BlueCross BlueShield Professional Reimbursement Policy

Compliance Department Overview of Non-Physician Practitioner Guidelines 11/2010

POLICY-DOCUMENTATION GUIDELINES

Evaluation and Management Services Guide

Compliant Documentation in the EHR. Introduction

Determine the Appropriate Level E/M Code Based on the Encounter

Strategies for Coding, Billing and Getting Paid Appropriately

E/M and Psychotherapy Coding Algorithm

Physician Practice E/M Guidelines

Best Practices in Billing and Coding. Janet Bull, MD, FAAHPM, HMDC Four Seasons

Non-Physician Practitioner Services Coding & Reporting. Karla R. Peter, RHIT, CCS, CCS-P, CPC Avera Health September 6, 2013

2013 PSYCHIATRY CPT CODES

Evaluation and Management Services Guide

CPT Coding Changes for 2013

CPT Coding Compliance Program

PROFESSIONAL BILLING COMPLIANCE TRAINING PROGRAM MODULE 2 EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT (E/M) SERVICES

2 nd Floor CS&E Building A current UMHS identification badge is required to obtain medical records

EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES Q&A: HOW DOES YOUR MAC INTERPRET THE GUIDELINES?

CPT The Key to E/M Documentation (and Reimbursement)? Rick Horsman DPM Olympia, WA

NHIC, Corp. Evaluation & Management (E/M) Coding Requirements

E/M Documentation Auditors Worksheet

E/M Components EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT (E/M) CODING FOR CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC OUTPATIENTS OVERVIEW

Emory Standards For Documenting, Coding, & Billing Professional Services TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hospital Coding Making the Rounds

DOCUMENTATION OF MEDICAL NOTES (Based on 1995 Guidelines)

Disclaimers/Confessions. Best Practices for Eye Care Staff Related to Medical Records. Disclaimers/Confessions, con. National Guidelines for Records

E/M coding workshop. The risk of not getting it right. PAMELA PULLY CPC, CPMA BILLING/CLAIMS SUPERVISOR GENESEE HEALTH SYSTEM

99213 or Visit?

Does Your EMR Lead You to the Right Code? Amy Dunatov, MPH, FACMPE, CCS-P, ICDCT-CM April 29, 2015

CODING AND BILLING. Mark R. Wright, OD, FCOVD.

Optimizing Revenue with Correct Documentation and Coding

Hot Topics in E & M Coding for the ID Practice

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM VISION CARE PROCEDURE CODES

Billing and Coding Conference

Audit Challenges with E/M Services. Webinar Subscription Access Expires December 31.

Coding and Documentation in Practice

Workbook STD Clinic Billing Coding Evaluation & Management Visits

Evaluation & Management Coding Category Selection Individual Exercises

Understanding Optometric Visit Coding. Ronald J Purnell MBA COE OCS

EMR Documentation The Risks and Rewards. Agenda

Disclaimer. EHR Chart Auditing Techniques. Bridging the chasm between electronic health records & compliance, quality care, $$$

Pediatric and Binocular Vision Examination and Billing Protocols

Forms designed to collect this information will help staff collect all pertinent information.

Evaluation and Management (E/M) Lecture Hall

E/M Documentation: Deal or No Deal? Documentation Guidelines. Documentation Elements 3/25/2013

AHS s Headache Coding Corner A user-friendly guide to CPT and ICD coding

What is Coding. Basics of Coding and Billing for the Optometric Staff. Vision Plan vs. Health Insurance. Vision Plan vs.

ICD-10 Documentation Differences in E/M Services. Suzan Berman, CPC, CEMC, CEDC

Improving the Quality of Care for Prevention and Treatment of Childhood Obesity

Medical Decision Making

Selection of Evaluation and Management Service Codes 1995 E&M Guidelines. Laura Sullivan, CPC Coordinator Corporate Compliance Auditing & Education

Payment Policy. Evaluation and Management

Part 1 General Issues in Evaluation and Management (E&M) in Headache

How To Write A Code Of Conduct

Coding for Evaluation and Management Services

School Based Health Care Coding at Your Best

HCIM ICD-10 Training Online Course Catalog August 2015

Billing and Coding Update in the Nursing Home 2015

How Physicians Get Paid: It's as Easy as: CMS, RVUs, ICD-9, and CPT

Maximizing Third Party Reimbursement Through Enhanced Medical Documentation and Coding

Associated Ear, Nose & Throat Specialists, LLC. OCCUPATION: Employer: Work Phone: PHYSICIAN REQUESTING CONSULTATION: TOWN: PHONE:

9/15/2015. Learning objectives. Coding and compliance. Coding Compliance for the IDS Environment. Could Your Coding be Costing You Money?

Shellie Sulzberger, LPN, CPC, ICDCT-CM Coding & Compliance Initiatives, Inc.

Let's Play a Game: Emergency Medical Documentation Coding for Emergency PHYSICIANS (not coders) Georgia College of Emergency Physicians June 5, 2012

English Language Fellow Program Health Verification Form

Documentation of The Top Ten CPT Codes, Part 1. Attention to detail will enable you to receive proper payment. Kenneth F.

HEALTH DEPARTMENT BILLING GUIDELINES

Learning Plan Step Tab Website URL

PHYSICIAN USER EMR QUICK REFERENCE MANUAL

Transcription:

Patient: Name: Chart #: Date of visit: / / Reviewer: Date of review: / / Medical History Review Select the level corresponding to lowest of the components PFSH ROS HPI Level of History 5 2 elements 0 or more 4-8 elements / Comprehensive Related 4 element 2-9 syst >3 chronic conds Detailed E/M level: 3 0 elements system -3 elements Expanded 2 0 system or no chronology Prob focused Level based on documented "update" of PFSH /ROS no HPI no history Chronology Fails to document or clearly reflect a chief complaint Duration Fails to document supplemental details of positive findings for PFSH Timing Fails to document supplemental details of positive findings for ROS Severity Fails to document chronological details of HPI (performing only an "extended" Chief Complaint) Location Fails to document the STATUS of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions Quality *EHR documentation compliance issues fail to validate medical necessity &/or that care was performed Context Copy forward functionality Copy-paste of pre-loaded generic text Mod. factors Documentation by exception, automated or single click Assoc signs & Sx Non-specific documentation resulting from use of pick lists Physical Exam Review (997 Guidelines) Select the level corresponding to guideline description multi-system specialty Ophth & Psych Level of Exam 5 2 in each of 9 all major, ea minor all major, ea minor Comprehensive Related 4 2 elements 2 elements 9 elements Detailed E/M level: 3 6- elements 6- elements 6-8 elements Expanded 2-5 elements -5 elements -5 elements Prob focused Practical E/M Audit Form: Established Outpatient Visit (p.) Fails to document specific abnormal findings no exam Fails to document relevant negative findings of symptomatic organ systems *EHR documentation compliance issues fail to validate medical necessity &/or that care was performed Copy forward functionality Copy-paste of pre-loaded generic text Documentation by exception, automated or single click Non-specific documentation resulting from use of pick lists Physical Exam Review (995 Guidelines) Select the level corresponding to guideline description Level of Exam 5 8 organ systems or complete single organ system exam Comprehensive Related 4 Extended exam of affected & related areas/systems Detailed E/M level: 3 Limited exam of affected & related areas/systems Expanded 2 Limited exam of affected body area or organ system Prob focused Fails to document specific abnormal findings no exam Fails to document relevant negative findings of symptomatic organ systems *EHR documentation compliance issues fail to validate medical necessity &/or that care was performed Copy forward functionality Copy-paste of pre-loaded generic text Documentation by exception, automated or single click Non-specific documentation resulting from use of pick lists (note: level appropriate when care provided under physician's supervision without physician present)

Data Gathering Form, History & Exam Section : Medical History HPI: see color sheet for listing of chronologic description & 8 elements of HPI PFHS: record which elements have documented inquiries & responses (see color sheet for documentation of qualitative factors & EHR data entry issues) Past medical history Family history Social history or UPDATE of PFSH from documented previous visit (assess # elements previously) Number of elements documented ROS: record which organ systems have documented inquiries & responses (see color sheet for documentation of qualitative factors & EHR data entry issues) Constitutional Gastrointestinal Neurological Eyes Ears, nose, & throat Genitourinary Musculoskeletal Psychiatric Endocrine Cardiovascular Integumentary Hematologic/lymphatic Respiratory (skin and/or breast) Allergic/immunologic or UPDATE of ROS from documented previous visit (assess # elements previously) Section 2: Physical Examination 997 Documentation Guidelines: Types of Examinations: Number of organ systems documented General multi-system exam Genitourinary (female) Cardiovascular Ears, nose, & throat Genitourinary (male) Hematologic/lymphatic/immunologic Psychiatric Respiratory Eyes Musculoskeletal Skin Neurological see exam details in "Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation & Management Coding" 995 Documentation Guidelines: Body areas: Head and face Abdomen Back, including spine Neck Genitalia, groin, buttocks Each extremity Chest, incl. breasts & axillae Organ systems: Constitutional Eyes Respiratory Gastroinstestinal Skin Neurological Ears, nose, mouth, throat Genitourinary Psychiatric Cardiovascular Musculoskeletal Hematol/lymph/immunol Documentation Details: All other symptomatic or related organ systems documented All other symptomatic or related organ systems NOT documented LIMITED examination of (all) affected and symptomatic/related organ systems EXTENDED examination of (all) affected and symptomatic/related organ systems COMPLETE examination of a single organ system

Patient: Name: Chart #: Date of visit: / / Practical E/M Audit Form: Established Outpatient Visit (p.2) Medical Decision Making Select the 2nd lowest of the RED circled levels Dx or Rx Options Data reviewed & ordered Levels of Risk Level of MDM 5 ext 4 ext 4 ext 4 ext ext 4 ext high high high High Related 4 mult 3 mult 3 mod3 mod mod 3 mod mod mod mod Mod E/M level: 3 lim 2 lim 2 lim 2 lim lim 2 lim low low low Low 2 min min min 0- min min 0- min min min min Strtfrwd cmplx cmplx pres diag mgmt no MDM Dx Rx # rev rev # ord ord prob proc optns Circle highest in red Circle highest of 4 in red Circle highest of 3 in red * Indicates sub-component(s) of MDM that are not documented in the medical record (note - level appropriate only when care provided under physician's supervision without physician present) ) Level of each MDM component is circled in blue or black ink, whether documented or interpreted by reviewer 2) Highest level in each of the three sections is circled in red ink; 3) An asterisk within the circle of any sub-component indicates that it was not documented in the medical record 4) The calculated level of MDM corresponds to the 2nd lowest of the red circles, which appears in the final column Glossary: Dx or Rx Options Dx: number of diagnoses Rx: number of treatment options min: minimum lim: limited mult: multiple ext: extensive Data Reviewed & Ordered # rev: amount of data reviewed min: minimum cmplx rev: complexity of data reviewed lim: limited # ord: amount of data ordered mod: moderate cmplx ord: complexity of data ordered ext: extensive Levels of Risk pres probs: risk of the presenting problem(s) diag proc: risk of the diagnostic procedures mgmt optns: risk of the management options min: minimum low: low mod: moderate high: high

Patient: Name: Chart #: Date of visit: / / Practical E/M Audit Form: Established Outpatient Visit (p.3) Nature of the Presenting Problem Moderate-High or High Code Level Supported by NPP 5 Moderate-High 4 Moderate 3 Low-Moderate Low 2 Minor Minimal * Indicates severity of NPP is not documented in the medical record ) Circles indicate severity of NPP and level of code warranted by this degree of severity 2) If severity of NPP not documented in medical record, level of severity and corresponding level of warranted care seem appropriate based on remaining documentation; indicated by asterisk (*) 3) If appropriate severity seems to be "moderate to high," choice of code level 4 or 5 based on level of care suggested as appropriate by the examples in CPT's Appendix C and/or highest documented level of risk CPT Descriptors for Severity of NPP: (* intermediate descriptors interpreted by Practical E/M) Minimal: Problem that may not require the presence of physician, but service is provided under physician's supervision Minor: Problem runs definite and prescribed course, is tansient in nature, and is not likely to permanently alter health status; OR, has a good prognosis with management and compliance Low: Problem where the risk of morbidity without treatment is low; there is little to no risk of mortality without treatment; full recovery without functional impairment is expected Low - Mod: *Problem where the risk of morbidity without treatment is low to moderate; there is low to moderate risk of mortality without treatment; full recovery without functional impairment is expected in most cases, with low probability of prolonged functional impairment Moderate: Problem where the risk of morbidity without treatment is moderate; there is moderate risk of mortality without treatment; prognosis is uncertain, or there is an increased probability of prolonged functional impairment. Mod - High: *Problem where the risk of morbidity without treatment is moderate to high; there is moderate risk of mortality without treatment; uncertain prognosis or increased probability of prolonged functional impairment High: Problem where the risk of morbidity without treatment is high to extreme; there is moderate to high risk of mortality without treatment, or high probability of severe prolonged functional impairment.

Patient: Name: Chart #: Date of visit: / / Practical E/M Audit Form: Established Outpatient Visit (p.4) Time for Counseling / Coordination of Care DOCUMENTATION that > 50% of face-to=face time spent counseling and/or coorinating care DOCUMENTATION of total amount of FACE-TO-FACE time of visit DOCUMENTATION of counseling and/or coorination performed Establ Visit Code Level Indicated by Time 40 mins 9925 25 mins 9924 5 mins 9923 0 mins 9922 5 mins 992 ) Time considered for code selection ONLY if ALL THREE of the above boxes are checked 2) Time value selected must equal or exceed amount in selected box Crated 2009 by ASA, LLC

Patient: Name: Chart #: Date of visit: / / Practical E/M Audit Form: Established Outpatient Visit (Summary) Select Correct E/M Code Code Level Code Level Code Level by Key Warranted Indicated Select level corresponding to 2nd lowest component Components by NPP by Time Comprehensive Comprehensive High 9925 9925 9925 Detailed Detailed Mod 9924 9924 9924 Expanded Expanded Low 9923 9923 9923 Prob focused Prob focused Strtfrwd 9922 9922 9922 no M.D. no M.D. no M.D. 992 992 992 no history no exam no MDM N/A Level of Level of Level of History Exam MDM ) "Level of history" is value that was determined on page 2) "Level of exam" is value that was determined on page ; selected the higher of 995 or 997 Guidelines 3) "Level of MDM" is value that was determined on page 2 4) "Code level by key components" is indicated by the next-to-lowest level circled among the 3 key components 5) "Code level warranted by NPP" is value that was determined on page 3 6) "Code level indicated by Time" is value that was determined on page 4 (if time properly documented) The result of step 4 indicates the level of care performed and documented; The result of step 5 indicates the level of care that is medically necessary / indicated The result of step 6 indicates the level of care that is supported by time of counseling and coordination of care Usually, the code level warranted by the NPP establishes the maximum level of care that should be coded If time properly documented, code level determined by time supercedes key components & NPP if it was higher Conclusion: code submitted: Code medically indicated based on NPP: Level of care documented: Code level based on counseling & time: N/A