The Facts About Forensic DNA Analysis and DNA Databases. dnasaves.org

Similar documents
Dear Colleague: Sincerely, Mai Fernandez Executive Director National Center for Victims of Crime

Computer Forensics US-CERT

DNA & CRIME VICTIMS: WHAT VICTIMS NEED TO KNOW

The DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime & Innocence Protection Act. Presentation Courtesy of STEVE COOLEY District Attorney of Los Angeles County

Federal Bureau of Prisons

FORENSIC DNA COLLECTION: A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO YOUR RIGHTS SCENARIOS AND RESPONSES

Defendant brought a Motion to Suppress the DNA Testing Results or in the alternative,

U.S. Department of Justice. Becoming A. Special Agent. U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION

Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward

Assess the purpose of the Criminal Justice System and the role of the Ministry of Justice.

CHECK ENFORCEMENT GUIDEBOOK. Maricopa County PROGRAM. Attorney s Office. Where to submit a bad check. Bill Montgomery. Page 1

COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS

MARYLAND IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 10, 85.8 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 4821 Complaints (2007) Updated January 29, 2009

September 2011 Report No

COLORADO IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 8, 89.0 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 4328 Complaints (2007) Updated November 28, 2008

OREGON IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 20, 68.1 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 2552 Complaints (2007) Updated January 10, 2009

Speaker Sheldon Silver. Breaking New York s Addiction to Prison: Reforming New York s Rockefeller Drug Laws

Senate Bill No. 38 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

CRIMINAL RECORD INFORMATION STATEWIDE CRIMINAL CHECKS CRIMINAL RECORD DATABASES FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT RESTRICTIONS

A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System

YOUR CONTACT DETAILS (ADDRESS, PHONE, etc.):

CONNECTICUT IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 19, 68.8 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 2409 Complaints (2007) Updated November 28, 2008

CRIMINAL LAW AND VICTIMS RIGHTS

Criminal Justice Information Exchange and Dissemination.

Introduction to Forensic Science and the Law. FBI Building Washington, DC

In Your Blood Forensic DNA Databases

WISCONSIN IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 15, Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 9852 Complaints (2007) Updated January 16, 2009

Heather L. Hughes, J.D. HIPAA Privacy Officer U.S. Legal Support, Inc.

Chapter 10: Records, Fingerprints, Photos, DNA. Part 1: Understanding Records

Lawrence Police Department Administrative Policy. August A. Access to CJIS sensitive data is only available to authorized users.

College Safety Offices ECC

5. The Model Strategies and Practical Measures are aimed at providing de jure and de

Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre Act 2004 No 42

Rapid DNA Instrument Update & Enhancement Plans for CODIS

Approved By: Agency Name Management

Remarks. 7th International DNA Users' Conference For Investigative Officers. Ronald K. Noble. INTERPOL Secretary General.

Criminal Investigation CRJ141. Matthew McCarty

MASSACHUSETTS WARRANTLESS CELL PHONE SEARCHES CASE HEADS TO THE SUPREME COURT

Federal Bureau of Prisons. Privacy Impact Assessment for the SENTRY Inmate Management System

How To Become A State Pol Forensic Tech Leader

OKLAHOMA LAWS RELATING TO IDENTITY THEFT

U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (B.S.) WITH A CONCENTRATION IN FORENSIC CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

Summary and Recommendations

Policy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated

OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER ATTORNEY S EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE CRIMINAL RECORDS DIVISION CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Summary of Privacy and Data Security Bills- 112 th Congress. Prepared for September 15, 2011 CT Privacy Forum

Glossary of Court-related Terms

Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000

PENNSYLVANIA IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 14, 72.5 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 9016 Complaints (2007) Updated January 29, 2009

DNA: Whose Is It, Orange County Crime Lab s or the District Attorney s?

STRATEGIC PLAN

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses

INTRODUCTION FORENSIC SCIENCE AND THE LAW CHAPTER 1 OBJECTIVES

EXPUNCTIONS IN TEXAS

PROTECTING PATIENT PRIVACY and INFORMATION SECURITY

An Introduction to Identity Theft. Letbighelptoday.com. Your Free Copy

CHAPTER. What is Criminal Justice? Criminal Justice: Criminal Justice: Criminal Justice: What is the Definition of Crime?

NONCRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCY USE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION

Georgia Department of Education Career Pathway Descriptions

VOLUNTEER & EMPLOYEE CRIMINAL HISTORY SERVICE (VECHS) USER AGREEMENT FOR CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD INFORMATION

1 of 7 DOCUMENTS. NEW JERSEY REGISTER Copyright 2007 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law. 39 N.J.R. 606(a)

Collection of Data on Juvenile Justice Ms. Creem and Mr. Tarr moved that the bill be amended by inserting, after section, the following new section:-

JUSTICE SYSTEM: FOCUS ON SEX OFFENDERS

PART VIII. AUTOMATED CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Criminal Records and Expungement. Rhode Island Public Defender

Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum

UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson

INFORMATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES CHARLES I. WADAMS PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

Genetic Witness: Science, Law, and Controversy in the Making of DNA Profiling

Homeland Insurance Company of New York Homeland Insurance Company of Delaware (Stock companies owned by the OneBeacon Insurance Group)

Application Form. Area of Concentration in Criminal Prosecution & Defense Practice

WASHINGTON IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 13, 76.4 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 4942 Complaints (2007) Updated January 11, 2009

MISSISSIPPI IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 32, 57.3 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 1673 Complaints (2007) Updated December 21, 2008

Department of Justice Policy Guidance 1 Domestic Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)

OFFICE OF DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY JAMES C. BACKSTROM COUNTY ATTORNEY

York County DUI Prevention Initiative

Using Data to Inform Evidence-Based Decision Making. January 8, 2013

The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report:

If the people who make the decisions are the people who will also bear the consequences of those decisions, perhaps better decisions will result.

SEALING OF RECORDS. Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE. DAVID ROGER District Attorney

Transcription:

dnasaves.org The Facts About Forensic DNA Analysis and DNA Databases A guide to scientific methodologies, laws and regulations for forensic DNA sample analysis.

The shared local, state and national forensic DNA databases, known as CODIS, do not contain names, social security numbers or any personally identifying information about an individual. The profile is identified by a Specimen ID Number that is generated randomly by the computer when the profile is uploaded. CODIS stores DNA profile information as a simple series of numbers and letters, as well as the lab and analyst that entered the profile into the system. See below for an example of the data that goes into the database. Scientific Methodology of Forensic DNA Databases Our nation s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) stores profiles from convicted offenders, unsolved crime scene evidence and missing persons. Its success is demonstrated by the thousands of cases that have been solved by matching crime scene evidence to known convicted offenders. The following information details how the DNA database system has been specifically designed to protect privacy. After there is a match between the offender profile and the crime scene DNA profile, the Specimen ID Number is used to cross-reference an offline, state-maintained secure database in which that profile s identity is stored. CODIS profiles are NOT shared with other types of databases and are NOT part of the criminal history record. They are also NOT accessible by third parties, such as the Department of Homeland Security. DNA profiles are only searched against the CODIS index of unsolved crimes or missing persons/unidentified remains index. CODIS data is protected by the FBI s state-of-the-art encryption and firewall technology. Forensic DNA analysis uses just 13 markers out of more than three billion base pairs in the DNA strand. These 13 sites, or loci, were specifically selected by a group of DNA experts assembled by the FBI. The 13 specific loci were chosen because they are unique to each individual and reside on portions of the human genome that DO NOT contain any predictive information on genetic health or other personal characteristics, other than gender information. Below is the only information that is uploaded into CODIS SAMPLE CODIS PROFILE: Originating Laboratory Lab XYZ Identifier Specimen ID Number 0012152 13 Core Loci 06, 09,11,12,10,10,22, 24, 9.3,10,08,09,14, 14,15,17,17,22, 25,12, 2, 9,10,09,13 Analyst Identifier ABC

Protecting Against Profile Misuse While forensic DNA profiles do not contain private genetic information, additional steps have been taken to further protect privacy. Federal law strictly prohibits the dissemination of information from DNA databases to unauthorized persons and for unauthorized reasons. The law states: Information resulting from DNA analysis may ONLY be released to criminal justice agencies for law enforcement identification purposes, in judicial proceedings, and to criminal defendants for the case in which the person is involved. Any person who has access to national DNA database information or samples and knowingly discloses such information in an unauthorized manner may be fined up to $250,000 and sentenced to one year in prison. Since the inception of the CODIS system there has never been an incidence of misuse, nor has there ever been a breach of the database. After the sample is verified, only law enforcement working on the case to which the profile matched can be notified of the identifying information and the match. This is used by law enforcement as an investigative lead. If the authorities decide there is enough evidence to prosecute, a search warrant is requested for another DNA sample and it is this sample that is admissible as evidence in a court of law.

Protection of Retained Samples Personal privacy is of the utmost concern. That s why a significant body of laws and regulations, both state and federal, already exist to provide ample privacy protection against illegal intrusions. According to government regulations, crime laboratories are not permitted to destroy DNA samples following analysis. After a match is made in CODIS, the laboratory re-tests the original offender sample to confirm the match. This extra step is taken to confirm accuracy and ensure that innocent people are not wrongly questioned. All laboratories participating in CODIS must store DNA samples in a secure, locked site and undergo an annual audit to ensure compliance. These strict standards are established by the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM). For more information on SWGDAM standards, visit: www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/codis/qas_databaselabs

The Importance of DNA Arrestee-Testing Laws Every day, innocent people needlessly become victims of violent crimes. Most of these crimes are committed by repeat offenders. By passing state legislation that enables law enforcement to collect DNA from felony arrestees we can: Catch repeat offenders sooner Prevent violent crimes Exonerate the innocent Protect civil liberties Minimize racial bias Reduce criminal justice costs About DNA Saves DNA Saves is a non-profit association organized to educate policy makers and the public about the value of forensic DNA. Jayann and David Sepich formed the association in late 2008, marking the five-year anniversary of the senseless murder of their daughter, Katie. DNA Saves is committed to working with states across the nation to pass laws allowing DNA to be collected upon felony arrest and to provide meaningful funding for DNA programs. 575-361-1931 jsepich@dnasaves.org dnasaves.org