ME 355 Manufacturing Processes



Similar documents
Sample Feasibility Study XYZ Company Widget Part Design

Grade 8 Performance Assessment Spring 2001

DESIGN OF PLASTIC INJECTION MOLD FOR AN AIR VENT BEZEL THROUGH FLOW ANALYSIS (CAE) FOR DESIGN ENHANCEMENT

What is a mold? Casting. Die casting. Injection Molding Machine. Injection Molding Design & Manufacturing II. Spring 2004

Lightweighting Custom enewsletter

INJECTION MOLDING COOLING TIME REDUCTION AND THERMAL STRESS ANALYSIS

3D Printed Injection Molding Tool ("PIMT") Guide. Objet Ltd.

DIESEL EFFECT PROBLEM SOLVING DURING INJECTION MOULDING

Kursus i Produktions- og materialeteknologi

Reaction Injection Molding (RIM)

Industrial/Organizational Psychology Master s Program Course List

SOLUTIONS FOR MOLD DESIGNERS

Chemistry 212 VAPOR PRESSURE OF WATER LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Ensuring Injection Molded Part Consistency and Conformance through In-Mold Cavity Sensor Technology

Characterization of an Injection Molding Process for Improved Part Quality

A Systematic Approach to Diagnosing Mold Filling and Part Quality Variations

Application Note. The Optimization of Injection Molding Processes Using Design of Experiments

Instructions for Using Your Laboratory Notebook

STANDARDIZED WORK 2ND SESSION. Art of Lean, Inc. 1

Troubleshooting Guide. PS Injection moulding. Splay marks. Burning (Black streaks) Cool feed zone. Dry material, check source of moisture.

Plastic Injection Molding

CHAPTER 2 INJECTION MOULDING PROCESS

Closed Loop Pressure Control for the Extrusion Process

House Published on

A Study of Process Variability of the Injection Molding of Plastics Parts Using Statistical Process Control (SPC)

New Advances in Rapid Prototyping using Inkjet-based 3D Printing

Part and tooling design. Eastman Tritan copolyester

Three-dimensional figure showing the operation of the CRT. The dotted line shows the path traversed by an example electron.

Machine needle shut-off nozzle type-a

Integrating a Factory and Supply Chain Simulator into a Textile Supply Chain Management Curriculum

ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION

Verification Experiment on Cooling and Deformation Effects of Automatically Designed Cooling Channels for Block Laminated Molds

Robotics Engineering. Ohio Academic Content Standards Grade. Lesson Summary:

Naue GmbH&Co.KG. Quality Control and. Quality Assurance. Manual. For Geomembranes

PROCESSING OF VARIOUS MATERIALS

Justifying Simulation. Why use simulation? Accurate Depiction of Reality. Insightful system evaluations

Investigation of process parameters for an Injection molding component for warpage and Shrinkage

LAB IV. SILICON DIODE CHARACTERISTICS

POWER SUPPLIES MAKE VS BUY Kevin Parmenter Director of Applications Engineering ON Semiconductor

What is the pattern? How is it changing? How can you describe it? How does it grow (or get smaller)? How can we organize the data?

Estuardo R. Ponciano, J.D. Assistant Director of Admissions UCIrvine SchoolofLawof

Chapter Test B. Chapter: Measurements and Calculations

Effects of the MuCell Molding Process

NetShape - MIM. Metal Injection Molding Design Guide. NetShape Technologies - MIM Phone: Solon Road FAX:

Important Steps to a Career in Higher Education (MA/MS or or PhD)

The electrical field produces a force that acts

Introducing Fundamental Manufacturing Processes and Manufacturing Organizational and Production Systems by Way of Laboratory Activities

Pressure -Temperature Relationship in Gases. Evaluation copy. Figure ml Erlenmeyer flask. Vernier computer interface

INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 29/07/2015 Grade: B Score: % (35.00 of 41.00)

Foam Injection Molding:

INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 09/06/2015 Grade: A Score: % (38.00 of 41.00)

Application Information

Summary of important mathematical operations and formulas (from first tutorial):

Injection Molding. Materials. Plastics Outline. Polymer. Equipment and process steps. Considerations for process parameters

EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES:

Hands-On Data Analysis

COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND EXPECTATIONS FOR ALL STUDENTS ENROLLED IN COLLEGE ALGEBRA ROWAN UNIVERSITY CAMDEN CAMPUS SPRING 2011

Introducing AUDIT-BUDDY

Physical Dry Conditioned Unit Test method

Using Excel (Microsoft Office 2007 Version) for Graphical Analysis of Data

Interfacial Adhesion in Multi-Stage Injection Molded Components

Determining the Right Molding Process for Part Design

CHAPTER 6: ANALYZE MICROSOFT DYNAMICS NAV 5.0 DATA IN MICROSOFT EXCEL

CADET PORTFOLIO GUIDE

Why Plastic Flows Better in Aluminum Injection Molds

ALUMINUM CASTING PROCESS COMPARISON CHARTS. Copyright 2002 Austin Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

General Physics Lab: Atwood s Machine

INJECTION MOLDING FRACTIONAL MELT INDEX, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE MATERIALS

Autoclave Design Considerations

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COORDINATION SECTION SOLID SURFACE FABRICATIONS

AMS 5 Statistics. Instructor: Bruno Mendes mendes@ams.ucsc.edu, Office 141 Baskin Engineering. July 11, 2008

DETERMINING THE DENSITY OF LIQUIDS & SOLIDS

DUPONT PERFORMANCE POLYMERS Joint Design: A Critical Factor in Strong Bonds GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR ULTRASONIC, VIBRATION AND SPIN WELDING

If your schedule allows you might consider joining ROTC.

Lesson 13: The Formulas for Volume

High School Algebra Reasoning with Equations and Inequalities Solve systems of equations.

Life Insurance. Nationwide and the Nationwide Frame are federally registered service marks of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company.

Facts About. Industrial gases for better injection molding. This article appeared in the trade journal Kunststoffe plast europe, issue 12/2004.

Algebra I. In this technological age, mathematics is more important than ever. When students

PSY 401: ADVANCED RESEARCH Fall 2014 Website:

Understanding Plastics Engineering Calculations

A Picture Really Is Worth a Thousand Words

General Injection Mould Specifications KONGSBERG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP

IC 1101 Basic Electronic Practice for Electronics and Information Engineering

Analytical Test Method Validation Report Template

Rules to Consider. All work shall be highly specified as to content, timing, sequence, and outcome.

Gas-Assist Injection Molding: An Innovative Medical Technology

Skateboard Assembly - Line Balance Lesson Plan (45-60 minutes)

DataDirector-to-Illuminate Transition Guide

One- and Two-dimensional Motion

Important Steps to a Masters or PhD in Public Health

Office of Disability Support Service 0106 Shoemaker Fax: A Guide to Services for Students with a

INSTRUCTOR'S GUIDE PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT SKILLS MODULE

High School Algebra Reasoning with Equations and Inequalities Solve equations and inequalities in one variable.

Tutorial 2: Using Excel in Data Analysis

DOE software paints picture of powder coating defects By Julia C. O Neill, Glenn Correll, Val debrunce, and Ralph Pereida

UNIT PLAN: EXPONENTIAL AND LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONS

EXPERIMENT: MOMENT OF INERTIA

eclips Design Packet Middle School and High School NASA Real World: Mathematics (Grades 6-8) NASA Launchpad (Grades 9-12) Educational Product

If your course is part of a similar assessment effort in your program, you probably need to assess the following outcomes in your course:

Transcription:

ME 355 Manufacturing Processes Injection Molding Lab Report Due next lab. 1. Purpose: a. Gain some hands-on experience with polymers, particularly injection molding. b. Apply Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology to an actual process. 2. Experimental Plan: You will actually run two experiments in this lab. You will run a simple 2 3 factorial design to allow you to visualize what is happening in a DOE more clearly. Additionally, the entire class will be conducting a large designed experiment with the intent of optimizing the process of injection molding this part. a. The large design is what is called a Central Composite Design or CCD. This design will calculate all the linear and interaction effects, as well as the quadratic effects. For those of you who may be well versed in DOE, you will note that the run order is not the best, as I have opened this design up to biasing the temperatures by grouping them the way that I have. That is intentional because this is for a class, and I want to save some of your time. I would NOT do this if it were a real experiment. 3. Procedure: a. With the instruction of the TA, use the injection molding machine to produce parts in accordance with the DOE data-sheet provided. i. Be sure to number all parts with the Run number on the DOE data sheet for later analysis. b. Collect data as follows: i. Set up the machine for the temperatures that you will first be running in the larger experiment. 1. Once temperatures have stabilized, record those temperatures. ii. Run the following 2 3 factorial and record just the flash ratings on these parts. 1. Analyze for a flash rating. This is a rating from 1 to 10, with ten being the best. (Always have 10 be the best, 1 be the worst.) Group the samples in rating groups from 1 to 10. Once all samples have been evaluated, then check the ratings to be sure they are consistent with one another. Make the worst flash group (or individual) a 1, the best flash group or individual a ten, etc. Mold Temp: Melt Temp: Clamp Time: 20 seconds Run A:Clamp Force B:Injection Pressure C:Injection Time Tons psi sec 1-10 1 10 50 6 2 7 50 6 3 10 100 6 4 10 100 10 5 10 50 10 6 7 50 10 7 7 100 6 8 7 100 10

iii. Time the production cycle. Be sure to time more than one cycle, but make sure that you don t need to change mold temperatures during that time, as that is not a desired part of the cycle time calculation. Your time should be from a definite point in the cycle, until the time that definite point happens again. For example, cavity open, to cavity open. iv. As a class, complete the following table, which will then be analyzed by me. The TA should divide the experiments up into appropriate blocks for each section. v. Upon completion of the table, (the last section of the week), have someone e-mail an excel spreadsheet with the response columns filled in, with the associated run order. Run A:Clamp Force B:Injection Pressure C:Injection Time D:Clamp Time (after stopping injection) E:Temp Melt F:Temp Mold Gloss Full Cavity Fill Sink Marks Tons psi sec sec deg F deg F 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 1 10 80 10 30 410 130 2 10 80 6 10 410 130 3 7 80 6 30 410 130 4 10 50 6 30 410 130 5 7 50 10 30 410 130 6 7 50 6 10 410 130 7 7 80 10 10 410 130 8 10 50 10 10 410 130 9 8.5 65 8 20 410 150 10 10 80 10 10 410 170 11 10 50 6 10 410 170 12 7 80 6 10 410 170 13 10 80 6 30 410 170 14 7 50 6 30 410 170 15 7 50 10 10 410 170 16 10 50 10 30 410 170 17 7 80 10 30 410 170 18 8.5 65 8 20 425 130 19 8.5 65 10 20 425 150 20 7 65 8 20 425 150 21 8.5 65 6 20 425 150 22 8.5 65 8 10 425 150 23 8.5 65 8 30 425 150 24 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 25 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 26 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 27 8.5 80 8 20 425 150 28 8.5 50 8 20 425 150 29 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 30 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 31 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 32 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 33 8.5 65 8 20 425 150 34 10 65 8 20 425 150 35 8.5 65 8 20 425 170 36 7 80 10 30 440 130

37 10 50 6 10 440 130 38 7 50 6 30 440 130 39 10 80 10 10 440 130 40 7 80 6 10 440 130 41 7 50 10 10 440 130 42 10 50 10 30 440 130 43 10 80 6 30 440 130 44 8.5 65 8 20 440 150 45 7 80 6 30 440 170 46 7 50 10 30 440 170 47 10 80 10 30 440 170 48 10 80 6 10 440 170 49 10 50 10 10 440 170 50 10 50 6 30 440 170 51 7 50 6 10 440 170 52 7 80 10 10 440 170 3. Report: a. This is NOT a full report. Just answer the questions. b. Create a Cube Graph with the following as an example. A hand-drawn cube plot is acceptable if it is neat and straight edges are used to create the plot. The numbers on the plot are the responses for flash as you measured them. DESIGN-EXPERT Plot X = A: Clamp Force Y = B: Injection Pressure Z = C: Injection Time Cube Graph 2 6 B: Injection Pressure B+ 4 8 4 8 C+ C: Injection Time B- 6 10 C- A- A+ A: Clamp Force c. The main effects in a DOE are calculated in this way: i. For Clamp Force, take the right face of the cube and average all the response values. ii. Take the left face of the cube and average those values. iii. Take the difference in the averages. That is the effect that you would expect to see if you changed only the clamp force from a low value to a high.

iv. Note that this is only an average change. That is why the whole model will also include the interaction terms to express how the response will be affected from a change in clamp force, based on different levels of the other variables as well. v. Calculate the main effects of the three factors of clamp force, injection pressure and injection time. vi. Don t worry about calculating the interaction effects as that gets a little more confusing, but suffice it to say that it is done in a similar fashion. d. Explain the process of injection molding with respect to the following: i. What factors affected all the measurements (individually ie. )? 1. How did they affect it? 2. Why did they affect it this way? e. What factors control the throughput (production rate) of the process? f. What was the cycle time of the process, as measured? i. How much product, in dollars, can this machine produce in a year? 1. Assume 3 shifts per day about 20 hours of production per day. 2. Five days per week. 3. 50 weeks per year. 4. Assume that the parts are each worth $1.00 each to the company. ii. What is the profit? 1. Assume that the labor cost is $25/hour (after benefits, taxes, etc). 2. Overhead burden is 100% (this machine is inexpensive). 3. 5% off quality. 4. Material cost is $0.10 per piece. g. What did you learn about Design of Experiments? 4. In addition to the report for this week, you have an additional item that is required to be turned in at the next lab. Please fill in the following form. The intention of this form is two-fold: 1) To force you to go through a critical self-analysis to determine what your performance was, in hopes of improving for the future, and 2) To provide you with solid details upon which your lab grade will be evaluated.

ME 355 Manufacturing Processes Lab Evaluation Form Please take the time to think about these questions before answering them. Your evaluation will be based upon your answers as well as the observations and interactions of the instructional team in the lab. Note that there are several items on this evaluation that some might misconstrue as behavior evaluation. However, it is important that you understand, (as has been previously discussed in class), your attitude is part of your performance. In fact, YOUR ATTITUDE WILL DICTATE THE SUCCESS OR FAILURE OF YOUR CAREER FAR MORE THAN YOUR ABILITY. 1. Fan Parts: a. Assigned Parts: i. List the parts you were assigned. ii. Were the parts completed in a timely manner with the rest of the parts so that the fan can be assembled without a crisis? If not, explain. iii. Did you receive significant assistance from anyone, and if so, what, who and why? iv. Explain any difficulties that you may have experienced. Note that it is expected that you would have had some problems, so don t be afraid to list and discuss them. In your discussion, please be clear on the number of parts that you needed to make to get a good one. v. What is the quality of your parts, in terms of: 1. Dimensions (I am not worried about to the drawings, but rather, are they correct to what is needed to assemble and run the fan.) 2. Cosmetic

3. Functionality 4. Innovation b. Additional Parts: i. What was your level of involvement in completing the additional parts? ii. Why were you involved with making them? iii. What is the quality of your parts, in terms of: 1. Dimensions (I am not worried about to the drawings, but rather, are they correct to what is needed to assemble and run the fan.) 2. Cosmetic 3. Functionality 4. Innovation 2. Lab Performance: a. How was your attendance? Were you always present, or did you miss a lab or two? b. Were you always on time for labs? If you were late, how often? c. What was your attitude towards the labs? Was it an attitude that you wanted to learn, or that you had to get this out of the way so that you could get to other things?

d. Were you an active participant in the lab, or just there? 3. Evaluate yourself numerically from 0 to 100%. As a guideline, use an 80% as a score for someone who did their job, nothing more, nothing less: a. Fan project: b. Lab performance: 4. The instructional team will assign your grade by filling out the following for your feedback: a. Fan project (individual note that group grades will be assigned verbally at the fan presentations): i. Justification: b. Lab performance: i. Justification: